[Winter Contest Entry 2013] An Analysis

Pages Prev123
2
Here. Comes. The. Mother(four word)ing. Review.

An Analysis of the Analysis. A different kind of piece deserves a different kind of review.

Why is it that your words tend to be have either no (let's not get haughty here) or some mistakes?

Why is it that I enjoy your essays in a way that I don't ever enjoy other essays? Why is that I expect both nothing and something magical? As a man of flow (not to be confused with a certain ageless lady from insurance purgatory), your words have a vibrancy that continues to fill my cheeks with happiness. More importantly, what is cold? It filled my heart with happiness or perhaps my vocal cords (maybe somewhere lower).

What is cold? Winter has come with its frozen hand in an ambiguous nature whether one is to question if conceptual death is cold, the act of death is cold, or the weather itself caused the entire situation to be cold. Whatever cold is, I'd rather say your essay was the opposite of any interpretation of a vague concept.

Your randomness brings a bit of light to the laundry list of common (mis)conceptions about what cold is and your intake on the concept of cold in the general concept of a writing contest could essentially be interpreted as an Inception of Writing Contests About Cold. Does that make you Joseph Gordon Levitt? If so, *man-crush* and if not, at least you played ball with some money or chained a random black man.

At the end of my review or whatever you could call it, I would have to say that like the end of your story, my end shall fall a bit flat. The time of floral language and pomp has died similar to the necessities of writing a serious review. The last segment about sex was so jarring and oddly placed that I would have rather not read it. Individually, it could have worked, but together, nay.
1
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
CoffeePrince wrote...
Here. Comes. The. Mother(four word)ing. Review.

An Analysis of the Analysis. A different kind of piece deserves a different kind of review.

Why is it that your words tend to be have either no (let's not get haughty here) or some mistakes?

Why is it that I enjoy your essays in a way that I don't ever enjoy other essays? Why is that I expect both nothing and something magical? As a man of flow (not to be confused with a certain ageless lady from insurance purgatory), your words have a vibrancy that continues to fill my cheeks with happiness. More importantly, what is cold? It filled my heart with happiness or perhaps my vocal cords (maybe somewhere lower).

What is cold? Winter has come with its frozen hand in an ambiguous nature whether one is to question if conceptual death is cold, the act of death is cold, or the weather itself caused the entire situation to be cold. Whatever cold is, I'd rather say your essay was the opposite of any interpretation of a vague concept.

Your randomness brings a bit of light to the laundry list of common (mis)conceptions about what cold is and your intake on the concept of cold in the general concept of a writing contest could essentially be interpreted as an Inception of Writing Contests About Cold. Does that make you Joseph Gordon Levitt? If so, *man-crush* and if not, at least you played ball with some money or chained a random black man.

At the end of my review or whatever you could call it, I would have to say that like the end of your story, my end shall fall a bit flat. The time of floral language and pomp has died similar to the necessities of writing a serious review. The last segment about sex was so jarring and oddly placed that I would have rather not read it. Individually, it could have worked, but together, nay.


Thank you for your very kind remarks. I thank you even more for taking the time to read this.

My monologues treat the writer as if he is the stereotype of an old and grumpy upper middle class Englishman. I try to make him erudite but batty.

It is all about a madman making a mountain out of a molehill over a dictionary entry. FGRaptor and Tegumi like you, pointed out problems with the content namely that it felt all over the place and inconsistent (especially where the theme of analysing a dictionary entry is concerned) even though I did try to use transition sentences to jump from one definition to another.

Upon reflection, I feel that my entry can do more to emphasise that this is really an analysis. If you clicked the link that links to the online dictionary, you may notice that I did not use all of the definitions but cherry picked those that I thought appropriate.

The first definition gives a somewhat layman definition of cold that I am sure you and I will agree on.

The second definition shows that the first definition is not really reliable. The word 'relatively' is a special word in this context, a point that eluded poor Mibuchiha. It means that pretty much any temperature can be considered 'cold' which is why I used the phrase 'weaselling (your way) out'. My references to Thatcher and myself insinuate the problem with the first definition.

The third definition of cold is filled with strange expressions that can be so easily misinterpreted. In this case, it becomes a not-so-erotic sex scene.

The fourth (non) definition serves a conclusion which I am personally proud of. My previous monologues never had a proper conclusion.

