[Locked] vegetarians are the real murderers?
0
GourmetPrince wrote...
Fuck Vegetarians. Wasting all my fucking tax money that could go to schools or some shit.Vegetarianism is like a disease.
I may not fully agree with vegetarians but that sort of language is unnecessary and unproductive. Before you mention someone elses age you should act more mature yourself.
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
My species didn't climb to the top of the food chain to feel sorry for the things it eats to survive.The first thing that irritates me about that statement is the "My species" part. When things like that are said, my hand just balls up into a fist. I can't describe it, its a subconscious reaction. Despite any benefit of the doubt, no one should ever even consider referring to the human species as "my species." I don't even need to point out the idiocy of the statement and I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm just pointing out the obvious. Think about what you say, before you say it.
Now with that out of the way, it seems to me you don't understand the concept of the food chain. Its an ecological system that is illustrated through the feeding habits of species in that particular species. I suppose you can say we are at the top of a food chain, and the operative word being "a" seeing as how we eat whatever the fuck we want. Its not the fact that other species are unable to eat us, its that we've isolated ourselves in a society where it is highly improbable that we will be eaten by another species. If we were in the wild, it would be very difficult to maintain this "top of the food chain" status, as members of the species are being dragged off by packs of wild animals for sustenance on a daily basis. In the way of animals, the majority of our diet consists of either herbivores or omnivores. I'll admit, we do eat some carnivores, but some such as big cats and wild dogs aren't exactly popular items on menus at restaurants. The fact of the matter is that many carnivores that can be classified as man-eaters turn to eating humans as an easier method of getting food when they are either injured, there is a shortage of their normal prey, or when illness or natural physical ailments hinder their abilities. That being said, I'd highly doubt that any human is rightfully "at the top of any food chain."
k_0uta wrote...
I'm talking about humans and not about "predatory animals" :roll: They don't feel pity for it's their nature, their instinct to kill to survive. Having choices, feeling pity for other beings and making decisions based on more than instinct is the only thing that seperates us from "predatory animals".
Bullshit... just because we can think about shit and decide things based on more than instinct doesn't mean we aren't predatory animals. By definition a predator is any organism that exists by preying upon other organisms. Like it or not, even if we don't actively seek out our prey doesn't mean we're not predators. We're just more passive in our predatory nature. That's why rapists, murderers, and other criminals exist, to compensate for their suppressed desires to hunt prey.
This is a terrible thread. Not just because of the nature of the topic, but because it flaunts pretty much emphasizes every egocentric aspect of the human species. We're at the top of the food chain, we're the most dominant species, we're the only species with morals, its just fucking endless. Then there's the idiocy that plants don't feel and all this other shit, it just fucking sickening. After attempting to sort out all of the bullshit that's been said, I was just overwhelmed. By doing that, I alone could keep the fucking Huns out of Fakku. Mankind has a long way to go in the way of empathy and just common awareness towards other living things.
0
The Jesus wrote...
Then there's the idiocy that plants don't feel and all this other shit, it just fucking sickening.This sentence bugged me... Are you implying plants do feel pain?
Your comment that humans think they are superior sickens you also nagged at my attention. Even wild animals feel pride and there is nothing wrong with displaying your achievements. I have doubts about humans being the most virtuous but the fact that we are the most intelligent of all the species is true and it seems to me we do have the right to call ourselves dominant after looking at the planet.
Also, why do you find the words "my species" irratating? There seems to be nothing wrong with it. If you are human you have the right to call yourself a part of the entity known as the human species and it seems "my species" is perfectly okay.
0
PersonDude wrote...
Your comment that humans think they are superior sickens you also nagged at my attention. Even wild animals feel pride and there is nothing wrong with displaying your achievements. I have doubts about humans being the most virtuous but the fact that we are the most intelligent of all the species is true and it seems to me we do have the right to call ourselves dominant after looking at the planet.My personal view is we are the dominant species because we can adapt better than any animal. If we were to give a letter grade on different aspects of survival. We get a C in everything but, we get an A+ in adaptation. We inhabit every corner of the earth every hospitable and inhospitable environment. No other animal has been able to do that.
