PumpJack McGee Posts

deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
Well I thought I'd just drop this info.

smite on xbox one

Personally I will try it, and I got feeling my GT is going to be talked about during some games.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
I know exactly what your looking for. I'll see if I can dig it up in the next day or two.

More info about the story by the way. The MC's wife and main girl are actually sisters. And the story is very long, takes a lot of chapters.

Edit:

Found it. It's called Bara Seiyoukan

here's the ex links if you know how to use it.

chapters 1 to 5

chapters 6-8

chapters 9 to end
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
pokemon puzzle league
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
So what I've learned from this

Spoiler:
Don't trust anybody. Even Pretty Girls with puppy dogs.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
"Waits patiently for Tegumi to respond to thread"
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
Reminds me of Cool na Asobi
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
Well damn.

Spoiler:
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
wow spam bots really love this topic
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
Going Otome, it's so full of emotions. And flying dicks.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
Canada is freaken awesome.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
Shirogane No Ishi: Argevollen's OP is surprisingly good, and catchy.

Spoiler:
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
This game has seriously got me considering buying a Japanese Version Online, if it doesn't get localized.

Good thing Vita's aren't region locked
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
is there a Yandere?
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
is there a Yandere?
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
I claim Emilia Justina from Hataraku Maō-sama

Woot got my main 3.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
So Gundams vs Dragons, with no love story?

I'll give it a shot. And there better be Dragon on Girl Hentai made of this later.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
This episode makes me wonder what Naru would look like in 10 years. Not that Loli's should ever grow up.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
deadsx wrote...
The RCMP tasered an unarmed man 20 times to death. Sometimes you just shake your head at the overkill.

A Guns job is not made to deter violence. A gun is a weapon. Definition of a weapon from the oxford dictionary. "A thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage".

So it's job is to inflict physical damage. Maybe my use of kill was a bit strong, but it's along the same lines. The part where it deter's violence is a..... I can't find the right words here, but something like a secondary effect.


Coconutt wrote...
Ok, so what? I ask you again: What is your point? What does this prove that fire arms are build to cause physical damage?


You know reading back on the discussion, I think I misunderstood your Knife analogy as saying that a Gun can be used for more than doing physical harm. So I was just restating facts that where settled. I apologize for this unnecessary part of the talk. Doing this at like 1am, easier to misread things.


deadsx wrote...
Yeah I think you both horribly misunderstood me here.

I'm not saying if we go poof weapons are gone, all problems are solved.

What I'm saying is the only way weapons could theoretically not exist in this theoretical world is if, no bad guys exists, no need for violence existed, we all just got along. If we didn't care about what religion people are, if skin colour didn't matter and etc.


Coconutt wrote...
What about all the weapons we use for hunting animals, for sports and for fun?
What about the weapons that are used in Olympic games for example?
What about the times we use weapons for entertainment and enjoyment, like shooting beer cans for example?

A rifle that you use to hunt moose is way more deadlier than a 9mm pistol that police have for example.


And again i'm not talking about poof and it's gone. But a civilization built from the ground up. There probably wouldn't be an olympics, and I'm not going to get into to deep here, as it's starting to get into much to detail.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
deadsx wrote...
But a gun has only one job, it's to kill, or at least cause serious damage to the target.


Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Guns exist to deter violence against the wielder as well. Whether the weapon kills depends on the conscious or panicked decisions of the wielder. Police often shoot a suspect in the leg, unless they are reckless mavericks who think a man with an IKEA knife needs 22 rounds in their chest.



The RCMP tasered an unarmed man 20 times to death. Sometimes you just shake your head at the overkill.

A Guns job is not made to deter violence. A gun is a weapon. Definition of a weapon from the oxford dictionary. "A thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage".

So it's job is to inflict physical damage. Maybe my use of kill was a bit strong, but it's along the same lines. The part where it deter's violence is a..... I can't find the right words here, but something like a secondary effect.

deadsx wrote...
In a theoretical world with no weapons, there wouldn't be any bad guys as there is no bad guys for weapons to be needed. Everybody is friendly and shit, but that's a unattainable utopia.


Spoiler:
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
So, you're implying by banning firearms, then deranged, angry and otherwise disturbed individuals would vanish into thin air? No, that is nonsense, mentally unstable, anger-prone, psychotic, etc people will still exist. The Akihabara massacre alone nullifies this childish daydream. In Japan, handguns are absolutely forbidden. Small-caliber rifles have been illegal to buy, sell, or transfer since 1971. Anyone who owned a rifle before then is allowed to keep it, but their heirs are required to turn it over to the police once the owner dies.

Japanese Gun Control Study

To get a gun in Japan, first, you have to attend an all-day class and pass a written test, which are held only once per month. You also must take and pass a shooting range class. Then, head over to a hospital for a mental test and drug test (Japan is unusual in that potential gun owners must affirmatively prove their mental fitness), which you'll file with the police. Finally, pass a rigorous background check for any criminal record or association with criminal or extremist groups, and you will be the proud new owner of your shotgun or air rifle. Just don't forget to provide police with documentation on the specific location of the gun in your home, as well as the ammo, both of which must be locked and stored separately. And remember to have the police inspect the gun once per year and to re-take the class and exam every three years.

So, if banning weapons would be a panacea for our societies ills, then how do you explain Tomohiro Katō the man responsible for the Akihabara massacre or the a stabbing spree in Tsuchiura?


Yeah I think you both horribly misunderstood me here.

I'm not saying if we go poof weapons are gone, all problems are solved.

What I'm saying is the only way weapons could theoretically not exist in this theoretical world is if, no bad guys exists, no need for violence existed, we all just got along. If we didn't care about what religion people are, if skin colour didn't matter and etc.
deadsx Lvl 99
11 years ago
deadsx wrote...
It's designed to kill the target. You may use it in self defense, but a gun is designed to kill.


Coconutt wrote...
It is a human decision to either use lethal force on purpose or not. Yes, gun is a tool that has the capabilities to kill another human being. So does a knife even though it was designed to cut your vegetables.


But can a gun cut vegetables? I agree it's up to the person using the gun, on whether to point the gun and pull the trigger at the person, or fire into the air. But a gun has only one job, it's to kill, or at least cause serious damage to the target.

deadsx wrote...
If theoretically there was no weapons, people would not have to worry about a bad guy with a weapon.


Coconutt wrote...
We would still have to worry about the bad guys.


In a theoretical world with no weapons, there wouldn't be any bad guys as there is no bad guys for weapons to be needed. Everybody is friendly and shit, but that's a unattainable utopia.
21222324252627