GoodDay Posts
softbanker wrote...
In my own experience, good oral or foreplay plus good banging is always a plus for the ladies. I remember this one time at band camp, when me and my gf just started having sex, I was confident I gave her my best foreplay due to the reactions shes giving but then when its time for penetration, even though I have the best size(she said so herself) I always fail to totally satisfy her due to I was young and still not experience yet (I cum so fast that it only take 5-9 pumps before I blow my jeez) but then as we had sex again and again I learned the way how to control it eventually. And now I'm totally confident that I can make a girl cums like she never had cum before harhar. So my point is having the skills in oral/foreplay plus a good size dick always has the advantage over the small dick + good oral/foreplay.Yes, yes, we're all sure you are a stallion in the sack and truly a sight to behold.
While people are generally all the same, there are certain differences from person to person, and one of those differences is in the best way for one to get maximum sexual satisfaction. Especially in women. Some women can climax through straight up penetration, but many just don't, although they probably still enjoy it. Which I can say, as a man, has always been an odd concept to me, enjoying sex without actually having an orgasm. In any case, guys probably worry too much about the size of their dicks and women probably wish guys would do things like oral more often because a lot of women enjoy it more, and, in fact, will have orgasms through it, even if they don't have them through penetration. And we'd all like to believe it's very scientific and that there is an exact method to making a woman cum, and there really isn't. The best we men can do is try to figure out what works with whoever we are with. If you have a girlfriend, and you care if she enjoys the sexual aspect of your relationship, then work on it with her instead of just guessing. And if you're just gonna go fuck some bitches, then it really shouldn't matter to you anyway how they feel.
lollollol12 wrote...
Quadratic wrote...
So, um, here's something I just found out today when I read the newspaper.As if Saturday night couldn't be any more fucked up than it was? Well, it was. How is that possible, you ask? Well, remember how I mentioned we went to a lookout point that peers out over the entire city? That place is called Dundas Peak.

Out of every crazy thing that happened that night, the ONE break we got from all of the weird shit, the ONE moment of the night where everything seemed calm and normal and fine...
...we were standing on top of a fucking dead body.
Just what the hell was going on that night?!
NOW SHITS GETTING INTENSE
Oh I agree. It's odd to me that you folks see this evening of shenanigans as somehow unusual or overly exciting.Sounds fairly normal to me. Except the dead body bit. Although, it's not as though you actually...saw the body or knew it was there or anything.
ansan wrote...
ERICKKING wrote...
The old fashion TV'sExactly, that's why so many kids are fat today; remote controls =)
You know the first television with a remote control was made in 1950, right?
Nov-a-tic wrote...
@irony. I was just stating a interesting theory that my friends and I came up with. there are limitless ideas people can come up with about stuff they dont know.
1.) a black hole is formed
2.) the atoms fuse
3.) the atoms just deflect off each other.
4.) an explosion
5.) an implosion
6.) a baby is born
7.) we discover God
All in all these are an extremely small amount of theories/ ideas of what is possible.
The fact of the matter is for all the hypotheses they make, no one actually know what will happen. so it is oppen for belief.
You make physics weep. Please stop taking a shit on it. Thank you.
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Time travel will never occur as far as I am concerned. Why? the theory of relativity states that an object requires exponentially more energy in order to go slightly faster. Why? Because as an object approaches the speed of light it gains mass (or weight I forget which). The sheer amount of energy that would be required to make an object reach the speed of light would be so massive that we simply can't produce that much energy at a single point. Though that only pokes hole in the faster than light travel theory.This is probably the most comprehensively true thing posted in this thread. It could certainly be a lot more true, but this isn't a classroom, so it's definitely true enough.
Most discussions about "time travel" tend to stray pretty well from being a discussion about the actual physical aspects and possibilities of it, and rest on being philosophical discussion with the assumption that in the future time travel is possible, and they then talk about the repercussions and more hypothetical subjects like how the universe would deal with someone traveling through time and change events that "already" happened. This isn't without reason, most people aren't having these discussions because they are a group of physicists working out how to actually do it, they're just some ordinary people. And ordinary people don't have a chance of coming close to understanding these kinds of things on any meaningful level. If you want to learn about this, study it independently and take some physics classes. And try to get your information from reliable sources, rather than just listening to what some dude on the internet says.