PersonDude wrote...
Also, why do you find the words "my species" irratating? There seems to be nothing wrong with it. If you are human you have the right to call yourself a part of the entity known as the human species and it seems "my species" is perfectly okay.
I agree with this. What is wrong with referring to the species that I belong to as "my species"? I refer to my family I live with as "my family" the same goes with everything else. So where is the problem?
The Jesus wrote...
Now with that out of the way, it seems to me you don't understand the concept of the food chain. Its an ecological system that is illustrated through the feeding habits of species in that particular species. I suppose you can say we are at the top of a food chain, and the operative word being "a" seeing as how we eat whatever the fuck we want. Its not the fact that other species are unable to eat us, its that we've isolated ourselves in a society where it is highly improbable that we will be eaten by another species. If we were in the wild, it would be very difficult to maintain this "top of the food chain" status, as members of the species are being dragged off by packs of wild animals for sustenance on a daily basis. In the way of animals, the majority of our diet consists of either herbivores or omnivores. I'll admit, we do eat some carnivores, but some such as big cats and wild dogs aren't exactly popular items on menus at restaurants. The fact of the matter is that many carnivores that can be classified as man-eaters turn to eating humans as an easier method of getting food when they are either injured, there is a shortage of their normal prey, or when illness or natural physical ailments hinder their abilities. That being said, I'd highly doubt that any human is rightfully "at the top of any food chain."Hey, thanks for repeating my high school biology teacher. Your assumption about my knowledge of ecosystems and food chains was wrong, I actually passed my biology and my ap bio classes with A's. Though I should have been a little more clear about what I was saying in relation to the food chain. I guess I meant "top" as in we are the dominant predator and no other animal actively hunts us.
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
PersonDude wrote...
Your comment that humans think they are superior sickens you also nagged at my attention. Even wild animals feel pride and there is nothing wrong with displaying your achievements. I have doubts about humans being the most virtuous but the fact that we are the most intelligent of all the species is true and it seems to me we do have the right to call ourselves dominant after looking at the planet.My personal view is we are the dominant species because we can adapt better than any animal. If we were to give a letter grade on different aspects of survival. We get a C in everything but, we get an A+ in adaptation. We inhabit every corner of the earth every hospitable and inhospitable environment. No other animal has been able to do that.
Adaptation, in a nutshell, is any change in the structure or functioning of an organism that makes it better suited to its environment. Typically, we change our surroundings to better suit us. Since we've begun developing technology, we've haven't had much need to "adapt."
PersonDude wrote...
Also, why do you find the words "my species" irratating? There seems to be nothing wrong with it. If you are human you have the right to call yourself a part of the entity known as the human species and it seems "my species" is perfectly okay.
I agree with this. What is wrong with referring to the species that I belong to as "my species"? I refer to my family I live with as "my family" the same goes with everything else. So where is the problem?
Your family and the human species are two different cases. When you're talking about your family, you would normally say "my family" when talking to people who aren't related to you. However, when you're talking to other people about the species, you're talking to another member of the species. That being said, its more suitable to say something along the lines of "our species."
The Jesus wrote...
Now with that out of the way, it seems to me you don't understand the concept of the food chain. Its an ecological system that is illustrated through the feeding habits of species in that particular species. I suppose you can say we are at the top of a food chain, and the operative word being "a" seeing as how we eat whatever the fuck we want. Its not the fact that other species are unable to eat us, its that we've isolated ourselves in a society where it is highly improbable that we will be eaten by another species. If we were in the wild, it would be very difficult to maintain this "top of the food chain" status, as members of the species are being dragged off by packs of wild animals for sustenance on a daily basis. In the way of animals, the majority of our diet consists of either herbivores or omnivores. I'll admit, we do eat some carnivores, but some such as big cats and wild dogs aren't exactly popular items on menus at restaurants. The fact of the matter is that many carnivores that can be classified as man-eaters turn to eating humans as an easier method of getting food when they are either injured, there is a shortage of their normal prey, or when illness or natural physical ailments hinder their abilities. That being said, I'd highly doubt that any human is rightfully "at the top of any food chain."Hey, thanks for repeating my high school biology teacher. Your assumption about my knowledge of ecosystems and food chains was wrong, I actually passed my biology and my ap bio classes with A's. Though I should have been a little more clear about what I was saying in relation to the food chain. I guess I meant "top" as in we are the dominant predator and no other animal actively hunts us.
