gizgal Posts
Gravity cat wrote...
One of the most worrying problems here is security; seems that some of the hard drives that get sent to E-waste dumping grounds still have all their files from the previous owners, which could be used for Cyber crime. The problem is there doesn't seem to be enough awareness about keeping your details safe when disposing of your old computers. It's really not that difficult to take out your hard drive and keep it for personal use or smash it, but most people just seem to forget to.
That's easily enough taught and fixed: the bigger concern is it still has to go somewhere (trash-wise)... @_@
HappyDia01 wrote...
I'm not sure... I mean, I like awkward guys only TO A POINT, you know? For instance, when my boyfriend and I first started going out he was really shy (didn't know when to make a move, blushed easily when holding hands/kissing/what have you, fumbled his words, etc)... but if he had stayed that way? Good lord! I'd have lost my mind for sure. I mean, being shy is cute and all, but you need to have some type of back bone at the end of the day! Otherwise, I probably won't be interested. I want a man who makes me feel like I'm the sexiest person in the world when I'm with him, like I'm all that he needs and desires, and if he's too shy to look at me? I won't feel that way.THIS!!!! So much this.
You can be shy, but if you never open up, then it's hard to get anywhere :o
VGuy wrote...
I'm actually doing my thesis on e-waste right now.IMO there are too many loopholes in current national and international legislation which facilitate the export and import of e-waste. There are many influential factors which ensure a steady and toxic production of e-waste, and virtually no control over it, since it's everyone's idea of recycling your e-waste by sending it overseas.
I would encourage anyone interested in this topic to read up on the WEEE directive, hit up the Basel Action Network or visit toxipedia. Lots of good information for anyone there.
Thanks! I'll check on those.
Really disconcerting to think that so much harm comes from tech that we've always thought was "saving the world", when it's also polluting it.
Pretty decent! Generic characters, lol, but if you drew these all freehand you're certainly doing a good job with poses and anime-like proportions.
Tsurayu wrote...
gizgal wrote...
Because it's not external. We're just judged by our mammaries instead, so consider the societal pressures equal in that respect. D;Bah! I cry foul on that!
Societies pressure on bust sizes is nothing compared to the social stigma on the size of a man's penis.
There is a bit of a stereotype (at least in the United States, can't vouch for the rest of the world) that larger breasts are better, but in general a lot men love breasts regardless of a woman's cup size. And that is even starting to take hold in media outlets as well. I don't see anytime soon a porn that is like "See this average, five-inch, man take on all these women!"
Okay, I agree a little on that... but still: we have internal genitals.
No one bothers to measure ;p
I love shy guys, but if they're too shy to take ANY initiative once in a relationship... it's too frustrating.
animefreak_usa wrote...
trekki859 wrote...
with you on that one, and ill admit, i almost wish they make the fuckup of doing it, just to see everyone go apeshit. but i rather it not for 99 percent of the sties i use would probaly be dead for a few weeks because of this That not even true to the slightest bit. There counties where the same dns blocking and ip policing in place... but they still can get thru the great firewall with programs and proxing. Only those without the computer knowledge will be fucked.. which a 7 year old can do it... well you can do it.
Sure you can get around it.
But the problem is the sites themselves (if they're hosted in the US or run from there) will be shut down entirely. There'd be nothing to access, even if you wanted to.
http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/ghana804/video/video_index.html
Here's the transcript if you don't want to watch the vid:
For a brief overview on how the world's been handling all the electronic waste we've collectively created, watch the video at the link above (20 min long, fyi).
After watching:
Did you know about this? I know for sure I had seen a few instances (at least of HD harvesting by scammers abroad), but the way that no country's government or electronic manufacturers themselves are addressing the problem of e-waste and its shady redistribution to poorer places is quite troubling.
Your thoughts, ideas, reactions to the topic of e-waste disposal and its repercussions?
Do you (or have you ever) recycled your electronics? What kind of programs/places are there locally for you to do so? Or just dump it?
Here's the transcript if you don't want to watch the vid:
Spoiler:
For a brief overview on how the world's been handling all the electronic waste we've collectively created, watch the video at the link above (20 min long, fyi).
