gizgal Posts
artcellrox wrote...
Wait, layman's terms, please! What good will limiting vasectomies do?
It's a joke. She's protesting the anti-choice sentiment and lawmaking currently ongoing.
I like this satire on the whole men-rule-women's-health-issues-debates.
- Mistakes happen. The only thing you can do with them is learn.
- Be true to yourself. Don't let someone else define "you", and let others be who "they" are in the same way (as long as no one is at risk).
- Haters gonna hate. Even if they get you down, remember that you're the better person for moving past it. You can only control your own actions, so make them count.
- No matter how how down you get, remember the good times. Keep yourself happy, but healthily so.
- Be true to yourself. Don't let someone else define "you", and let others be who "they" are in the same way (as long as no one is at risk).
- Haters gonna hate. Even if they get you down, remember that you're the better person for moving past it. You can only control your own actions, so make them count.
- No matter how how down you get, remember the good times. Keep yourself happy, but healthily so.
Maeve wrote...
So you mean that they can't abort unless they're raped or am I taking this info incorrectly?Pretty much correct. As in "you can abort, but first we'll rape you with this object, no matter if you say no". And yes, as the FBI (FINALLY, after 50+ years of being asked to) changed the legal definition of rape to include both sexes, any orifice, and object rape, this IS rape.
Randumb wrote...
Wait ... so why the ultrasound? Can anyone enlighten me as to any salient reason for it? Oh wait, "no medical reason." You know what? Fuck you, Virginia. Santa Claus isn't real.To force them to see the tiny speck that anyone who isn't a doctor wouldn't be able to see. They then circle it on the ultrasound image as if to somehow guilt women into hearing bullshit moral advice. "DERP THERE'S A LITTLE PARASITE IN THERE, YOU SHOULD TOTALLY SAVE IT SEE IT IS A SPECK, THAT TOTALLY MEANS IT'S A PERSON!".
We're not talking visible images of embryos that expecting parents get printed out and figure out the child's sex from. We're talking a blob of cells.
When in fact it may not even be that far along or developed. And studies have shown that even when forced to view an ultrasound image of their uterus, most women STILL go along with it. Seriously, if you've set your mind against having an unwanted pregnancy, there's a REASON, and not one easily changed.
Also, this woman is my new hero.
http://jezebel.com/5887293/smartass-state-lawmaker-proposes-vasectomy-limits-for-men
"Tired of the bullshit, a female Democrat shot back with a bill that would limit vasectomies in the state. The author of the No Child Left in Ballsack Act is Yasmin Neal, a Democrat from Riverdale. In a statement to the media, she said,
'Thousands of children are deprived of birth in this state every year because of the lack of state regulation over vasectomies. It is patently unfair that men can avoid unwanted fatherhood by presuming that their judgment over such matters is more valid than the judgment of the General Assembly, while women's ability to decide is constantly up for debate throughout the United States.' "
I'm okay with this. When you actively and knowingly produce constant pollution, you should be given citation.
It's like driving a car without a muffler. Or not turning on a vent when cooking over a stove.
It benefits no one, no matter how "cool" it may look to someone.
It's like driving a car without a muffler. Or not turning on a vent when cooking over a stove.
It benefits no one, no matter how "cool" it may look to someone.
It fits into the legal definition of rape. Forced objects into orifices.
Which constitutes unwanted penetration, aka RAPE. Seriously, is NO ONE SEEING THIS :|
To quote from my post in the other thread ( https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=82345 )
Also, this bullshit... ZERO WOMEN allowed to speak, but men from various religious postions allowed? Wait, I thought uterus control was on trial here, not church-centric moral bullshit. -___-
http://jezebel.com/5885672/congressional-birth-control-hearing-involves-exactly-zero-people-who-have-a-uterus
Oh, and even funnier: a news channel's panel discussing this lack of vagina was comprised of... guess? No women.
I swear, if a Republican wins this coming election, I will be leaving the US as soon as I'm able. They're crazily motivated enough (and getting financially backed enough) to turn this great land into a place scarily reminiscent of the dystopian, anti-female novel "The Handmaid's Tale".
Which constitutes unwanted penetration, aka RAPE. Seriously, is NO ONE SEEING THIS :|
To quote from my post in the other thread ( https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=82345 )
Also, this bullshit... ZERO WOMEN allowed to speak, but men from various religious postions allowed? Wait, I thought uterus control was on trial here, not church-centric moral bullshit. -___-
http://jezebel.com/5885672/congressional-birth-control-hearing-involves-exactly-zero-people-who-have-a-uterus
Oh, and even funnier: a news channel's panel discussing this lack of vagina was comprised of... guess? No women.
I swear, if a Republican wins this coming election, I will be leaving the US as soon as I'm able. They're crazily motivated enough (and getting financially backed enough) to turn this great land into a place scarily reminiscent of the dystopian, anti-female novel "The Handmaid's Tale".
