Fiery_penguin_of_doom Posts
peto453 wrote...
I agree, but we must remember that a lot of "mexicans" go to USA legally, and with all the paper work done, even with that a lot of us become discriminated, i also agree with you not all americans are racist i know that, i got a lot of friends there, Chicago, NY, Texas... we just want and not only us the "mexicans", all the immigrants in US, arab, jap, chinese, etc. we want a little or your hospitality cause most of us the only thing we want is a job, could be disturbin for you, maybe for me too if you come to Mexico and ask for a job, but you dont lose anything for givin us an oportunity to help you and in the same time helpin us. We only want some respect and not be treated as ignorants, criminals, inferiors, or idiots.Intelligent Americans don't have a problem with your kind of immigration. As long as they come in through legal methods and at least assimilate into the culture (i.e. speak English in public) then most Americans wouldn't even take a second look. Any person would be willing to give you a job but, you still have the stigma as long as immigrants are crossing the boarder illegally. Also it's human nature to dislike those who aren't like you blah blah blah.
nzephier wrote...
if some random guy from Japan wnated to come here, there would be no problem. im sure he would have to go through the necessary paperwork for his citizenship, but its not like we are gonna put him on a plane back to Asia. so why do we need to crack down on Mexicans? Mexican people take all the jobs nobody even wants. this is the only reason why i would say i hate America, because of this so caleld "problem". if the reason for sending Mexicans back to Mexico is because it is easier to put mexicans back in mexico then it is to ship other people back to their respective continents, then isn't that worthy of calling America hypocrits/racists? this is called "the land of the free", so why do Mexicans have to sneak into America? How is a Mexican man supposed to even become a citizen if he is not allowed into america without being one?"Mexicans" on the other hand come across in droves. Take jobs away from LEGAL immigrants and citizens. Doesn't matter if we want the job or not. Somebody will take the job because they want to eat. If I lose my job, I'll go work at McDonalds, I'll go back out and work construction,etc. If the job exists, somebody will do it. If they came through the proper channels then we'd be golden. Just fill out a few sheets of paper and wait. It's not that hard, it's actually about as difficult as filling out a job application.
That is my issue with illegals. They cut in line in front of other immigrants, the break our laws (by entering and not leaving, some even drive without car insurance), then take jobs away from legal immigrants and American Citizens
nzephier wrote...
not to be racist or even mean to Arab and/or Indians (from India), but when 9/11 happened, the government said it was the fault of Arab terrorists. i didn't see any Arab people kicked out of America just because they were associated with their own nationality. hell Canada has done some fucked up things to, theres no border patroll there. if another reason is because law officials equate Mexicans with crime, then they need to go down to all of the gangsters in detroit, and LA and figure out the problem from where it is actually coming from.
this is not a serious topic.
We're not racist..well some Americans are but, not all. The difference between "arab" americans and "Mexicans" is the method they got into the country. Arabs come in legally where as "Mexicans" don't.
About Canada: It's Canada. We don't need to hire a security guard for the guy renting the apartment above us. Unless he starts making a lot of noise so we can't sleep at night. Once people start sneaking into America via Canada we'll put boarder patrol there.
WhiteLion wrote...
I'm pretty sure this isn't true. The government doesn't print money for this kind of spending, they just increase the debt. They either take money from other sources of income that were meant for other things(people paying into social security, etc) or borrow money via bonds. Printing 1 trillion dollars, as you say, would be idiotic. I'd be interested to know what source claims we are going to print 1 trillion dollars.Let me counter with this. We had to print money for the bank bailouts. The last few years we have been borrowing money from other countries to pay for the various programs of the government. Social Security is already a mess and will be bankrupt before we're old enough to draw benefits. People are spending money to be taxed to raise the income of the Federal Government. So what's left?
We're already printing money for "smaller" spending. So..what is so hard to grasp when we are about to spend 1/3rd of the total federal budget (of 2008) within the first two months of 2009? The money wasn't there before and the politicians couldn't play their economic voodoo then so why is it any different now? The money didn't exist then and it doesn't exist now. Even borrowing this amount of money only means that we are digging a deeper hole. I can't go into debt and keep spending and somehow magically get out of debt. Neither can the government. You simply can't spend your way out of debt.
Debt Clock
Anyways, you'll have to give me time on this. The amount of articles I read a day is staggering when you have to search through them again.
theotaku wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Sarene wrote...
wtf... how does that little boy even know what sex is?! o__o i didn't even know what a blowjob was until the middle of hs >__>
You lived a sheltered life my dear. I was going to school with girls who were late term pregnant in 7th grade. The world is a fucked up place.
