Takerial Posts

Fuuuuuu, it's a weeatard.

Is the op really going out of their way to type gay like some sort of gay attention whore?

Lawl at the newfag that cares about rep.

My first luv luv was Aoi-chan! Her short blue hair inside her traditional kimono was just darling. Her devotion to those she loved was her more attractive feature.

Sadly it was not a love to be had as she was completely devoted to her childhood fiance.

By law they can't do so and still be shown on regular television.

Sounds like you're gay.

You cannot be this dumb, you seriously cannot be this dumb.

No wait, you are. You really are.

I'm just going to pinch my nose and shake my head at you because it's obvious you do not have critical thinking skills needed to discuss anything.

So you're saying that you're wrong about your advice.

Way to fail.

God you're dumb.

I know what you're trying to say. It's not actually what you're saying because you are misguided about what certain words mean and you are desperately twisting definitions of others to try and make a stretched point but I get what you're trying to say.

And I know what you think I'm saying and why you think it's the same thing.

But it's not kid.

When you first begin asking a question about something, you also first start to make a stance on it. Accepting neither claim just means you made the distinction to do so, that is different than not having a stance.

But you can only have no stance as long as you don't have knowledge about the subject and do not ask the question. As soon as you do you take some sort of stance and it is no longer nothing.

That's not what you're saying.

What you're saying is the default position is to reject everything. Rejection is a form of action and showing preference with a hint of knowledge.

This is quite different than what I said.

So yeah, still disagreeing with you. If you want to change your point to a better one that's quite alright. But don't act like it was your original point and try and make it like I'm agreeing with you. It's pitiful.

It's easy to tell that you're saying a different point than that because you're trying to define atheism as the default position. That would not coincide with what I'm saying which means they are two different points.

Someone said strawberry panic.

I dunno.

FAP FAP FAP!

I did disagree with you.

"You are my air freshener to the weeaboo stench."

I haven't though of my expenses in a solitary sense for some time now since I live with my fiance. Our money is a pool and such.

I will have even less freedom when I have children.

Oh, on the note to the original topic.

The default position on the subject would be nothing. As in having no preference for any side of the issue. Beliefs are not an innate part of people and only develop with gained knowledge. Until you are introduced to the position you have no beliefs meaning the default is none.

This is different than any of the positions mentioned as each one is declaring something.

So again, OP is still wrong and is still just trying to push his misguided ideals onto others as "knowledge".

Um what? Have you ever done an actual experiment before? Do you not understand that this evidence you seem to talk about, the support for theories, is gained from trying to prove things wrong. That is what the scientific method is. It's a method used to test hypothesizes, trying to prove it one way or another.

Except you can't prove something right, so you have to either prove it wrong, or fail to prove it wrong. Failing to prove it wrong is where the evidence, the support, comes from.

Congratulations on failing to understand basic scientific procedure. But I already expected this from you so I'm not astonished considering there have been plenty of scientific ideals you do not fully understand but think you do.