Flaser Posts
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
wcsinn wrote...
mibuchiha wrote...
In my country, the test to get the license uses manual transmission cars...So I'm surprised at how it's implied that it's possible for you to drive with a license there without touching a stick. *_*
It's not implied, in the US at least, you test in the auto you brought, so if you bring an automatic you test in an automatic - in fact stick shifts are becoming rather rare in the US.
In Europe automatics are pretty rare. As a matter of fact, I'm proud that I can drive stick so smoothly you feel almost nothing as I shift gears (except the change in pitch of the motor).
My advice follows:
1. Push the clutch to the metal. Always do this, as cars have a different sweet spot and is the only way to ensure you've properly decoupled the transmission.
2. Be gentle with the gear stick. Get a feel for how you have to push it and don't hurry! Take your time, later on this will come naturally to you and will only take a second... however inuring this "gentle" handling of the stick will reward you in the long run. Whether you're in a beat down car with rough stick or a sport-car with a stick smooth as silk, machines appreciate careful use.
3. ...now start to release the clutch. Don't bother with the accelerator yet! Focus on the clutch. Be slooooow! Move your foot inch by inch, millimeter by millimeter if you can. Learn to kick the clutch fast, but always release it slowly. Once again as you train this will only take a fraction of a second, but start slow!
4. You'll feel it when the transmission engages... since you've moved your foot slowly you can easily hold it at this position. The car may shudder a bit, push the clutch in a bit until it stops... now start the release again. Practice this until you can hold the clutch at the sweet spot with the car only slightly shuddering.
5. Now *gently* push the accelerator. You already have a feel for the sweet spot on the clutch. Add more gas as you release the clutch. If you're gentle with both the (slooow) clutch release and the gas, you can move the car by centimeters. Focus on this! It's a necessary skill for parking and is how you actually have to start the car all the time. Practice will make this second nature.
6. When you stop for more than a moment, always put the stick in neutral. When doing so, always push the stick left-and-right, left-and-right to get a tactile feedback for having done so. The stick only moves like this when in neutral.
7. Learn when to down-shift! Idiosyncratically you should do so *both* when in need to break or accelerate fast! Down-shifting increases the torque the motor can put onto the transmission. When the motor is revving high it pulls better... when it's idling, its inertia in turn will act as a stronger break.
8. When gently breaking don't engage the clutch your speed drops below 20 km/h. Engaging the clutch early will lower your braking potential, as an idling engine actually retards the wheels through the transmission.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
EchelonV wrote...
I've got a fleshlight myself, it was kind of cheap but I wanted to give it a shot. It honestly doesn't do much for me, but I'd be curious in trying out a higher quality one sometime, something with a vibration function might be nice. I also wish I could set it up somewhere to where I could just bang it with my body... if that makes sense, lol. And not just jackoff with it. So far...
My hand: 1
Fleshlight: 0
lol
1. Put a towel on the bed (so you won't make a mess) and lay the Flesh-light on top of it.
2. Fold a big pillow and put it on top of the Flesh-light .
3. If you lay down on the pillows you should be pinning the Flesh-light to the bed.
4. Add more folds/pillows if necessary.
5. Put a folded up sock or another pillow beneath the Flesh-light if your bed's too soft to keep it aligned.
Happy "banging"!
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
castor212 wrote...
New question : Is there anyway to keep your firefox bookmark n history? I need to reinstall my OS, and it's a pain to rebookmark and revisit all my fav sitePress Ctrl+Shift+B --> Importing and Backup --> Backup

Read more here:
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing%20up%20and%20restoring%20bookmarks
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
Wow my name is really lon wrote...
fgd49 wrote...
I have also herp some stem cells could come from the placenta or the embryo. Is that true? (cause if it is this really reminds me or bioshock)Short answer: yes.
In fact there's a practice nowadays to freeze some of the blood from the umbilical cord, as the stem cells in it are genetically indentical with the child and later on in their life may come very handy.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
Raimeken wrote...
Moar corez aint betar!All that needs to be said
Since the performance of single cores can't be increased as rapidly as it had been in the past, the future of programming is in parallel computing. More cores are better at parallel computing. Hyper-threaded cores are better at parallel computing than non hyper-threaded cores.
...future programs therefore will take better advantage of multi-core processors, hence my advice is to give it a rest and see how it turns out.
Unfortunately, since game development is console centric, it may be only after a new generation of consoles are released that you see the same boost in gaming. Right now only the PS3 is a true multi-core platform.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Flaser wrote...
What the fuck are you two smoking? Since when can a government force any business institution into making any deal? You two have it all backwards.The egalitarian policies of government through such legislation as the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 "persuaded" lenders, Mafioso style, to lend to low-income borrowers, against their better judgment. Government lawyers made it clear that the consequences of failing to meet politically imposed targets and quotas could be dire. Then we have government-sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac subsidized mortgages for people who, under more-prudent rules of borrowing, would never have qualified for a loan from a conservative banking institution. Congressman Barney Frank in 2003 stated in a moment of candor,
"
Barney Frank wrote...
I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation toward subsidized housing.Well he certainly did, at the same time accepting with gratitude campaign contributions from Fannie and Freddie.
I'm not sure these programs would've turned into the clusterfucks they are if there was more government regulation (and enforcement) in place, however I do have to concede that the policy was fundamentally wrong.