What kind of school did you go to? :shock:
Suburban Georgia middle school. When you look at the school you think "this seems like a typical slice of Americana"...Then once you see the "youth"..and realize we are so fucking screwed...
Sarene wrote...
wtf... how does that little boy even know what sex is?! o__o i didn't even know what a blowjob was until the middle of hs >__>
You lived a sheltered life my dear. I was going to school with girls who were late term pregnant in 7th grade. The world is a fucked up place.
qurius wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom "Who shot the first gun?"
it's the israeli!!! they attack the palestinian and take the land that they have... what the palestinian done with the act of suicide bombing and all was the act of regaining their freedom from oppression...
Blowing up buses & markets with civilians isn't a way to gain "freedom from oppression". I would find your argument more believable if Hamas wasn't firing indiscriminately into Israel and attacking civilian targets. Israel has a clear and standing military. If Hamas only attacked military targets then I would find your argument more believable. I still think Israel could have done a better job but, I can certainly see from the perspective of the Israeli people.
irondik wrote...
i think suicide bomb is just freakingly, crazily, stupidly, retard thing to doyou don't go to heaven by killing other person.......
well except if that person is threatening some one you love
maybe....
i don't know, I'm not god you know
jeez
You just earned yourself a place next to Mnx as a "good Muslim" which is one step closer to me thinking that the majority is actually peaceful instead of wanting to go Jihad on my ass.
blind_assassin wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
stuffI'll just assume you're going after the idea of a stimulus in the world sense rather than singling out the United States one (and, of course, making your dislike of Obama clear). Your criticism of the stimulus is a really common "I don't have any formal or practical understanding of how economics actually works" argument. The idea that when everyone is broke spending money seems like a very dumb idea is a common sense notion but it's wrong. When everyone stops spending markets continue to shrink infinitely. GDP will plummet and unemployment goes up as the economy recesses repeatedly. The economy shrinks because real savings can't happen when there's no investment in an economy. The only (or at least the simplest and most effective way) to get the economy functioning normally is to spend money. On an individual level this is outrageously risky and not something a normal person would think to do and would likely result in financial self-destruction. Rather than coordinate a few hundred million people spending on their own the government takes on the responsibility of putting money into the system to build confidence in investors to get the system working again as it normally does. That's how a capitalist system works. Clearly the recessions are a big flaw but people know how to deal with them. The only flaws are that the public gets very scared and confused and Libertarians (whom I tend to mostly agree with politically) get in the fucking way. A non-recession prone system would be nice but since the primary alternative is a system where the economy just functions so poorly that having it shrink wouldn't matter.
Giving the American people $8 a week isn't going to help anybody (look at the numbers and break them down. You'll see my point). The money won't create jobs, it'll barely do anything for the economy if it does anything at all. As Whitelion has pointed out we should spend the money on better projects since some aren't "pressing" and others are downright stupid. But, as the senators run rampant with our hard earned tax dollars like a teenage girl at the mall with a no-limit credit card. We will eventually have to pay for our irresponsibility. Though, I can understand where people are coming from. The man that gave them "hope" is suddenly telling the American people that the sky is falling. The average idiot played into the mass hysteria so politicians like Chuck schumer, Nancy pelosi and Harry Reid can pass their little pet projects.
I'm starting to not hate Obama, I'm starting to pity him. I'm also beginning to think he was just a puppet for certain politicians.
Edit: I think we had a communication error Blind_assassin. When I said that we didn't have the money. I meant that the money didn't physically exist in the world. The Government actually had to print up money for both "stimulus" bills between Bush & Obama. So our Federal Government just decided to make more money (anybody who stayed awake in their economics class would realize the problem with printing 1 trillion dollars at once).
We live in a word full of idiots and their gross stupidity has begun to overwhelm the intelligent people in the world.
This basically sums up my feelings about the state of the world
For those who have seen Idiocracy. I wholehearted believe that is where the world is heading.
This basically sums up my feelings about the state of the world
Spoiler:
For those who have seen Idiocracy. I wholehearted believe that is where the world is heading.
rbz123 wrote...
holygift wrote...
completely prohibit the consumption of meat and fishFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU
They don't understand the meaning of freedom.
Same
Drugs: Sure, I won't do anything more than pot but, everybody has the right to do what/with their body as long as they only affect themselves.
