Israeli/Palestinian conflict

No one is right to attack anyone.
Get angry and want change? Yes. Harm? No.

I honestly don't know all the details I feel are required to take a stand on this issue, so I can't draw any conclusion worth polling. I'd need to look into it far beyond just what we hear in the news media.

I don't think anyone should be deprived of their life for arbitrary reasons but, if the life of my friends,family or my own is endangered by unguided rockets being fired into my country. I'm hunting some people down and putting a stop to it.

I think palestinians should have their own country, the birth of Israel was also the birth of that state the thing is thath palestinians grow believing Israel is their mortal enemy, and when they are adults act guided by those thoughts, that is something should change to achieve peace.

We hear a lot about the conflict going on between the Israelis and Palestinians in the news these days but I noticed alot of people (myself included) are confused by it. Who started it? Who really owns the land there? This is what I want to discuss: Is peace an option? What would be the best solution to this conflict. Who really is to blame for starting this conflict? I will post some websites that have from what I can tell three different stances on this conflict if you want to read up on it first.


If America Knew

Masada

Mideast web

Just for your information here, I really don't like Israel's attitude. You know, suddenly bombarding cities and borders for almost-joking reason? That's mad.
Heck, they even attacked help supplies from neutral parties! How can that be not evil?

You're joking right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel,_2011



Not exactly neutral, and those aren't exactly 'supplies'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvS9PXZ3RWM
http://krishna109.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/31/4443631-weapons-found-on-the-flotilla-ship-mavi-marmara-used-by-peace-activists-vs-idf-soldiers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9p5QT91QYs
Aside from that, there was a very clear statement that they would board and seize any vessel attempting to break the blockade, and then they're surprised when they're boarded and seized.
It's like the people who read and comment on doujin tagged "Trap" that are surprised he has a penis.

I see this war as a action of nonsense...
killing is not my thing...
If they wanna battle it out then fine... just take the kids and elders and women out of it and put em somewhere far away from the war..
Its not fair that kids and women have to die because of a mans foolish idea.

It is not really non-sense when people are killing each other because the British couldn't keep promises made during WW1.

Can you please care to explain about the British did?
Im not that well informed about the first world war....
but one thing is for sure....
that it is a great way to profit off of and people are doing it for their own countries benefit ( Possibly) their own.

To sum it up in a nutshell, during world war 1 then British got the Arabs under the control of the Ottoman empire to revolt saying they would get an Arab state spaning from Baghdad to Gaza and what is now Yemen to Syria if they helped. Then after they agreed the British turned to the french and said you want some land and they made the The Sykes-Picot Agreement in 1916 which divided the Ottoman holdings between Syria which was given to France and included Lebanon. The British got what is now Iraq, Jordan and Israel. All of the conflicts over the Levant today can be traced to this.