I also have to accept - though I never claimed it wasn't so - that government intervention can be harmful.
However I have an interesting question: Who was behind the Community Reinvestment Act?
I have a nagging suspicion that beyond the socialist leaning of the Democrat party, there was some corporate interest in the back pushing for what's effectively yet another government subsidy, like how you have agriculture subsidies today that are pretty much wealthfare.
Since this is just suspicion I have to accept that these government policies were at fault and are proof that socialist policies can be harmful on their own without outside "corruption". (Though the same could be said of any political ideology, no party/school of thought has monopoly on stupidity or ignorance). I wrote this down to show that I'm capable of criticizing and accepting criticism of my "own side" as well.
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
The banks pretty much did every dirty deed in the book, but the one word that best described their conduct is FRAUD. There's a reason why fore-closures are being handled in kangaroo courts and hushed through as fast as possible... because often times the paperwork is very suspect. They sold rotten deals even when the home owner could've qualified for a decent one. They sold these deals to people who clearly didn't understand what was at stake... because they had nothing to loose, since they were going to sell the deed soon enough and wash their hands of it.
The whole system is corrupt from top to bottom. Everyone from the Government, to the Banks to the people are at fault. It was a massive cluster fuck. Quit ignoring the fact that more than just the banks were at fault. Government isn't perfect so please stop insulting us by acting like it is. People in America aren't brainwashed to worship government as some infallible entity.
I'm not ignoring that the government was *also* at fault. Granted this must've been lost in my crusade against chriton hard line libertarian jihad that would lay the blame *solely* on the government.
What I want to do is point out is that the basis of the crisis is the parasitic enmeshment between government institutions and corporate money.
Right now, the true masters of the system are those with the money. They control elections through lobbying. They also have vested power in institutions like the FED which act like a state within the state with only limited oversight from actual elected officials. Nominally the public still has power through officials nominated by the president, but he's under so much lobbying pressure that no candidate with a true regulatory agenda ever gets the nomination.
Corporate interest has also come to control the academia through think tanks and research grants that come with the implicit demand for ideological compliance. This has lead to the domination of neoliberal policies and the prevalence of the Austiran schools of economics.
I'm not arguing that the government is not at fault - it very much is!
What I *AM* arguing though, is whether this corruption is an inherent quality of governance or something that has been achieved through decades of work by corporate interest... I'm inclined for the later and believe that this overtake could've been thwarted by more political involvement from the public.
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
1. Even if the government is at fault for not catching a criminal, the person committing the crime is still just as guilty! In fact Wall Street has been lobbying for 20 years, claiming that since they're such a responsible institution such things would never happen... except the very moment government started de-regulating (Reagen himself said, that he was in the "deregulating business") they did exactly that.
2. ...how the fuck would the government actually force these banks to do all these illegal things? Let me make this clear, just because no one was convicted yet, doesn't mean there was no crime... it just means America is so fucked up, corporations can't be made to account for anything.
2. ...how the fuck would the government actually force these banks to do all these illegal things? Let me make this clear, just because no one was convicted yet, doesn't mean there was no crime... it just means America is so fucked up, corporations can't be made to account for anything.
1: Government forced a change in loaning practice through the community reinvestment act to "help" the poor get into home ownership. What this caused was a distortion in the market and gave incentive to predatory lending practices. Wall Street further complicated matters by lobbying against regulations in the 80's leading to a free for all.
Banks are guilty of fraud and the Government is guilty of failing to protect the American people.
2: By mandating unhealthy business practices (Community reinvestment act) and placing incentives for businesses to commit crimes. Government is guilty of providing the incentive and the banks are guilty of pursuing those crimes. It's called being an accomplice to a crime.
corporations can't be made to account for anything.
If you weren't so stubborn and actually listened to others you'd realize that nobody except for the NeoCons are trying to say that corporations are not accountable. The original T.E.A. Party formed because they were against the bailouts and wanted the banks to fail, the Occupy Wallstreet crowds (and off shoot branches) want the banks to be held accountable for their actions and want caps on insurance company profits. What, amongst any of that leads you to believe that Americans think companies should not be accountable?
I have a request flaser. I'm curious if you are capable of saying that government isn't perfect. Just type "The Government is capable of mistakes". Go on, type it. I believe in you.
The government is capable of mistakes. There I typed it out... and I believe it too. Once again, I believe we're not on the same page, since I wasn't arguing that government was infallible. What I *am* trying to say, is that corruption by corporate forces is a bigger reason for the situation than an inherent, structural failing of government.
Can the government solve the situation? Not without massive reform that'd replace key players. Maybe the current government can't be saved since it's too corrupt and enmeshed with corporations.
I can actually agree with moderate libertarians/liberals that want to solve the problem by putting more power into state/local hands, especially since these would increase political involvement from the public at large.
What I can't agree to is getting rid of all government regulation, hoping for the invisible hand to fix it all, as this would only exacerbate the current situation.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
chriton wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
chriton wrote...
I figured so, during this thread and on others you just have to read his posts to tell that. But thanks for telling me that he said it on this site. I wonder if he knows Karl Marx had a sex slave. marxOh shit, you said something negative about Karl Marx. Better get a helmet.
To avoid making a post without some substance. Which biography is this by the way? There are other accounts that Lenchen was a friend that worked with the engles to put the marx papers together.