As far as going back in time and changing something, I've always liked to think that the universe can handle some dick trying to fuck shit up, and basically wouldn't let you do it, or at least not in the same continuity of reality that you originally existed in. I like the many-worlds interpretation, just because it gives the impression of better origination in the universe (or actually, multiverse), but I don't know if it's actually the most likely. It's a pretty speculative area.
Ironytaken wrote...
mangaka350 wrote...
Ironytaken wrote...
kitakaze wrote...
Dirty wrote...
This would be so awesome if it was actually real. I'd probably devote my life researching crap about this stuff.If you haven't researched it yet, how do you know if it isn't real?
Besides, there is scientific proof that the human brain can do amazing things with the body. Why is it such a stretch to think that the mind can function outside of the presumed limits?
tl;dr: You can't disprove it, either.
A rational person does not believe something without evidence.
There is no evidence of this third eye thing or chakra.
the third eye is real dude~
ive tried it since i was 7 years old
then it closed in the age of 15.
ability - the third eye has the ability to see something that is unknown to human beings plus its not a chakra its a gift or talent~
believe me ive always see shit!
since i was young! and i keep it
from myself.
And you think just saying that it is real is evidence that it is real?
I see no scientific source or peer review articles about it?
So I assume there is no evidence at all.
Actually I have searched and found no evidence whatsoever for chakra or a third eye.
Sorry but your word is not evidence.
It's entirely possible that he believes he saw something with his third eye, but I entirely agree with you that he, in fact, did not.
I wouldn't trust something someone says they saw as a little kid, then stopped seeing anyways. It's not uncommon for kids to fail to distinguish between reality and fiction.
When I was younger, I saw all sorts of things that I now realize were hallucinations, or happened entirely in my head. Someone who believes in the supernatural and such would be very likely to take that same experience and say they saw things with their third eye, or they had a gift for seeing ghosts, rather than just saying, "It was crazy, but it didn't happen."
Oriens Astrum wrote...
the perfect windows OSoh, lol and a half.
g-money wrote...
Here's a question I wanna ask others that pertains to this topic and my essay: what generation are we, the Z aka Internet generation, or the Y generation? I feel the distinction between the two to be pretty slim.My initial response was to say that most of us are Y generation, but then I realized that even assuming everyone here is of proper age, the latest birthdays could be in 1991. I just generally think of myself in the youngest group around, and I was born in 1989 and my parents were baby boomers, so I would probably be Y generation, but we could have members born as late as 1991 and their parents could be Generation X, which would probably make them Z.
I think most people posting in this thread are probably Y, though, simply because most in Z do not clearly remember the 90's. I only clearly remember the last half myself.
Mrprinnybomb wrote...
Dante1214 wrote...
Mrprinnybomb wrote...
Schellinkhout wrote...
Oh, recent happening, Lost the game with some friends, and these stupid white trash douches start laughing and pointing, and we hear "huh huh, those guys are fags" so I gave them shit, and asked why the fuck that would make us gay, apparently only those attracted to the same sex are able to play. just. wow. I didn't know it worked like that.My brain must not be working because I can't figure out how that story works.
As far as my experience goes, It would have to be from my philosophical studies class in my first year of college. Of course the first thing my teacher has us debate is religion and creationism. I decided to side with the people who would argue that religion is bullshit. Bad move; it was three people, me included, against fifteen. We were given ten minutes to organize our arguments. The worst offenders were these two girls I had to debate against. The first one tried to counter my argument that religion is the most successful scam in mankind's history by saying that christianity can not be manipulated because God made it and therefore it is perfect. I could barely contain myself and almost lol'd. The second girl's attempt to derail my stance on creationism, how could God exist in the first place if in the beginning there was nothing, by saying that my point is invalid because I am going to hell.
And somehow these people got into college. Just... wow.
That's...odd. What state was this school in? Most college kids I've encountered have been idiots, but ardent atheists, because they think it's the intellectual thing to be, and they want to seem intellectual. They are annoying and are the biggest reason you hear people say things like, "Atheism is itself a religion."
Also, in some collages, a professor can get in mad trouble for even mentioning creationism. And I certainly agree that it is unscientific, and further more, stupid, I don't think any topic should be off limits, especially in an environment with the stated purpose of higher learning. But this is another subject entirely.