Public Nudity: Eh, don't really want this since it means that fat 40yr old people can walk around without cloths. I'd prefer it in separate areas.
Age of consent:..Don't see a good outcome to this. I don't think I need to explain why. Seriously? Child porn? WTF? I need a table for this one.
Banning of meat: They can go fuck themselves.
In general. They can go fuck themselves.
Waar wrote...
at least the FCC doesn't control the internet, imagine if they did...Don't worry, they are trying to get laws passed so they can "regulate" the internet.
A good (but, misguided) man who fought passionately for a cause he believed in. Even if I disagree with his ideology of socialism/communism. Did a good thing by fighting on the behalf of the poor, downtrodden and removing dictators. Other than my ideological disagreements over socialism/communism. I find the man inspiring.
blind_assassin wrote...
And are seriously swiping at Obama for doing what every fucking country on the planet that has currency and an economy is doing? The US has the most expensive stimulus because the US got it by far the worst. The only reason that other countries are being affected by it is because their banks went up to US ones and said "Can we get in on this action?" and loaded up on problems and bad loans. In theory it was possible for only America to be in trouble here, although in practice it clearly didn't work out that way and never would have without foreknowledge.Lets ignore the fact that the United States is projected to have a $1.2 trillion deficit by the end of this year, even though the "stimulus" is estimated to cost 1 trillion dollars even if I overestimated it a little bit. That is still hundreds of billions of dollars being spent THAT WE DON'T HAVE. Money works the same way no matter who holds it. I can't go into debt and keep spending money and magically get out of debt.
The "stimulus" which is barely doing anything besides funding "pet projects" for senators is as big as the entire federal deficit ($1.2 trillion this year). Money works the same way in my hands as it does in the governments hands. I can't spend my way out of debt and neither can the government. My money was near worthless before the Government decided to print billions more and lower the value.
A lot of the actual "spending" in the "stimulus" is junk that wouldn't help the economy. Whatever, if the economy is going to collapse unless people get their digital converters or get screened for STD's then this place sucks enough that is needs to collapse and start over.
$2 billion earmark to re-start FutureGen, a near-zero emissions coal power plant in Illinois that the Department of Energy defunded last year because it said the project was inefficient.
A $246 million tax break for Hollywood movie producers to buy motion picture film.
$650 million for the digital television converter box coupon program.
$88 million for the Coast Guard to design a new polar icebreaker (arctic ship).
$448 million for constructing the Department of Homeland Security headquarters.
$248 million for furniture at the new Homeland Security headquarters.
$600 million to buy hybrid vehicles for federal employees.
$400 million for the Centers for Disease Control to screen and prevent STD's.
$1.4 billion for rural waste disposal programs.
$125 million for the Washington sewer system.
$150 million for Smithsonian museum facilities.
$1 billion for the 2010 Census, which has a projected cost overrun of $3 billion.
$75 million for "smoking cessation activities."
$200 million for public computer centers at community colleges.
$75 million for salaries of employees at the FBI.
$25 million for tribal alcohol and substance abuse reduction.
$500 million for flood reduction projects on the Mississippi River.
$10 million to inspect canals in urban areas.
$6 billion to turn federal buildings into "green" buildings.
$500 million for state and local fire stations.
$650 million for wild land fire management on forest service lands.
$1.2 billion for "youth activities," including youth summer job programs.
$88 million for renovating the headquarters of the Public Health Service.
$412 million for CDC buildings and property.
$500 million for building and repairing National Institutes of Health facilities in Bethesda, Maryland.
$160 million for "paid volunteers" at the Corporation for National and Community Service.
$5.5 million for "energy efficiency initiatives" at the Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration.
$850 million for Amtrak.
$100 million for reducing the hazard of lead-based paint.
$75 million to construct a "security training" facility for State Department Security officers when they can be trained at existing facilities of other agencies.
$110 million to the Farm Service Agency to upgrade computer systems.
$200 million in funding for the lease of alternative energy vehicles for use on military installations.
It was more than just a swipe at Obama. It was a swipe at the politicians in Washington who claim to be champions for the "little guy" and yet earn 6 figure incomes ($165,000) for their jobs while middle class America gets around 50k a year
Overall, I agree with projects like repairing bridges, making government buildings "green" or more energy efficient which saves money in the long run. Hell, if I had my way every government building would have solar panels (where it would be effective). Tax cuts across the board rather than the government spending. The 500 a head is 'okay' for the moment but, my principals are that Government should only give it's people Protection from force or fraud (Cops, Military, Courts). While the rest should be left up to the individual state governments or in the private sector. A lot of this is just pure junk. The actual paper for the "bill" being passed in the Senate is 900 pages and weights 11lbs. I feel the need to buy a the worlds largest pig and write "Government spending" on the side of it to drive my point.