Might want to source that.
What I don't get is how a man who did no manual labor in his life, and owned a sex can talk about the hardships of the working class.
I'm not sure what biography it's from.
Also Flaser I'm willing to admit that you beat me on this one. But I would rather be at an American hospital then a Canadian one. But have you heard the Marx had a sex slave?
For all I care he could've been raping midgets and drinking the blood of the virgins... what the fuck does that have to do with government policy? ...or the correctness/falseness of the theory he put together?
You're demonstrating why Republicans can't do honest academy research and/or debate: you inevitable turn to personal attacks and the other myriads of rhetoric tricks that are effective at shaping public opinion but which have no connection to the truth.
Using the very same "arguments" once could attack Upton Sinclair's works since he never worked in meat packaging and therefore he *couldn't* have written honest investigative journalism/fiction.
PS.: Could you actually link me to the biography in question? Hearsay on a hard liner free market discussion forum is does not qualify as an unbiased source... especially when they fail to cite their sources.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
Why am I not surprised that you're trying to sidetrack the discussion?
You haven't addressed any of the issues I've mentioned earlier.
Moreover the article you pulled in doesn't validate your stand et all: Fannie Mae was privatized in 1968. It's disruptive behavior can be dated from the very same moment. In other words, Lyndon B. Johnson created yet another beast like the FED, an institution not really controlled by the government, yet having an exempted status that puts it above the normal prudence of law.
You might argue that the government should have regulate Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, but the fact still stands that these are private corporations that acted fraudulently and not direct government policy.
...so your basic premise, that the "government is to blame for all of this" is categorically false.
Once again, it has a share of the blame, but the distinct core of the problem was the sociopathic greed of a privatized institution that has slipped the reins of government regulation.
You haven't addressed any of the issues I've mentioned earlier.
Moreover the article you pulled in doesn't validate your stand et all: Fannie Mae was privatized in 1968. It's disruptive behavior can be dated from the very same moment. In other words, Lyndon B. Johnson created yet another beast like the FED, an institution not really controlled by the government, yet having an exempted status that puts it above the normal prudence of law.
You might argue that the government should have regulate Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, but the fact still stands that these are private corporations that acted fraudulently and not direct government policy.
...so your basic premise, that the "government is to blame for all of this" is categorically false.
Once again, it has a share of the blame, but the distinct core of the problem was the sociopathic greed of a privatized institution that has slipped the reins of government regulation.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
SilverAlswhite wrote...
I just wanted to know if my Windows 7 updates and after I turn it on again some of my Shortcuts disappear should I be worried?Also one of my computers is constantly restarting after the start up screen what should I do?(I don't have a recovery disc)
Help would be most appreciated thank you.
To actually help you, we will need more information:
A) Missing shortcuts
1. What are the shortcuts pointing to? Are these for programs, some location/file on your hard-drive? File/location on a network/home-group?
2. can you recall what update you installed? In Windows 7 you can actually check the log up windows updates.
3. If they were standard icons like My Computer, Network, etc. you just need to right-click your desktop --> personalize --> set visible icons, and readd these to your desktop. Some update could've reset your desktop preferences, so these icons could "disapper".
4. Windows now has a built in spyware/virus removal tool now that's usually installed through windows update. It could've removed your shortcuts, as there was a bug earlier that exploited a vulnerability in the icon rendering engine... though I kinda doubt this would've removed your icons, it's a remote possibility.
B) Restarting computer:
Please list what the configuration of the computer is (CPU, motherboard, etc). and what OS is running on it (Windows XP, Vista, 7, some flavor of Linux, etc).
If it's some version of Windows, press F8 during startup and try to boot into Safe-mode. If the system boots, check the error logs (Control Panel --> Administrative Tools --> Event log) for what could be causing this behavior.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
K-1 wrote...
Flaser, I think I get what you're saying, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.The insurance company is like the manager of a store, and the hospitals are the employees. If a customer comes into the store and gets treated rudely by an employee, the manager should be blamed as well as the employee, because he should have trained the employee better or otherwise ensured that the employee wouldn't treat customers badly. The manager is the one that pays the employee, after all, and it is the manager's responsibility to curb bad behavior and, if need be, replace employees to ensure customer satisfaction.
If an insurance company sends me to a crappy hospital, I should be able to complain to the insurance company because they're the ones that sent me there. Ideally, if sent to a crappy hospital, I would be able to drop the insurance company that sent me there, thus showing that I thought they were doing a bad job, and instead get an insurance company that would send me to a good hospital.
The employee gets chewed out, but so does the manager. After all, no matter what I do, I cannot fire the employee. Only the manager can do that.
Exactly, you got it right and I believe so did everyone else...
...except for chriton, who I believe is either a brainwashed GOP pundit or a GOP propagandist who actually believes the drivel he's spouting.
Insurance companies don't "just pay the money". They dictate which hospitals one can attend, what procedures one is eligible for and so on... in other words since they take away the person's freedom to choose all of the above, then they're responsible for all these services.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
chriton wrote...
Well the U.S government forced companies into it by making the banks give out loans to people who should have been denied and then they offered to buy the debt. This practice is what led to the housing collaspe and eventually the whole economy taking a dump.What the fuck are you two smoking? Since when can a government force any business institution into making any deal? You two have it all backwards.