This monologue could do more to point the problems of these definitions out and condemn the dictionary entry as unreliable, at the same time show that our poor author has long taken leave of his senses. (Namely pointing out what I have written above briefly and concisely)

I am considering doing a revision of this monologue. Hopefully, I could keep the original monologue.
1
Xenon FAKKU Writer
Oh, leonard. Why did I foresee something just like this coming? I am not surprised one bit. Quite the humorous trip, the random alliterations to various people or concepts serve your humor well. On the positive side, your grammar is mostly astounding and it pleases me to see.

Disclaimer: I am an editor by nature. I read word-for-word and I pick up almost every little thing. So, the only way I can express my corrections is by directly reposting your story. Additions are in red, comments are in dark red, removals are strike-through. Here you are.

Spoiler:
An Analysis


(The) Cold.

It seemed like the contest organisers had metaphorically yelled that four letter word at me. I was as agitated as I would be when one uses the other four letter word which is suggestive of suggestive(Redundant, use another word for the first †˜suggestive.’) behaviour that I would suggest one not to suggest(Doesn’t logically fit here, consider †˜speak’ or †˜use.’ Something like that.) in front of me.

This was the main reason why:

While coldness as a sensation is easily grasped from the very young to the very senile, the English language insists on giving it so many connotations that Xenon, a very noble gas, and the late US President Grover Cleveland decided that they would have fun seeing self-proclaimed writers like myself struggling to interpret what it means. (One sentence. Not an error, but thought I’d point that out.)

So, in retaliation, I decided that I am going to bore them and you, the reader, by going through the uses of that four letter word by analysing a dictionary's entry of it.

(Here is the link if for those who derive pleasure from reading dictionaries:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cold?show=0&t=1386860715)

A few minutes into digesting the definitions of the word 'cold' which involves a reluctance to take the definitions at face value and a refusal to appreciate the ambiguous nature of languages in general, I have realised a few things:

1. The late Margaret Thatcher and I may not be human.

2. I am stupid for thinking that '1' is in any way plausible and even more stupid for not realizsing(If you’re going to use the Queen’s English, you should stay consistent.) that the authors of the dictionary are slimy fraudsters who resort to weasel words.

3. Dictionary definitions can be somehow be sexually arousing.

4. Dictionaries can predict the future.

For those of you who managed to read till this point, you may not be curious as to why I came to these conclusions. So, I will explain myself by going into detail as much as possible into the dictionary definitions of 'cold' so as to annoy you.


Dictionary definitions of 'cold':

1 A temperature that is uncomfortably low for humans.

Those people who had to suffer what I had written about the summer, which was described as a meandering and whiny weblog entry by someone who had the misfortune to go through it, would know that I come from warm climes.

Any temperature below 25 degrees Centigrade or 80 degrees in very-confusing-soon-to-be-obsolete-Fahrenheit would be uncomfortably low for me. Fair enough it seemed to me, to assume that 25 degrees Centigrade is cold since it is an uncomfortable temperature and I am supposedly human.

Then(I wouldn’t begin a paragraph with †˜then.’) I was reminded that some woman from the ironically named 'temperate regions' called Margaret Thatcher found that temperature to be sweltering hot. Putting aside the fact that I have used the name of some woman as a feeble attempt to draw attention, the thought occurred to me that either she or I, or more likely both of us may not be human. Further reflections of the stories I hear about her and my great contributions to this site further reinforced that thought.

Yet, just as I was entertaining the possibility that I would become a female Prime Minister, get backstabbed, face all of the problems that come with old age, have people celebrate both my life and death and spend my afterlife gawping at the reception of some black man's funeral, my eyes turned to this line of the dictionary entry...


2 Having a relatively low temperature or one lower than normal or expected

Anyone who is acquainted with the type of discourse that goes on the Internet would very well know how pointless and frustrating it is to read capital (or block) letters in big and coloured fonts. This is why I am going to do it anyway--

RELATIVELY?! BLOODY RELATIVELY?! SMART OF YOU EH, WEASELLING YOUR WAY OUT WITH WORDS LIKE THESE!


Some part of me that genuinely believed in the infallibility of dictionaries in elucidating this great language of Shakespeare died. It was rather traumatic and I would have spent the remainder of my days in depression if not for the next dictionary entry (or entries).

