Lelouch24 Posts
[color=#2e1a6b]um, this belongs in Computers and Technology
[color=#2e1a6b]I'm playing Fate/Stay Night for the first time; this is my second visual novel after Katawa Shojo. I absolutely love it, the story is so engaging. I hate reading, and I never read any books for fun, but I'm having fun with this. What's most amazing about this is that the story is SO good, that the sex scenes actually get boring
I was very amused with myself though: early in the story, when Saber said that she had limited magic, I thought "Maybe Shirou will have sex with her to restore her magic", but I laughed at that absurd thought, thinking that I must watch way too much hentai. Then it turned out that I was right...
I was very amused with myself though: early in the story, when Saber said that she had limited magic, I thought "Maybe Shirou will have sex with her to restore her magic", but I laughed at that absurd thought, thinking that I must watch way too much hentai. Then it turned out that I was right...
BigLundi wrote...
this is going to be my last post on the matter[color=#2e1a6b]Okay, you've shown improvement on your knowledge of the case:
earlier you wrote...
it's an instance of some guy blatantly gunning down an innocent boy for thinking he's dangerous when the only difference between him and other kids was his skin color, and the fact that HE COULD GET AWAY WITH IT.now you wrote...
While visiting with his father his father's fiance', Trayvon decided to go on a walk to get something to eat and drink. So he went to a 7-11 and bought a bag of skittles and an Arizona Iced Tea. During this walk he received a phone call from his girlfriend, and began chatting with her. Meanwhile Zimmerman saw Trayvon and noticed that Trayvon wasn't a usual member of the gated community. Since there have been reports of break ins he decided that this was suspicious enough to call the police. Trayvon was out of sight after the phone call, so he, being a neighborhood watchman that felt it was his responsibility, continued to follow him. Zimmerman was a known aggressive person, which is explained by his sole volunteering for the neighborhood watch where nobody else would, calling the cops on several other occasions, catching a thief before, and desiring to be a police officer. This would lead him to not back off when Trayvon turned and asked him why he was following him. Zimmerman instead asked what he was doing there and advanced on him, possibly placed a hand on Trayvon to make sure he stopped moving. After all, the whole reason he followed Trayvon in the first place as he made clear in his phone call was so that he could give an exact location for the police officers to find him. Trayvon, not appreciating some strange older man following him, advancing on him and placing a hand on him, retaliated violently, knocking Zimmerman to the ground and beating on him. Zimmerman, after screaming for help a few times, panicked and shot Trayvon in the chest.
[color=#2e1a6b]Before you respond any further, please do some reading
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin
[color=#2e1a6b]Thank you Biglundi, your reply is a perfect example of how much the media has distorted this case. All the falsehoods you stated perfectly show how biased the media is.
So the media is bias towards the position that Trayvon wasn't all that suspicious? Or...could it possibly be that he wasn't all that suspicious?
[color=#2e1a6b]They're biased towards the position that George Zimmerman is guilty. They're doing everything they can to make it look like Zimmerman murdered Trayvon not out of self defense, but out of race discrimination.
Sources please? For both claims?
[color=#2e1a6b]Wow, I found a source that proves both at once
http://healthland.time.com/2012/05/18/traces-of-marijuana-found-in-trayvon-martins-body-does-it-matter-2/
(The picture they show is from when Trayvon was 12)
Yes. There's ALSO the fact that he was the appointed "neighborhood watchman" And, if you know the handbook for making a neighborhood watch, you'd know that it states the Neighborhood watch is supposed to OBSERVE. Confrontation is strictly prohibited, as is the carrying of firearms.
[color=#2e1a6b]He had a license for his firearm.
Source?
[color=#2e1a6b]If the media wasn't biased, you wouldn't have to ask for a source for such a key element to the case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEDBqvEauYU
[color=#2e1a6b]Way too many pronouns to understand what you said. Can you please post the source where you got this dialog from.
[color=#2e1a6b]Your making an affirmative claim with no evidence, and asking me to cite evidence against it? -____-
Well, Zimmerman has a clean record, but Trayvon was suspended from school because of Pot and graffiti. Zimmerman's description of Trayvon before the conflict shows that Trayvon probably initiated it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aVwPqXc-bk#t=0m46s to 1:30.