The banks pretty much did every dirty deed in the book, but the one word that best described their conduct is FRAUD. There's a reason why fore-closures are being handled in kangaroo courts and hushed through as fast as possible... because often times the paperwork is very suspect. They sold rotten deals even when the home owner could've qualified for a decent one. They sold these deals to people who clearly didn't understand what was at stake... because they had nothing to loose, since they were going to sell the deed soon enough and wash their hands of it.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/matt-taibbi-courts-helping-banks-screw-over-homeowners-20101110
Next these "investment banks" called these rotten deals sure winner investments... and sold them to unsuspecting investors. Finally to add insult to injury they took out a credit default insurance on these rotten deals, so *when* they defaulted - not *if!* - the investment bank would be sure to make a tidy profit. It's like I sell you a car that's about to explode, then I take out an insurance with me as a beneficiary when you die.
...and you say it was all just the governments fault (Enek) or that actually the government forced things to be this way (chriton)?
You two need a reality check.
1. Even if the government is at fault for not catching a criminal, the person committing the crime is still just as guilty! In fact Wall Street has been lobbying for 20 years, claiming that since they're such a responsible institution such things would never happen... except the very moment government started de-regulating (Reagen himself said, that he was in the "deregulating business") they did exactly that.
2. ...how the fuck would the government actually force these banks to do all these illegal things? Let me make this clear, just because no one was convicted yet, doesn't mean there was no crime... it just means America is so fucked up, corporations can't be made to account for anything.
3. Finally said banks had the nerve to actually ransom the nation. This is how it actually went down:
"Unless you bail us out, the economy is going to collapse!"
...and so the tax payers were made to ponny up, and make sure these bastards got ever richer.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wall-streets-bailout-hustle-20100217
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
Comissioning FAQ
Q: What's a Comission?
A: Paying a scanlator to get something translated.
Most translation teams will also release the commissioned stuff on their own site. Requesting exclusive (not released to anyone else) commissions may cost extra. Some translation teams frown on commissions later released for profit, others accept such use.
Q: Beyond money what do I need?
A: A RAW (scan) of sufficient quality.
Only a handful of translation teams have scanners of their own, who're usually busy scanning stuff the team wants to translate anyway. So if you want something translated you'll usually have to provide a RAW of your own.
Most teams are willing to do the cleanup on their own, but if the raws are really atrocious they won't deal with you.
Since nowadays most "translation" sites are compromised either of a team of translator/editor or people who can do both, from this point on I'll just refer to the team as a whole, unless the team/person only specializes in either.
Q: What's a scanlation?
A: A drawn work translated from a foreign language.
Scanlations typically preserve reading direction, so manga/doujinshi will retain right-to-left layout. Whether sound effects are translated vary by scanlator, though typically they're left untranslated as they're hard to replace since they're outside speech bubbles.
Detailed scanlation description:
Spoiler:
Editing difficulty
Most manga/doujinshi is straighforward, since it's black & white with text in separate speech bubbles.
If the text is not in speech bubbles, or the speech bubbles are transparent the work is a lot harder, since the editor has to preserve the content behind the text.
If the text has specific effects, the editor may need to use different fonts to retain the meaning and if these effects mingle with the graphics his job is harder.
Color pages are harder to work on, since now the editor has to preserve colors.
Color pages with text not in speech bubbles or colored text are the hardest to edit.
The harder something is to edit, the more it may cost!
The more text there is, the more it may cost!
List of translation teams:
Updated: 2012-08-05
Updated: 2012-08-05
Listed prices are based on stuff the translator usually works on!
More difficult scanlations will cost more to commission!
(Read the above section on editing difficulty for details).
Bouyatachi Translations
URL: http://ac124.wordpress.com/
Request Method: E-mail to bouyatachi@gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$1.00/page.
Payment: Full payment upfront after comission has been confirmed. Gift through Paypal at bouyatachi@gmail.com.
Restrictions: No scat, vore, gore, birthing, unbirthing, >10% furry, yaoi/male homoerotic, bestiality, lolicon, toddlercon, or shitting. Licensed work such as Linda Projects. Doesn't like preggo, yuri/lesbian, shotacon, extreme femdom such as reverse anal, nipple fucking, non-sexual physical abuse like hitting the face or stomach, or subjectively ugly art.
Preferences: netorare, cheating, 2 or more males and 1 female, gangbang, mind control, mind break, sexual training, female masochism, sex change, chicks. Favorite artists include Taira Hajime, Takeda Hiromitsu, Otono Natsu, Bai Asuka, Drill Murata, Nagare Ippon, Redrop, and Erect Sawaru.
Brolen's Scanlation Hideout
URL: http://brolen9104.wordpress.com/
Request Method: E-mail brolen2339104@gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$0.65/page text translation (~50 words/page). ~$0.65/page editing. ~$1.30/page translation+editing. (Editing is contracted out).
Payment: By Paypal.
Restrictions: None
Preferences: None
Biribiri Translation
URL: http://biribiri.eu
Request Method: Contact through e-mail biribiri.bh@gmail.com or IRC #biritrans@irc.rizon.net
Cost: ~$1.0-$1.5/page. +$0.5/page for private release.
Payment: Not listed.
Restrictions: Not listed.
Preferences: Lolicon.
