[Locked] Grow up.
0
face it TMS, people's opinion is a jerk. no such thing as sudden innocence and it seems like after your last failed troll attemp, people might've started to view you on a negative perspective. and i'll repeat this again, you clearly haven't been any better than your last ziggy post and like i said, you don't change your image or think deeply before posting and that's what lead into this argument
0
Rbz wrote...
It's like the best way to relieve boredom is to argue about stupid shit in this thread.Agreed. Thread started out good, IMO. Now it's going back to the same state as the Kaho thread. Multiple arguments over nothing big.
0
ero-sensei: I don't think I should have to censor myself just because people may like me more that way. You obviously didn't even read the other thread, or you wouldn't tell me I had to think about what I posted. My posts had no insult or hostility in them, but it's people with prejudice like yours that seem to find something that wasn't there.
0
is it just me or you're repeating what i've mentioned?
*insert pink bunny.jpg* if i'm wrong, care to fix it with a more logical post?
*insert pink bunny.jpg* if i'm wrong, care to fix it with a more logical post?
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
hinagiku wrote...
Yes I don't judge you, like I said I'm just plain doubtful. If you won in a lottery I would still question you either you stole that or really won that. It doesn't mean I'm truly making you as a thief. Why apologize? Think about it, though you meant no harm (or maybe you do like I said I doubt a lot) the fact that you inflicted harm is something to apologize for.ridiculous, so if I won the lottery you would question whether I stole my ticket? Yet you're not calling me a thief? do you understand what you're saying? I don't believe he was harmed in all honesty, in fact the vote went in favor for keeping the catchphrase. So i in fact meant no harm and did no harm either. If he was harmed by it it was simply harm to his own bruised ego and let's be honest, I'm not going to apologize to someone for hurting their feelings when I didn't intend to.
hinagiku wrote...
As for being a target, I could really careless right now. Like you I know the consequence of stepping up and saying my ideas. In a way you can say that whatever happens here I'm just glad I am talking here toe to toe with you.not quite sure we're toe to toe on this, as i said earlier I've responded to everything you've said multiple times and you keep repeating your points; I'm almost at a loss on how to answer you differently each time, at least without sounding repetitive.
hinagiku wrote...
As for you not making posts anymore that's just ABSURD plain and simple. What I just mean is that you should be careful more. I am not a CR member through and through in fact I just go there to vote for their motemote but I can tell that they really have something against you. So with that said why not help the forums and stop the flame wars by being more considerate with your threads and posts? I don't believe it's right to flame you, tell me in what way have I flamed you as of current? Wasn't it you who said it's nice to have debates?My post have been more considerate as of late, perhaps people should just stop assuming everything I say is negative and it might alleviate some of the hostility seen on the forums recently.
hinagiku wrote...
As for your "I've contributed much more to this forum," that makes you sound like you're full of yourself. When a person gives you food then kills your pet which one would you remember? Still of course the bad one. I am not saying that you can't give good threads in fact most are very intellectual but you have to understand that you're also to blame for such reputation. I do not know if your ego is just too big to say "sorry" for once since this is the internet after all.Again, I still maintain it was not a harmful thread, nor was it intended to do so. I don't see how me having created good threads contributes to my ego, you may need to explain that. Still don't see a reason to apologize.
hinagiku wrote...
Me on a crusade, this is amazingly true right now since most of your enemies are asleep lol. How can I be in a crusade though if my aim is not to target someone but rather just gather my thoughts? It is you who's doing this right now to retrieve what you lost from that thread. Like a crusader you march with your allies to prove you are right. A martyr? Perhaps the same can be said to all who posted in that thread. Each one had staked to get flamed just to throw a punch at you.You're not targeting someone? This post isnt even about me yet the past 2 pages have been you fighting a losing battle against me and someone who believes you've demonized me. I'm defending myself and have not gone on the attack once, nor have I questioned your intelligence or character. The waar you seem to make me out to be would have lined every sentence with insults, every comment with veiled sarcasm and hostility. I am not the man you believe me to be, I am not the painting you have created. I don't believe you know what a martyr is if you believe those who insulted me in my thread are martyrs.
