GoodDay Posts
animefreak_usa wrote...
could of got a 360 or ps3 for 129$ this morning.... is there as black friday in frostback land or it just friday -30000 thereYeah, I'm getting one for around the same price. Gonna buy it (prob a ps3) on boxing day (Dec 26)
Posting in a locked thread leads to a
Your post did not meet the basic intelligence requirement for this forum.
Go back and try again (this time use proper punctuation).
page.
Your post did not meet the basic intelligence requirement for this forum.
Go back and try again (this time use proper punctuation).
page.
Sindalf wrote...
As far as my working systems go I own a ps3, ps2, GBA, NDS, gamecube, and a computer powerful enough to emulate ps2, gamecube, wii, NDS, and everything else in the world. Feels awesome and fuck xbox because mine broke twice on me.
I dream about good games then I download/buy those games.
You really are trying to bring the fanboys to this thread, aren't you?
I don't have any video game consoles.
I sleep.
I dream about buying a PS3 for $30 and Black Ops for another cost.
I was so happy.
I wake up.
I got sad.
[size=4]inb4 rage talk between the fanboys[/h]
I sleep.
I dream about buying a PS3 for $30 and Black Ops for another cost.
I was so happy.
I wake up.
I got sad.
[size=4]inb4 rage talk between the fanboys[/h]
Show her your dick. Maybe she'll be like, "ZOMG THAT SHIT WILL MAKE ME FEEL SO GOOD".
...But that's not likely.
...But that's not likely.
Sindalf wrote...
Waar wrote...
neko-chan wrote...
Someday, someone will want to get themselves perma banned, and they'll post thread with a picture of a dead kitty.It'll be like suicide by cop.
you've just described the previous incident that I was referring to earlier.
You forgot the part where it was being burned alive if my memory serves me right.
Was it fun?
Waar wrote...
GoodDay wrote...
Waar wrote...
GoodDay wrote...
Waar wrote...
going to point out that the rule does exist as gugu said and to be perfectly honest as another user was banned for something similar I don't see it being out of the question. I looked at both links and there is room for punishment in these cases. I am against a harsh punishment but I do believe one is in order.edit: links to videos/pics, you really think they don't apply? Someone links to gore websites, you don't think they'll see a ban?
How do you expect the users, who weren't there when a similar issue occurred before, to know of such event?
In addition, I do agree that a punishment should be in order, but not to the one who gave a warning before.
I expect them to read the rules and not be too stupid to realize that links to images and videos are the same things as the videos themselves, and as I said before, fair warning of gore is not enough to be able to post gore on fakku.
Then tell your lord, Jacob, to update the rules. Write Posting links to images/videos is equivalent to posting the images/videos in the link provided.
Guro/Scat/Loli/Beastiality or links directed to Guro/Scat/Loli/Beastiality materials will not be tolerated whatsoever
I don't see the point; are you telling me I need to specify links to images/videos as well as images/videos? Are you all really that stupid?
You really don't know anything about the forum section you're moderating.
@serpentura:
Lol I like where you're going with this.
Waar wrote...
GoodDay wrote...
Waar wrote...
going to point out that the rule does exist as gugu said and to be perfectly honest as another user was banned for something similar I don't see it being out of the question. I looked at both links and there is room for punishment in these cases. I am against a harsh punishment but I do believe one is in order.edit: links to videos/pics, you really think they don't apply? Someone links to gore websites, you don't think they'll see a ban?
How do you expect the users, who weren't there when a similar issue occurred before, to know of such event?
In addition, I do agree that a punishment should be in order, but not to the one who gave a warning before.
I expect them to read the rules and not be too stupid to realize that links to images and videos are the same things as the videos themselves, and as I said before, fair warning of gore is not enough to be able to post gore on fakku.
Then tell your lord, Jacob, to update the rules. Write Posting links to images/videos is equivalent to posting the images/videos in the link provided.
Guro/Scat/Loli/Beastiality or links directed to Guro/Scat/Loli/Beastiality materials will not be tolerated whatsoever
casiopao wrote...
Spoiler:
1. As i said before Don't you think it is weird if SK is already warned by NK before that they would not stay still seeing SK training their army but SK still do it ignoring the threats. I also could think that maybe SK is also looking for chance to strike NK by using the civilians and army as sacrificial lamb for giving them reason to strike back.
SK was, indeed, warned.
HOWEVER, this goes back to the example neko-chan gave. SK can do whatever they fucking want. It's their territory. If NK felt threatened, they should've given enough warning shots, instead of shooting at civilians right away.
Also, I believe SK wasn't even given enough time to get their shit away.
I assume you're saying that NK had a right to bombard SK with artillery because they felt threatened.
Then does that mean USA and SK can bombard Pyungyang because they feel threatened about the Uranium facility? I'm pretty sure both of them gave NK enough warnings about stopping their nuclear activities.
casiopao wrote...
2. I did not say i do not believe everything don't i? I meant we have seen the news from South Korea sides why don't we try to look the North Korea ones maybe it will be able to shed the light about what truly happen there.Good point. But they are not trustworthy. Too many lies were made by NK recently.
casiopao wrote...
3. So? because that economy has gone we should straightly let them falls to the end of earth. Nowadays countries are more concern about their economy and politics rather than their countries dignity anyway. If the economy is good their people would likely to choose them for another election however if they started war and the economy fall down would the people who suffer because of this action would likely to choose them again? And of course War would took life of the civilians as thats war nature. No one is wrong in War only the loser is the wrong sides and the winner is the righteous.Please re-post this with revision for grammatical errors. I was not able to understand you at all here.