[color=#2e1a6b]There's no evidence on who initiated the conflict. Please stop acting like you have evidence.
[color=#2e1a6b]Um... you agree with this? then why the hell did you ask for a source earlier?
[color=#2e1a6b]This was after Martin was already dead, so why is this relevant? If Martin wasn't dead yet, then this is a reasonable means to restrain him until he dies.
[color=#2e1a6b]I don't disbelieve something just because the media says so. I've never heard of anyone who disbelieves something on the basis that the media said so.
Most people (like you) are guilty of the exact opposite; they believe something just because the media tells them to.
Based on nothing more than a loose and vague interpretation of the "stand your ground" laws, and the fact that there were no eye witnesses to confirm that he was in fact guilty. Because the only other person who saw...he killed.
[color=#2e1a6b]copy/paste from above
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEDBqvEauYU
Here's the thing. I agree that the media has inconsistency when it comes to covering stories, however please don't tell me that the media is bad for covering this story. I think they need to cover stories like this more OFTEN. I think they need to point out when police officers do these things, I think they need to point out when regular people do these things, I think murders at ALL should be covered in detail by the media.
Know why? That's their job.
[color=#2e1a6b]The media is not bad for covering this story. It's the way they covered this story. They didn't expose the eyewitness of before the shot, they didn't expose the police report, and instead they showed altered phone calls and 12 year-old pictures.
What Lishy and I our saying, is that there is a major inbalance of exposure of this case, and exposure of cop vs citizen cases.
[color=#2e1a6b]This is really hilarious coming from you. Here, Post links to all the evidence I supposedly ignored right here:
[color=#2e1a6b]He had traces of it after he died
http://healthland.time.com/2012/05/18/traces-of-marijuana-found-in-trayvon-martins-body-does-it-matter-2/
He was even suspended from school for marijuana
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin
BigLundi wrote...
Lelouch24 wrote...
[color=#2e1a6b]Thank you Biglundi, your reply is a perfect example of how much the media has distorted this case. All the falsehoods you stated perfectly show how biased the media is.
So the media is bias towards the position that Trayvon wasn't all that suspicious? Or...could it possibly be that he wasn't all that suspicious?
[color=#2e1a6b]They're biased towards the position that George Zimmerman is guilty. They're doing everything they can to make it look like Zimmerman murdered Trayvon not out of self defense, but out of race discrimination.
[color=#2e1a6b]You said that Trayvon "looked like a regular kid". Sorry, but those pictures the media showed were from when Trayvon was 12. Trayvon was not at all a kid; he was old enough to have THC traces.
Sources please? For both claims?
[color=#2e1a6b]Wow, I found a source that proves both at once
http://healthland.time.com/2012/05/18/traces-of-marijuana-found-in-trayvon-martins-body-does-it-matter-2/
(The picture they show is from when Trayvon was 12)
[color=#2e1a6b]you said that Zimmerman "was told to leave him alone" even though this never happened. The 911 operator only said "we don't need you to [follow him]".
Yes. There's ALSO the fact that he was the appointed "neighborhood watchman" And, if you know the handbook for making a neighborhood watch, you'd know that it states the Neighborhood watch is supposed to OBSERVE. Confrontation is strictly prohibited, as is the carrying of firearms.
[color=#2e1a6b]He had a license for his firearm.
[color=#2e1a6b]Twice, you said that he shot him because he "felt" he was dangerous. I must admit, your ignorance is astounding. Zimmerman shot him because Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman, beating on him.
Source?
[color=#2e1a6b]If the media wasn't biased, you wouldn't have to ask for a source for such a key element to the case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEDBqvEauYU
The fact of the matter is that there is a confirmed witness to the event via a phone cal made to Martin's girlfriend, who said that he expressed concerns that someone was following him. She told him to run away, instead he asked, "Why are you following me?" and someone else asking, "What are you doing here?" Followed by scuffling noises and the phone dieing.
[color=#2e1a6b]Way too many pronouns to understand what you said. Can you please post the source where you got this dialog from.
It seems to ME that Zimmerman approached Martin, and tried to restrain him. If Martin hurt him at all, it was in self defense, and in response to Martin resisting, Zimmerman shot him...
