Waar Posts

Article 92: Failure to obey an Order or Regulation.

There are actually two things that she as a service member did that are against this.

The first being being that with customs and courtesies, she is required to stand and render a salute during the National Anthem.

The second being that you are not allowed to conduct business such as protesting while in uniform and/or on duty as while you are uniform and/or on duty you are not considered yourself but as a representative of the military.

In addition to the above she would also be placed under suspicion of other allegations than to the united states (which she would have pledged to have and protect when enlisting) and this would automatically result in her security clearance at the least being revoked. Which it did.

edit:

Here is the customs and courtesies regulation for the Navy http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/documents/united_states_navy_regulations_chapter_12.pdf

Here is the DoD instruction stating when it prohibited for a Service Member to wear their uniform. http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/133401p.pdf

She violated BOTH of these regulations.

Under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.

It's the additional laws that Military Personnel have to follow while they are in the service.

It is not unconstitutional.

True.

But it's not a matter of her not being patriotic or honorable (which I wouldn't even suggest) it's about the idiotic idea that she was above the law she willingly agreed to adhere.

Don't you mean, bizarro watch it again?

I've actually watched that show. The bizarro episode is one that sticks out for me.

If you could redesignate the Caiptal from London to anywhere else within the former British Empire, where would you put it?

On other page what taste better rye or bourbon whiskey. I wanna try out that old fashion.

Fakku is an established company now, you can't go around correcting people anymore.

Aw dun be liek dat T..T

Meh it's all internet slang so who cares lol