Most true predators don't even consider humans as prey unless they're not physically unable to hunt their natural prey, I believe I already said that. Just because we aren't actively hunted doesn't mean we're not on the menu. The thing is that the majority of human ecosystems are isolated from nature and humans typically avoid areas where there are animals that would hunt them. I'm not saying you're completely wrong, I'm just saying that you're not taking into account the whole picture.
Like I said, as a species we are predators, that's something I won't deny. We are apex predators, but that is only because of the circumstances in which we live. Mankind has only found its dominance in these ecosystems because we are, essentially, the ones who built them. Basically, we eat animals that we specifically raise to slaughter, not hunt. However, that's all beside the point. The reason I am so critical of our position as predators is because in our day to day lives, we do not rely on predation for survival. The humans that do actual hunt their food on a natural basis, we have come to refer to as savages. Our classification as alpha predators, by definition is situational. If we were placed in another ecosystem, our dominance would most likely be overshadowed by predators that are more conditioned to hunting on a day to day basis. Realistically speaking, the vast majority of humans, without all the technology that we've come to rely on to make our lives easier, are in a shitload of trouble.
Getting A's in classes doesn't reflect actual knowledge. I passed my bio classes too. I didn't get A's, but that was because I wasn't there half the time, but if I was I would've. You don't learn everything in school. I won't sell you're wisdom short, you could know everything there is to know about the subject, but by the way you talk, it shows a very restricted understanding.
0
The Jesus wrote...
Your family and the human species are two different cases. When you're talking about your family, you would normally say "my family" when talking to people who aren't related to you. However, when you're talking to other people about the species, you're talking to another member of the species. That being said, its more suitable to say something along the lines of "our species."Now, your just splitting hairs my friend.
The Jesus wrote...
I won't sell you're wisdom short, you could know everything there is to know about the subject, but by the way you talk, it shows a very restricted understanding.I condense things down assuming people will just be able to connect the dots and get the general idea. Its a bad habit, I know. I should explain better but, then we would also get tl;dr like you and I usually get since we are the most long winded people here.
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
[quote="The Jesus"] Your family and the human species are two different cases. When you're talking about your family, you would normally say "my family" when talking to people who aren't related to you. However, when you're talking to other people about the species, you're talking to another member of the species. That being said, its more suitable to say something along the lines of "our species."Now, your just splitting hairs my friend.
What do you mean splitting hairs?
The Jesus wrote...
I won't sell you're wisdom short, you could know everything there is to know about the subject, but by the way you talk, it shows a very restricted understanding.I condense things down assuming people will just be able to connect the dots and get the general idea. Its a bad habit, I know. I should explain better but, then we would also get tl;dr like you and I usually get since we are the most long winded people here.
Well people who are always saying tl;dr are just lazy. I personally don't care if someone doesn't want to read what I write because of its length. If a person is part of an intellectual conversation, they should be ready to encounter long posts. In a serious discussion, sometimes you need to go deeper into what you're saying.
0
Sorry to butt into your conversation, just for the explanation, the splitting hair term is a common one in Germany. It means as much as overstepping being a perfectionist, just to keep your own opinion / to argue too much into the detail.
Anyways, explanation done, have fun continuing. It is a good read :)
Anyways, explanation done, have fun continuing. It is a good read :)
0
The Jesus wrote...
Now, your just splitting hairs my friend.What do you mean splitting hairs?[/quote]
nit-picking over details that don't really have an impact on the topic at hand. Like if I made off hand remarks about someones grammar when having a serious conversation. Its a minor detail, which I honestly can't believe we are discussing it.
