Rbz Posts

That mgs music video was fucking baller. (Sins of the father is the new snake eater)


World of tanks: 50 seconds of nothing but what might as well be the same tank ejaculating its heavy load with the force of a thousand suns. It's always amusing to see the porn the more niche audiences watch. This one was gang rape.

Some kiddie shit.

Dark souls 2: Oh god, mah dick.

Ryse: Ye olde call of duty, featuring the scripted shit and QTEs we know and love, but with more face-to-face, sweaty, man on man action. (Bioware involvement confirmed.)


Killer Instinct: What the fuck kind of reveal was that? Too low a budget for the cinematic shit the other games got?

Sunset overdrive:


The marketing assholes writing this shit aren't even trying.

Forza: On-stage car porn. Oh god, someone think of the childrens! This is pretty much dragon's dogma vroom vroom edition.

MINECRAFT ON XBOX111!!ONE! Yawn.

QB: Game based on a tv show. Clearly a goty in the making. Step up your game, micro-softie.

D4:


More smart grass technology.



All this technological advancement is happening too fast for me.

Crimson Dragon: it is our goal to bring you innovation and a quality gaming experience, so as part of the next advancement in gaming, we bring you *dramatic pause* no sound. Only on xbox one.

Deadrising 3: more zombies and shit, with a mechanic reminiscent of Mercenaries.

Witcher 3: hide your women; the beardman cometh.

Battlefield 4: technical difficulties edition. We don't have doggies, but we've got more wub wub. Pls dont buy cowadoody.

Xbone exclusive claimed to be showing in game graphics. Bullshit.

Holy shit, master chief found the next gen legendary pokemon.

$500. Taken exclusively by Xbox one.

Titanfall: I thought black ops 2 was the futuristic cod (and you even get splashed with digital jelly when shot). Hard to be impressed by robo midgets after seeing Hawken. Then again, I'm more of an armored core motherfucker.

Conference rating: JediMindTrick/10

You will forget xbox one's shit, anti-consumer policies. You will bend over and let us xbone you in november.

I'll do a hit job on sony's conference in my next post. I'm sure there'll be some bullshit.

---

EA conference in a nutshell:
>NEXT GENURAYSHUN!
>Playing demos on a pc

Get fucked, EA. Deepen your knowledge of true ball handling.

The correct answer is B. I never make gifs.

So far so good: PS4 Has 48 Announced Games So Far With Tons Of Third-Party Launch Titles.

I don't know how much longer this will be available, but you could actually watch the game being played here. Go to the user's profile for the rest. Naturally, expect spoilers.

The gameplay looks brutal and visceral like in the demo, but the animation transitions are still horrible. At 60:42 you can clearly see the fucker sliding to punch the player. For some stupid reason Naughty Dog adopted cowadoody's screen jelly.

Having watched the first video, I can't help but agree with the guy I quoted. The AI is outrageously retarded, and it's more noticeable when it comes to your companions. At 69:10, the chick runs behind a bunch of containers for cover, then GTFOs back to the player. After the player goes behind the exact same containers, you could see a guy standing there, looking right at you, in the midst of taking a mental dump. In Naughty Dog's attempts to keep companions from being a burden, they've created figments of the protagonist's imagination. ND also promised that gunshots would have more impact, but all I'm seeing is uncharted all over again. There's no health regen. My god, the impact is so great that health doesn't come back! How will this generation's gamers cope? The game does, however, get a lot more interesting when the fungal brigade gets involved.

Considering what I've seen, all the perfect scores now seem even more ludicrous.

So? Would you prefer I be more credulous and uncritical?

Indeed, not only will this game that I haven't played be a 10/10 goty epic win (I mean, my expectations should be 11/10 considering how much jizz professional, trustworthy reviewers lost playing it; all aboard the hype train, toot toot), but its multiplayer will be borderline revolutionary and not your typical "bang bang, he dead, me win" tps because Naughty Dog's marketing said so. Of course, contrary evidence is too cynical, so we should assume that a publisher's demands that a game have mass appeal will have no impact on the gameplay, which will no doubt have depth and complexity, with respect for player agency and minimal hand holding.