NG14916 wrote...
I'm somewhat surprised that there isn't one already, but there should be a genderbending tag. https://www.fakku.net/viewmanga.php?id=3138
In what sense? Reversed roles or clothes?
We have tomboy and femdom tags... and trap covers reverse traps as well, I think.
Takerial wrote...
You're proud of the fact that you lied to your boss, neglected your duties to have sex with an obvious slut who you feel prey to someone after giving her smokes with just some cleavage.With a condom from a gas station bathroom?
Probably an underage girl too.
That's not a win.
Yeah, and selling cigs to underage people to boot. Ugh.
Too soon, bro, too soon.
Gotta give people some space and time to think. No offense, but that might have (or at least temporarily may have) jeopardized your chances.
Gotta give people some space and time to think. No offense, but that might have (or at least temporarily may have) jeopardized your chances.
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
True that Disney has brought it very far by distributing other people's work in the West and has made a lot of profit from it, but is it wrong to "claim it"?I don't see Disney giving proper credit to the ones who actually made it. Not just Disney but others as well.
I'm not against it if they wanna bring other people's work and turn it to the West, but I just find it awkward claiming it is mine.
Are you shitting me?
I JUST went to see Arrietty in theaters. Yes, dumb ol' Disney shows their logo first, but then the big blue screen of Studio Ghibli's logo came on. Followed by accurate, English-translated credits for all the people who worked on the film.
They don't "hide" or take credit for the work. Yeah, some idiots who take everything at face value may assume that due to the fact they "presented" the film, they own it somehow, but that's just not the case.
John Lasseter and Miyazaki are even FRIENDS. He got a damn Catbus for his wall!
Ok, let's get something straight. DISNEY DOES NOT OWN GHIBLI.
Never have, never will. Ghibli still profits from its overseas theatrical releases.
Studio Ghibli and Eisner John Lasseter teamed up long ago to bring the films over here and to other countries outside Japan.
Honestly, yes, it pisses me off too, to see the Disney logo emblazoned on all things Ghibli when they're in theaters, but without Disney's wide reach and funds, a lot of the studio's films would not be seen by many.
If you buy the Japanese version legitimately, so be it, but understand that buying an official Disney-sanctioned release does just as much good.
MILLIONS of companies do similar things to this. How do you think we get foreign films shown anywhere but their home country? International distributors.
Never have, never will. Ghibli still profits from its overseas theatrical releases.
Studio Ghibli and Eisner John Lasseter teamed up long ago to bring the films over here and to other countries outside Japan.
Honestly, yes, it pisses me off too, to see the Disney logo emblazoned on all things Ghibli when they're in theaters, but without Disney's wide reach and funds, a lot of the studio's films would not be seen by many.
If you buy the Japanese version legitimately, so be it, but understand that buying an official Disney-sanctioned release does just as much good.
MILLIONS of companies do similar things to this. How do you think we get foreign films shown anywhere but their home country? International distributors.
As much as I enjoy talking with certain users, this is a porn site.
Not a social networking one.
If you want to keep in touch, why not just get someone's contact info?
What is there to "follow" on here? There's not "updates" or status postings, unless you creepily want to check every comment someone makes... but you can do so manually by looking at their profile anyhow.
Not a social networking one.
If you want to keep in touch, why not just get someone's contact info?
What is there to "follow" on here? There's not "updates" or status postings, unless you creepily want to check every comment someone makes... but you can do so manually by looking at their profile anyhow.
Ugh... a few qualms.
- is multimedia major, but has NO DESIGN SENSE... work looks like my middle school websites (and level of slang...)
- buys anime DVDs and supports shows she doesn't even like (just the characters, via merch she buys officially), but buys bootlegs of fave series; Y U NO PAY FOR ACTUAL, QUALITY, CREATOR-PAYING ITEM IF YOU WANT THE DVD?!
- doesn't give a shit for anyone's opinion, while claiming to be open (at least on leadership stuff)
- is multimedia major, but has NO DESIGN SENSE... work looks like my middle school websites (and level of slang...)
- buys anime DVDs and supports shows she doesn't even like (just the characters, via merch she buys officially), but buys bootlegs of fave series; Y U NO PAY FOR ACTUAL, QUALITY, CREATOR-PAYING ITEM IF YOU WANT THE DVD?!
- doesn't give a shit for anyone's opinion, while claiming to be open (at least on leadership stuff)
Iamnotchrishansen wrote...
gizgal wrote...
Iamnotchrishansen wrote...
I crack LGBT jokes but I don't hate or dislike them....I hate to be the one to break bad news or sound "overly PC", but jokes just further problematic behavior against people of non-hetero-sexualities...