After watching:
Did you know about this? I know for sure I had seen a few instances (at least of HD harvesting by scammers abroad), but the way that no country's government or electronic manufacturers themselves are addressing the problem of e-waste and its shady redistribution to poorer places is quite troubling.
Your thoughts, ideas, reactions to the topic of e-waste disposal and its repercussions?
Do you (or have you ever) recycled your electronics? What kind of programs/places are there locally for you to do so? Or just dump it?
Maybe check under tomboy?
The tag is a bit new, so not a lot of manga have it, but we're trying to go through older stuff to add it.
The tag is a bit new, so not a lot of manga have it, but we're trying to go through older stuff to add it.
To be honest, fine: yes, the emails may not in and of themselves phase anyone. The fact that so many people ARE emailing/blogging/talking about the issue WILL.
It's about getting the word out so that those in power know people aren't happy, will take action if this comes to pass, and are lying in wait to act up. Something to that effect.
Sometimes just spreading awareness of the issue helps, and in this case (since the bill had so little media coverage), here's hoping it's working.
It's about getting the word out so that those in power know people aren't happy, will take action if this comes to pass, and are lying in wait to act up. Something to that effect.
Sometimes just spreading awareness of the issue helps, and in this case (since the bill had so little media coverage), here's hoping it's working.
Lishy1 wrote...
Are republicans freaking stupid? Isn't this their third attempt recently to impose internet censorship?There is no way Obama will let this pass. This is bound to be vetoed just like the other bills he has been vetoing.
Personally, I am disturbed we have so many congressmen who keep pushing for these "bills" however.
It is rumored he will veto at least this incarnation of the bill.
However, it's been tweaked in the past (to its present form aka SOPA titled version), and it will be tweaked and pushed again.
Let's look at who was present today, shall we?
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/hear_11162011.html
Among the few witnesses present (and allowed) were reps from the MPAA, Pfizer, Mastercard. The rest were a few government and union related groups. All other attendees were prohibited, except to view/hear via a webcast that (as I mentioned above) went quite poorly.
They're letting in these people but shutting out dissenting opinions of any sort, right off the bat?
They know they can lock regular citizens out of hearing/seeing/learning of what's going down in there (at least in detail), and by gosh they're doing just that.
Regardless of the action taken/not taken (in your view), look at this.
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/hear_11162011.html
Among the few witnesses present (and allowed) were reps from the MPAA, Pfizer, Mastercard. The rest were a few government and union related groups.
They're letting in these people but shutting out dissenting opinions of any sort, right off the bat?
They know they can lock regular citizens out of hearing/seeing/learning of what's going down in there (at least in detail), and by gosh they're doing just that.
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/hear_11162011.html
Among the few witnesses present (and allowed) were reps from the MPAA, Pfizer, Mastercard. The rest were a few government and union related groups.
They're letting in these people but shutting out dissenting opinions of any sort, right off the bat?
They know they can lock regular citizens out of hearing/seeing/learning of what's going down in there (at least in detail), and by gosh they're doing just that.
Luke Piewalker wrote...
Why don't people ever care about the reverse of the situation, and measure vagina sizes? Size matters there too, right?Because it's not external. We're just judged by our mammaries instead, so consider the societal pressures equal in that respect. D;
Oh, and even if the public wanted to hear/see what went down (as we have a right to), the stream of the whole thing was shitty.
Oh the irony.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/public-shut-out-stop-online-piracy-act-hearings-again
From the EFF this morning...
"This morning, EFF’s staff and concerned netizens across the country tuned into the live webcast of the House Judiciary Committee’s hearing on the Stop Online Piracy Act (H.R. 3261). At least we tried to. Unfortunately, we were confronted with an incredibly poor webcast stream for much of the hearing. We find it ironic and deeply concerning that Congress is unable to successfully stream video of an event this important to all Internet users, even as they are debating a dangerous plan to change the Internet in fundamental ways and deputize Internet intermediaries to act like content police."
Another nice analysis of the ramifications of the bill, from the NYTimes.
Not only are there problems with how far it wants to restrict/remove freedoms, but the literal cost this would have on the government to put in place (and right now, that's just more debt).
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/opinion/firewall-law-could-infringe-on-free-speech.html
"China operates the world’s most elaborate and opaque system of Internet censorship. But Congress, under pressure to take action against the theft of intellectual property, is considering misguided legislation that would strengthen China’s Great Firewall and even bring major features of it to America.
