Homosexuals
Homosexuality
0
gentle Jichan wrote...
Vio wrote...
I never said sexual desire. I said dissatisfaction. Is heterosexuality a conscious choice? No. Neither is homosexuality.
ya want to say they were born as gays and bis?
http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20050128/is-there-gay-gene
Amongst other sources.
0
A few of my really good friends are gay and they are amazing people. One of them is marrying his boyfriend of 5 years very soon, I will be the best man at the wedding. I hope they are able to adopt a child because they would both be amazing parents.
0
Ergheiz
Derp
What does it matter what sexual orientation someone has? As long as I don't get bothered with it, it's cool. :)
0
I don't think homosexuality is wrong.
I have always wanted to have gay friends.
I have many lesbian friends, and they were not too different from other girls. I respect what they like, since I do not see anything wrong with it.
I do not see a reason why people should be hated for being homosexual. They are just different, and I respect that.
I have always wanted to have gay friends.
I have many lesbian friends, and they were not too different from other girls. I respect what they like, since I do not see anything wrong with it.
I do not see a reason why people should be hated for being homosexual. They are just different, and I respect that.
0
For some strange reason, I seem to attract female bisexuals, as they make up 1/3 of my friend population.
0
Two of my best employees are gays. Yeah I know its weird especially coming from me, but this is SD.
0
Spoiler:
I was using my personal experience as an example. I could have said the same thing in third person and it would have gotten the point across just as fine.
Also, English sucks when it comes to words for "love". It seems you misunderstood me. There's a huge difference between familial love and friendship than romantic love. I meant specifically romantic love.
Every person is different. Maybe they were gay from birth. Maybe they were gay from some mental experience. Maybe another person went through the exact same experience and wasn't changed at all from it. I can't speak for everyone.
gentle Jichan wrote...
If they want to fuck each other then they are only being ashamed of their pervert side infront of others. If a man feels affaction for another man it doesn't mean they have to have sex. BROS. RESPECT. CARE. DEVOUTION. not all goes to sex.Not necessarily true. There's so much pressure on people to be straight. Gay people are made to feel like they're sinners, unclean, unworthy, condemned. If one falls to this pressure and begins to believe that they are all of those things, it breeds self-hatred. Self-hatred is a very personal thing, a strictly internal battle. It's not just that they're ashamed of having people know that they're gay. They're ashamed of being gay, even if they're the only person in the world who knows. They may even hate themselves for it. (Now, this doesn't apply to all homosexuals. Just some.)
0
What do you mean you can switch your sexual preferences at any time? So you're not being turned on by men because you choose to not be? I'm siding with science that suggests that your are born gay or straight.
0
NeoStriker wrote...
Spoiler:
Really? Just really? You became scared of homosexuals? No no, in this case, I don't think you were scared of homosexuals and homosexuality, I think you just hated being put down. Anyone can do that. Not just homosexuals. So I don't believe you're a homophobe, and also, to everyone else: I don't believe the correct term is "homophobic", I believe it's, "pissed at homosexuals". There's a different between fear and anger.
No no no, let me try to explain this better...
When I talked about being put down, I was talking about people who think that because I impulsively utter a word that has other connotations than a sexual slur, I am being hostile to homosexuals. Deep down, these people are desperate to show the world that they're mature, and think that by chewing me out for using that one word, regardless of context, they are now fighting on behalf of a good cause and thus demonstrating to the world how grown up they are. I'm calling bullshit.
That was a tangent, somewhat unrelated to what you had said. Now, let me explain why I think you shouldn't pick on homophobics:
Even if homophobics (and I think homophobe is an accepted shorthand of the term) are in the moral wrong, it's not right to treat them with hostility. People can't help their fears, and homophobia comes down to fear of a concept that, while natural, still goes against the more common way of doing things.
Besides the fact that homosexuality is a little weird of a concept to begin with, gay culture likes to tack on a lot of bizarre, occasionally perverted, and usually really creepy imagery to it. I think a number of homophobics are reacting negatively to this and only this, and mistakenly think that it carries over to every gay person on the planet (it does not).
Akaoni21 wrote...
Spoiler:
There's nothing wrong with homosexuality making people uncomfortable, so don't take it out on them, even if they're hostile about it. You have to embrace people and understand their fears before they can embrace you; picking on them is counterintuitive, it only makes them more hostile.
0
Anomalouse wrote...
No no no, let me try to explain this better...
When I talked about being put down, I was talking about people who think that because I impulsively utter a word that has other connotations than a sexual slur, I am being hostile to homosexuals. Deep down, these people are desperate to show the world that they're mature, and think that by chewing me out for using that one word, regardless of context, they are now fighting on behalf of a good cause and thus demonstrating to the world how grown up they are. I'm calling bullshit.
That was a tangent, somewhat unrelated to what you had said. Now, let me explain why I think you shouldn't pick on homophobics:
That…was a tangent? Well, thank you for making it clear.
Anomalouse wrote...
Even if homophobics (and I think homophobe is an accepted shorthand of the term) are in the moral wrong, it's not right to treat them with hostility. People can't help their fears, and homophobia comes down to fear of a concept that, while natural, still goes against the more common way of doing things.
