Fiery_penguin_of_doom Posts
omnicide wrote...
I think Yumi may have been scared off. Too bad she's pretty cute.Agreed. If I remember right, she's jail bait for some of us (like me)
Eranikum wrote...
ZiggyOtaku wrote...
Eranikum wrote...
As many rights as you might have, you also pay a bit of freedom or security for said right. So basicly it is as I tried to point out more of a control / double edged blade issue.As an example: In Germany you can't get fired from the job without a pre-warning of at least 2-3 months while you can't fire anyone strictly either without said pre-warning.
Incase you still decide to do it you have to pay several fees to the person you had employed in most circumstances.
Geez. They can fire you any day they want, but they need a reason.
Well here you have to prove that the person was going against the contract. In most cases you have to pay reparation to the person or 1-3 monthly incomes that person would receive under working condition.
The reasons where they can avoid paying are things like going broke, the person stealing from work or being engaged in other criminal activities, or a breech of contract in general.
In America, some companies make you take a "personality" test which is designed to give a company a loophole to fire you in case you do something they don't like such as whistle blowing, union organizing,etc. Though "legally" they can't refuse to hire you because of your religion (or lack of one) but, its up to you to prove it which is practically impossible. If your fired its up to you to prove they fired you based on gender,creed,etc but, again its basically impossible for you to find out because you don't get access to that information.
omnicide wrote...
However, you have to take into concideration, in the U.S. we are guaranteed the right to keep and bare arms in the constitution. So for the government to do so would bring a whole world of shit right on top of their heads. The political parties would simply tear themselves apart, between the groups that are pro weaponry, and the groups trying to disarm the public. I really don't see it happening any time soon here, but then again you never know. The Patriot Act nullified due process so they could concievably enact some sort of policy to nullify the 2nd amendment. I hope I'm wrong.The government has tried to control and or ban of all guns since before the Clinton administration. Nowadays even Obama wants to ban guns. I honestly want to see the faces of people when guns are banned and the government can waltz around and do whatever it pleases. When power is so one sided an extermination and genocide is at a mans whim. Whose to stop them at that point?
tsujoi wrote...
He popped out of his mom with it. Then he spanked the doctor that was that.Fixed
Seriously, I believe Jacob is inhuman. No mere mortal could craft such a miracle of beard-kind
If I remember correctly, there is a live action fight scene that syncs up to those two fights as well. Also in the Sasuke v Naruto fight at the waterfall Sasuke's movement syncs up to a Jackie Chan fight scene.
Nate River wrote...
i don't think i'm understanding ur point(contradiction) , u're saying that banning guns is a bad idea for which criminals will always gain the opportunity to "purchase" or take control of firearms either way aroundCorrect Several historic events have shown us that "banning" something that people want will just lead people to skirt the law and ignore it.
Nate River wrote...
but u're also stating that peoples' natural desire for power will only lead to the abuse of the weaker if they are to be able to possess "power"(guns) in the first place. Banning guns completely is a ridiculous and unapproachable idea(though i lean towards it), but granting the general public the rights to bare arms also doesn't likely seem to work out either, the government(as much as i hate it as the next guy) is doing a fair job on the flow and control on firearms already in my opinion, we've got the "pretentious" police on our asses
There isn't a contradiction. If the government is the only one allowed to have guns then we follow in the steps of the Soviet Union, German, Turkey,etc
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves were rounded up an exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945 13 million were thrown into concentration camps.
Guns were banned in England and Australia
Australia
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/aus.html
England
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1440764.stm
The list goes on. Ban guns and you take away the ability for people to defend themselves against people who have access to those guns through illegal means.
This isn't meant to fearmonger. History has shown us that those in power who want to ban guns only want to do so to cement their control.
"Every care must be taken that our auxiliaries, being stronger than our citizens, may not grow too much for them and become savage beasts." Plato
People will power desire to use it against those weaker than themselves. A criminal prays on people he knows won't put up a fight like gas station attendants or a guy who is unarmed. People with power tend to abuse it. If the police and the military are the only ones who have guns. Whats to prevent them from just storming into your house because they think you did something wrong? The laws? Cops don't even follow all of the laws they are meant to enforce.
If all guns are banned then only criminals will have guns. We saw how well prohibition worked and how well the war on drugs is working. Criminals will always have access to whatever they want. Banning guns only puts the honest people in danger.
People will power desire to use it against those weaker than themselves. A criminal prays on people he knows won't put up a fight like gas station attendants or a guy who is unarmed. People with power tend to abuse it. If the police and the military are the only ones who have guns. Whats to prevent them from just storming into your house because they think you did something wrong? The laws? Cops don't even follow all of the laws they are meant to enforce.
