sifian_ Posts
Well, men are definitely more resistant to the idea of sharing a spouse than women.
Women are coded to seek out the most superior DNA from a partner, whereas men are coded to seek out the most partners. But there are ideas of companionship and family that can extend beyond these baseline feelings.
Imagine a society has polygamy rampant enough that there is a discernable lack of available women. I think that there would be a lot of couples willing to take on a younger brother type husband- especially if there is already a child or two produced by the couple. I think there would be a lot of guys who lost their first love to a guy who already had wives and would feel sympathetic to a close unmarried friend. I doubt would be enough to offset the imbalance entirely- but I doubt it would be uncommon either. This also assumes somehow this society evolves without some moral prohibition against it.
That scenerio aside if group marriages were somehow permissible, I suspect the necessity for 1 to 1 gender pairing would be substantially lessened. If two women are sharing 3 guys, the three guys are a lot more likely to permit a fourth guy- much moreso than one guy allowing a second husband to his one wife.
Women are coded to seek out the most superior DNA from a partner, whereas men are coded to seek out the most partners. But there are ideas of companionship and family that can extend beyond these baseline feelings.
Imagine a society has polygamy rampant enough that there is a discernable lack of available women. I think that there would be a lot of couples willing to take on a younger brother type husband- especially if there is already a child or two produced by the couple. I think there would be a lot of guys who lost their first love to a guy who already had wives and would feel sympathetic to a close unmarried friend. I doubt would be enough to offset the imbalance entirely- but I doubt it would be uncommon either. This also assumes somehow this society evolves without some moral prohibition against it.
That scenerio aside if group marriages were somehow permissible, I suspect the necessity for 1 to 1 gender pairing would be substantially lessened. If two women are sharing 3 guys, the three guys are a lot more likely to permit a fourth guy- much moreso than one guy allowing a second husband to his one wife.
"Sora no Iro, Mizu no Iro" is definitely a contender for the non-glossy category. (although once again, why the hell did they make the dude such a toolbag?)
Most of the rest of the stuff listed has animation that's a little on the crude side. Not to say they're anything wrong with them, just anything made before 2004 or so automatically looks dated. Compare "Bible Black" or "Discipline" against "Cleavage" and you should see the difference I'm talking about.
Of course then again, visuals is an ambiguous term, so artistic direction can count for a lot.
I'll add "Wet Summer Days" and "Futari Ecchi" to the list of hentai that's especially well animated. Neither is the most fapworthy, but the animation is superb and they're the kind of things that are watchable without any H-Scenes.
Most of the rest of the stuff listed has animation that's a little on the crude side. Not to say they're anything wrong with them, just anything made before 2004 or so automatically looks dated. Compare "Bible Black" or "Discipline" against "Cleavage" and you should see the difference I'm talking about.
Of course then again, visuals is an ambiguous term, so artistic direction can count for a lot.
I'll add "Wet Summer Days" and "Futari Ecchi" to the list of hentai that's especially well animated. Neither is the most fapworthy, but the animation is superb and they're the kind of things that are watchable without any H-Scenes.
I doubt you'll have a whole lot of contest on that one... except maybe those opposed to glossy skin.
Front Innocent / Another Lady Innocent is one of the best animated 25 min I've seen from any genre.
Front Innocent / Another Lady Innocent is one of the best animated 25 min I've seen from any genre.
gibbous wrote...
If human DNA had fewer flaws, then there is no reason why incest should be illegal.
Holy fuck. Nice job on opening a can of worms. So the state is supposed to control breeding based on genetic quality?
Umm... that's not at all what I said. All I'm saying is that incestuous relationships have a disproportionate chance of producing unhealthy offspring, and that it is immoral to subject one's children to that if avoidable. It's the same reason why human cloning is immoral, because science hasn't found a way to produce cloned offspring as healthy as the genetic donors. (for the record, the sanctity of the human soul argument with regards to cloning is total bullshit)
I suppose that we're fast approaching scenerios like that described in Gattaca where the state actually could approve/disapprove genetic couplings based off of a list of known genetic disorders, but that'd still have the negative reprocussion of whittling away genetic diversity.
razama wrote...
But it wont cause no guy is going to let his wife fuck another dude. Just the nature of the beast.That's definitely a real bias, but it's by no means absolute. There was an episode of Penn & Teller Bullshit that discussed marriage- they did a focus on one particular married couple both partners had lovers on the side and they were totally cool with it.
