Sure, it's always possible to go from nothing to everything, but if you are at the very bottom, you generally need some extraordinary talent or a good break of luck to make it. Even your situation was better than a lot of what we see. You had two parents who were there to impress upon you the value of working hard. Many people don't. While hard work and frugality seem like common sense to a lot of us, one has to learn these values.
While I was in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th grade I saw my parents for a grand total of two hours a day, if that. My parents were out the door before I woke up for school (I got up at 6 a.m. and rode my bike to school during 3rd and 4th). They arrived home a couple hours before I went to sleep which was about 8-9 p.m. So I saw my parents between 6-8 p.m. Even then I saw my father for maybe 30 minutes. Which was enough for him to eat then he went to sleep. The only "values" they tried to instill in me was "believe in Jesus and you'll go to heaven". Outside the fact they paid for my dinner (since I skipped breakfast and lunch was free) and gave me a roof over my head. They had little involvement in my life. Even to this day I only see them for maybe a week every 3-4 months. I still live at home and during this latest stint they haven't been home in 3 months. Not a big deal since my childhood gave me a strong self reliance.
The "welfare queen" came out of a hyperbolic media portrayal of a small number of people who were committing welfare fraud. There will always be someone who is lazy and tries to cheat the system, but the perpetuated idea that everyone who is on some form of welfare is a lazy ass who wants to live off government handouts is completely false.
Medicare (maybe medicaid I forget which) has a 31% fraud rate. One man was able to con the system for over 100,000 individual medical claims before anyone caught on. One man currently wanted by the U.S. Marshals was able to scam Medicare for 3 million in claims. They paid 1.5 million to him before catching on. The Miami Herald found out that Medicare loses
2.5 billion in south Florida alone also Medicare reportedly loses 60 billion or more nationally every year. The American Government and politicians are far too incompetent to effectively and efficiently run such a large program. You can look it up the facts are there, every large hand out program that United States Government has is riddled with bureaucracy, inefficiency, corruption, mismanagement and fraud. Do you really expect Socialist Health care to really be any different? If you answered yes. You have no connection to reality.
Sure, a few volunteer groups would spring up, but they wouldn't have nearly the effectiveness, reach, or consistency of a collectively run government force. There are volunteer groups out there trying to run charitable healthcare programs, but they simply don't have the resources or reach to stop the problem alone.
I disagree, Police and fire fighters were originally volunteers and they we "adequate" for their situation. While you are correct that they wouldn't be as effective as a disciplined force, they would be able to provide enough protection for suburban areas. Urban areas are a different beast to wrestle. Arguing over this point has nothing in connection to the original argument. Fire and Police departments are controlled by state governments instead of the Federal Government. While they follow the rules and regulations of the Federal Government to keep the standards the same across the country. It does not directly control them and if the Federal Government was in charge of those departments then calling for help would take longer than waiting in line at the DMV.
That's a unusual position, considering the rest of your positions, as well as the fact that most research shows minimum wage to be an ineffective way of helping low wage workers earn more money.[quote/]
I hardly see how its an unusual position. A low minimum wage prevents abuse of employees by companies. In the current society people are willing to do anything for a dollar. If you won't do something then the jack off behind you will do it for half and the jack off behind them will do it for half of that. "Minimum wage jobs" are usually restaurant positions or other "entry" jobs the people use as their first job. Since high school students and some college students would be vulnerable to being taken advantage of. A simple 5.75 wage (adjusted for inflation) is enough for a High School student to pay for a few things while leaving enough for the intelligent ones to put some towards college. A low but, reasonable minimum wage is perfectly fine since 5.75 is a better base line than 0.01.
[quote]I think he was referring to the so called idea of "strict constitutionalism" espoused by the conservatives on the US supreme court.
I see. I guess I fall into "strict constitutionalism" but, my interpretations are broad enough to work with just about everything. I see the first ten as set in stone and can't be amended,repealed,restricted or changed and anyone who attempts to do so should be met with any and/or all forms of resistance. I just disagree with people on the "right to an education" or the "Right to free health care" since that is a slippery slope. With that logic, anyone who feels entitled to something automatically claims they have a right to it. Eventually, it would all boil down to "I have a right to drive" "I have a right to have a house" "I have a right to do whatever I want even if it infringes on the rights of others". See my point? My idea of a "right" should be something you are willing to die to protect. If you are not willing to die for it then you can't call it a "right".
Isolationism, as a whole, might have worked 100 years ago, but is pretty much an idiotic policy in today's world.
I already stated I disagree with it but, its a Damned if you do and Damned if you don't scenario for America. If we try to protect a country from invasion then we're accused of killing women and children. If we oust a dictator to promote democracy and freedom we are accused of perpetrating a war for ulterior motives. If we fight a group that doesn't stand and fight (Viet Cong, Radical Islam,etc) and would rather mix in with civilians and use them and religious buildings as shields, we are the bad guys even with them killing their shields when they kill us (kids with Grenades in hand baskets, Suicide Bombers,etc). Every time America attempts to do anything we are automatically the great Satan. If the world constantly treats us as the Great Satan then why even bother sacrificing our men and women protect any other nation?
My personal stance is this: Evil exists in the world and just like the school yard bully. You need to stand up to it and defeat it. Ignoring it will only leave you vulnerable to the next strike. Trying to appease it will only encourage it. You have to stand and fight. My definition of evil is any person, country, ideal,etc that is a threat to the freedom