0
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
Now, your just splitting hairs my friend.What do you mean splitting hairs?
nit-picking over details that don't really have an impact on the topic at hand. Like if I made off hand remarks about someones grammar when having a serious conversation. Its a minor detail, which I honestly can't believe we are discussing it.[/quote]
Sorry, but its always been one of those things that I get a little wiggy about.
0
The Jesus wrote...
Sorry, but its always been one of those things that I get a little wiggy about.perfectly understandable. Everyone has that "thing" that sets them off. I'd be a hypocrite if I criticized you about that. As long as there are no hard feelings then, thats all that matters. (this goes for everyone I "debate" with)
0
let's just use the substitution method and sum things up.
lion eats pig
lion = animal specie
human eats pig
human = animal specie
pig eats plant
pigs = animal specie
human eats plants
human = animal specie
to eat is to survive
humans are just animals, we eat to survive, so do animals that feed on plants/meat or both.
Saying that we kill other animals to eat is murder is just plain wrong because other animals also kill to eat, thus ensuring their survival.
WE'RE ALL JUST ANIMALS! We eat meat and plants to survive. It's just so happen that science proved that we are evolutionary superior than the other animal specie which explains why we cook meat before we eat it.
let's all just eat healthily and enjoy life as we go on with it.
edit*
sorry, I didn't read all of the post here, it's too long. XD
I just wanted to post what is in my mind right now regarding the topic.
^_^V
lion eats pig
lion = animal specie
human eats pig
human = animal specie
pig eats plant
pigs = animal specie
human eats plants
human = animal specie
to eat is to survive
humans are just animals, we eat to survive, so do animals that feed on plants/meat or both.
Saying that we kill other animals to eat is murder is just plain wrong because other animals also kill to eat, thus ensuring their survival.
WE'RE ALL JUST ANIMALS! We eat meat and plants to survive. It's just so happen that science proved that we are evolutionary superior than the other animal specie which explains why we cook meat before we eat it.
let's all just eat healthily and enjoy life as we go on with it.
edit*
sorry, I didn't read all of the post here, it's too long. XD
I just wanted to post what is in my mind right now regarding the topic.
^_^V
0
I think I'll stick with the "Fuck vegetarians" maxim: For every animal you don't eat, I'll eat three.
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=sponsor
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=sponsor
0
It doesnt matter what you do in life, there will always be someone/or group to bitch about it.
Im not a vegetarian, but i do respect their choice. I think the problem here is that most(but not all of them) seem to think that they have a moral highground in life because they dont "murder" animals.
I dont have a problem with someone being vegetarian, all i ask is that they dont push their goddamn beliefs onto me.
Ive made my choice, and that choice is a juicy steak! :P
Im not a vegetarian, but i do respect their choice. I think the problem here is that most(but not all of them) seem to think that they have a moral highground in life because they dont "murder" animals.
I dont have a problem with someone being vegetarian, all i ask is that they dont push their goddamn beliefs onto me.
Ive made my choice, and that choice is a juicy steak! :P
0
I think most people who turn vegetarian isn't because they believe in animal rights but because of religion or health reasons. It's much more healthier to be a vegetarian (diary included, or else I'd call you a vegan, which is real bad for the body) since you can get the same nutrients in a healthier manner.
0
g-money wrote...
I think most people who turn vegetarian isn't because they believe in animal rights but because of religion or health reasons. It's much more healthier to be a vegetarian (diary included, or else I'd call you a vegan, which is real bad for the body) since you can get the same nutrients in a healthier manner.Except for protiens and B vitamins. Unless you eat a lot of tofu and eggplant and take vitamin supplements.
Although, different people work differently, so you can't really say that all humans should eat one way. We are all basicly the same creatures, but there are certain traits that evolved differently for one reason or another.
0
I'm not reading 8 pages of this stuff but I'll just throw out that the total amount of animals killed by things like wheat threshers is probably at least equal to the number of domesticated animals killed to feed people (and whatever else they're killed for). Vegetarians that are throwing out inconsistent bullshit for the case of moralistic grandstanding are not only wrong in principle (that eating animals is wrong) but aren't even internally consistent on how they value the life of animals.
