Fiery_penguin_of_doom Posts

Oh yeah, I realize that. But even so, people jump at any chance that they can to criticize Obama. Why is he taking so much heat when HE didn't make the decision? He definitely said that he feels he doesn't deserve it.

That's like me nominating Jacob for garfest just because he runs the site, Jacob saying he doesn't think he deserves to be there but will try being gar, and then he ends up being flamed for it. Why flame Jacob when he never asked to be nominated in the first place?

(Random analogy, but it makes sense and is simple to understand.. or at least I'd think so.)

And as aforementioned, either way people would be complaining and he was going to take heat. This is nothing new.

As Tsuyaru pointed out, it probably would've been more insulting to have turned the award down. Either way, Obama was definitely going to take some heat (no matter what he did). What disgust me more than the choice of the committee, is the response I'm seeing from people who have witnessed this event.

Sure, Obama (as well as his cabinet and other government officials) hasn't managed to change much since his inauguration back in january. Sure the economy is fucked up and getting a job isn't easy (I would know, I've been trying the past two years and haven't had any luck, aside from an interview which didn't seem to work out.) And sure, the war is going on today and people are still being killed almost mindlessly.

But if you put that aside for a second, and really look at the situation, Barack Obama seems to be trying. Call me a brainwashed Obama follower if you want, but I just don't agree with many of the negative responses I'm seeing. Obama, unlike former presidents, has spent a great amount of time attempting to interact with and appeal to the people and continues to do so. Since he became President, he has done a great number of motivational speeches (across the world-- probably a reason for him getting the prize). People, who happen to be against Obama and his policies, have even supported my last statement by saying that Obama is too much of a people person and spends too much time talking.

But at least he's doing something. I was going to write more, but I lost motivation midway.

Unfinished thought is unfinished.

Many were shocked by the unexpected choice so early in a presidency that began less than two weeks before the Feb. 1 nomination deadline for the prize and has yet to yield concrete achievements in peacemaking.

Holy shit. If these walls of text are any indication, then we have some serious contenders for Mason of the Year.

Nah, Im saying he's calling you an idiot, but he is an idiot, so an idiot is calling you an idiot
that help any?

"I admire your stupidity" When someone disagrees, but does not have a valid reason or argument, they pull this. They insult you, then continue on with their ignorant beliefs.


"Good luck and I hope the said criminal you hire would not get his criminal instinct turn on again and not butcher you and your family." Where did you get your information, movies? You assume that every person who has commited a crime is a murderer, they are not. There is no such thing as a Killer instinct (it was a movie title, shut up). And as for the Instinct turning On? what grade are you in? sixth? It doesn't work like that, our hunting instincts don't just "turn on", I've never suddenly started hunting rabbits while waiting for the bus.
The murderers who actually would kill your entire family would not be applying to a shop you own, they would still be imprisoned.

"And don't tell me shit about forgiveness. I do forgive but I will not give you a chance." If you don't give anyone a chance for forgiveness, you won't forgive anyone. You didn't think that through at all.

"Scumbags only need just one moment, just one chance and your dead." No, people kill out of compulsion, reaction, or necessity. People just don't suddenly go "well, perfect life, wonderful family, grea-I need to kill" and those who do usually suffering from some form or mental problems, which falls under compulsion.

"And as a tax payer I condemn my hard earned money to be spent paying professionals fees, medicals, and facilities for this scumbags." You do not "condemn" your money. The government subtracts a percentage of the money you earn, and it is collected as a lump sum which is divided as seen fit by those in the government. Not to mention that reforming prisoners is one of the better uses of our tax payers money. Do you realize how much money is wasted on pointless research endeavours? How about the millions wasted on our governors salaries? You have no idea what you're talking about.

"I rather have it spend on foods and medical supplies or on scholarships for special children."
You do realize that very little tax dollars go towards anything close to this? and nice try throwing in how you want to help the mentally impaired. lemme guess, if we argue with you, We hate mentally impaired children.

And from your second post


You completely Missed the point. and, when a complete idiot admires you, because in his eyes you're an idiot, It should be taken as a complement.

I had no idea what FPOD said...

I'm thinking that you're clicking the little thing next to the thread you haven't read. It's a little square/rectangle. Just click the topic.

Does that help?

So being admired due to your stupidity is a compliment? Ok I'm done here.

I admire your stupidity. Good luck and I hope the said criminal you hire would not get his criminal instinct turn on again and not butcher you and your family. And don't tell me shit about forgiveness. I do forgive but I will not give you a chance. Scumbags only need just one moment, just one chance and your dead.

And as a tax payer I condemn my hard earned money to be spent paying professionals fees, medicals, and facilities for this scumbags. I rather have it spend on foods and medical supplies or on scholarships for special children.

Putting criminals in jails does us one good thing, it keeps them from making another crime and makes our neighborhood a lot safer. This scums choose to do a crime that they are fully aware that's it's wrong and they know that it has consequences but still choose to be. I for one will never ever trust the safety of my love ones go any near a convicted molester or rapist or murderer even though they done a full treatment with a psychiatrist, no sir I will not give them that chance. Would you hire a convicted murderer on your shop? Would you have your kids go to school/park where a convicted child molester work? Will you really trust them?

Don't see the resemblance. Always thought Jacob looked like a horse...

Are you high?

It'll be a waste, those body parts could help another person

Well, my father is an outspoken Marxist, does that count?

If a fetus is considered a person, then it becomes a constitutional issue on the national level. If not, then it becomes a bit more contentious, but telling women what they can or can't do with something that is considered simply a part of their body(and in this case the procedure is quite and harmless, unlike suicide or self-mutilation) starts to sound pretty iffy(thus the "right to privacy".) When someone then sues a state and loses(upholding a state's right to ban abortion), it creates a somewhat uncomfortable federal court precedent. That's my view on that matter. Rhenquist certainly thought otherwise.