I think there are a lot of guys who would be willing to share a woman if they are convinced that the new guy will be kind and loving to her, and that the new guy will not terribly diminish access to the wife. Most guys are inherantly jealous, so it's a tall order, but not inconceivable.
I also saw a documentary about an interesting tribe in south america...
from wikipedia:
The marriage rituals of the Zo'e are complex and not fully understood. It is not known how many wives or husbands one is allowed to have. Usually one woman has several husbands, one or more of whom may be "learning husbands"; young men learning how to be good spouses, in exchange for hunting for the rest of the family.
Sweet Cream by Inuboshi has a loli-yuri oneshot in one of the traslated chapters.
You can get it here.
http://pant.su/index.php/2009/07/inuboshi-sweet-cream/
You can get it here.
http://pant.su/index.php/2009/07/inuboshi-sweet-cream/
I thought the concept of MILF was a focus on older women who are still hot in spite of their age- the mother thing was mostly just means of establishing age, moreso than the fact that she's squeeze someone out of her vagina. Women who look like they're in college don't qualify as MILFs in my book regardless of their actual maternal status.
Then again, it's hard to find anime women who are drawn to look "mature", but not "old". But I did find one... :)

Then again, it's hard to find anime women who are drawn to look "mature", but not "old". But I did find one... :)

ShaggyJebus wrote...
Series could talk breaks instead of producing fillers, but that would be very hard to do. I don't know a lot about Japanese TV, but I assume it's similar to American TV in that a show can't just stop airing in the middle of January and start up again in the middle of July.
Lol... have you never watched american television? That's almost exactly what happens. A new season starts in sep-oct and goes for 6-8 episodes, then takes a break. It comes back jan-feb doing the same again, then does the last few episodes starting april-may. All told, it takes nearly nine months to show 20-22 episodes and there are almost no new episodes during the summer months... that's the time for new series and tv movies.
There is no reason whatsoever why an anime series based off weekly comics couldn't just alternate seasons. For example Bleach and Naruto could share the same timeslot, one getting Jan-March and July-Sep, the other getting April-Jun and Oct-Dec. The only reason this doesn't happen is people people are willing to watch crap and it still makes money.
As for the original question, filler isn't entirely bad, but it's usually pointless. Bones has done a really good job with filler in their manga conversions, so I don't mind that at all if for example a hero stops in 5 towns on his journey rather than one two. I'd really prefer to watch two 26 episode series than 51 episodes of a single series, and I really doubt that the manpower required to do the former is much greater than the latter.
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
"Same-sex marriage would start us down a "slippery slope" towards legalized incest, bestial marriage, polygamy and all kinds of other horrible consequences". A classic example of the reductio ad absurdum fallacy. A classic scare tactic - making the end scenario so scary and so horrible that the first step should never be taken. Such are the tactics of the fear and hatemongers. A form of gay marriage has been legal in Scandinavian countries for years. Why haven't they "slid" yet?
My apologies for not reading the whole thread, but I wanted to comment because I find this argument amusing and disturbing.
Legaliszed Incest: The only reason this should be a law is because of the need for genetic redundancy. If human DNA had fewer flaws, then there is no reason why incest should be illegal. Since gay couples do not exchange DNA, it's not a valid argument.
Beastial Marriage: If animals ever receive the full rights and privaleges of legal adult citizens, then marriage is the least of my worries.
Polygamy: Should not be illegal. I don't think I've ever heard a good reason for why this is illegal, except that most people can barely handle the responsibilities of one spouse, much less multiples. However, just because something is hard doesn't mean it should be illegal. One of the most intriguing concepts of marriage I heard was described in Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" where people were kind of paired off, but only loosely, and there were general relationships happening. The entire family also had shared monetary responsibility. Of course, that thing would never be legal because it'd be impossible to institute inheritance tax because everyone would always have a younger spouse.
Smegma wrote...
You think that if loli were banned, there would be an increase in CP and molestation? That's stupid!
"Damn, loli's illegal now. Wouldn't wanna break the law. Better go find a real kid to have sex with." Anyone horny enough to even think about molesting a child or taking naughty pictures of them won't stop fapping to loli just because it's not allowed anymore. Loli would STILL be on the internet and loli would STILL be much safer than the real thing. I can't see a ban on loli increasing either of these. Its effects can only be positive.