I will say however that some people are vegetarians for personal health concerns. There is nowhere near enough evidence to suggest that being vegetarian is actually more healthy than having a real diet (it's quite conclusively at least equal in cases of lax vegetarianism or people that actually have the sense to plan how to keep protein in their diets) but some people can't handle meat for one reason or another and it's just easier to eat peanut butter sandwiches every day instead.
It is also more economical/environmentally friendly since raising animals is expensive and cows fart and shit a LOT and it's noxious in both the sense of raw disgust as well as generally heinous to the environment at large.
In summary, don't be a bitch and just eat meat unless you're religious or some kind of hypochondriac.
EDIT: Didn't see that g-money did mention part of my middle paragraph. Unfortunately, he is incorrect in stating that vegetarianism is inherently healthier than a standard omnivorous diet. Vegetarians have an appearance of greater health because they actually pay attention to what they're eating (the ones that aren't undereating anyway). Most people tend to not just eat too much meat but also eat too much junk food or food in general. A proper diet including meat is, like I said, at the exact same level of nutrition as a proper diet in a vegetarian regimen.
I will say however that some people are vegetarians for personal health concerns. There is nowhere near enough evidence to suggest that being vegetarian is actually more healthy than having a real diet (it's quite conclusively at least equal in cases of lax vegetarianism or people that actually have the sense to plan how to keep protein in their diets) but some people can't handle meat for one reason or another and it's just easier to eat peanut butter sandwiches every day instead.
It is also more economical/environmentally friendly since raising animals is expensive and cows fart and shit a LOT and it's noxious in both the sense of raw disgust as well as generally heinous to the environment at large.
In summary, don't be a bitch and just eat meat unless you're religious or some kind of hypochondriac.
EDIT: Didn't see that g-money did mention part of my middle paragraph. Unfortunately, he is incorrect in stating that vegetarianism is inherently healthier than a standard omnivorous diet. Vegetarians have an appearance of greater health because they actually pay attention to what they're eating (the ones that aren't undereating anyway). Most people tend to not just eat too much meat but also eat too much junk food or food in general. A proper diet including meat is, like I said, at the exact same level of nutrition as a proper diet in a vegetarian regimen.
0
Ok this just made me hit my head against my keyboard for a few minutes. I have no problem with vegetarians (vegans are just fucking nuts, I don't get them, I don't think being vegan is healthy at all and it's kinda against human nature if you think about it.) I have a problem with the asses who tell me, that I am a murder because I eat meat. I'm an omnivore damnit all! It's human nature!
Now on to something funny. I live thirty minutes from the headquarters of PETA (it's Norfolk, VA). One of the local radio stations, (FM99) used to hold an annual fishing tournament on the pier right next to the PETA building and boy did it make PETA unhappy. Though it made the rest of us laugh are asses off. Unfortunately they had to stop in recent years, but it was funny as hell to stick to the uptight fuckers (and yes they are uptight, no animal bi-product was allowed in the building...friend of mine used to work there) Zealots need to lay the fuck off and that goes in everything.
And on another note, what the hell is up with Soy Milk, it's not milk, you can't milk a soybean, it's Soy Juice. Now where is my moo-cow fuck milk. (and rep to anyone who guesses where this train of thought came from)
Now on to something funny. I live thirty minutes from the headquarters of PETA (it's Norfolk, VA). One of the local radio stations, (FM99) used to hold an annual fishing tournament on the pier right next to the PETA building and boy did it make PETA unhappy. Though it made the rest of us laugh are asses off. Unfortunately they had to stop in recent years, but it was funny as hell to stick to the uptight fuckers (and yes they are uptight, no animal bi-product was allowed in the building...friend of mine used to work there) Zealots need to lay the fuck off and that goes in everything.
And on another note, what the hell is up with Soy Milk, it's not milk, you can't milk a soybean, it's Soy Juice. Now where is my moo-cow fuck milk. (and rep to anyone who guesses where this train of thought came from)