[Locked] mass murder of the modern time

I was gonna say something, but I forgot what it was ._.

I honestly can't understand what most of you are saying.

Jacob need to sell tinfoil hats and stuff.

And minors.

i agree...

Me liking this cave speak.

bug post?

No no no. They are not mass murderers. It is just that they love to start wars, especially the Republicans. Check their history. It is pretty interesting to read as if you are riding a roller coaster.

there are no brakes on the rape train

We are discussing weather we should give a "mass murder of the century" title to G.W.Bush. Currently it being held by kim jong il with 800,000 people dead because of his action. but the title are still effective for G.w.bush for local record (his record started by sending his troop to overseas just to be killed by those Afghanistan and Iraqi rebels).

That title should be given to a country. No just one man. Or rather to a country's military.

In our case this title (on US) should be given to G.w.bush he's the one who started these war against the Iraqi nation. i could understand if it's the afghanistan but this is the Iraqi? why just for political reason? or because of his father grudge?

These title should not be given to a military personel because all these military personel are doing it's jb given from it's superior in our case it's the president.

Faces of a mass murder? or should i say WANT TO BE A MASS MURDER.

1st pic say "hell i can kill more than g.w.bush".
2nd pic say "fuck i can kill more by recruit these cock 1st"
3rd pic say "hell yeah i can kill people a lot more and better than g.w.Bush"
last pic say "sorry not into it. we were more to total extinction type".

Do anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more G.W. murders? Title be give to rich politicians who need oil for chevalier alligator with a movie theater. Blood money to demon God of USA.


[size=1]This is only funny when everyone does it ...sigh[/h]

It's not the rich politician who gave the orders to attack why should they have those title the title should be the one that order these attack the former president G.w.bush, do you even realize how many military personel have die in that good for nothing war? 10,000 people. yes! 10,000 people perhaps even more if those soldier do not come home soon.

the rich politician? yes they do also play a part in this but the final commitment shall be on the shoulder of the president it was his choice either we should attack or what. everything came back to the president at last.

Well, I don't exactly believe that's fair. Considering he did give the order, it was something he was kind of pushed into through the bombing, and the people weren't just gonna sit there and do nothing do to the terrorist actions. Not to mention that the President would have to have consulted his adviser's and such with such a matter, and a majority agreed to go to war.

Sure, Bush wasn't a great President, but not as bad as people make him out to be. He was just in office during a bad time, when a giant shit hit the biggest fan.

Giving the order to shoot people and giving the order to NOT shoot people are two very different THING. A Leader should have the ability to withstand any external influence although it's from the people nor from the political party.
If this criteria cannot be fullfilled then that person are not fit to be a Leader. A leader are the one that can make one good decision for the good of many

Yet the President does not have that power. If the mass Majority of the congress, Senate, and the population want something done about this, then he is obliged to follow through with it. You seem to be over estimating the Presidents power. Remember, America is a democracy, not a dictatorship, his word is nothing if overruled by everyone else.

You realize america isn't a democracy nor has there been a democracy since greece in the early bc.