Kaimax Posts
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Damoz wrote...
Pfft i know that, its more work than waar could ever be capable of~Also, ive been off fakku for a while due to.... well its a long story. And well i decided to come come back because its almost my 2 year thread time~
Gonna be in the city today though~
I'm in Burwood at the moment, sleeping over at a friend's and because i need to go to library ;__;
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
TheOverFlow wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
TheOverFlow wrote...
Mmm. When I say "cut equally" I mean we are all same in terms of humanity. No one is better than others.Really? You really think that way? Then why your communication (argument, if I may) skills is lower than Waar's? Why some students that achieved 90% in their finals and others achieved less?
We're not talking about effort here, because while everyone has the basic skills, every individual is unique and their strength and weaknesses varies. There is no way denying this, because, realistically and the most common examples, you will find some who are good with essays and some who are good with numbers.
So you believe that we are better than those who are poor or mentally incapacitated? Because I don't think so. We are all born humans and we die human. Do you understand what i meant by "cut equally" now? If I didn't stress it out earlier than that's my fault.
If you're talking about how a human in essence is no different than other human, yes, you are right. But each human has different strengths and weakness, and you don't seem to acknowledge that.
I have a better life than those who lives in Zimbabwe. I am more intelligent than those who are still in middle school. In essence, yes we're gonna die as human beings, but everyone's set of abilities is different.
I get where you're coming from, but we're (you were with Waar) discussing a different issue. It's entirely different concept.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
TheOverFlow wrote...
Mmm. When I say "cut equally" I mean we are all same in terms of humanity. No one is better than others.Really? You really think that way? Then why your communication (argument, if I may) skills is lower than Waar's? Why some students that achieved 90% in their finals and others achieved less?
We're not talking about effort here, because while everyone has the basic skills, every individual is unique and their strength and weaknesses varies. There is no way denying this, because, realistically and the most common examples, you will find some who are good with essays and some who are good with numbers.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
TheOverFlow wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
TheOverFlow wrote...
You weren't as keen as I expected. Our debate was evolved around Waar yes, but the real point that i was trying to get across was one part, cut equally, cannot be better than the other half. A concept many people seem to forget these days and wonder why the world is in chaos everyday. That doesn't make any sense, which part of you and waar is cut equally? What do you mean by cut equally??
You can't be this dense. I refuse to believe it.
Believe it all you want, I still don't get your point.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Damoz wrote...
I would say let her back on the pure point that she amuses me ( i know how little that matters)But that said, her past actions cannot simply be ignored and she tends to overreact not matter what the situation would be.
But it would seem to me she care more about her account faves and usage.... so would it be possible to allow her back but revoke posting and pm rights? I would think that would be a suitable course of action.
It means
- No problems of the past
- She gets what she seemingly asked for
- ?????????
- PROFIT!
And then we can all cease caring like i know most will~
Well, it's kinda pointless. AND WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN MAN?
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
K-ON a shit.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
arpeggi wrote...
just unban her.so she's an autistic retard, and what.
half the users here are just as autistic yet i don't see them getting banned.
you're on a hentai porn website forum, of course you're going to get underage faggots and socially inept retards, i mean just look a ctfg.
not my internet feels.
As much as a retard a person can be, if they start harassing people over the internet (PMs and "go fuck yourselves" for no obvious reason), it's still unacceptable.
And underage faggots and socially inept retards is inevitable, but you can't just start pointing fingers and calling people out like that.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
cruz737 wrote...
At this point only the one who can make a decent case for her, is koko herself. She doesn't really seem to want to show remorse for her actions or willingness to change, so the probability of her saying anything worthwhile is pretty slim.This!
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
I don't care when people do kill themselves, I just find it very, very depressing.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
TheOverFlow wrote...
You weren't as keen as I expected. Our debate was evolved around Waar yes, but the real point that i was trying to get across was one part, cut equally, cannot be better than the other half. A concept many people seem to forget these days and wonder why the world is in chaos everyday. That doesn't make any sense, which part of you and waar is cut equally? What do you mean by cut equally??
@Waar: i'm sorry if I sounded like I attacked opanihuya, a little bit of me did feel irritated by his indirectness and not telling us why he thinks that we should let Koko back in. I'm also glad that you get what I meant about the precedent part.
@Opanihuya: I'm sorry if I sounded like I attacked you, I was just irritated. But now, I still wanna hear why you think we should let Koko back. I'll try to be as objective as possible, but it piqued my curiosity already.
EDIT: OverFlow is not SolidShark, it's Sgt.Broski. SolidShark is Humbugs Associate.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Drifter995 wrote...
artcellrox wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
artcellrox wrote...
Drifter995 wrote...
I'm single you preb fuck.Wait, what? Since when?
Since a few weeks ago. Broke up, because things weren't working out. various reasons behind it
Ouch... sorry to hear, bro.