Chocolate Scans
URL: http://chocolatescans.blogspot.com
Chocolate Scans doesn't accept any more commissions for the time being. Emails regarding commissions and donor projects will be ignored until further notice. Thanks for understanding, and we hope to get back to doing regular releases soon.
Request Method: E-mail either anonymouscf@hotmail.com or blumeino@yahoo.com Put "Commission Request" in subject field, include all appropriate links, e.g. link to the raws, include any special instructions (otherwise will translate by own taste).
Cost: ~$1.20/page. Extra editing: +$0.15/page. E.g excessive dialogue (>10 bubbles per page), TL/replacement of original SFX. Decensoring: +$0.50/page.
Payment: By Paypal. Full payment up front. First time customers may deposit 30% in advance the rest on delivery.
Restrictions: None
Preferences: None
DesuDesu's Weblog
URL: http://desudesu0.com/
Request Method: E-mail desudesu2[at]gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$1.50/page.
Payment: By Paypal. Commissioner receives samples once translation is done. Full work transferred once full payment arrives.
Restrictions: Heavy guro, mutant freakshow (e.g: that sewer-mutant-insect-girl manga series).
Preferences: Anything that's acceptable on 4chan /h/ and /d/. May even do scat.
Epic Works Zone
URL: http://epicworks.wordpress.com
Request Method: E-mail epicworkss@gmail.com or contact through webpage. Provide RAW link.
Cost: ~$1.25/page, extreme content(e.g. guro, scat) +$0.10/page, super-extreme content (heavy guro, bestiality) +$0.45/page, excessive text/editing +$0.15/page.
Payment: By Paypal. Usually full payment up front.
Restrictions: No restrictions. Everything is acceptable. Even heavy guro and extreme bestiality.
Preferences: Nothing in particular.
Fated Circle Translations
URL: http://fatedcircle.wordpress.com/
Request Method: E-mail fatedcirclev3@gmail.com. Provide RAW link.
Cost: ~$1.00/page.
Payment: By Paypal.
Restrictions: Heavy guro and yaoi.
Preferances: MILFs, matures, OLs, teachers, girls/women in uniform.
Fuwafuwaru! (formerly Hei x Yin Translations)
URL: http://fuwafuwaru.fakku.net/
Request Method: E-mail fuwafuwaru.translations@gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: Normal ~1.25$/page, guro/scat ~$1.5/page.
Payment: By Paypal. Must pay full price before release.
Restrictions: Not listed, probably none.
Preferences: Not listed, probably not guro/scat.
Kizlan's Hentai Translations
URL: http://kizlan.fakku.net/
Request Method: E-mail kizlan@wildblue.net. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$1.30/page.
Payment: By Paypal. At least 25% in advance.
Restrictions: Obvious loli, yaoi, bestiality, guro, scat.
Preferences: Tentacle, rape, mind break, gender swap.
Kusanyagi's Translation Corner
URL: http://kusanyagi.blogspot.com
Request Method: E-mail kusanyagi8@gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$1.00/page translation only. ~$1.50/page with editing. ~$2.00/page for private translation.
Payment: By PayPal and AlertPay. Full payment in advance.
Restrictions: Not listed.
Preferences: Not listed.
One of a King Productions (AKA CGRascal)
URL: http://cgrascal.fakku.net/
Request Method: E-mail oneofakind_055@yahoo.com .
Cost: ~$0.75/page translation only. ~$1.25/page with editing.
Payment: By Paypal.
Restrictions: Scat, tentacles, furry or loli. Handwritten text. Waterworks is iffy. Yaoi is Hideyoshi-gendered only. No tankoubons. Abundance of text over the images instead speech/thought bubbles.
Preferences: Not listed.
Pineapples 'R Us
URL: http://pineapplesrus.fakku.net/
Request Method: E-mail ackeejag@gmail.com. Proide RAW link.
Cost: ~$0.80-$1.50/page
Payment: By Paypal, must have a Paypal account of your own.
Restrictions: Scat, guro, furry, yaoi, or obvious loli.
Preferences: Not listed.
QB Translations
URL: http://QB-TL.com
Request Method: Email QBtranslations@gmail.com. Provide RAW link.
Cost: ~$1.3-$1.7/page.
Payment: By PayPal. 50% upfront for first time commissioners.
Restrictions: None as of now.
Preferences: Lolicon.
SaHa's Weblog
URL: http://www.sahadou.com
Request Method: E-mail sahadou@gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$1.80/page.
Payment: 50% up front for first time commissioners. Method not listed.
Restrictions: No guro. There must be at least some level of continuity in the commission (i.e.: Don’t ask for page 2, 6, 9 and 15 in a 16 page chapter).
Preferences: Not listed. Straight Sex, Gangbang, Rape, Yuri, Yaoi, Futanari, Furry, Cross-Dressing, Golden Shower, Tentacles, Beast(dogs, horses, frogs, whatever else), Loli, Shota, Preg, Birthing/Egg-laying, X-ray and probably various other fetishes he can't think to name are all acceptable.
sirC's Commissions
URL: http://sirccommissions.blogspot.com
Request Method: E-mail sirC82@gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$1.00/page. +$0.15/page for Hardcore "alternative" (/d/) genres, e.g. guro, scat.
Payment: By Paypal.
Restrictions: Not listed, probably none.
Preferences: Not listed, but probably shota (e.g. Juan Gotoh).