Do you have any evidence AGAINST that?
Do you have any evidence AGAINST that?
[color=#2e1a6b]Your making an affirmative claim with no evidence, and asking me to cite evidence against it? -____-
Well, Zimmerman has a clean record, but Trayvon was suspended from school because of Pot and graffiti. Zimmerman's description of Trayvon before the conflict shows that Trayvon probably initiated it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aVwPqXc-bk#t=0m46s to 1:30.
Sure, MArtin may have started beating on the guy...after the altercation began and was initiated by Zimmerman being an irresponsible douchebag...
...HOWEVER, there is suficient reason to believe Zimmerman initiated
...HOWEVER, there is suficient reason to believe Zimmerman initiated
[color=#2e1a6b]There's no evidence on who initiated the conflict. Please stop acting like you have evidence.
witnesses say they saw Martin indeed beating on him.
[color=#2e1a6b]Um... you agree with this? then why the hell did you ask for a source earlier?
after Martin was shot, Zimmerman was seen straddling him on the ground by two witnesses.
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/20/neighbor-trayvon-martin-shooting-wasnt-self-defense/
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/20/neighbor-trayvon-martin-shooting-wasnt-self-defense/
[color=#2e1a6b]This was after Martin was already dead, so why is this relevant? If Martin wasn't dead yet, then this is a reasonable means to restrain him until he dies.
But of course you'll just brush this off as "the media's spin". I can already predict it. There is NO evidence that the media can present to change your mind because you'll simply disbelieve them just because the media says it. And that's a pathetic reason to not believe something. It's similar to a conspiracy theorist saying he doesn't believe the official story of an event simply because, "It's the official story".
[color=#2e1a6b]I don't disbelieve something just because the media says so. I've never heard of anyone who disbelieves something on the basis that the media said so.
Most people (like you) are guilty of the exact opposite; they believe something just because the media tells them to.
"HE COULD GET AWAY WITH IT"... huh? Zimmerman was detained and questioned for 5 hours, and after the police report confirmed innocence, they released him.
Based on nothing more than a loose and vague interpretation of the "stand your ground" laws, and the fact that there were no eye witnesses to confirm that he was in fact guilty. Because the only other person who saw...he killed.
[color=#2e1a6b]copy/paste from above
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEDBqvEauYU
[color=#2e1a6b]What Lishy was saying is that the media is Glorifying Trayvon because it will start a race war. Lishy then pointed out that the media doesn't glorify someone shot by cops because that will not start a race war, but discredit governmental security
Here's the thing. I agree that the media has inconsistency when it comes to covering stories, however please don't tell me that the media is bad for covering this story. I think they need to cover stories like this more OFTEN. I think they need to point out when police officers do these things, I think they need to point out when regular people do these things, I think murders at ALL should be covered in detail by the media.
Know why? That's their job.
[color=#2e1a6b]The media is not bad for covering this story. It's the way they covered this story. They didn't expose the eyewitness of before the shot, they didn't expose the police report, and instead they showed altered phone calls and 12 year-old pictures.
What Lishy and I our saying, is that there is a major inbalance of exposure of this case, and exposure of cop vs citizen cases.
What you need to do Lelouch, in the future, is look at ALL the evidence, not just a couple things. You can't listen to only one witness saying he saw Trayvon hitting Zimmerman and conclude soley from that that it was a justified self defense shooting. If there's other evidence out there that contradicts the image that puts in your head...you don't get to ignore it.
[color=#2e1a6b]This is really hilarious coming from you. Here, Post links to all the evidence I supposedly ignored right here:
Spoiler:
Also, what the fuck was that about him being old enough to have THC marks? Are you saying he smoked weed? Do you have evidence of that? Or are you just saying, "He's an older black kid wearing a hoodie. Probably did drugs too" like an ignoramous?
[color=#2e1a6b]He had traces of it after he died
http://healthland.time.com/2012/05/18/traces-of-marijuana-found-in-trayvon-martins-body-does-it-matter-2/
He was even suspended from school for marijuana
BigLundi wrote...
Lishy1 wrote...
Black Jesus JC wrote...
