Waar Posts
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Kiba Eve Fumihiro wrote...
Nah every place has its own bullshit in a way fuck it. Im moving to canada next to waar for the time being. :3You wouldn't like it here.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
We're in for a show.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Jabba really let himself go...
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
He's been acting a bit emo recently, perhaps this is his way of taking control.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
It's like you guys picked up slayer nexus disease: being unable to identify sarcasm.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
When will you get blade arms adam jensen?
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Der Kizer wrote...
I know a practicing Catholic lesbian. I really don't get how the hell that works and we aren't really friends so I don't think she'd appreciate my asking.Well, the pope says shes going to hell but I'm sure her local priests dont give a shit, or dont know. Rules set down by the Vatican are not the same rules the rest of us follow, most follow the "spirit of the new testament"(be kind, generous, love your fellow man) rather than the literal interpretation of the old testament.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Roman Catholic here, the faith that doesn't really care of you follow our rules... except for the gay thing, that's a no go.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Cruz wrote...
If you're going to force an arbitrary rule at least give people the courtesy of telling them what it is and how it's going to be dealt with. The only instance anything has been moved, not deleted or locked, was to move it to CTFG. Topics about anime/music/games/cosplay/etc. have never been moved out of IB into the corresponding sections, only the inverse where they leave those sections and come to IB/CTFG, or just locked. Everything not breaking rules is IB material/accepted, if this isn't a rule, Let people know. And do your job and just delete post that don't belong in Serious Discussion.
Not getting into an argument with you about this, post serious shit here or have it moved when I see it.
p.s. Telling me to "do my job" as if I don't already is a surefire way to get your request ignored, so if that was your goal, gj.
edit:added a line to the rules to help you out.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
When I see them, probably.
edit: your replies are enough.
edit: your replies are enough.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
NEXUS wrote...
There was no bike, he was a druggy who most likely tried to break into my place. He probably made that part about the bike up, because he was really nervous when the cops came.... How do you not get jokes?
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Cruz wrote...
>that's not how it works hereAs tak has already pointed out, assuming that a person serving their country is granted the same rights as civilians is counter intuitive, especially when you're representing your branch and country. That's how it works everywhere.
There was no mutual respect not because you made a bad assumption, it's because you got defensive and then cried Trump.
Idk what to tell you, people dont get dishonorably discharged/punished for refusing to stand during our national anthem(asked my brother[member of the RCN] before I said it originally) so unless Canada is not longer part of "everywhere"...
I mean, I'm not wrong; it is still trump like behavior, that part still stands. If you'd like to consider me a hypocrite for doing he same to people I don't respect by all means, as you've shown me I have no reason to really care what you think at this point.
edit: idk why i'm even bringing this up tbh, Ive stopped arguing so theres no point in replying.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Cruz wrote...
"I made a logical argument". No you didn't. That's the reason you were called an idiot. It's because you had no reasoning other than "well I'm not from your Country/Not in the military/Don't personally agree with it".(and yes, you did shift through all 3 when talking to different people)
You're trying to make yourself a victim of "lol internet srs business". Heh.
Someone is being punished for refusing to stand, I still hold that it's logical to assume they wont be. You're telling me they have a different set of standards/some parts of the constitution dont apply to them because they're in the military(mostly tak) and i'm telling you that's not how it works here. That logic is sound. I'm not a victim, I just assumed there was mutual respect where there was none, it's not your fault and I will accept responsibility and remember for the next time.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Takerial wrote...
You answered your own question wrongly, and you refuse to actually listen to someone who knows more about what you're trying to argue about.I wouldn't expect anything more from you Waar.
I'm not trying to argue anymore, I can't be more clear about this. I was done after my second post. Why do you feel the need to correct me to this extent, a random person on the internet? Seems personal, like you're holding a grudge for me shitting on you in the past.
Cruz wrote...
If I am or did hold you to those "standards" in the past it doesn't matter because you aren't above them if you resort to "UH YOU'RE LIK DIS BAD PERSON BECAUSE UR MEAN :'(". And it's not like this behavior is new for you, so what do you think, buttercup?Its more like, "wow, I made a logical argument and hes resorting to name calling, I thought cruz had more respect for me than that."
Guess not, I'll have to remember that.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Cruz wrote...