Naivete can only save one from disappointment for so long.

Also, the negrep was completely accidental. I'll restore it tomorrow.

It's Official: Xbox One Game Rentals Not Possible, Fees Nixed, 24 Hour Check-In Confirmed. That title isn't entirely accurate. William Usher is very passionate and sometimes he goes overboard with the shit he says. Game rentals are not "impossible." This is not officially confirmed. However, the rest of the dickery is accurate (he uses xbox.com as a source):



No fee (see next two quotes), but you can only sell to "participating" retailers. Gamestop will be all over this shit. Your local small business game store is pretty much fucked and will focus on distributing any other console's games.



This implies that you will be charged unless you follow the strict requirements.



Microsoft will be the middleman for the publishers who will decide how big the dick they fuck you with will be.



For the best unparalleled premium quality optimal positive experience, tell your master you've been good every 24 hours and in his infinite generosity he will allow you access to the games you've paid for.

The only times that matter. All Nintendo has to do is remind people that they're not microsoft and present games worth playing on the wii u.



Microsoft Cancels Xbox One Executive Interviews At E3. Keep crying bitch nigga.

My problems with it are related to the "broader appeal" shit. I'm not questioning a dev's right to add multiplayer. I go out of my way not to mention this because I assume that it's implicitly understood and I consider it condescending to make explicitly known, but I'll say it to make it absolutely clear: in my opinion, a game which ostensibly focuses on a rich single player experience doesn't add anything of value with multiplayer (there are always some exceptions). For a game like CoD, I think the SP is unnecessary/pointless because the main draw is the MP and the SP is low quality.




HA!



You'd think that if you've only watched the trailer for it and weren't cynical enough to realize it was typical marketing bullshit.



Looks like a standard TPS using The Last of Us' gameplay mechanics. But don't mind me, I'm just some cynic.

Also, to clarify my issue with giving games a 10/10, to me a perfect score means a game is one of the best games ever made. Not a goty, not a "must buy this generation," but the best of the best of the best. I'm very skeptical of such scores for modern games, especially for a AAA title that adds an unnecessary multiplayer mode to an otherwise single player experience. This is also considering the trend for big budget games to strive for broad market appeal, which means dumbed-down gameplay mechanics to make the game more casual friendly.

Back in the day, games like Deus Ex, Fallout 2, Planescape: Torment, and System Shock 2 didn't give a shit about casuals and the devs focused on creating a quality experience for a niche audience with barely any hand holding. Nowadays the budgets are bigger and the publishers are too paranoid about investing in a niche title, so the devs have to try to create a quality experience that attempts to please a wider demographic. If a 10/10 game comes out any time soon, it'll likely be from a kickstarter dev or some indie.

It's more complicated and subtle than that.

In other words, no one who wants to hear a genuine opinion about this game would give a shit what any of these reviewers have to say.

>pretending to be a trustworthy reviewer
>giving a game a 10/10

Gamespot barely ever gives a score lower than 5, which implies that they believe most games to be above average.

edit: so far 26 reviewers have given the game a perfect score. Even if all of them were honest opinions I wouldn't believe the game was that good. All that's missing right now as far as I'm concerned is my experience with the thing. I'll add my own little review to the thread as I typically do a few days after release.

SKIP TO 3:37



I would also suggest watching part two, which is in an annotation.

I'm actually surprised ND pulled it off. This demo allayed my fears that the game would be a casualized shitfest. My main complaint is the existence of the ever pervasive "cheat vision." However, it's a nice way to make casualizing the game optional, meaning less dumbing-down elsewhere. It also seems like quite a lot of effort was put into making this game immersive and feel authentic. The characters interact with their environment, the sound design is superb, the infectecunts are genuinely off-putting, the lead characters are interesting, and their conversations with one another make them seem more human. I also noticed that ND has significantly improved their multi-character animation triggering. In Uncharted 3 (which was not well polished), if you engaged in melee combat Drake would teleport from the end of one animation to the starting position of the next. Now the transitions are more fluid and inconspicuous, preserving immersion.