The reason people were pissed about the Travyon thing is because Zimmerman shot a teenager and there was no trial. That is all reasonable people have been trying to get, a trial to get all the facts out there. And the insistence on bringing up Travyons past just seems like blaming the victim.
I'm talking about how he's glorified personally BECAUSE he's black!
Cops shoot people with no trial all the time! And when does the media ever make a big deal about that?
He wasn't glorified because he was black, he was glorified, as people have been glorified in the past, as an example of black people being persecuted even though things are supposed to be 'equal' in this world. The fact is some guy who wasn't even a cop shot a black kid even though he was told to leave him alone because he felt the black kid was dangerous. DESPITE the fact that Trayvon looked...like a regular kid. The only conclusion that can be made, is that Zimmerman felt that because Trayvon was black, that meant he was dangerous. And THAT is what pissed people off.
This isn't an instance of a cop shooting someone without trial,
it's an instance of some guy blatantly gunning down an innocent boy for thinking he's dangerous when the only difference between him and other kids was his skin color, and the fact that HE COULD GET AWAY WITH IT.
[color=#2e1a6b]Thank you Biglundi, your reply is a perfect example of how much the media has distorted this case. All the falsehoods you stated perfectly show how biased the media is.
You said that Trayvon "looked like a regular kid". Sorry, but those pictures the media showed were from when Trayvon was 12. Trayvon was not at all a kid; he was old enough to have THC traces.
you said that Zimmerman "was told to leave him alone" even though this never happened. The 911 operator only said "we don't need you to [follow him]".
Twice, you said that he shot him because he "felt" he was dangerous. I must admit, your ignorance is astounding. Zimmerman shot him because Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman, beating on him.
"HE COULD GET AWAY WITH IT"... huh? Zimmerman was detained and questioned for 5 hours, and after the police report confirmed innocence, they released him.
What Lishy was saying is that the media is Glorifying Trayvon because it will start a race war. Lishy then pointed out that the media doesn't glorify someone shot by cops because that will not start a race war, but discredit governmental security
[color=#2e1a6b]I've had only 8.5GB of just hentai: 4.7GB of Video, 1.3 GB of images, and 2.5GB of games and visual novels.
However, I decided to download Flaser's hentai collection so in...
*looks at utorrent
...6 days, 19 hours, I'll have an addition 138GBs of h-manga in my collection
SO MANY LEECHERS... my upload speed is about 3x faster than my download speed
However, I decided to download Flaser's hentai collection so in...
*looks at utorrent
...6 days, 19 hours, I'll have an addition 138GBs of h-manga in my collection
SO MANY LEECHERS... my upload speed is about 3x faster than my download speed
[color=#2e1a6b]So... I replied to biglundi's thread, which inspired biglundi to make another thread, which inspired you to make this thread...
I believe that a soul is just an embodiment of one's conscience. at death, the soul continues to exist, having the same conscience from when he was alive. In this state, the soul is basically a ghost. different religons have different explanations of what happens to the soul, but according to Christianity, they follow this complex chart
I believe that a soul is just an embodiment of one's conscience. at death, the soul continues to exist, having the same conscience from when he was alive. In this state, the soul is basically a ghost. different religons have different explanations of what happens to the soul, but according to Christianity, they follow this complex chart
dragonsheart967 wrote...
Spoiler:
It's amazing, right? To have your entire world rocked, to suddenly have your entire view on the world just warped, and it was all in the forums of an asian pornographic website.
[color=#2e1a6b]Any medium of intelligent discussion would have done the same. It just happens that the medium I found was a site for people to masturbate to hentai.
on a somewhat random note, I love to read poll results like this:
"among people who masturbate to hentai, 60% support [whatever the poll was]"
[color=#2e1a6b]I use chrome, and it inconsistently works. Usually, it'll work at first, then when I do some more edits, it will not work, saying something like "loading preview"
[color=#2e1a6b]Wasn't the last update a stability update?
Jacob wrote...
I just finished a pretty awesome upgrade to all of our backend code, this won't be very noticeable to you (the user) but it is awesome for me. It will make adding new content and new features significantly easier.