I do believe people can "help" their fears. And to be scared of homosexuals of all things…hahaha! They’re not necessarily in the moral wrong, but they are silly.[/quote]
0
Anomalouse wrote...
That was a tangent, somewhat unrelated to what you had said. Now, let me explain why I think you shouldn't pick on homophobics:Even if homophobics (and I think homophobe is an accepted shorthand of the term) are in the moral wrong, it's not right to treat them with hostility. People can't help their fears, and homophobia comes down to fear of a concept that, while natural, still goes against the more common way of doing things.
Besides the fact that homosexuality is a little weird of a concept to begin with, gay culture likes to tack on a lot of bizarre, occasionally perverted, and usually really creepy imagery to it. I think a number of homophobics are reacting negatively to this and only this, and mistakenly think that it carries over to every gay person on the planet (it does not).
The University of Georgia did a study in th late 90's that concluded that homophobic men are closet gays. I don't have a link at the moment but, I do know it was published in the August 1996 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association. Also a Cornell University study found that some men who are homophobic are overcompensating due to their own insecurities about their own masculinity.
Edit: Found some links but, will look for actual study.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20040202035152/www.apa.org/releases/homophob.html
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/08/02/12222.aspx
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/aug05/soc.gender.dea.html
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
The University of Georgia did a study in th late 90's that concluded that homophobic men are closet gays. I don't have a link at the moment but, I do know it was published in the August 1996 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association. Also a Cornell University study found that some men who are homophobic are overcompensating due to their own insecurities about their own masculinity.Edit: Found some links but, will look for actual study.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20040202035152/www.apa.org/releases/homophob.html
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/08/02/12222.aspx
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/aug05/soc.gender.dea.html
I thought that was more of a myth...
Still, there are people out there who are honestly creeped out by overly flamboyant homosexuals, and I think what I was getting at holds true for both of those groups anyway...
0
Anomalouse wrote...
]I thought that was more of a myth...Still, there are people out there who are honestly creeped out by overly flamboyant homosexuals, and I think what I was getting at holds true for both of those groups anyway...
Nothing wrong with not liking obnoxious people. Flamboyant gays tend to be rather obnoxious and loud like the gentlemen you spoke of who hung all over you.
I was speaking more along the line of the people who irrationally hate gays (sans any religious doctrine). Those men are so deep in the closet their finding Christmas presents.
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Nothing wrong with not liking obnoxious people. Flamboyant gays tend to be rather obnoxious and loud like the gentlemen you spoke of who hung all over you.That was not me, I was quoting Akaoni21, who posted that at the bottom of page 2. Didn't you notice all the typographical and grammatical errors (which I'd like to think I avoid)?
0
Anomalouse wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Nothing wrong with not liking obnoxious people. Flamboyant gays tend to be rather obnoxious and loud like the gentlemen you spoke of who hung all over you.That was not me, I was quoting Akaoni21, who posted that at the bottom of page 2. Didn't you notice all the typographical and grammatical errors (which I'd like to think I avoid)?
My apologies. I was reading it while typing. All the brackets and such mislead me.
0
gentle Jichan wrote...
as you can see, Koyori-san, i'm speaking to a lesbian right now. Currently she is not feeling lust for male sex which seems not quite natural. Assuming from bi's experience a boy/girl only needs a suitable mindset to do the thing. (similar to Nashrak's favorite "mindbreak")Wait, what? Are you referring to me? When did I say anything even hinting that I might be a lesbian myself? The personal example I gave was actually a story of me lusting after a man.
I can defend homosexuals without being gay myself. I'd defend a black man if he faced discrimination, although I'm white.
0
Some people are homophobic, some arn't. typical pointless prejudice. i dont really understand it in the slightest, or at least not in a way i could properly articulate.
It is very heartful of you to say that. But i should point out that skin pigmentation of a human and his sexual desires are not the same.
but arn't they? a persons skin color and a persons sexual attraction are both part of their natural identity. you do not choose your skin color, and you do not choose your sexual attraction. they are both simply part of who you are as a human being. you do not have to defend each merit separately, but rather defend a persons natural identity as a whole.
gentle Jichan wrote...
Vio wrote...
I can defend homosexuals without being gay myself. I'd defend a black man if he faced discrimination, although I'm white.It is very heartful of you to say that. But i should point out that skin pigmentation of a human and his sexual desires are not the same.
but arn't they? a persons skin color and a persons sexual attraction are both part of their natural identity. you do not choose your skin color, and you do not choose your sexual attraction. they are both simply part of who you are as a human being. you do not have to defend each merit separately, but rather defend a persons natural identity as a whole.
0
Look, it's very simple. Sometimes opposites attract and sometimes they don't.
Edit: Oh yeah, and sometimes they attract both ways.
Edit: Oh yeah, and sometimes they attract both ways.
0
ZKnoves wrote...
Edit:[/b] Oh yeah, and sometimes they attract both ways.
Like me ^^ I feel so speshul.
0
gentle Jichan wrote...
So how do you think - would they, by the time their puberty takes place, start mating with the same sex? Some would, some would not as everything apart from personal believes of a few people such as yourself indicates that you are born gay or straight. And the concept that humans would act like animals if they weren't taught anything is flawed. And who defines what's "natural"? If natural is just what's most common for you then it must also mean that it's natural to be a complete retard as most people are pretty idiotic.