0
ero-sensei wrote...
face it TMS, people's opinion is a jerk. no such thing as sudden innocence and it seems like after your last failed troll attemp, people might've started to view you on a negative perspective. and i'll repeat this again, you clearly haven't been any better than your last ziggy post and like i said, you don't change your image or think deeply before posting and that's what lead into this argumentAgain, just because people have a negative opinion of someone doesn't mean they should look for hidden meaning in their posts; I've seen, many times, people that I thought were complete retards make intelligent posts, and I don't go out of my way to find stupidity in them.
0
if that's how you take it toward that person's post, be sure to remember that not everyone is like you on their way of thinking
Spoiler:
0
TehMikuruSlave wrote...
Again, just because people have a negative opinion of someone doesn't mean they should look for hidden meaning in their postsNo one's saying that they should, it's just that they know of your reputation, and look for hidden meanings based on that. Frustrating, I know, but that's what happens.
0
Nope I assure you we're toe to toe on this. You've responded nothing but denies and plea that I believe in you. I already said that I do believe in you but I'm still going to give a way point. Someone who's stuck in one idea is dead until he can move somewhere else.
As for if he was harmed he did say that "He's sad to know that many actually hate it". Deny it or not you affected him
Your posts have been considerate? I cannot imagine then how you would post without being considerate with this level already alarming this much of the population. Maybe you people should try lowering the troll more.
As for your "this thread is not a harmful thread" how dare you say that when you're not Kaho. You're not the receiving side. Tell that to me again once you've switched places. Oh yes it has gone to your ego. You're "Mr. Hey look at me and my big ePenis" now.
Yes I am not targeting anyone until now. Before I was talking to the population responsible for the Kaho thread but since right now we're singled out like this there is no point not to dodge you anymore.
The waar I seem to make what of? Don't think like that, only you makes yourself. It's you who made you look that way. The waar I saw before when I first arrived here was cool and intelligent and had good ideas. Now I can't even look at your line of site.
As much as I would like to continue this charade I have to go to sleep since I still have work tomorrow. Take care everyone and don't let this ruin your day. Happy or not, this is still just the internet. Goodnight and see you tomorrow, hopefully in a better atmosphere than this.
As for if he was harmed he did say that "He's sad to know that many actually hate it". Deny it or not you affected him
Your posts have been considerate? I cannot imagine then how you would post without being considerate with this level already alarming this much of the population. Maybe you people should try lowering the troll more.
As for your "this thread is not a harmful thread" how dare you say that when you're not Kaho. You're not the receiving side. Tell that to me again once you've switched places. Oh yes it has gone to your ego. You're "Mr. Hey look at me and my big ePenis" now.
Yes I am not targeting anyone until now. Before I was talking to the population responsible for the Kaho thread but since right now we're singled out like this there is no point not to dodge you anymore.
The waar I seem to make what of? Don't think like that, only you makes yourself. It's you who made you look that way. The waar I saw before when I first arrived here was cool and intelligent and had good ideas. Now I can't even look at your line of site.
As much as I would like to continue this charade I have to go to sleep since I still have work tomorrow. Take care everyone and don't let this ruin your day. Happy or not, this is still just the internet. Goodnight and see you tomorrow, hopefully in a better atmosphere than this.
0
hinagiku wrote...
As for your "this thread is not a harmful thread" how dare you say that when you're not Kaho. You're not the receiving side.Neither are you. He openly admitted he wanted to know if a lot of people disliked it, and as such the poll was created. And not to strut around on my high horse, but I believe both waar and I have been on the receiving side far more than kaho.
0
The saddest part of all this is that this is the most active thread on the forums. This thread has gotten more replies in a few days than the Entertainment section has gotten in a month.
I almost think it'd be a good idea to delete all the user stats and make everybody anonymous. No post counts, no reputations, and nobody knows who anybody is. At least that way, people wouldn't be able to slam or ignore a post simply because of the person who made it.
I almost think it'd be a good idea to delete all the user stats and make everybody anonymous. No post counts, no reputations, and nobody knows who anybody is. At least that way, people wouldn't be able to slam or ignore a post simply because of the person who made it.
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Not sure what your first point means, am I the one who is "stuck in one idea"? you lack skill young one.
If he felt injured by the topic then he needs to grow up as it was not about him but something he did. If I were to post about my love for a specific animation team, oh... let's call it LEAD, and someone said they didn't like it or didn't like that I reminded everyone how much they rule every time i posted I don't think I would take offense to it. No one called him annoying, nor did anyone insult him in any way.