Okay get ready for it.....wait for it..... the state I am currently going to school in is.............. almost.......... Tennessee. Yeah I know, not so odd now is it.
Oh my. Well, it could be worse. It could be Alabama.
To be honest, I would probably just say, "I do" without even thinking of the mention of God. The more time I spend away from my family, who are really the only religious people in my life, or at least the only people religious enough to mention God regularly in ordinary life, the more I notice when people say something about God or some shit. That being said, I'm still fairly used to the commonplace mention of God, and there are certain times you expect it and it doesn't stand out. Court is probably one of those situations. It's like saying, "I swear to God," or "God bless you," or "God's truth." I say these things, and I don't believe in God. Just sayings. And even if I noticed it, I wouldn't care enough to mention I was an atheist. I might sigh slightly on the inside, to the effect of, "lol separation of church and state," or something, but I would just agree and proceed.
I do feel like atheists are discriminated against in certain settings. Most people I'm regularly around don't care one way or the other. The majority of my friends are really agnostic. So I do not ever feel like being an atheist causes me any trouble. But sometimes people react to atheism as though it's a disease that you might give them, or associate a lack of faith in a higher power with a lack of any morality or anything good at all. Like being an atheist makes a person a lowlife. Which seems like what this guy had happen to him.
I don't know, like I said, it's honestly not a big deal to me. And I'm sorry I made that post a little longer than intended.
I do feel like atheists are discriminated against in certain settings. Most people I'm regularly around don't care one way or the other. The majority of my friends are really agnostic. So I do not ever feel like being an atheist causes me any trouble. But sometimes people react to atheism as though it's a disease that you might give them, or associate a lack of faith in a higher power with a lack of any morality or anything good at all. Like being an atheist makes a person a lowlife. Which seems like what this guy had happen to him.
I don't know, like I said, it's honestly not a big deal to me. And I'm sorry I made that post a little longer than intended.
Most fights that break out in highschool and such do not really last long. Someone breaks them up, or they end abruptly because someone lands something and the guy who gets hit realizes that getting hit hurts or some such thing.
I don't know. It doesn't do much good to talk about this kind of thing on the internet, anyway. I could say I'm awesome and no one could prove I wasn't.
But I used to train and fight at armature level in mixed martial arts and the like. So I've been in a lot of fights in that sense.
(Does football count... that hurts like a fight... i think.)
It doesn't count as a fight, I don't think. It's a different sort of hurt.
I don't know. It doesn't do much good to talk about this kind of thing on the internet, anyway. I could say I'm awesome and no one could prove I wasn't.
But I used to train and fight at armature level in mixed martial arts and the like. So I've been in a lot of fights in that sense.
Morning Star wrote...
*sigh* I never got in a fight...(Does football count... that hurts like a fight... i think.)
It doesn't count as a fight, I don't think. It's a different sort of hurt.
Tsujoi wrote...
kyuby7 wrote...
accident I thinkNo, see, he meant to go write a grocery list, but he was really messed up and accidentally wrote a suicide note, then stumbled around the house until he tripped and... fell into a shotgun blast.
Ironytaken wrote...
Lots of people miss the past. They call the past simple times. Or they think the past was better. But the reason they think this is because they were kids and they didn't have the responsibilities of an adult nor the worries of one.It is for this and several other reasons that nostalgia in general is pretty much bullshit.
The 90's weren't a particularly good decade, and there really isn't a particularly good decade. The 90's wasn't even long enough ago that people only remember music and other media in broad genres and have mostly forgotten about the bad stuff except in a sort of mocking manner (as we so often do with the 70's).
I don't remember the 90's being bad or anything for me, I just hate nostalgia.
Rin_Penelope wrote...
That seems like a great life. But you forgot to count possibilities of STDsThat's not all too likely unless you start doing Tijuana bestiality films.
In the regulated porn industry in the US, there are required STD screenings for performers. I think there is even a porn-workers union.
Well, you can certainly make a lot of money in a band with out anything about an average amount of musical skill, as long as you have skill in marketing, but I don't think it's fair to make the blanket statement about this kind of a thing. It really would depend on the band, and on the person. The only generalization I would make about it would be that in a band, in general, you don't have to worry as much about group organization; there are simply less instruments being played, and usually less than half a dozen guys, whereas in an orchestra you would have much more than that. But even then, it's not terribly hard to keep time once everyone learns to hit their cues and such.
