oneshott Posts
Jonoe wrote...
echoeagle3 wrote...
swordmanXIII wrote...
echoeagle3 wrote...
it says Waar is online. But im freaking hungry and we are about to have christmas eve dinner. I'm going to miss it!FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!
endure endure it man
my parents won't let me skip dinner. they are big on the whole family being there. I am actually being called right now. SHIT! no one had better take my waifu!!!!
What's the name of the waifu you wish to claim?
hentairella wrote...
Waar is here but it's been 6 minutes ago since last activity.He's probably typing up the opening post and rules.
Ziggy wrote...
I don't really get what the reclaiming is. If you've played previously, you get first dibs on the girl you claimed?Yeah, you can carry over a waifu you claimed in the last game.
Just so everyone knows (in case they forgot) Waar forgot about the game when Game 6 started, and the opening round didn't start until many hours later. Troll or not, it was still funny to see a lot of reactions.
artcellrox wrote...
oneshott wrote...
artcellrox wrote...
HungLikeAZombie wrote...
lets hope his son is not as crazy...His son is a gamer. One who Il wanted to disown for being to addicted to the stuff, IIRC.
No, that's his eldest son Kim Jong-nam. He's pretty much been banished from NK since that incident in Disneyland, and has been living in China since then. Jong-Il had a second son, Kim Jong-chul, who's supposedly following Eric Clapton on tour...
Kim Jong-un is the least liberal of the three, and supposedly enlisted at the age of 16. He is hailed as a genius artillery commander (which is utter bullshit) but the YP-DO island shelling was supposedly his idea. Just to give you an idea of who he is.
I was literally dancing in celebration when I heard the news. I actually thought my co-workers were fucking with me when they told me he was dead.
So, what are you gonna do now? Are you allowed to leave?
It's too early to tell what the U.S. Military response is going to be, consider the size of our chain of command, it will likely be tomorrow when we know what's changed for us. ROK Military has been placed on emergency alert, and the police have been getting into high alert as well. It's not even been a full day, so the outcome is impossible to determine.
artcellrox wrote...
HungLikeAZombie wrote...
lets hope his son is not as crazy...His son is a gamer. One who Il wanted to disown for being to addicted to the stuff, IIRC.
No, that's his eldest son Kim Jong-nam. He's pretty much been banished from NK since that incident in Disneyland, and has been living in China since then. Jong-Il had a second son, Kim Jong-chul, who's supposedly following Eric Clapton on tour...
Kim Jong-un is the least liberal of the three, and supposedly enlisted at the age of 16. He is hailed as a genius artillery commander (which is utter bullshit) but the YP-DO island shelling was supposedly his idea. Just to give you an idea of who he is.
I was literally dancing in celebration when I heard the news. I actually thought my co-workers were fucking with me when they told me he was dead.
Anesthetize wrote...
I wonder if you could tell me when you became so deluded in ignoring that the US isn't all sunshine and ponies and are actually corrupt and act on self interests.
I am not deluded, and know damn well that we aren't made of rainbows and lolipops. I just don't focus on only the negative aspects of my country. I wonder if people are as quick to paint us black as they are to forget the good things we've done as well. Earthquake in Haiti? Tsunami recovery in Indonesia and India? What about that flood in Pakistan? Yeah, we are all heartless corrupt bastards huh?
Anesthetize wrote...
I'll give you evidence, Syria. Where's the media explosion or all the coverage over Syria? They're in exactly if not in a worse situation than Libya ever was, yet you don't see the amount of coverage on your televisions about it that Libya received. So what's the difference between Syria and Libya? Why did Libya get 24/7 coverage while Syria got largely ignored by prominent western media outlets? Oh that's right, Syria doesn't have oil while Libya does, what a coincidence.
I wonder if you could tell me exactly when you became an expert on U.S. foreign policy? As for Syria, it's my understanding that the rest of the Arabic world is attempting to handle it on it's own.
Jaston wrote...
Yeah, that is sad, but true. We only support or criticize any country that has oil...I guess that means since Gaddafi is gone, we'll be in Libya for a good amount of time and try to install a "democracy"?And by "we" I mean the US. I don't mean to categorize anyone who is from the UK or any other country that visits this site.
I still find it impressive people are this selective about their memory on things. Yeah, there's oil in Libya, and yes the U.S. would love to get as much of it as we can. The world runs on oil, and it's quickly becoming a hot commodity.
