math for Reps xD
0
Ok here are the rulez
i will post a math question first post to answer correctly gets rep for that day*if i can get to it, dont worry though i will rep before i make new math problem.
Also please dont use a calculator its just not fair use your brain xD
Also ill explain how the answer is obtained so that there no I WAS CORRECT
First Problem
Easy one
2+3x4=
i will post a math question first post to answer correctly gets rep for that day*if i can get to it, dont worry though i will rep before i make new math problem.
Also please dont use a calculator its just not fair use your brain xD
Also ill explain how the answer is obtained so that there no I WAS CORRECT
First Problem
Easy one
2+3x4=
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Ugh...giving out primary school problem really is weird...you should at leeast come up with high school ones...
btw, i wanna see the next too.
btw, i wanna see the next too.
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Naoto Shirogane wrote...
If X is a variable then x = -1/6...What do you mean? It's not even an equation so...how?
0
mibuchiha wrote...
Naoto Shirogane wrote...
If X is a variable then x = -1/6...What do you mean? It's not even an equation so...how?
cause i cannot believe that it's that simple... I imagined it as 2 + 3(4)x = 0...
0
mibuchiha
Fakku Elder
Naoto Shirogane wrote...
cause i cannot believe that it's that simple...
lol. and the OP gonna rep who can answer it too.
0
gibbous wrote...
Cool questions bro, now I post one:Is 1-dimensional dynamics generally hyperbolic?
Discuss.
NO
0
Tegumi
"im always cute"
Naoto Shirogane wrote...
cause i cannot believe that it's that simple... I imagined it as 2 + 3(4)x = 0...You didn't believe it was "that simple" so you foofed the problem into something that it was not?
gibbous wrote...
Cool questions bro, now I post one:Is 1-dimensional dynamics generally hyperbolic?
No
(EDIT: I lost reputation for this post? What?)
0
He said it was easy so I don't think it was an equation and if it was an equation he would of been smart enough to add in the parenthesis.
0
Yorozuya wrote...
if it was an equation he would of been smart enough to add in the parenthesis.Hopefully, at least. But yeah, next question D:
0
I also have a problem:
I'm sitting on the toilet and there's no more toilet paper. I need one of you advanced mathematicians to find the solution. (Round to the nearest whole number faggots!)
I'm sitting on the toilet and there's no more toilet paper. I need one of you advanced mathematicians to find the solution. (Round to the nearest whole number faggots!)
1
Rbz wrote...
I also have a problem:I'm sitting on the toilet and there's no more toilet paper. I need one of you advanced mathematicians to find the solution. (Round to the nearest whole number faggots!)
12
0
Rbz wrote...
I also have a problem:I'm sitting on the toilet and there's no more toilet paper. I need one of you advanced mathematicians to find the solution. (Round to the nearest whole number faggots!)
Toilet = 2
On = +
Sitting = 1
No Toilet Paper = X
2+1-X=0
I ANSWER 3 lol wtf
0
Rbz wrote...
I also have a problem:I'm sitting on the toilet and there's no more toilet paper. I need one of you advanced mathematicians to find the solution. (Round to the nearest whole number faggots!)
No you guys are wrong, obviously there is no solution.
0
Fallan
Kamen Rider Cheeki
Yorozuya wrote...
Rbz wrote...
I also have a problem:I'm sitting on the toilet and there's no more toilet paper. I need one of you advanced mathematicians to find the solution. (Round to the nearest whole number faggots!)
No you guys are wrong, obviously there is no solution.
yes cause.
person/(toiletXtoilet paper) = X
1/(1X0) = X
1/0 = X
undefined