The Club Cowslip (Hentai Section of Rabbit Revelry)
URL: http://rabbitrevelry.com/clubcowslip/
Request Method: E-mail ribaldrabbit[at]gmail[dot]com. Provide RAW link in mail. (No e-mail attachments).
Cost: Tit-for-tat. You send them a 30 page doujinshi to do, you’ll have to pay enough to get another 30 page doujinshi.
Payment: 50% up front for first time commissioners. Method not listed.
Restrictions: Won't work on full volumes.
Preferences: Oneshots and doujinshi.
TONIGOBE
URL: http://www.tonigobe.net/
Request Method: E-mail tonigobe@gmail.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$0.75/page translation only. ~$1.25/page with editing. Coloring (characters only, sans background) ~$1.0/page. SFX translation ~$1.25/page
Payment: By Paypal. Schedule up to commissioner. Payment up front means priority.
Restrictions: Futanari, yaoi, tentacle, guro, beastiality, insect-iality, and any weird stories of mutated women with multiple vaginal orafices.
Preferences: Not listed.
UMAD Scans
URL: http://umadscans.ryuutama.com/
Request Method: E-mail zeniththeone@yahoo.com. Provide RAW link in mail.
Cost: ~$1.50/page.
Payment: Not listed.
Restrictions: Not listed.
Preferences: Not listed, probably Touhou doujinshi.
Template
Spoiler:
This post is still WIP.
If you have some relevant data or you're translator yourself willing to do commissions feel free to post and I'll it to the list.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
...and another one:
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
chriton wrote...
All insurence companies do is pay bills. Lets say I go to the hospital and my bill comes out to $20,000, if I didn't have insurence then I'd have to pay the whole thing. If I have insurence I pay the insurence company a fee every 6 months or so, for when I need to go to the hospital they pay the most of the bill and I only end up paying $500. (This was an example I don't know what the actual numbers would be.) Their job is not to oversee hospitals. Are insurence companies greedy, yes. Do I like them, no, but I'd rather pay them then let the government dicate what I could do medically and give them more control over me then they already have.Your just trying to sidetrack the conversation.
Insurance companies still ARE responsible for the hospitals.
Who else is responsible? Who could make the conditions better? ...and if insurance companies are not responsible, then why the fuck should I pay them a penny?
If I pay for a service, I better damn get it.
People are not paying the fucking insurance so they won't have to pay more later... they're paying 'cause they want medical coverage!
If you peddle a service, then you fail to deliver, then yes, it's your fault, you're the one who took on the responsibility by taking the money for it.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
No stroll down memory lane is complete without this bit (...at least if you're old enough to remember):
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
chriton wrote...
Flaser wrote...
chriton wrote...
Flaser wrote...
chriton wrote...
KrnSurferDude wrote...
K-1 wrote...
[quote="Darzu"]Living in the US doesn't mean you'll get good health care. There are a lot of shitty hospitals here.
As I said, my mother went to the closest hospital and got horrendous care. The doctors and nurses, the entire organization of the hospital in fact, were inadequate and incredibly poor. And the hospital wasn't a free clinic or meant only for poor people; it's a large hospital in a large city. I am very glad we didn't pay for the service there, because if we had paid, we would have been royally screwed over. It'd be like paying someone a couple hundred dollars to fix your car and only being able to drive it out of the shop before it broke down again.
High prices do not always mean quality service. That is true of all business, but it is especially true when it comes to health care in America. You're always going to get a huge bill at a hospital, whether you get good treatment or not.
you spoke my mind. i recently got my student health insurance back. it's a great insurance, but it doesn't mean that i'll get necessary tests to take right away.
I made an appointment for an endoscopy, and the nearest appointment avaliable was on Nov. 7, a nearly fucking month away!
i mean, i've been suffering for 4 months now, and I just want to find out what is exactly wrong with me. Just because our health care is way more costly than other countries, or not socialized does not mean that the hospital service/care is great.
My university hospital is ranked 13th in the U.S. overall. I can honestly tell you that every service i received was average/even not satisfactory. I shudder at how bad other hospitals can be if one of the supposedly top university hospital is so mediocre, with long wait list.
btw, K-1, I hope that your mother is doing well
I believe that is the staff to blame and not the insurence people faults that they didn't care about you or the other people in the hospital.
Excuse me, but IT IS THEIR FAULT! The main supposed, "benefit" of an free-market insurance based system is that an insurer should be a better host than the state, since it wants to get the most for its money... hence why mere trifles like "customer satisfaction", should be at least better then in purely state run systems.
So the insurence people are to blame when I go to the ER after a car crash and while I'm waiting for a doctor for 5 hours no one on staff atempted to clean up the dried blood on the floor. And I suppose it's also their fault that when my grandpa was in the hospital my mom had to give him a spongebath because the nurse wouldn't do it because he was white.
Yes, it IS THEIR FAULT! They're the one with the "cold hard cash", so to speak. They're the "boss", who decides what goes and what doesn't. They're the ones who should enforce a good environment.
Insurence agents don't run hospitals, doctors and nurses do and it is their apathy that causes crappy conditions in hospitals.
You're confusing agency with responsibility. It's the doctors and nurses who run the day to day business of a hospital, however it's still the insurance companies' responsibility to insure they do in an adequate matter... because they've got the our dough and therefore the responsibility to insure we get our money's worth. In fact that was the reason the whole insurance scam came to be, since they claimed they'd do a better job than the state.