3a having lost freshness or vividness

b far off the mark

c marked by poor or unlucky performance

d not prepared or suitably warmed up


My friends, some of you would express utter disbelief if I told you that I am young, impressionable and very, very interested in the birds and the bees. I confess that I have just emerged from my juvenile years and I suffer from this state of mind known colloquially as 'thinking dirty'. As I scanned through that entry, I put in utmost effort to 'think dirty'.

It was then I came up with quite an erotic story. While some may deem it an outrage of modesty to put it into writing for all to see, I thought it was appropriate considering that I am writing this for a pornographic website:

The Beginning of Some Erotic Story

The couple had been married for half a century sharing many pleasures and braving many troubles. In this day and age of quick tempers and even quicker divorce proceedings, how did that couple stay together for so long? Perhaps a close observation of that couple could provide us with some answers.

Carnal desires inhabit each and every(space)one of us, even newborn infants, so sayeth the crypto-paedophile and psychopath Sigmund Freud. The couple exploited these desires as much as possible in order to sustain this very long marriage which could have rendered anyone else insane.

They dragged their ancient bodies into their nest of love, more commonly known as a bed. Despite their bodies having lost their freshness and vividness so to speak, they decided to engage in that intimate moment which ought to be shared between happy, married couples.

To the onlooker, their romp would be far off the mark so to speak. It would be marked by poor or unlucky performance so to speak(Twice?), due to the loss of their rigour of youth over the years. Had they been doing it with someone else, he or she or not-quite-he-or-she or it would lament that they were not(Duplicate.) not prepared or suitably warmed up so to speak.(Thrice?)

They were nonetheless happy, even though they risk sending themselves to the gates of Hades by doing it at such an advanced age. Yet, more importantly, I am not happy. I have to suppress the urge not to throw up my dinner and I want to make the reader suffer that mental image of two senile citizens having a go at each other for the rest of his or her life.

The End of Some Erotic Story


I realised that the story above might be a grim picture of my future. It was then I was set into deep thought about what is going to happen to me in the future.(Redundant, you’re better off just stating the first part plainly.) (One day into the future to be precise) This is when I discovered that dictionaries can really predict the future upon reading the following entry--


4 A lack of the warmth of normal human emotion, friendliness, or compassion

I closed my eyes for a few seconds to visualise the response I would receive once I allow this piece to see the light of day. Perhaps this is when I will truly realise what it means to suffer a lack of warmth offrom normal human emotion, friendliness or compassion. I would soon know the true meaning of the word 'cold'.

THE END
0
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Xenon wrote...
Oh, leonard. Why did I foresee something just like this coming? I am not surprised one bit. Quite the humorous trip, the random alliterations to various people or concepts serve your humor well. On the positive side, your grammar is mostly astounding and it pleases me to see.

Disclaimer: I am an editor by nature. I read word-for-word and I pick up almost every little thing. So, the only way I can express my corrections is by directly reposting your story. Additions are in red, comments are in dark red, removals are strike-through. Here you are.

Spoiler:
An Analysis


(The) Cold.

It seemed like the contest organisers had metaphorically yelled that four letter word at me. I was as agitated as I would be when one uses the other four letter word which is suggestive of suggestive(Redundant, use another word for the first †˜suggestive.’) behaviour that I would suggest one not to suggest(Doesn’t logically fit here, consider †˜speak’ or †˜use.’ Something like that.) in front of me.

This was the main reason why:

While coldness as a sensation is easily grasped from the very young to the very senile, the English language insists on giving it so many connotations that Xenon, a very noble gas, and the late US President Grover Cleveland decided that they would have fun seeing self-proclaimed writers like myself struggling to interpret what it means. (One sentence. Not an error, but thought I’d point that out.)

So, in retaliation, I decided that I am going to bore them and you, the reader, by going through the uses of that four letter word by analysing a dictionary's entry of it.

(Here is the link if for those who derive pleasure from reading dictionaries:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cold?show=0&t=1386860715)

A few minutes into digesting the definitions of the word 'cold' which involves a reluctance to take the definitions at face value and a refusal to appreciate the ambiguous nature of languages in general, I have realised a few things:

1. The late Margaret Thatcher and I may not be human.

2. I am stupid for thinking that '1' is in any way plausible and even more stupid for not realizsing(If you’re going to use the Queen’s English, you should stay consistent.) that the authors of the dictionary are slimy fraudsters who resort to weasel words.