The legislation — the Protect IP Act, which has been introduced in the Senate, and a House version known as the Stop Online Piracy Act — have an impressive array of well-financed backers, including the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Motion Picture Association of America, the American Federation of Musicians, the Directors Guild of America, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the Screen Actors Guild. The bills aim not to censor political or religious speech as China does, but to protect American intellectual property. Alarm at the infringement of creative works through the Internet is justifiable. The solutions offered by the legislation, however, threaten to inflict collateral damage on democratic discourse and dissent both at home and around the world.
The bills would empower the attorney general to create a blacklist of sites to be blocked by Internet service providers, search engines, payment providers and advertising networks, all without a court hearing or a trial. The House version goes further, allowing private companies to sue service providers for even briefly and unknowingly hosting content that infringes on copyright — a sharp change from current law, which protects the service providers from civil liability if they remove the problematic content immediately upon notification. The intention is not the same as China’s Great Firewall, a nationwide system of Web censorship, but the practical effect could be similar."...
**read the rest at the link above**
Oh the irony.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/public-shut-out-stop-online-piracy-act-hearings-again
From the EFF this morning...
"This morning, EFF’s staff and concerned netizens across the country tuned into the live webcast of the House Judiciary Committee’s hearing on the Stop Online Piracy Act (H.R. 3261). At least we tried to. Unfortunately, we were confronted with an incredibly poor webcast stream for much of the hearing. We find it ironic and deeply concerning that Congress is unable to successfully stream video of an event this important to all Internet users, even as they are debating a dangerous plan to change the Internet in fundamental ways and deputize Internet intermediaries to act like content police."
Another nice analysis of the ramifications of the bill, from the NYTimes.
Not only are there problems with how far it wants to restrict/remove freedoms, but the literal cost this would have on the government to put in place (and right now, that's just more debt).
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/opinion/firewall-law-could-infringe-on-free-speech.html
"China operates the world’s most elaborate and opaque system of Internet censorship. But Congress, under pressure to take action against the theft of intellectual property, is considering misguided legislation that would strengthen China’s Great Firewall and even bring major features of it to America.
The legislation — the Protect IP Act, which has been introduced in the Senate, and a House version known as the Stop Online Piracy Act — have an impressive array of well-financed backers, including the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Motion Picture Association of America, the American Federation of Musicians, the Directors Guild of America, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the Screen Actors Guild. The bills aim not to censor political or religious speech as China does, but to protect American intellectual property. Alarm at the infringement of creative works through the Internet is justifiable. The solutions offered by the legislation, however, threaten to inflict collateral damage on democratic discourse and dissent both at home and around the world.
The bills would empower the attorney general to create a blacklist of sites to be blocked by Internet service providers, search engines, payment providers and advertising networks, all without a court hearing or a trial. The House version goes further, allowing private companies to sue service providers for even briefly and unknowingly hosting content that infringes on copyright — a sharp change from current law, which protects the service providers from civil liability if they remove the problematic content immediately upon notification. The intention is not the same as China’s Great Firewall, a nationwide system of Web censorship, but the practical effect could be similar."...
**read the rest at the link above**
One piece suits cover more, are worn more often by younger girls, and thus, for loli-lovin' Japan, evoke that sex appeal they find in prepubescence. D;
While acting a certain way to win women over is all fine and good, just remember: you're setting the bar for the rest of your relationship.
If you have to put on an act or put on airs to be worthy to someone, you won't be able to easily be yourself around them (or if you are, they might not like the "real you" you kept hidden!).
If you have to put on an act or put on airs to be worthy to someone, you won't be able to easily be yourself around them (or if you are, they might not like the "real you" you kept hidden!).
zeroniv_legend wrote...
moose75000 wrote...
Read it, she isn't a loli, she is the main female characters 23-year old sister.I know, but she has loli body. Too loli of a body. And that's way beyond my taste.
Well, according to the publisher that prints the English book, they state all the characters depicted in their manga are 18+.
They published Gunma and Enemoto Heights' works with the same disclaimer, even though they both deal with high school age people... they might just change the wording to avoid issues.