To throw a few buzzwords out there: ISO 9001, auditing, auditing agent... look these up, and see how it's normally done in responsible industries.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
1. You called the protesters demand for free net and communication idiotic.
2. Your argument that corporations paid for the infrastucture therefore they own it lock stock and barrel is not exactly honest:
The corporations didn't pay for all the infrastructure they're using.
The consumers did. Whether as part of the price tag, or as subsidies by the government... or as it actually happened a combination of the two.
I know all of this is like Marxism to a libertarian, but we'll just have to agree to disagree, since as a social democrat I can't agree to raising the right of ownership above the common good, for the need of the many outweighs the need of the few.
Even as an entrepreneur you have to be accountable in some form to the public at large, since your property has such a massive impact on their life... hence why government regulation and intervention is a must. Trickle down economics and lassie fair capitalism have been proven to be inviable, as you've had massive monopolies rising up and exploiting both consumers and employees, union busting and setting the price unfairly.
Finally, you once again pulled out the AT&T parable, which is a false analogue, since you've had a private corporation fighting tooth and nail to remain a monopoly and government finally breaking it up. Anti-trust regulation was already in place, it was just not getting enforced thanks to massive lobbying by AT&T.
3. My prime problem with handing the keys over to corporations is that they're not accountable to the public in any form whatsoever. The government is... except its already overrun by corporations.
It's like the Augean stables, except not only is it filled to the brim with shit, but stable boys (officials) are bribed not to clean the shit up and the stable is overrun with vampire pigs (corporations) who're feasting on the horses blood (the national assets).
Your "solution" would mean getting the stable boys out and handing the keys over to the vampire pigs.
I say we go with a good 'ol Herculean cleanup: get the horses out, and let a flood wash away all the filth (...and let the pigs drown).
In real world terms:
-Stop subsidies, take the rich off wealthfare. (Read the book with the same name).
-Fire all government officials who had any connection to corps they're meant to regulate. Hooray! You've just made SEC an effective regulatory body.
-Reform election funding so lobbying can't be done. No more corporate funding for representatives.
-Take away personhood from corporations.
2. Your argument that corporations paid for the infrastucture therefore they own it lock stock and barrel is not exactly honest:
The corporations didn't pay for all the infrastructure they're using.
The consumers did. Whether as part of the price tag, or as subsidies by the government... or as it actually happened a combination of the two.
I know all of this is like Marxism to a libertarian, but we'll just have to agree to disagree, since as a social democrat I can't agree to raising the right of ownership above the common good, for the need of the many outweighs the need of the few.
Even as an entrepreneur you have to be accountable in some form to the public at large, since your property has such a massive impact on their life... hence why government regulation and intervention is a must. Trickle down economics and lassie fair capitalism have been proven to be inviable, as you've had massive monopolies rising up and exploiting both consumers and employees, union busting and setting the price unfairly.
Finally, you once again pulled out the AT&T parable, which is a false analogue, since you've had a private corporation fighting tooth and nail to remain a monopoly and government finally breaking it up. Anti-trust regulation was already in place, it was just not getting enforced thanks to massive lobbying by AT&T.
3. My prime problem with handing the keys over to corporations is that they're not accountable to the public in any form whatsoever. The government is... except its already overrun by corporations.
It's like the Augean stables, except not only is it filled to the brim with shit, but stable boys (officials) are bribed not to clean the shit up and the stable is overrun with vampire pigs (corporations) who're feasting on the horses blood (the national assets).
Your "solution" would mean getting the stable boys out and handing the keys over to the vampire pigs.
I say we go with a good 'ol Herculean cleanup: get the horses out, and let a flood wash away all the filth (...and let the pigs drown).
In real world terms:
-Stop subsidies, take the rich off wealthfare. (Read the book with the same name).
-Fire all government officials who had any connection to corps they're meant to regulate. Hooray! You've just made SEC an effective regulatory body.
-Reform election funding so lobbying can't be done. No more corporate funding for representatives.
-Take away personhood from corporations.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
chriton wrote...
Flaser wrote...
chriton wrote...
KrnSurferDude wrote...
K-1 wrote...
[quote="Darzu"]Living in the US doesn't mean you'll get good health care. There are a lot of shitty hospitals here.
As I said, my mother went to the closest hospital and got horrendous care. The doctors and nurses, the entire organization of the hospital in fact, were inadequate and incredibly poor. And the hospital wasn't a free clinic or meant only for poor people; it's a large hospital in a large city. I am very glad we didn't pay for the service there, because if we had paid, we would have been royally screwed over. It'd be like paying someone a couple hundred dollars to fix your car and only being able to drive it out of the shop before it broke down again.
High prices do not always mean quality service. That is true of all business, but it is especially true when it comes to health care in America. You're always going to get a huge bill at a hospital, whether you get good treatment or not.
you spoke my mind. i recently got my student health insurance back. it's a great insurance, but it doesn't mean that i'll get necessary tests to take right away.
I made an appointment for an endoscopy, and the nearest appointment avaliable was on Nov. 7, a nearly fucking month away!
i mean, i've been suffering for 4 months now, and I just want to find out what is exactly wrong with me. Just because our health care is way more costly than other countries, or not socialized does not mean that the hospital service/care is great.