Obvious troll is obvious, and I should just ignore this, but I find it amusing how you're so blatantly contradictory. Based on your overall candor and commentary, you think that loli should be made to be equally illegal to real CP. If your utopian society is created, then loli is no longer a safer option than CP, therefore why wouldn't the real pedos start looking for the real thing?
randummonkey wrote...
Kanon 2006 -Why did they have to pick AyuSpoiler:
As for stuff I seriously want to see more of (that isn't already confirmed for additional season)...
Sekirei
Kamen no Maid Guy
Koihime Musou
Sumomomo Momomo
Berserk
Tsurayu wrote...
I think there was actually too much comedy.
I can see how people would view it as such, but for me, the comedy was more a question of showing that these people were first and foremost good friends before they were romantic partners.
And as for the "touching" aspect (I should have said it earlier), whenever I'm feeling down, Toradora is my definitive "go to" to cheer me up. If that's not the epitome of touching, than I can't think of what would be. I had to watch a lot of Toradora after watching School Days.
Kanon: Nayuki
Clannad: Can I pick Akio? He's not part of the harem, but he's one of the best anime character's ever.
Ai Yori Aoshi: Chika (I've only read manga)
To Love-ru: Lala
Clannad: Can I pick Akio? He's not part of the harem, but he's one of the best anime character's ever.
Ai Yori Aoshi: Chika (I've only read manga)
To Love-ru: Lala
While I'm not going to argue against Clannad, I really have to wonder why has no one mentioned Toradora? Sure Clannad will make you cry, but nothing managed to instill me with warm fuzzy feelings as much as Toradora.
Any Mom/Son wincest story will be MILFy.
IF you want a video, check out "Consensual Adultery" (no I will not tell you were to find it- read up on torrents if you don't know)
IF you want a video, check out "Consensual Adultery" (no I will not tell you were to find it- read up on torrents if you don't know)
Well, I recommend you can check out my "Hentai with plot" post in the general hentai discussion thread.
Beyond that, I suggest:
To-love-ru (overly silly harem anime)
Umi no Misaki (very cute harem romance with clever premise- has phenominal artwork)
Yomeiro Choice (from this I learned that "clam meat" is japanese for "roast beef")
Sekirei - It's like Pokemon, but with big breasted women instead of monsters.
Lol, I didn't realize just how much harem manga I read before listing it off like this.
Beyond that, I suggest:
To-love-ru (overly silly harem anime)
Umi no Misaki (very cute harem romance with clever premise- has phenominal artwork)
Yomeiro Choice (from this I learned that "clam meat" is japanese for "roast beef")
Sekirei - It's like Pokemon, but with big breasted women instead of monsters.
Lol, I didn't realize just how much harem manga I read before listing it off like this.
About 22gigs at this point. I do end up deleting like 3/4 of what I download though.
My hentai Folder is arrange like so
Hentai
>Videos
>General
>Doujins (specific for anime/vg stuff)
>Loli
>Futa
>Misc (stuff that's a little too fetish for general, but I don't have enough for its own category)
>Stills (for color cg artwork)
My hentai Folder is arrange like so
Hentai
>Videos
>General
>Doujins (specific for anime/vg stuff)
>Loli
>Futa
>Misc (stuff that's a little too fetish for general, but I don't have enough for its own category)
>Stills (for color cg artwork)
I'd definitely go for girls in command. Nothing quite as awesome as being told to take out the dick so she can suck on it. Also probably my oldest fantasy is the "naughty cop" scenerio.
lazyasschillypepper wrote...
I can't count the number of identical threads like this on fakku..lol.I would just ignore it, but I'm new here so I'm posting for extra exposure.
No, I like hentai because I think it is an artform and porn (meaning real people) is discusting to me and that sex should not be portraied that way.
Drawn pornography is still pornography. Erotic stories are also pornography, but generally don't get classified as such. The etymology of the term is it's greek for "writing about prostitutes" so hentai is arguably truer to the original meaning than live action.
Also I find it a little funny to argue over how sex should be portrayed when discussing hentai. If I had to pick a completely random live action porno or a random hentai to watch, I'd go with the live action. I sure as hell prefer hentai, but if I'm rolling dice, I'd go with the option less likely to give me rape.
AzulE05 wrote...
They're not used to seeing a bold "P" being slid in a "V" on they're first time/months of watching "H"stuff.What you're referring to is softcore porn, not censored porn.
And in case you're unaware, censorship is a Japanese cultural issue full of strange contradictions. Also contrary to popular belief, has been going on since the early 20th century and is not the product of evil american imperialism post WW2.