You've been here long enough to see badass waar, if you think I've been posting as such recently then i pity your lack of reading comprehension skills (not an insult fyi).
As I made the thread I know what it intended to do, I also saw how it unfolded, if he was hurt it was not by any of my actions unless he believes the thread meant something it did not say. As I have said it was not a topic about the user but something the user did he should take it at face value, you're right I can't control how he will take it but I won't apologize for someone misinterpreting the reasoning behind the thread, that would be ridiculous.
How can you possibly maintain that I was not the target of every post you've made in the past 2-3 pages?
That's foolish, I agree that I make my reputation what it is, but let's be honest other users can paint an awful picture of someone they dislike. You certainly painted me as something terrible over the past few hours.
If he felt injured by the topic then he needs to grow up as it was not about him but something he did. If I were to post about my love for a specific animation team, oh... let's call it LEAD, and someone said they didn't like it or didn't like that I reminded everyone how much they rule every time i posted I don't think I would take offense to it. No one called him annoying, nor did anyone insult him in any way.
You've been here long enough to see badass waar, if you think I've been posting as such recently then i pity your lack of reading comprehension skills (not an insult fyi).
As I made the thread I know what it intended to do, I also saw how it unfolded, if he was hurt it was not by any of my actions unless he believes the thread meant something it did not say. As I have said it was not a topic about the user but something the user did he should take it at face value, you're right I can't control how he will take it but I won't apologize for someone misinterpreting the reasoning behind the thread, that would be ridiculous.
How can you possibly maintain that I was not the target of every post you've made in the past 2-3 pages?
That's foolish, I agree that I make my reputation what it is, but let's be honest other users can paint an awful picture of someone they dislike. You certainly painted me as something terrible over the past few hours.
0
TehMikuruSlave wrote...
Oh dear lord, this has turned into another "Waar and TMS are always on the same side" debate? No matter how you cut this, you would have jumped on anyone who made that thread, be it me, waar, or even one of the mods. The thought of a thread never crossed my mind, I just saw that one had been made and decided to go in there, thinking there would be a chance for me to voice my opinion. Waar never said if he was in favour or against "ruuuuuuuuuuuu", and countlessy stated that he didn't vote. I really don't see what the big deal is. He made a thread, big deal.I just saw that one had been made and decided to go in there
I just saw ... decided to go in there
I want to pink rabbit this so much.
You didn't decide to do anything but allow waar to do it. Since he was helping a buddy out to not look like an idiot. Am I the only one who was in that Skype conversation?
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
i made the thread and told him about it, the helping him to not look like a retard was when i told him how to word things without sounding like an idiot.
0
Waar wrote...
Not sure what your first point means, am I the one who is "stuck in one idea"? you lack skill young one.If he felt injured by the topic then he needs to grow up as it was not about him but something he did. If I were to post about my love for a specific animation team, oh... let's call it LEAD, and someone said they didn't like it or didn't like that I reminded everyone how much they rule every time i posted I don't think I would take offense to it. No one called him annoying, nor did anyone insult him in any way.
You've been here long enough to see badass waar, if you think I've been posting as such recently then i pity your lack of reading comprehension skills (not an insult fyi).
As I made the thread I know what it intended to do, I also saw how it unfolded, if he was hurt it was not by any of my actions unless he believes the thread meant something it did not say. As I have said it was not a topic about the user but something the user did he should take it at face value, you're right I can't control how he will take it but I won't apologize for someone misinterpreting the reasoning behind the thread, that would be ridiculous.
How can you possibly maintain that I was not the target of every post you've made in the past 2-3 pages?
That's foolish, I agree that I make my reputation what it is, but let's be honest other users can paint an awful picture of someone they dislike. You certainly painted me as something terrible over the past few hours.
lol i was just brushing my teeth when I almost puked when I read this.
I'm the one stuck in one idea? What I've been trying to spoon feed to you the past few hours is not that I'm judging you but what your intentions MAY (take note of the may it's even in caps) have been. Those theories of intentions MAY not necessarily be true but POSSIBILITIES (look this in a dictionary since I've used it a lot and yet you never took notice of them *not an insult fyi*). In short you've been defending against nothing! What I said about your "soft punch" was a possible explanation of why people got ticked by your thread, it wasn't a means of alienating you or whatever, sorry if you feel that way. It's similar to asking Q:"Why did the chicken die?" A: "Cause it died of a disease" Third Party Answer: "No maybe it choked with corn."