I'd be a bitch, and probably a lesbian. More than likely even more miserable about everything in life.
NotYou wrote...
But why? Because all the expensive wars! (And some other influences,too.)I love how everybody blames the wars as the reason that the world economy hit the breaks. The wars may have costs us an equivalent of money equal to the GPA of several smaller countries but, we're sustained these wars for 8 years now. Depending on who you ask the cost in around 1-2 trillion. Everybody bitches about that cost (even though Obama's Faux "stimulus" will cost 1 trillion).
The real reason behind the economy hitting the breaks is that people got greedy, everybody was borrowing on credit and debt was just exchanging hands all the time. The average American has actually been spending more than they make. Combined with the overinflated housing prices. There are estimated to be 2 million more homes than there are families to occupy them. So combined the overspending of the average person, mismanaged lending to anyone (living or dead), the bursting of the housing bubble.
This isn't a case of the straw that broke the camels back.
ShaggyJebus wrote...
I hate when people say shit like this. "The Hispanics are only doing jobs that no one wants." That isn't true. People always want jobs, even if it's mopping up puke or cleaning up shit. Hell, cleaning up shit isn't any worse than working in fast food and having grease splashed all over your face all the time. At least shit wouldn't give you acne.Plus, it's impossible to find a job right now. Two years ago, the whole "Hispanics do shitty jobs" thing might have worked, but America's economy is so fucked right now, and jobs are so scarce, that that statement holds no water. I know people (and I'm one of them) who would get just about any job right now, and if all the illegal immigrants disappeared, we'd all probably be able to get jobs.
I was hoping for a "good" debate on this subject but, Misterstupid has forced me to settle with this.
If you came into this country illegally, you broke the law. What happens when you break the law? You get punished. We enforce every other law (even the arbitrary ones) so why the fuck do people feel the need that these people are somehow different?
Now, that this is out of the way. Illegal immigrants are leaving in droves because their primary work (housing, construction,etc) is drying up or completely stopped. They weren't "taking the jobs nobody wants" they were forcing people to work for less. Why would a construction company hire a guy for $9-10/hr when he can hire an illegal for $5/hr? I've worked in warehousing and construction and most of my coworkers were illegal immigrants (usually Guatemalan). Construction, roofing and such are good ways to debunk the "jobs nobody wants" argument. Since not every illegal is a maid in a hotel or a janitor. Even fast food and other restaurant jobs are jobs somebody would want (usually younger people).
ShaoZhao wrote...
officially changing my name to Kingpin_ShaoZhaothanx Klown
Ask Jacob very nicely and he may do it.
A weapon can do nothing on it's own. A gun will just lay there waiting for someone to pick it up. The same goes for a hammer, a shovel, a pitchfork, etc.
The problem with banning weapons is that it's impossible. For countries like Japan that have bans on firearms. Guns still get into the country and into the hands of the Yakuza and similar organizations. In order to counter this the police or other security forces would have to be armed to counter the threats of gangs or the petty thief. There are two problems with this (I'm just going with guns for simplicity)
1). Criminals will usually have better weapons. They can access anything from a GLOCK to a fully automatic rifle. The average patrolman is only issued a 9mm. Sometimes they are issued a shotgun but, only S.W.A.T. have any real access to "heavy firepower". In order to counter this problem you have to equip the average patrolman with better guns on par with S.W.A.T. teams. Which leads to problem #2
2). With increases in firepower between the criminals and the police. The average citizen is the only one actually effected by the banning of weapons. They are no longer allowed to possess any means to defend themselves (outside of baseball bats, golf clubs, etc). Which leaves the citizens vulnerable to robbery. Police can't always be there to protect them and not everyone will have the money to hire their own security. So in the absence of police the only person left to defend the family is the family itself. A related problem to the difference in firepower between citizens and the people charged with their protection leads to abuse of power.
Without the means to protect themselves it leaves the citizens at the mercy of abusive police or criminals. History has proven several times that the removal of weapons from the hands of the ordinary citizen only leads to trouble.
