Garfest 2010 Nominations
0
Kaimax
Best Master-San
food for thought:
"Isn't it going to be redundant if the "majority" are characters that has already been in the last GARfest?"
"Isn't it going to be redundant if the "majority" are characters that has already been in the last GARfest?"
0
Hentanize
rebaS
Isn't it a pain in the ass to figure out character who weren't in the last GARfest xD?
Anyways Not enough video games characters IMO:
Nominating Raiden (MGS series):
Anyways Not enough video games characters IMO:
Nominating Raiden (MGS series):
0
[size=20]nominating my cherished first love o' animation[/h]
[size=20]AMEN[/h]
[size=29]FATHER ALEXANDER ANDERSON[/h]
[size=20](HELLSING)[/h]
[size=20]AMEN[/h]
[size=20](HELLSING)[/h]
[size=20]AMEN[/h]
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Kaimax wrote...
food for thought:"Isn't it going to be redundant if the "majority" are characters that has already been in the last GARfest?"
Different match ups. I'd say the finalists shouldn't be allowed though.
No god-tier like GARY MOTHERFUCKING OAK and them.
0
Well, the thing is I'm only letting in about 64 or so contestants, so there is a high chance that new people will get priority over returnees.
0
Shia wrote...
64? Why not... 96? First round of 3. Cuts it down to 32. Then 1v1. Lol.Hrm, actually it would last just as long both ways so if there are enough contestants then why not?
0
Could even make it 128 and go an extra round. Lol.
Or 128 -> 32 -> 8 -> 4 -> 2 Lol. You can do some weird stuff with multiples of 2, 3, and 4.
Or 128 -> 32 -> 8 -> 4 -> 2 Lol. You can do some weird stuff with multiples of 2, 3, and 4.
0
There will probably be more because I remember last year everyone was like "What? When were nominations? I want to nominate someone right now even though it is the second round!"
Or 128 -> 32 -> 8 -> 4 -> 2 Lol. You can do some weird stuff with multiples of 2, 3, and 4.
Yeah well if you are going to be like that we could do 288 people with the first round having 9 contestants each round. Then it will get back to 32 people in the second round.
Shia wrote...
Could even make it 128 and go an extra round. Lol.Or 128 -> 32 -> 8 -> 4 -> 2 Lol. You can do some weird stuff with multiples of 2, 3, and 4.
Yeah well if you are going to be like that we could do 288 people with the first round having 9 contestants each round. Then it will get back to 32 people in the second round.
0
neko-chan wrote...
There will probably be more because I remember last year everyone was like "What? When were nominations? I want to nominate someone right now even though it is the second round!"Shia wrote...
Could even make it 128 and go an extra round. Lol.Or 128 -> 32 -> 8 -> 4 -> 2 Lol. You can do some weird stuff with multiples of 2, 3, and 4.
Yeah well if you are going to be like that we could do 288 people with the first round having 9 contestants each round. Then it will get back to 32 people in the second round.
9 is too much.
0
Shia wrote...
neko-chan wrote...
There will probably be more because I remember last year everyone was like "What? When were nominations? I want to nominate someone right now even though it is the second round!"Shia wrote...
Could even make it 128 and go an extra round. Lol.Or 128 -> 32 -> 8 -> 4 -> 2 Lol. You can do some weird stuff with multiples of 2, 3, and 4.
Yeah well if you are going to be like that we could do 288 people with the first round having 9 contestants each round. Then it will get back to 32 people in the second round.
9 is too much.
Yeah I should of ended that post with [/sarcasm].