If all guns are banned then only criminals will have guns. We saw how well prohibition worked and how well the war on drugs is working. Criminals will always have access to whatever they want. Banning guns only puts the honest people in danger.
discordia wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
You can still do it. Hell, I'll walk outside naked and rub my junk on the handle of my neighbors car. I'll probably get arrested but, you can still do it!hmm...
this is serious discussion damm
otherwise i d tell you to
DO IT FAGGOT
anyway, appearantly i just did anyway.
and sure you can do it...but sometimes i forget that on forums people tend to take things literally when they know better, now if you want i can rephrase that for you...but then again, i think its a waste of your and especially of my time.
When I hear people say "I can't do that" I always rebuttal with a similar comment. We can do whatever we want we just have to deal with the consequences of our actions.
Anyways, I got what you were saying.
animeholic1 wrote...
so ur saying that if a black light was shined on your bed it may light up like christmasMore than likely.
animeholic1 wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
discordia wrote...
well...you still cant run around naked in the cities...You can still do it. Hell, I'll walk outside naked and rub my junk on the handle of my neighbors car. I'll probably get arrested but, you can still do it!
remind me never to touch anything in your house
Why would I do that to my own stuff? My neighbor is a pretentious jackass and its a fitting punishment.
Edit: Though my suggestion is to stay off my bed. Who knows how many bodily fluids are on/in that thing.
Reasons to get a job
To not be a penniless loser, To afford your own place, food, video games, anime, computers, movies, meth, crack, heroin, hookers, weed, to pay your bills, to fuel your car, for condoms so you don't get STD's from the hookers, to act like your a pimp with your stack of bills, to have the $100 bill you lite on fire to lite your cigarette when a homeless man acts for spare change. Donating to a charity...Nah, just kidding.
There are many reasons to get a job.
To not be a penniless loser, To afford your own place, food, video games, anime, computers, movies, meth, crack, heroin, hookers, weed, to pay your bills, to fuel your car, for condoms so you don't get STD's from the hookers, to act like your a pimp with your stack of bills, to have the $100 bill you lite on fire to lite your cigarette when a homeless man acts for spare change. Donating to a charity...Nah, just kidding.
There are many reasons to get a job.
discordia wrote...
well...you still cant run around naked in the cities...You can still do it. Hell, I'll walk outside naked and rub my junk on the handle of my neighbors car. I'll probably get arrested but, you can still do it!
jester of sorts wrote...
dont know you but hey doesn't mean we cant be friendsSays the guy as he pets the hungry tiger.
She sought a restraining order. Like that actually does anything. Now, if the restraining order was a force field and the person with the restraining order physically couldn't go within the required distance. That would be awesome.
Since we're not that awesome, I believe a good ole fashioned 12 gauge is the only real "restraining order"
Since we're not that awesome, I believe a good ole fashioned 12 gauge is the only real "restraining order"
The Jesus wrote...
The first guy looked like he on acid. I don't really know if I failed the gay test or not. I wouldn't fap to any of them, but a couple of them did look kind of cute.My thoughts exactly. Though the last two may fool me on the streets someday.
Rights exist only if the people who have them fight for them. The American constitution only stands for something as long as people are willing to do what it takes to keep those "rights" intact.
Personally, I'm one of those who would do what it takes to keep those right. Governments can write laws that contradict what my constitution says and I'll break those laws. My constitution guarantees my freedoms and the freedom of others without the error in logic that Carlin's plan had. If everyone has the "right" to do whatever they want then I have the right to kill you and take away your rights. Doesn't work that way and if we try to do it that way we will undo everything mankind has ever done and prove that we should never have evolved beyond monkeys.
Our "rights" exist only as long as we want them.
Personally, I'm one of those who would do what it takes to keep those right. Governments can write laws that contradict what my constitution says and I'll break those laws. My constitution guarantees my freedoms and the freedom of others without the error in logic that Carlin's plan had. If everyone has the "right" to do whatever they want then I have the right to kill you and take away your rights. Doesn't work that way and if we try to do it that way we will undo everything mankind has ever done and prove that we should never have evolved beyond monkeys.
Our "rights" exist only as long as we want them.
Everything goes in there except what typically goes into a blender. Though a stress test like that definitely proves that is works, even if it can't down down Chuck Norris.
HentaiElder wrote...
Makes me wonder what would happen if one day there was a price you had to pay to access certain things on Fakku.The magic of Jacob's beard prevents that. Though if it got to the point where Jacob needed assistance with the costs of the website. I'm sure a majority of the Fakkuza would help out as best as they could.