On the other hand, look at what Gaddafi was doing to his people, and what he promised to do to the rebels once he caught them. It was going to be the next Rwandan genocide, but without the buffer of 'ethnic cleansing'. It was going to be a straight up bloodbath, and the world was going to watch it happen...again
For weeks on end, guess who pushed and pushed the U.N. and more specifically, the United States? That's right, the rest of the fucking world. We pushed back, because our press was already bad enough what with Iraq and told everyone else that if they wanted us in, they needed to help out. And then what happened? As soon as we go in people cry foul after about a month and say we're only in this for the oil. What, we can't have our cake and eat it too? We went in there and we helped those people, we didn't even send troops on the ground and still you demonize us for it?
Well world, we aren't too fond of you either, particularly when you pull crap like that on us. We can help people while advancing our own goals at the same time you know. We aren't the satan worshiping selfish pricks you make us out to be.
Firstbornnyc wrote...
crazymissotaku wrote...
artcellrox wrote...
First things first: are you so sex-crazy that you're willing to fuck anyone?No, just my husband.
then your not a nympho, nymphos dont care who they get it from.
Bullshit; sluts don't care who they get it from, nymphos are a good step below that. All OP wants is her husbands dick, not whoever has a boner at the time. There is a big difference between the two.
Drifter995 wrote...
Just try to keep your hands busy with say, building models.. or cleaning the house.. do something to take your mind off it. As artcellrox said.Hold out for the sex, be patient. After all, the longer you wait, the better the gasm will be, right? (assumption made by a man here)
I would say try to talk him into getting more frisky more often as opposed to keeping yourself busy, since being horny wears on your mind constantly. I don't know how it goes for women when they get in the mood, but when I get a hard on it's very difficult to concentrate on other things, especially when it refuses to go away for periods of time. It also makes it difficult to walk around, women can be so lucky sometimes.
If he can't be coerced (which I would think is surprising, but not strange) then I'd say find a good masturbation tool to tide you over between the times the two of you get your freak on.
I could see myself listening to a "This Week in Hentai" commentary. Who would actually make/record the podcast though? Whoever can do it for that week, or have a crew dedicated to doing the voicing/hosting/what have you?
Aud1o Blood wrote...
I prefer my "cynical asshole" pennant, to adorn the points I make.Righteous or otherwise, drones are used to instill fear in the government's enemies.
You can deny whatever you want, but when nobody is around to watch, Geneva goes out the window.
The only enemy I'm aware of are the kind of people who blow up women and children instead of attacking soldiers directly, and if you don't think that's an enemy worth scaring then you are the definition of apathetic.
You too are of course free to claim that the second someone isn't watching the US, we start breaking every rule in the book, but that doesn't make it true. I doubt you fully understand or appreciate the demanding standards that we hold ourselves to during operations, but I am not blind to the opposite side of the coin.
Wow my name is really lon wrote...
What I was trying to ask was if there ever a mission you were involved in where an attack on a possible high valued target also caused civilian casualties or injuries unintentionally. I've heard many stories of civilians and kids getting hurt and/or killed by drone attacks in the past year. I would be a liar if I tried to deny that civilians have been hurt/killed during operations. An unfortunate truth is that accidents can and will happen; even with all our checks, double checks, and then starting it all over again to be sure. To answer the question, I have never been given an order, nor independently made the decision to fire on what turned out to actually be innocents. Our standards of operations give us good guidance on how to tell good people from bad people.
I am also familiar with what I think Aud1o is talking about with regards to violations of Geneva. There are always going to be good eggs and not so good eggs in any country. Sometimes these not so good eggs turn into real fucking bad eggs and think that just because they can take someone's life means that they are entitled to it.
Those men are most definitely not entitled, and I think it unfortunate that the world sees the actions of a few dishonorable men and use them as a basis to judge our entire country on.
Aud1o Blood wrote...
The Prince does what the fuck he wants. The military industrial complex debates, re-defines, and covers up the official definition of "civilian." (The language of operation is now "non-combatant")Drones are "cheap," effective, and unlabeled. They have become the weapon of choice for non-covert----covert operations. They're even good propaganda.
A new face, for a new era of supposed superpower.
(And, don't wave your affiliation around like that. Makes you look like a sockpuppet douche.)
And when you wave your "I think I know how the world works" flag and assume it means you're politically savvy makes you look like you're some kind of self righteous cock sucker.