It's all good. Looks like we both took it fairly well. Aside from my terrible breakup attempt. Went and done fat sweaty nerded it up. But ah well.
COME MELBOURNE BRO! I'LL TREAT YOU DRINKS UNTIL WE'RE BOTH FUCKED!
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
TheOverFlow wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
TheOverFlow wrote...
You three should stop talking. It's a waste of time arguing over an opinion.As I recall, you were engaged in an argument with Waar a couple of days back...
You recalled correctly but unlike this, It actually had a valid point to be made.
No, it was the other way around. Drifter, Cruz, Takerial and I was trying to find a valid reason behind Opani's opinion, whereas you argued on how Waar has a direct approach towards people and can't accept the fact that he's better than you.
All of the above aside, what is wrong with arguing? Arguing is discussing different opinions, if arguing because of opinion is pointless, every human beings would be closed minded and that wouldn't be good.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
TheOverFlow wrote...
You three should stop talking. It's a waste of time arguing over an opinion.As I recall, you were engaged in an argument with Waar a couple of days back...
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Sneakyone wrote...
Cirno a shit.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
opanihuya wrote...
cruz737 wrote...
We were never talking about what Jacob said earlier, just your points which were:Entrainment - something that doesn't make sense <---subjective
New possibilities which is also an argument against her <---it's 50/50
Money - ... <--- Idk the formula for that stuff.
I think at this point you're scrapping at the bottom of the barrel and can't come up with anything worth while.
Well, in the beginning I said that my reasons were purely subjective but people kept demanding logical backings at which I pretty much failed.
@Takerial true. He kinda implied he would be ok if she stayed so it's up to how waar will treat this implication.
So if something is subjective it doesn't have to logical? Subjective is an opinion, an opinion is backed by evidence that made you think why you think that way. If you can't come up with the logical reason behind your subjective opinion, it's terrible rubbish.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Takerial wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
Takerial wrote...
God, who the fuck is this fag. It's like he just got done sucking some homeless guy's dick before he posted here.He's new here, allegedly.
That doesn't excuse him coming here after sucking off some homeless guy.
I told him that, he didn't listen. I got 99 problems but a newfag ain't one.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
PumpJack McGee wrote...
I've seen her acting out and stuff, but she's only ever been pleasant to me- so by my personal experience there was never any trouble.Me too, she never attacked me directly or indirectly.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Takerial wrote...
God, who the fuck is this fag. It's like he just got done sucking some homeless guy's dick before he posted here.He's new here, allegedly.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
HumbugsAssociate wrote...
You said it yourself. She's who the forum needs, not deserves.
Says the guy who answered his own question and has bisexual hypersexual slut he snatched as girlfriend. Enjoy competing not just with other men, but with women too for her chance to slip for her next "relationship". :)
This is a real treat.
I've never seen Drifter so pissed before, because I think he's laid back and cool (I've met him before IRL, shut up.)
This would be my last time trying to talk to you, assuming you're a human being with average IQ.
1. Please do explain briefly how Koko is a person that the forum needs, over people such as Mantis, Anesthetize, or even Illumia.
2. What does Drifter's personal life (if it's true) has to do with his opinion about Koko? Explain briefly.
If you can't, or don't make any coherent argument, go fuck yourself a thousand times.
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
opanihuya wrote...
"Did they go all schizophrenic?" A first, in the sense you mean it, but that's what ctfg is for."Did they harass people over PMs?" Idk.
"Did they tell everyone to go fuck themselves?" Yes, one of em, that was the reason for ban.
That's fucked, as much as people dislike ctfg, calling it for the place of schizophrenics is uncalled for and unjustified.
opanihuya wrote...
Ok ok we already know this by now, this stuff lasts for who knows how long. But if it was only for that, would waar make this thread?He was asking for our opinion. And most said no. End of story.
opanihuya wrote...
Probably yes but jacob isn't against it and that has got to mean something. I kinda like that the staff allows us to debate their decisions and that jacob's opinion could be ignored (?!) but if it was all already set in stone because of the things you pointed out, then why are we still talking?Again, the staff didn't ask us to find reasons for Koko to be allowed to come back. Waar specifically asked whether we should let Koko back, and most of us said no.
opanihuya wrote...
Isn't it because she's so persistent that it compliments the site's creator? I don't know where I'm going with this but if waar's decision depended only on koko's history, it wouldn't be open to debate. After all, wasn't this thread made in hopes to find something that could be accounted in her favor.Well, as I said before, that will set a bad precedent. If the staff decides to let koko come back, everyone can just make 100 alts just to be able to come back after getting perma-banned, because if they can't, they're getting an unfair treatment.
This thread was made by Waar (ignoring yet another rules broken by Koko) to "ponder what we should do". He didn't specifically said we should give some sympathy, or support her so she can come back. Therefore, everyone here is entitled to what they said.