kenjiharima Posts
MasterBetamax wrote...
As a Tea Party conservative these are my opinions.....To OP: Your post could use some edditing to reduce size. Your scarcasm touches upon some major faults in Romney. You seriously liked Paul????
The major reason to get behind Romney is that at this point he is who we are stuck with as a republican candidate (because of an act of blind rage*), because he is not a hardline born'n'raised commy like Obama, and because it is unlikely that a strong third party uber-consrevative-candidate will arise that can actually beat both Obama and Romney.
Obama could care less about the economy or our capatalist system, and will do his best to force us deeper in to a depression, if he is re-elected, in order to try to kill capitalism thus setting the stage for the commies to gain power.
*The act of blind rage that stuck us with Romney was the act of Gingrich, whom had a feud going with romeny, and wanted to hinder Romney any way he could. If Gingrich had thoughtful rage instead of blind rage he would have dropped out of the primaries sooner and not sucked up/divided a needed portion of Santorum's base. By staying in as long as he did, Gingrich handed Romney victory(by impeding Santorum), instead of dealing Romney the blow that he wanted to(talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face).
All that said I really wanted Santorum to win the primary. He had great chrisma (asside from occasionally putting his foot in his mouth by touching stupid unecessary topics that he should have just not touched), discussed good policy based ways to fix the ecconomy(The darned media didn't give it enough attention though), and showed good foreign policy.
We really need a Scott Walker(I'm proud to say that I voted for him in both elections!) or a Sarah palin(I wish the damn media haden't gone after her so badly else she could have ran this time arround) to cut the fat(and BS) from the budget so it can be balanced(and the debt reduced), cut taxes and regulatory hastels to allow bussiness to recover/grow.
Paul was great on discussing the ecconomy(and I think would be a good head for the federal reserve), but he is REALLY bad on foreign policy, and between that and other things can come across as being totally left field/mental at times. Foreign policy is a major part of the presidential duty and Paul just don't look like a sane choice to mannage that.
Those who don't care about politics either don't work and don't pay taxes, or are leaving major parts their futures to be decided by the whims of the four winds IMHO.
[national anthom plays in background in staicy low-Fi mono sound while the american flag waves in the background with analog video smear] Monotone Voice: This is MasterBetamax WMBX siging of for the evening.......[30 seconds of SMPTE "color bars" test patern, followed by static(untill my next post)]
So your only reasons for voting for Romney is because he's your only other choice then Obama? I won't even validate that communist ignorance or that pointless comment that he doesn't care about the economy as reasons as not only did you fail to present evidence as to why this is so but as to why Romney is better.
Shinzumakami wrote...
Darkhilt wrote...
"Ps3 limitation won't allow me to quote long paragraph"I can't give you a proper response right now because I'm really tired and sleepy.
But I will say this thread is only about "Does a certain rule applie in Incoherent Babbling." I'm not going to start a debate on your comment.
Shinzumakami wrote...
Darkhilt wrote...
Sympathy is a type of butthurt as butthurt is just negatively condensed emotion. Even if you don't personally receive any attacks or commentary on whatsoever thread, your care shows you indeed are butthurt.I'm not "Butthurt" about anything and even if I was it wouldn't matter here? I'm trying to ask if the rule "Do not insult or harass other members. " applies in "Incoherent Babbling" and by the looks of it your trying to find a way to troll or turn people against me. If your going to make unnecessary comments please just stop posting in this thread. -.-
In no shape or form am I trying to troll you and I don't quite see how giving an opposite opinion is unnecessary but I'm bringing in the question : Why should we care? The reason why it matters if you are indeed butthurt is to show that there is no adequate response to your question as it in its presented form is trivial. This opposition, would you consider it harassment or a personal insult to you? It follows the suit of every comment made to the unsavory fags in IB. While it does pushes a line, comments like what I posted are meant to cause the OP to question; this in point is exactly what newfags forget. Newfags have the audacity at times to believe immediately what they say has worth then when criticized through harsh remark as you would see it continue to do so. A proper user would try first to stop and learn. Newfags do not.
Shinzumakami wrote...
Iam1vs100xp wrote...
Ahh, you don't view their posts as "shitposts". Shitposts are mostly like this thread of mineWell I'm sympathetic towards most users threads. There are some threads that seem to unnecessary or idiotic but I never trolled on the user merely because I see no purpose. I see it as someone who is trying to have fun on the forums, but everybody else gets a bit to serious.
Can't explain well since I'm not so great at descriptions ^.^"
Darkhilt wrote...
Spoiler:
I'm going to post this again....
"Also I'm not being harassed by anybody, I just feel sympathetic towards new users who get trolled on for no reason."
Please try and stay on topic -.-
Sympathy is a type of butthurt as butthurt is just negatively condensed emotion. Even if you don't personally receive any attacks or commentary on whatsoever thread, your care shows you indeed are butthurt.
The solution is quite easy: follow the crowd and post on already made threads. Why are we obligated to give newfags the right of opinion?