Honestly, if there aren't any major fuck ups and the story, characters, and gameplay remain great throughout most of the game, then I'll likely consider this my new GOTY. Bioshock Infinite cannot win on great story and art direction alone with competition like this.

Watched the first minute then skipped around to the end. Turn the game volume down. If your voices and game volume are inseparable during editing, then you're just going to have to figure that shit out like I was supposed to after uploading Borderlands 2 gameplay where I essentially show off how master race the PC is. Apparently some people use Audacity, but I'm constantly paranoid about syncing the audio with the video.

I believe Let's Plays are a new kind of topic for this section. You're not really advertising products or a service, so if you keep all the videos in this thread there shouldn't be much of a problem. If people give a shit, the thread's development will come naturally.

The only foreseeable problem I can think of is playing a game that already has its own thread.

Proposed advertisements for sony (I didn't make them, except for the last one):



Also: /watch?v=L0HgsIf-ps4

I'm saying the 360 will function as a sort of counterweight.



Sure, but it's not the same as a net operating loss, which is what would really harm microsoft in the profit department. Also, consider their Online Services Division's 8 billion operating loss. Bad, but not something to go apeshit about considering the consolidated results. I doubt the xbone will harm them to the extent you think it might.



An unlikely apocalyptic outcome, but microsoft hasn't revealed their hand yet. Microsoft is still in damage control mode internally. Now, like magic, the used game fee is no more, but the constant check-ins are still there. At the very least, micro-softie is shutting the fuck up about it.



If they were to charge a fee, that statement could still be claimed as accurate.



Unless Microsoft actually will charge for used games, in which case publishers would be incentivized to make games for the platform since they'll be getting a return on resales.

Hardly. The 360 is the main focus of that particular division. Microsoft is not going to go 101% retard and abandon it.



In 2012, the EDD accounted for about 13% of Microsoft's consolidated revenues, and it has been earning more each year.

This is not to say that it's very profitable, relatively speaking, since their operating income (revenues - cost of doing business) from that division is only 365 mil.

The xbone release will simply split microsoft's attention. How consumer's will react is still an open question, but a siphoning from the 360's profits is what I expect, considering that casuals will likely get the thing. It'll be hilarious if the 360 gets more popular after release. At least they'd finally be marketing for themselves instead of nintendo and sony.



It wouldn't. Their windows and microsoft business divisions are more profitable.



Not much yet, but the fuckers are looking.

That reasoning would work for an individual, but not for a money-grubbing profit maximizing entity beholden to its shareholders. If it significantly affects profitability, they'll create skid marks and reenact the obama campaign, boasting change. That's what I'd like to see. However, what is more likely is that they'll find cleverer ways to sugar coat their product's features while clinging on to wallet raping technology until it becomes too costly to maintain the policies they use. They won't admit they fucked up, they'll just tout new "benefits," or whatever tripe their chief marketing cocksucker can think up.

They could also claim that they changed their policies to better serve the consumer, wording it in such a way that it seems like they've always given a shit about them.

Not really. Fakku's just forcing itself into the url, the rapist.

The newsroom has been active since a report attached to a brick has been flung through our window.

Amazon UK Wii U sales destroy the roof as Microsoft ejaculates greed all over Britfucks.


I heard another window break. In other news, Troll in Britland (if you get a 404, remove fakku . net from the address) owns domains of xboxone for .com and .net. Microsoft registered every imaginary name except for the real one. They filed a complaint; what whiny cunts.

That is all.

Edit: No it's not. Another brick said hello.

Mandatory kinectivity confirmed. The eye won't let you have too many viewers of that content, dave.


This is the future of drm.