The last thing I want is free speech to be killed by PC. It's just an example of how soft society has gotten. You're right about the statement gizgal, but what will happen if the snowball gets rolling and more and more things become "taboo"?
I agree on that. We can't allow just the Onion or comedians to crack race and sex jokes but prohibit common people from it, but at the same time it's so hard to find that fine line where the people being joked about start to laugh and not frown...
crimson875 wrote...
i know, my coloring sucks LOL but uh.....i will still post it here :)Spoiler:
btw i wanted to ask, is HENTAI artwork like this allowed in deviantart?
There's another art site specifically for "hentai" art (anime/manga/cartoon style only, I think), but the name escapes me atm...
:D Good starts!
I have forgotten much of my origami skill over the years... used to be able to do tougher ones, but I learned from watching and workshops, so going back to book diagrams was tough for the harder folds I'd forgotten. ;;
You and heck, any other paper craft fans should check out 4chan's /po/ board, it's fairly active for an online community. I got really into papermodels back when it was started in '05 or so! :D
I have forgotten much of my origami skill over the years... used to be able to do tougher ones, but I learned from watching and workshops, so going back to book diagrams was tough for the harder folds I'd forgotten. ;;
You and heck, any other paper craft fans should check out 4chan's /po/ board, it's fairly active for an online community. I got really into papermodels back when it was started in '05 or so! :D
Iamnotchrishansen wrote...
I crack LGBT jokes but I don't hate or dislike them....I hate to be the one to break bad news or sound "overly PC", but jokes just further problematic behavior against people of non-hetero-sexualities...
I love hentai as a pure manga genre, and not just character smut. Heck, I love original eromanga so much I've been trying to research its modern rise to greatness! :D
Well, since the site's partnering with Kitty Media now (at least for a few vids), I wonder if in the future we'll see more free (or heck, on demand/legal DL!!!) content available here.
I think that would be a great joint venture :o
I think that would be a great joint venture :o
I don't wanna threadjack (just PM me the answer I guess) but would any car audio folks know the answer to this?
I've been having a problem with my multi-CD stereo for years: after years of functioning, and proper use (I never stuff CDs in there, always wait for the loading signal, etc.), it began to malfunction and refuse to eject discs any longer.
For a while, my dad and I used to fix this issue by merely pulling and reinserting the stereo's fuse from its location under the hood while the car was on, and this worked pretty well for a few years after the issue started.
Then two years ago, it stopped working completely, and the usual "fix" of adjusting the fuse doesn't do anything; I just get an error reading when the stereo tries to start up. The radio, tape deck, and all work fine, but CD player is shot as I can't change or eject discs.
I don't give a damn about the player working anymore (as clearly it's too faulty and old to work), but how would I get my damn CDs out?
My fave six are in there, some rare and a pain to buy again if I can't get them out, and I never downloaded them to my computer stupidly... what can I do to free them, or do I need to pay a hefty fee to some technician to have them taken out (while not ruining the entire sound system/the car)? I've got a Toyota Landcruiser.
I've been having a problem with my multi-CD stereo for years: after years of functioning, and proper use (I never stuff CDs in there, always wait for the loading signal, etc.), it began to malfunction and refuse to eject discs any longer.
For a while, my dad and I used to fix this issue by merely pulling and reinserting the stereo's fuse from its location under the hood while the car was on, and this worked pretty well for a few years after the issue started.
Then two years ago, it stopped working completely, and the usual "fix" of adjusting the fuse doesn't do anything; I just get an error reading when the stereo tries to start up. The radio, tape deck, and all work fine, but CD player is shot as I can't change or eject discs.
I don't give a damn about the player working anymore (as clearly it's too faulty and old to work), but how would I get my damn CDs out?
My fave six are in there, some rare and a pain to buy again if I can't get them out, and I never downloaded them to my computer stupidly... what can I do to free them, or do I need to pay a hefty fee to some technician to have them taken out (while not ruining the entire sound system/the car)? I've got a Toyota Landcruiser.
The Jesus wrote...
I'm pro-choice, but an argument that never comes up is that the process of fertilization can take anywhere from 30 minutes to over 5 days. Aside from the fact that the basis of the legislation is completely ridiculous, it reinforces the notion that a vast majority of Republican law makers disregard science.Indeed. My personal favorite was one senator's response to the idiocy: if we're saying sperm and eggs separately are people too (essentially, this "personhood" bullshit believes this!), so she wants to pass a bill to make cumming anywhere but into a vagina constitute manslaughter.
http://jezebel.com/5883026/brilliant-democratic-state-senator-tacks-every-sperm-is-sacred-clause-to-oklahomas-personhood-bill
The genius of this bill lies in the fact that even the most stuck-up Repubs (and more than that, male and perhaps female VOTERS!) would never pass it. But if personhood-shit passed, they'd HAVE to consider how stupid a decision it was then!