[color=#2e1a6b]I'm not sure what constitutes as a needed feature, but there are 2 small ones that I think would be very helpful:
I think a mark-as-read feature should be implemented. I think it could be implemented together with the plan-to-read feature. The main benefits of a mark as read feature would be:
- You could type "unread" along with other tags, and the search results will only display manga that you haven't read, and contains those tags.
- If you're trying to find a manga you've read before, you could type "read" in the searchbar, and you'd be able to easily find it
- It would help you remember what you've read and what you haven't, so that you don't start reading it and say "oh yeah, I've already read this"
The other feature that should be implemented is a method to sort the search results. Preferably something like this
^youtube
I think a mark-as-read feature should be implemented. I think it could be implemented together with the plan-to-read feature. The main benefits of a mark as read feature would be:
- You could type "unread" along with other tags, and the search results will only display manga that you haven't read, and contains those tags.
- If you're trying to find a manga you've read before, you could type "read" in the searchbar, and you'd be able to easily find it
- It would help you remember what you've read and what you haven't, so that you don't start reading it and say "oh yeah, I've already read this"
The other feature that should be implemented is a method to sort the search results. Preferably something like this
^youtube
[color=#2e1a6b]I'm kinda a hypocrite for doing this, but...
Don't reply to horrible threads just to make fun of how horrible they are
If you think a thread is useless, don't bump it by posting in it. That's what Random and Incoherent Babbling is for.
If you think a thread is useless, don't bump it by posting in it. That's what Random and Incoherent Babbling is for.
[color=#2e1a6b]I was born and raised in a Christian family, I've been going to church every Sunday (and sometimes Wednesdays) for my whole life, and I've always been educated in a christian environment. I was homeschooled up 'till 7th grade, then I went to a "independent study highschool" (a christian school) from 8th grade on. I was constantly surrounded by christian people and christian teachings, so I never faced any opposition, ever. I did a lot of critical thinking, but because all my education was christian-based, my critical thinking resulted in me believing that Christianity was true.
My first real opposition that I faced was here on FAKKU, mostly by biglundi. Before I debated with him, I had never had someone legitimately question my faith. My teachers have brought up half-ass attacks against Christianity and explained what's wrong those attacks, but that doesn't really count. I had a discussion with biglundi through PMs, in which biglundi posted a link that responded to what my teachers have said to be the best evidence for Christianity.
Ever since then, I've been extremely critical of Christianity, questioning my family, my Sunday school teacher, and my highschool teacher. I've learned that my Family and Sunday School teacher are very stupid, or at least incapable of making logical arguments. I used to think that anyone who disagreed with Christianity was just stupid and in denial of the truth, but after seeing how horrible some Christians debate, I'm much more understanding of non-Christians.
As of now, I'm still a Christian. I don't believe in it as strongly as I did a year ago, but I still believe it. obviously, I became a Christian because of my environment, but there are 3 main reasons why I've remained a Christian,
1. No other religion has convinced me that said religion is true. Among the theist religions, Christianity seems to have the most supporting evidence. I've never even considered a different theist religion. I'm unconvinced by atheists because I'm unconvinced of their explanation of how the universe came to be. I don't believe that the universe exploded into place, or that life can originate out of nothing.
2. It would be inconvenient for me to not be a Christian. Like I said, I'm surrounded by Christianity, and I wouldn't hear the end of it if I stopped being a Christian.
3. I want Christianity to be true. Christianity provides meaning to my life. It gives me hope of great joy to come. I don't want to think I'm a result of random mutations that lives 80 years and dies. I want to believe that I have a greater meaning
My first real opposition that I faced was here on FAKKU, mostly by biglundi. Before I debated with him, I had never had someone legitimately question my faith. My teachers have brought up half-ass attacks against Christianity and explained what's wrong those attacks, but that doesn't really count. I had a discussion with biglundi through PMs, in which biglundi posted a link that responded to what my teachers have said to be the best evidence for Christianity.
Ever since then, I've been extremely critical of Christianity, questioning my family, my Sunday school teacher, and my highschool teacher. I've learned that my Family and Sunday School teacher are very stupid, or at least incapable of making logical arguments. I used to think that anyone who disagreed with Christianity was just stupid and in denial of the truth, but after seeing how horrible some Christians debate, I'm much more understanding of non-Christians.