3. Dictionary definitions can be somehow be sexually arousing.

4. Dictionaries can predict the future.

For those of you who managed to read till this point, you may not be curious as to why I came to these conclusions. So, I will explain myself by going into detail as much as possible into the dictionary definitions of 'cold' so as to annoy you.


Dictionary definitions of 'cold':

1 A temperature that is uncomfortably low for humans.

Those people who had to suffer what I had written about the summer, which was described as a meandering and whiny weblog entry by someone who had the misfortune to go through it, would know that I come from warm climes.

Any temperature below 25 degrees Centigrade or 80 degrees in very-confusing-soon-to-be-obsolete-Fahrenheit would be uncomfortably low for me. Fair enough it seemed to me, to assume that 25 degrees Centigrade is cold since it is an uncomfortable temperature and I am supposedly human.

Then(I wouldn’t begin a paragraph with †˜then.’) I was reminded that some woman from the ironically named 'temperate regions' called Margaret Thatcher found that temperature to be sweltering hot. Putting aside the fact that I have used the name of some woman as a feeble attempt to draw attention, the thought occurred to me that either she or I, or more likely both of us may not be human. Further reflections of the stories I hear about her and my great contributions to this site further reinforced that thought.

Yet, just as I was entertaining the possibility that I would become a female Prime Minister, get backstabbed, face all of the problems that come with old age, have people celebrate both my life and death and spend my afterlife gawping at the reception of some black man's funeral, my eyes turned to this line of the dictionary entry...


2 Having a relatively low temperature or one lower than normal or expected

Anyone who is acquainted with the type of discourse that goes on the Internet would very well know how pointless and frustrating it is to read capital (or block) letters in big and coloured fonts. This is why I am going to do it anyway--

RELATIVELY?! BLOODY RELATIVELY?! SMART OF YOU EH, WEASELLING YOUR WAY OUT WITH WORDS LIKE THESE!


Some part of me that genuinely believed in the infallibility of dictionaries in elucidating this great language of Shakespeare died. It was rather traumatic and I would have spent the remainder of my days in depression if not for the next dictionary entry (or entries).

3a having lost freshness or vividness

b far off the mark

c marked by poor or unlucky performance

d not prepared or suitably warmed up


My friends, some of you would express utter disbelief if I told you that I am young, impressionable and very, very interested in the birds and the bees. I confess that I have just emerged from my juvenile years and I suffer from this state of mind known colloquially as 'thinking dirty'. As I scanned through that entry, I put in utmost effort to 'think dirty'.

It was then I came up with quite an erotic story. While some may deem it an outrage of modesty to put it into writing for all to see, I thought it was appropriate considering that I am writing this for a pornographic website:

The Beginning of Some Erotic Story

The couple had been married for half a century sharing many pleasures and braving many troubles. In this day and age of quick tempers and even quicker divorce proceedings, how did that couple stay together for so long? Perhaps a close observation of that couple could provide us with some answers.

Carnal desires inhabit each and every(space)one of us, even newborn infants, so sayeth the crypto-paedophile and psychopath Sigmund Freud. The couple exploited these desires as much as possible in order to sustain this very long marriage which could have rendered anyone else insane.

They dragged their ancient bodies into their nest of love, more commonly known as a bed. Despite their bodies having lost their freshness and vividness so to speak, they decided to engage in that intimate moment which ought to be shared between happy, married couples.

To the onlooker, their romp would be far off the mark so to speak. It would be marked by poor or unlucky performance so to speak(Twice?), due to the loss of their rigour of youth over the years. Had they been doing it with someone else, he or she or not-quite-he-or-she or it would lament that they were not(Duplicate.) not prepared or suitably warmed up so to speak.(Thrice?)

They were nonetheless happy, even though they risk sending themselves to the gates of Hades by doing it at such an advanced age. Yet, more importantly, I am not happy. I have to suppress the urge not to throw up my dinner and I want to make the reader suffer that mental image of two senile citizens having a go at each other for the rest of his or her life.

The End of Some Erotic Story


I realised that the story above might be a grim picture of my future. It was then I was set into deep thought about what is going to happen to me in the future.(Redundant, you’re better off just stating the first part plainly.) (One day into the future to be precise) This is when I discovered that dictionaries can really predict the future upon reading the following entry--


4 A lack of the warmth of normal human emotion, friendliness, or compassion

I closed my eyes for a few seconds to visualise the response I would receive once I allow this piece to see the light of day. Perhaps this is when I will truly realise what it means to suffer a lack of warmth offrom normal human emotion, friendliness or compassion. I would soon know the true meaning of the word 'cold'.