Waar wrote...
Canadian.edit: lol, you made a thread because I called you out? Muhahahaha That's right, dance puppets, dance.
More like you had a weird spasm and I was concern for your health, didn't know diabetus fucked with brain too. And the debates were coming up at the time.
>Post confirming I made you start a thread.
>winner
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Takerial wrote...
stuffSo, not reading all of that. I probably wasn't clear last time, I'm going to try and be crystal here: I already answered my own question, stop talking.
edit: Tak I might not care anymore due to this being a few days ago, stuff kept me away from Fakku. Lets try this again some time.
Cruz wrote...
>you're trump because you called me dumb for my biases getting in the way of sound logicNot to compliment you, but you do it all the time to idiots.
Well did.
Now you come to my point, those people aren't real people; they're idiots. So are you holding me on the same level as whatever the fuck koko and illumia was or did you perhaps go too far while trying have a conversation with someone above that level.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Canadian.
edit: lol, you made a thread because I called you out? Muhahahaha That's right, dance puppets, dance.
edit: lol, you made a thread because I called you out? Muhahahaha That's right, dance puppets, dance.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Takerial wrote...
stuff.My post found the law, the one that exists with no punishment remember? Shes being punished for breaking a regulation, not a law(which again, does exist but has no punishment) as you mentioned. So the "debate" part was over a while ago, she wasn't ordered to stand, shes not being brought up on criminal charges, shes not less patriotic than you are, like I said we're done.
As far as the Canadian military goes; someone would not face dishonorable discharge for not standing during the national anthem, that's all I'm saying.
It's not like her constitutional right to protest was denied her. What was denied her was the right to make statements in the military's name. What was denied her was the right to renege on her pledge to protect the country and constitution.
This bit, can you clarify? Was she at a press conference or speaking on behalf of the United States Army Forces? As far as I can tell she was with other servicemen and decided not to stand. I mean, it looks to me like a protest to an outside like me. She didn't refuse to fight or lay down her life to protect your constitution, she just didn't stand for a song.
Anyways, I answered my own question like 6 posts ago so we should be done with that, yes?
Cruz wrote...
There's having different ideas & beliefs, and there's being plain illogical. Our differences fall into you being illogical and lacking common sense. Your military's system also has it's own policy regarding conduct & compliance. Every modern military does. Because it's common sense.
>Trump
Literally has nothing to do with this.
My posts up to now have been logical for someone not in the military and sees a person being punished for sitting down when everyone else was standing. What part of that lacks common sense, not to assume her right to protest was suspended while wearing the uniform? That's what this is right? Shes being held to a "higher standard" which does not afford her one of her rights as an american citizen.
Insulting someone you don't agree with... he has something to do with this.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Takerial wrote...
Are you being serious right now? I told you what law she broke.Article 92 of the UCMJ, Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation.
I even posted the regulations that she did not obey.
That is a law. And it's not unconstitutional because of what you have to willingly swear to to become part of the military. It wouldn't make sense to not hold someone in the military to a higher standard.
It's not like she doesn't have the right to protest. She just doesn't have the right to protest while in uniform.
When you wear your military uniform, you are representing the military. So anything you say or do, is basically saying that the military is saying and doing that.
That's why it's a big deal that she did this. Because not only did she violate one of the oldest custom and courtesy in the military, she did in a way that said the military support BLM. Why do you think she shouldn't get in trouble for this?
And she was no ignorant to what would happen when she did this. She knew exactly what she was doing. And she was wrong to do it. Stop trying to justify something you know little about.
I don't get why you keep replying, my last post didn't call you a liar. I myself found evidence of the law which I originally questioned. I was done at that point. What keeps enraging you? The fact I dont agree with your government regulations? I don't have to, I'm Canadian. So while were on the subject, what other constitutional rights do your military personnel have suspended? Can Muslim servicemen still pray 5 times a day or is that okay? I'm honestly asking as our system seems to differ.
edit: Cruz, calling someone stupid because they have very different system of beliefs is below yo... never mind, it's right where you belong, mr trump.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Takerial wrote...
It's failure to obey an order or REGULATION.Those are Regulations. She failed to obey them.
I asked what law she broke which I answered myself like a month ago, thanks tho.
edit: still convinced that order is unconstitutional.