As for the carrying a weapon on your person for protection on the street is nonsense. The only chance to use such a weapon would be if the thug turned his back to run. Which would lead to the thug just shooting his victims before he runs. In the end it is impossible to prevent humans from killing one another. It is simple human nature.
The problem with banning weapons is that it's impossible. For countries like Japan that have bans on firearms. Guns still get into the country and into the hands of the Yakuza and similar organizations. In order to counter this the police or other security forces would have to be armed to counter the threats of gangs or the petty thief. There are two problems with this (I'm just going with guns for simplicity)
1). Criminals will usually have better weapons. They can access anything from a GLOCK to a fully automatic rifle. The average patrolman is only issued a 9mm. Sometimes they are issued a shotgun but, only S.W.A.T. have any real access to "heavy firepower". In order to counter this problem you have to equip the average patrolman with better guns on par with S.W.A.T. teams. Which leads to problem #2
2). With increases in firepower between the criminals and the police. The average citizen is the only one actually effected by the banning of weapons. They are no longer allowed to possess any means to defend themselves (outside of baseball bats, golf clubs, etc). Which leaves the citizens vulnerable to robbery. Police can't always be there to protect them and not everyone will have the money to hire their own security. So in the absence of police the only person left to defend the family is the family itself. A related problem to the difference in firepower between citizens and the people charged with their protection leads to abuse of power.
plato wrote...
Every care must be taken that our auxiliaries, being stronger than our citizens, may not grow too much for them and become savage beasts.As for the carrying a weapon on your person for protection on the street is nonsense. The only chance to use such a weapon would be if the thug turned his back to run. Which would lead to the thug just shooting his victims before he runs. In the end it is impossible to prevent humans from killing one another. It is simple human nature.
pumpkin king wrote...
The people in germany at the time probably follwed hitler because he could speak better than any body else at the time and was promising to revitalise germany. When he started keeping his word more people followed and it was probably quite easy for them to go along with the master race bullshit since the cost of paper to print bills no longer outstripped the value of the dollars they made. The people were just patriots Hitler was the insane idiot who started started another world war because he couldn't organise and coordinate anything in large numbers for shit.
Anyone who doesn't believe me just look at any of the military battles that did not end in blitzkreg and tell me the result. This was the same military retard who had the worlds first jet planes and didn't use them in dog fghts.
Similar to what I said at the beginning of the thread. Took a shit hole and turned it into a powerful industrial country. He wasn't a complete idiot when it came to military tactics but, he wasn't a master of tactics either. If he had won in WW2 he would have been a hero to his country but, since he lost he is considered one of the faces of evil. As someone already said in this thread "The winners write the history books"
Busy penguin was busy.
Not a matter of tight or not but, she was nice. If masturbation felt that good, your hand would never leave your pants.
The whole event was rather interesting. Ziggy got lost in the airport due to the terrible way the airport is designed for arriving flights. Showed her how terrible the roads are designed here (as the other Georgia residents of Fakku can attest to). She kept asking questions about the differences between Atlanta and Penn. Mostly, the different signs like "No" or "X" over opposing traffic lanes and various other traffic differences.
The condo was rather impressive. Well furnished (besides what appeared to be an ancient tv. It was so old I believe that if I had turned it on I would have gotten a crude cave painting of a buffalo.
The tour of the campus was excruciatingly long. I was bored out of my mind during the whole trip but, I was happy to help Ziggy out anyways.
Though I am glad the stereotypical southern accents and mannerisms didn't come out. Ask for a coke and get asked "What kind?" or the dreaded "Y'all want some sweet tea?"
Waar wrote...
how was the raep fpod? tight?Not a matter of tight or not but, she was nice. If masturbation felt that good, your hand would never leave your pants.
The whole event was rather interesting. Ziggy got lost in the airport due to the terrible way the airport is designed for arriving flights. Showed her how terrible the roads are designed here (as the other Georgia residents of Fakku can attest to). She kept asking questions about the differences between Atlanta and Penn. Mostly, the different signs like "No" or "X" over opposing traffic lanes and various other traffic differences.
The condo was rather impressive. Well furnished (besides what appeared to be an ancient tv. It was so old I believe that if I had turned it on I would have gotten a crude cave painting of a buffalo.
The tour of the campus was excruciatingly long. I was bored out of my mind during the whole trip but, I was happy to help Ziggy out anyways.
Though I am glad the stereotypical southern accents and mannerisms didn't come out. Ask for a coke and get asked "What kind?" or the dreaded "Y'all want some sweet tea?"