THE END


I didn't realise that I misspelt 'realise'. I blame the silly auto correct function of my browser.
1
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Xenon wrote...
Oh, leonard. Why did I foresee something just like this coming? I am not surprised one bit. Quite the humorous trip, the random alliterations to various people or concepts serve your humor well. On the positive side, your grammar is mostly astounding and it pleases me to see.

Disclaimer: I am an editor by nature. I read word-for-word and I pick up almost every little thing. So, the only way I can express my corrections is by directly reposting your story. Additions are in red, comments are in dark red, removals are strike-through. Here you are.

Spoiler:
An Analysis


(The) Cold.

It seemed like the contest organisers had metaphorically yelled that four letter word at me. I was as agitated as I would be when one uses the other four letter word which is suggestive of suggestive(Redundant, use another word for the first †˜suggestive.’) behaviour that I would suggest one not to suggest(Doesn’t logically fit here, consider †˜speak’ or †˜use.’ Something like that.) in front of me.

This was the main reason why:

While coldness as a sensation is easily grasped from the very young to the very senile, the English language insists on giving it so many connotations that Xenon, a very noble gas, and the late US President Grover Cleveland decided that they would have fun seeing self-proclaimed writers like myself struggling to interpret what it means. (One sentence. Not an error, but thought I’d point that out.)

So, in retaliation, I decided that I am going to bore them and you, the reader, by going through the uses of that four letter word by analysing a dictionary's entry of it.

(Here is the link if for those who derive pleasure from reading dictionaries:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cold?show=0&t=1386860715)

A few minutes into digesting the definitions of the word 'cold' which involves a reluctance to take the definitions at face value and a refusal to appreciate the ambiguous nature of languages in general, I have realised a few things:

1. The late Margaret Thatcher and I may not be human.

2. I am stupid for thinking that '1' is in any way plausible and even more stupid for not realizsing(If you’re going to use the Queen’s English, you should stay consistent.) that the authors of the dictionary are slimy fraudsters who resort to weasel words.

3. Dictionary definitions can be somehow be sexually arousing.

4. Dictionaries can predict the future.

For those of you who managed to read till this point, you may not be curious as to why I came to these conclusions. So, I will explain myself by going into detail as much as possible into the dictionary definitions of 'cold' so as to annoy you.


Dictionary definitions of 'cold':

1 A temperature that is uncomfortably low for humans.

Those people who had to suffer what I had written about the summer, which was described as a meandering and whiny weblog entry by someone who had the misfortune to go through it, would know that I come from warm climes.

Any temperature below 25 degrees Centigrade or 80 degrees in very-confusing-soon-to-be-obsolete-Fahrenheit would be uncomfortably low for me. Fair enough it seemed to me, to assume that 25 degrees Centigrade is cold since it is an uncomfortable temperature and I am supposedly human.

Then(I wouldn’t begin a paragraph with †˜then.’) I was reminded that some woman from the ironically named 'temperate regions' called Margaret Thatcher found that temperature to be sweltering hot. Putting aside the fact that I have used the name of some woman as a feeble attempt to draw attention, the thought occurred to me that either she or I, or more likely both of us may not be human. Further reflections of the stories I hear about her and my great contributions to this site further reinforced that thought.

Yet, just as I was entertaining the possibility that I would become a female Prime Minister, get backstabbed, face all of the problems that come with old age, have people celebrate both my life and death and spend my afterlife gawping at the reception of some black man's funeral, my eyes turned to this line of the dictionary entry...


2 Having a relatively low temperature or one lower than normal or expected

Anyone who is acquainted with the type of discourse that goes on the Internet would very well know how pointless and frustrating it is to read capital (or block) letters in big and coloured fonts. This is why I am going to do it anyway--

RELATIVELY?! BLOODY RELATIVELY?! SMART OF YOU EH, WEASELLING YOUR WAY OUT WITH WORDS LIKE THESE!


Some part of me that genuinely believed in the infallibility of dictionaries in elucidating this great language of Shakespeare died. It was rather traumatic and I would have spent the remainder of my days in depression if not for the next dictionary entry (or entries).