My university hospital is ranked 13th in the U.S. overall. I can honestly tell you that every service i received was average/even not satisfactory. I shudder at how bad other hospitals can be if one of the supposedly top university hospital is so mediocre, with long wait list.
btw, K-1, I hope that your mother is doing well
I believe that is the staff to blame and not the insurence people faults that they didn't care about you or the other people in the hospital.
Excuse me, but IT IS THEIR FAULT! The main supposed, "benefit" of an free-market insurance based system is that an insurer should be a better host than the state, since it wants to get the most for its money... hence why mere trifles like "customer satisfaction", should be at least better then in purely state run systems.
So the insurence people are to blame when I go to the ER after a car crash and while I'm waiting for a doctor for 5 hours no one on staff atempted to clean up the dried blood on the floor. And I suppose it's also their fault that when my grandpa was in the hospital my mom had to give him a spongebath because the nurse wouldn't do it because he was white.
Yes, it IS THEIR FAULT! They're the one with the "cold hard cash", so to speak. They're the "boss", who decides what goes and what doesn't. They're the ones who should enforce a good environment.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
chriton wrote...
KrnSurferDude wrote...
K-1 wrote...
[quote="Darzu"]Living in the US doesn't mean you'll get good health care. There are a lot of shitty hospitals here.
As I said, my mother went to the closest hospital and got horrendous care. The doctors and nurses, the entire organization of the hospital in fact, were inadequate and incredibly poor. And the hospital wasn't a free clinic or meant only for poor people; it's a large hospital in a large city. I am very glad we didn't pay for the service there, because if we had paid, we would have been royally screwed over. It'd be like paying someone a couple hundred dollars to fix your car and only being able to drive it out of the shop before it broke down again.
High prices do not always mean quality service. That is true of all business, but it is especially true when it comes to health care in America. You're always going to get a huge bill at a hospital, whether you get good treatment or not.
you spoke my mind. i recently got my student health insurance back. it's a great insurance, but it doesn't mean that i'll get necessary tests to take right away.
I made an appointment for an endoscopy, and the nearest appointment avaliable was on Nov. 7, a nearly fucking month away!
i mean, i've been suffering for 4 months now, and I just want to find out what is exactly wrong with me. Just because our health care is way more costly than other countries, or not socialized does not mean that the hospital service/care is great.
My university hospital is ranked 13th in the U.S. overall. I can honestly tell you that every service i received was average/even not satisfactory. I shudder at how bad other hospitals can be if one of the supposedly top university hospital is so mediocre, with long wait list.
btw, K-1, I hope that your mother is doing well
I believe that is the staff to blame and not the insurence people faults that they didn't care about you or the other people in the hospital.
Excuse me, but IT IS THEIR FAULT! The main supposed, "benefit" of an free-market insurance based system is that an insurer should be a better host than the state, since it wants to get the most for its money... hence why mere trifles like "customer satisfaction", should be at least better then in purely state run systems.
Flaser
OCD Hentai Collector
About the "cell phone" issue, way to misinterpret the message FPOD:
"93% believe that communications like cell phone and internet access be a right and not just reserved for the rich and we should have free internet and cell phone service as a national goal."
You once again fail to grasp, that a "free service", doesn't mean no one is paying for it... or you actually do grasp it perfectly well, except as a libertarian you're unwilling to accept any system where you "pay by default".
You focus on the hardware, citing manufacturing and operational costs.
These people focus on what the system brings to the people and how technology has transformed communication. Without Internet access, without having a phone that you can use to reach out to the net, to broadcast and disseminate up to date information, freedom of speech and expressions are not possible.
System owners and operators are in the process of undermining those rights, by claiming overt power over the system they oversee. The whole net neutrality issue is around these concepts. To what degree can operators claim ownership over networks? Can a company literally own the radio bands, if a company is in a monopolistic position, does that grant it the rights to monitor and police thoughts?
Your post hasn't addressed any of these issues, merely citing that the costs have to be paid. (As they're being paid right now by consumers in the end).
I can accept your stance, however calling people names or stupid for demanding a free service - like how we have free roads and free radio broadcasts - is foul play, for instead arguing why such a setup is harmful you make base attacks on the character of the speaker(s).
"93% believe that communications like cell phone and internet access be a right and not just reserved for the rich and we should have free internet and cell phone service as a national goal."
You once again fail to grasp, that a "free service", doesn't mean no one is paying for it... or you actually do grasp it perfectly well, except as a libertarian you're unwilling to accept any system where you "pay by default".
You focus on the hardware, citing manufacturing and operational costs.
These people focus on what the system brings to the people and how technology has transformed communication. Without Internet access, without having a phone that you can use to reach out to the net, to broadcast and disseminate up to date information, freedom of speech and expressions are not possible.
System owners and operators are in the process of undermining those rights, by claiming overt power over the system they oversee. The whole net neutrality issue is around these concepts. To what degree can operators claim ownership over networks? Can a company literally own the radio bands, if a company is in a monopolistic position, does that grant it the rights to monitor and police thoughts?
Your post hasn't addressed any of these issues, merely citing that the costs have to be paid. (As they're being paid right now by consumers in the end).
I can accept your stance, however calling people names or stupid for demanding a free service - like how we have free roads and free radio broadcasts - is foul play, for instead arguing why such a setup is harmful you make base attacks on the character of the speaker(s).