You also have to remember that music, even bad music, is art. Bad music is just bad art. So while technical skill is important and deserves respect, it isn't all there is to it.
This also applies to rap or hip hop, but that is actually not necessarily so much music as it is poetry and beats. And there is skill that goes into beat arrangement and lyrical work, but a lot of popular rap is just shit. Write about gettin' money and having a bunch of shit and talk about it over a lame-ass beat that sounds like something that a 14-year-old would tap on their desk with a pencil. Get millions of dollars for it.
sigh.
You also have to remember that music, even bad music, is art. Bad music is just bad art. So while technical skill is important and deserves respect, it isn't all there is to it.
This also applies to rap or hip hop, but that is actually not necessarily so much music as it is poetry and beats. And there is skill that goes into beat arrangement and lyrical work, but a lot of popular rap is just shit. Write about gettin' money and having a bunch of shit and talk about it over a lame-ass beat that sounds like something that a 14-year-old would tap on their desk with a pencil. Get millions of dollars for it.
sigh.
TsundereHack wrote...
I'm kinda disgusted that half the voters think its okay. =/..
Ew. D;
But then again i was raised to not wait until marriage, But to wait until i was in love and they loved me back.
And frankly, Letting another person other then the one you love touch your body to me is nasty. Just fap.
Or get an artificial vag.
I'm all up for threesomes, But if your single still one night stands are a disrespect to yourself. =/
It doesn't work for all people, and I certainly respect people's respect for sex. For some people it's heavily symbolic and significant. But not everyone feels that way, and it doesn't make you a bad person not to. I don't think it's disrespectful to you or your partner, even if it's someone you don't know very well, to do something you both enjoy and leave it at that.
Mrprinnybomb wrote...
Schellinkhout wrote...
Oh, recent happening, Lost the game with some friends, and these stupid white trash douches start laughing and pointing, and we hear "huh huh, those guys are fags" so I gave them shit, and asked why the fuck that would make us gay, apparently only those attracted to the same sex are able to play. just. wow. I didn't know it worked like that.My brain must not be working because I can't figure out how that story works.
As far as my experience goes, It would have to be from my philosophical studies class in my first year of college. Of course the first thing my teacher has us debate is religion and creationism. I decided to side with the people who would argue that religion is bullshit. Bad move; it was three people, me included, against fifteen. We were given ten minutes to organize our arguments. The worst offenders were these two girls I had to debate against. The first one tried to counter my argument that religion is the most successful scam in mankind's history by saying that christianity can not be manipulated because God made it and therefore it is perfect. I could barely contain myself and almost lol'd. The second girl's attempt to derail my stance on creationism, how could God exist in the first place if in the beginning there was nothing, by saying that my point is invalid because I am going to hell.
And somehow these people got into college. Just... wow.
That's...odd. What state was this school in? Most college kids I've encountered have been idiots, but ardent atheists, because they think it's the intellectual thing to be, and they want to seem intellectual. They are annoying and are the biggest reason you hear people say things like, "Atheism is itself a religion."
Also, in some collages, a professor can get in mad trouble for even mentioning creationism. And I certainly agree that it is unscientific, and further more, stupid, I don't think any topic should be off limits, especially in an environment with the stated purpose of higher learning. But this is another subject entirely.
I don't like getting up early, but I work two jobs, and one of them is morning shifts at McDonalds. I actually have to work tomorrow at 6am, but during the week I usually work at 5am. If it weren't for the fact that I have another job I work evenings at, I would probably sleep during the afternoon, and get up between like 9pm and midnight, then be up for a while before going to work. I just generally feel better when I do that than when I have to get up at like 4:30am.
Level | Score
Purgatory | Very Low
Level 1 - Limbo | Very Low
Level 2 | Very High
Level 3 | High
Level 4 | Very Low
Level 5 | High
Level 6 - The City of Dis | Very High
Level 7 | High
Level 8- the Malebolge | Very High
Level 9 - Cocytus | High
I'm a heathen and a bastard.
Purgatory | Very Low
Level 1 - Limbo | Very Low
Level 2 | Very High
Level 3 | High
Level 4 | Very Low
Level 5 | High
Level 6 - The City of Dis | Very High
Level 7 | High
Level 8- the Malebolge | Very High
Level 9 - Cocytus | High
I'm a heathen and a bastard.