3a having lost freshness or vividness

b far off the mark

c marked by poor or unlucky performance

d not prepared or suitably warmed up


My friends, some of you would express utter disbelief if I told you that I am young, impressionable and very, very interested in the birds and the bees. I confess that I have just emerged from my juvenile years and I suffer from this state of mind known colloquially as 'thinking dirty'. As I scanned through that entry, I put in utmost effort to 'think dirty'.

It was then I came up with quite an erotic story. While some may deem it an outrage of modesty to put it into writing for all to see, I thought it was appropriate considering that I am writing this for a pornographic website:

The Beginning of Some Erotic Story

The couple had been married for half a century sharing many pleasures and braving many troubles. In this day and age of quick tempers and even quicker divorce proceedings, how did that couple stay together for so long? Perhaps a close observation of that couple could provide us with some answers.

Carnal desires inhabit each and every(space)one of us, even newborn infants, so sayeth the crypto-paedophile and psychopath Sigmund Freud. The couple exploited these desires as much as possible in order to sustain this very long marriage which could have rendered anyone else insane.

They dragged their ancient bodies into their nest of love, more commonly known as a bed. Despite their bodies having lost their freshness and vividness so to speak, they decided to engage in that intimate moment which ought to be shared between happy, married couples.

To the onlooker, their romp would be far off the mark so to speak. It would be marked by poor or unlucky performance so to speak(Twice?), due to the loss of their rigour of youth over the years. Had they been doing it with someone else, he or she or not-quite-he-or-she or it would lament that they were not(Duplicate.) not prepared or suitably warmed up so to speak.(Thrice?)

They were nonetheless happy, even though they risk sending themselves to the gates of Hades by doing it at such an advanced age. Yet, more importantly, I am not happy. I have to suppress the urge not to throw up my dinner and I want to make the reader suffer that mental image of two senile citizens having a go at each other for the rest of his or her life.

The End of Some Erotic Story


I realised that the story above might be a grim picture of my future. It was then I was set into deep thought about what is going to happen to me in the future.(Redundant, you’re better off just stating the first part plainly.) (One day into the future to be precise) This is when I discovered that dictionaries can really predict the future upon reading the following entry--


4 A lack of the warmth of normal human emotion, friendliness, or compassion

I closed my eyes for a few seconds to visualise the response I would receive once I allow this piece to see the light of day. Perhaps this is when I will truly realise what it means to suffer a lack of warmth offrom normal human emotion, friendliness or compassion. I would soon know the true meaning of the word 'cold'.

THE END


I have an axe to grind with you Xenon over a well intentioned post made over four months ago!

It appears that realize is Queen's English, recommended by the Oxford English Dictionary (and Cambridge Dictionary it seems) though realise is used widely by the British.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences#-ise.2C_-ize_.28-isation.2C_-ization.29

You are right though. If I want to be consistent I should not use 'realise' in one paragraph then 'realize' in another.
0
Xenon FAKKU Writer
leonard267 wrote...
It appears that realize is Queen's English, recommended by the Oxford English Dictionary (and Cambridge Dictionary it seems) though realise is used widely by the British.


Ah, interesting. I believe I posted the table in the Oxford spelling wiki in a thread a while ago. It's a very intriguing topic.

I believe my intentions with that comment, instead of "Queen's English," was "Anywhere-but-America English."

Thank you for the wiki link.
0
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Xenon wrote...
leonard267 wrote...
It appears that realize is Queen's English, recommended by the Oxford English Dictionary (and Cambridge Dictionary it seems) though realise is used widely by the British.


Ah, interesting. I believe I posted the table in the Oxford spelling wiki in a thread a while ago. It's a very intriguing topic.

I believe my intentions with that comment, instead of "Queen's English," was "Anywhere-but-America English."

Thank you for the wiki link.


Sorry for the incredibly late reply. Where is the Oxford spelling thread?
0
Xenon FAKKU Writer
leonard267 wrote...
Sorry for the incredibly late reply. Where is the Oxford spelling thread?


After quite a bit of searching through nearly 20 pages of my previous posts, I've finally found it. It was in your very own thread! How about that?

That is a Bloody Long Title, Isn't It?!
1
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Xenon wrote...
leonard267 wrote...
Sorry for the incredibly late reply. Where is the Oxford spelling thread?


After quite a bit of searching through nearly 20 pages of my previous posts, I've finally found it. It was in your very own thread! How about that?

That is a Bloody Long Title, Isn't It?!


Words fail me, Xenon. Words fail me.
Pages Prev123