As for TMS, I am not Kaho so I am only putting in POSSIBILITIES. But the fact he said he was sad about it makes that possibility close to reality.
I agree that he should mature more, and there's still room for that. So what about it? If you know it'll hurt him would you still do it again? In the end it's just a question of integrity. Again let me state out POSSIBILITIES (You might not do it again and pity him. OR You might stick out your big ePenis again and this time whack his face with it) Goodnight, I might actually dream of this tonight...
Edit: Oh yes about the meaning of martyrs. Don't teach that to me since I don't believe someone who cannot see his own fault and apologize for it actually know the meaning OR another POSSIBILITY here someone who knows his own fault but has too big of a head to bow down and say sorry. Which one are you? Not an insult fyi.
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
hinagiku wrote...
I'm the one stuck in one idea? What I've been trying to spoon feed to you the past few hours is not that I'm judging you but what your intentions MAY (take note of the may it's even in caps) have been. Those theories of intentions MAY not necessarily be true but POSSIBILITIES (look this in a dictionary since I've used it a lot and yet you never took notice of them *not an insult fyi*). In short you've been defending against nothing! What I said about your "soft punch" was a possible explanation of why people got ticked by your thread, it wasn't a means of alienating you or whatever, sorry if you feel that way. It's similar to asking Q:"Why did the chicken die?" A: "Cause it died of a disease" Third Party Answer: "No maybe it choked with corn."no,re-read what i said; i was asking what you meant by it, I don't think its a valid argument to be honest. I'm not sure how many times i've said it but I know what my reputation is, and I know why people may misinterpret my intentions but it doesn't change the fact that I made the thread and I know what my intentions were, there is no possibilities in that respect. p.s. your analogy is poor.
hinagiku wrote...
I agree that he should mature more, and there's still room for that. So what about it? If you know it'll hurt him would you still do it again? In the end it's just a question of integrity. Again let me state out POSSIBILITIES (You might not do it again and pity him. OR You might stick out your big ePenis again and this time whack his face with it) Goodnight, I might actually dream of this tonight...Was this about me or TMS?
0
Waar wrote...
i made the thread and told him about it, the helping him to not look like a retard was when i told him how to word things without sounding like an idiot.That was kind of you waar.
0
Waar wrote...
hinagiku wrote...
I'm the one stuck in one idea? What I've been trying to spoon feed to you the past few hours is not that I'm judging you but what your intentions MAY (take note of the may it's even in caps) have been. Those theories of intentions MAY not necessarily be true but POSSIBILITIES (look this in a dictionary since I've used it a lot and yet you never took notice of them *not an insult fyi*). In short you've been defending against nothing! What I said about your "soft punch" was a possible explanation of why people got ticked by your thread, it wasn't a means of alienating you or whatever, sorry if you feel that way. It's similar to asking Q:"Why did the chicken die?" A: "Cause it died of a disease" Third Party Answer: "No maybe it choked with corn."no,re-read what i said; i was asking what you meant by it, I don't think its a valid argument to be honest. I'm not sure how many times i've said it but I know what my reputation is, and I know why people may misinterpret my intentions but it doesn't change the fact that I made the thread and I know what my intentions were, there is no possibilities in that respect. p.s. your analogy is poor.
hinagiku wrote...
I agree that he should mature more, and there's still room for that. So what about it? If you know it'll hurt him would you still do it again? In the end it's just a question of integrity. Again let me state out POSSIBILITIES (You might not do it again and pity him. OR You might stick out your big ePenis again and this time whack his face with it) Goodnight, I might actually dream of this tonight...Was this about me or TMS?
It wasn't meant to be an argument to begin with but an explanation to the unanswered question that you gave to Illu.
Of course there are possibilities the only fact here is that you THINK (or make yourself think) for certain that at that moment of time until to this point, that your intentions are those which you have mentioned. That is YOUR certainty not the OVERALL reality. The over all reality is that no one is sure about your true intention so we must trust YOUR CERTAINTY (your so called face value). In no way have i said that your certainty was wrong but rather I gave out my opinion on what maybe other realities for others that differ from yours.
And that's for you since you're the thread starter of that thread.
My analogy is poor? You should listen to how people in different chatboxes laugh at how only you can understand what you say. Not an insult FYI