As of now, I'm still a Christian. I don't believe in it as strongly as I did a year ago, but I still believe it. obviously, I became a Christian because of my environment, but there are 3 main reasons why I've remained a Christian,
1. No other religion has convinced me that said religion is true. Among the theist religions, Christianity seems to have the most supporting evidence. I've never even considered a different theist religion. I'm unconvinced by atheists because I'm unconvinced of their explanation of how the universe came to be. I don't believe that the universe exploded into place, or that life can originate out of nothing.
2. It would be inconvenient for me to not be a Christian. Like I said, I'm surrounded by Christianity, and I wouldn't hear the end of it if I stopped being a Christian.
3. I want Christianity to be true. Christianity provides meaning to my life. It gives me hope of great joy to come. I don't want to think I'm a result of random mutations that lives 80 years and dies. I want to believe that I have a greater meaning
BigLundi wrote...
...[color=#2e1a6b]I don't think I did a good job of explaining (my fault), so I'll start over and try again
When a joke only makes sense if a certain fact (or facts) is true, and you laugh at the joke, you agree that that the joke makes sense, and thus agree that the certain fact (or facts) is true.
Because of this, you need to be careful of what facts are actually involved in the joke, since some people might disagree/disapprove/be offended with those facts.
These are facts that must be true in order for the rape joke to make sense
- "oh come on..." has 2 different meanings
- the attacker wants to cum on her
No one should be offended by these facts. But with one small change, it can offend people:
A woman is being chased by a Christian down an alleyway, only to find it's a dead end. She whines and says, "Oh come on..." to which the Christian grins and replies, "Where?"
obviously, this can now offend people, since people are offended by the fact that a christian wants to cum on her.
BigLundi wrote...
Lelouch24 wrote...
[color=#2e1a6b]Laughter is a means to gain acceptance of something. humor usually has hidden implications behind it. When we laugh at a joke, we accept the implication of it. People like Bill Maher use this tactic to get people to accept is views So, when you tell a joke that has an implication that people dislike/disapprove of, they shouldn't laugh at it. When they laugh at it, they deceive themselves into accepting something they dislike/disapprove of. I still think you have the right to tell the joke, but the listener can (and sometimes should) dislike it
Mmmmmno.
If I tel la rape joke, and you laugh at it, it's not you accepting Rape as being ok.
[color=#2e1a6b]That depends on the implication of the joke.
A woman is being chased by an attacker down an alleyway, only to find it's a dead end. She whines and says, "Oh come on..." to which the attacker grins and replies, "Where?"
[color=#2e1a6b]In this joke, the implications are:
- "oh come on..." has 2 different meanings
- the attacker wants to cum on her
This joke relies on a play on words. In such jokes, the implications are obvious and non-controversial. Anyone who laughs at this is accepting these implications as true. But since these implications are non-controversial, accepting them doesn't mean much. Now let's look at another joke:
What's the difference between speeding and raping? a cop will stop you from speeding
In this joke, the implications are:
- a cop will stop you from speeding
- a cop won't stop you from raping
These implications are still kinda obvious, but have controversial facts. Anyone who laughs at this joke is accepting the implications within it; In this case, the idea that a cop won't stop you from raping.
[color=#2e1a6b]Laughter is a means to gain acceptance of something. humor usually has hidden implications behind it. When we laugh at a joke, we accept the implication of it. People like Bill Maher use this tactic to get people to accept is views So, when you tell a joke that has an implication that people dislike/disapprove of, they shouldn't laugh at it. When they laugh at it, they deceive themselves into accepting something they dislike/disapprove of.
I still think you have the right to tell the joke, but the listener can (and sometimes should) dislike it
I still think you have the right to tell the joke, but the listener can (and sometimes should) dislike it
[color=#2e1a6b]Probably my overall favorite set is: vanilla, oppai, incest, oral
Other good combinations are:
Tsundere + schoolgirl,
yuri + futanari,
harem + mizugi,
group -forced
Edit: does anyone else not see the first post?
Other good combinations are:
Tsundere + schoolgirl,
yuri + futanari,
harem + mizugi,
group -forced
Edit: does anyone else not see the first post?
