[Locked] mass murder of the modern time

Kim Jong Il= 800,000 and 3,500,000 from 94 to 98. Plus a few thousand every year. The party members and army eats most of the food send for humanity aid or sell them for money to china, Nam or Laos. Seen people live off bark and grass soup and cakes.

Guess my source of information still not enough huh? but these information that i get a really was a fact, but most people just put aside these info instead they blaming others.

G.W.Bush 10000= for me that's to much of life has gone for nothing they didn't die for our country but they die because of our selfish request of our president. I'm really glad that our current president B obama has taken the 1st step in bringing home our boys from that Hell.

As for omar al-bashir i'm still waiting for my source to gave me the latest info on that. 300,000 people dead that is shit, if that really happen then the title of mass murder on global scale have been taken by him. But on our country mass murder still G.W.Bush unchanged.

Mass murder Rank =
KIm jong II (1st place on global scale)
Omar al-bashir (2nd place on global scale)
G.w.Bush (3rd place but 1st place on U.S)

Can you provide a source of information that will back up your claim?

More importantly can they provide better English? This shit is too damn hard to read.

I'm sorry, my source name or any information about him a highly classified top secret. There are only few person on this planet know about these person identity.

Sorry! my work have taken a toll on my engelish- ish

I sure i killed at least 8 of them in Afghanistan personally.

If you can't provide any information then your claim is bullshit and your excuse for your English is bullshit.

What he said. Also what is this thread even about.

Something about Bush killing people. Iunno.

On a similar note, Obama hunted down Osama Bin-Laden and killed him with his own hands. True story.

lol really? I thought the "SEALs" or something killed him

As i were saying any information on these person are highly classified top secret. Sorry dude but talking just a little about that person would cause a serious problem because all of that person report actually came with proof or evidence. So i can't just pushed away these info if it came with evidence. Current report that person making are about someone inside our country but i can't say anything yet cause no evidence have came with the report that person send to me.

See! Obama are actually making the right choice rather than G.W.Bush

Our nation do not need A leader who started a war, all we need are good decision making president.

nope not that person.

This thread. [color=FFFFFF]OP is a fagget, should try harder

'Twas but a joke, dear friend.





You realize that saying you have a source and then saying that you cannot prove said source completely eliminates any and all credibility your argument may have.

Just wait! perhaps next year we'll hear someone got busted in some kind of deal can't say anything yet cause no proof have come but that person promised to gave me an evidence. Just wait! it could be involving someone from the military, the CIA, the FBI, the police or even a senator i can't wait. we'll see.

Beside the fact that your source seems highly suspicious, if the facts you speak of were to be true and so top secret as you say, how the fuck did you get a hold of them?

Even if you know the person who has them I find it highly unlike that he would let you see them, considering that they are oh so top secret.

Or are you some government worker?

Wow, more shit threads.
Huge surprise.

having an acknowledge source does not mean i have to gave the evidence away or giving away any information on that person. Do you even understand the words of "HIGHLY CLASSIFIED" OR "TOP SECRET".

So as I said, if it's so fucking top secret, why the fuck would this person give you the information?