Noutakun Posts
Still lurking.
This thread needs a rest before it gets demoted to another flame war or bash fest. Smegma, you made a dumb move advocating anti-lolicon material on Fakku. Lul, that's like... well, similar to posting a video of yourself torturing a cat on /b/. It's just asking for trouble. You say it's immoral, we say you're a hypocrite. Ebb and flow.
Lurking moar now
This thread needs a rest before it gets demoted to another flame war or bash fest. Smegma, you made a dumb move advocating anti-lolicon material on Fakku. Lul, that's like... well, similar to posting a video of yourself torturing a cat on /b/. It's just asking for trouble. You say it's immoral, we say you're a hypocrite. Ebb and flow.
Lurking moar now
Joe-kun wrote...
I'm a member of Club Nintendo (Nintendo's excuse for you to register your games,) and at the end of every "club year," people who have reached elite status (by registering so much stuff) get to choose from a list of rewards. Check this out:
It hasn't come yet, but it's supposed to get here before November.
Yeah. I'm gonna look so fucking *sexy.
*sexy = I'll never get chicks wearing that damn thing. Oh well, fuck it.
I hereby declare you victorious at life. You have my congratulations.
This topic, however amusing it has become to me, is going to derail at this rate. As usual, the Godtard (yes, I went there. Fuck being unbiased) ran out of Bibleshit to throw at us and resorted to the "you're going to hell" bit. Go figure. That's about the pinnacle of every religious debate here.
Science: 1, Godfags: 0
Science: 1, Godfags: 0
lollollol12 wrote...
elfen lied wrote...
Jacob wrote...
I read all of the IRC logs and even though I don't think Hibia saw everything that was said, I approve of the ban.As everyone knows I rarely ban people for trolling or being an asshole (that's what happens on the Internet, get over it) but you managed to take it too far this time lolol. In addition to the IRC ban I am going to ban you from FAKKU for a week. When you come back (assuming you read this) do not make excessive personal attacks on my users.
+rep that is the words of an true leader
I HAVE THE OFFICIAL COPY VERSION:

Put that shit on a t-shirt, dawg.
I will quote my physics teacher when asked about religion. He responded, "Those who think science and religion are opposing views usually know very little of either."
Science is studied to unravel the mysteries of our universe. Personally, I believe the only difference between modern religion and old age Native American myths is popularity. Religion was created to attempt to explain what people could not, as well as spiritually attract people towards certain principles. Indian myths were made for the same reason. Different religions are a result of different areas of people, different languages, and different cultures. Who's to say one religion is more credible or more realistic than another without hardcore evidence? This leads to why I call myself an atheist.
Scientists have discovered evidence and constructed theories that contradict some religious claims. Evolution is a prime example. Christianity would state that God created man, and dinosaurs never existed; yet, we find fossilized remains of dinosaurs all the time, and we've good reason to believe we've evolved from ancient primates.
"Evolutionists have proof without certainty. Creationists have certainty without proof." I side with the atheist view because the Big Bang theory and my knowledge of science leads me to disbelieve in the possibility of a god. Religion would feed me stories as facts without evidence where science gives me evidence and rational hypotheses to apply my own thinking to.
Science and religion may contradict each other, but that doesn't make them two opposite stances. I just prefer to side with one.
Science is studied to unravel the mysteries of our universe. Personally, I believe the only difference between modern religion and old age Native American myths is popularity. Religion was created to attempt to explain what people could not, as well as spiritually attract people towards certain principles. Indian myths were made for the same reason. Different religions are a result of different areas of people, different languages, and different cultures. Who's to say one religion is more credible or more realistic than another without hardcore evidence? This leads to why I call myself an atheist.
Scientists have discovered evidence and constructed theories that contradict some religious claims. Evolution is a prime example. Christianity would state that God created man, and dinosaurs never existed; yet, we find fossilized remains of dinosaurs all the time, and we've good reason to believe we've evolved from ancient primates.
"Evolutionists have proof without certainty. Creationists have certainty without proof." I side with the atheist view because the Big Bang theory and my knowledge of science leads me to disbelieve in the possibility of a god. Religion would feed me stories as facts without evidence where science gives me evidence and rational hypotheses to apply my own thinking to.
Science and religion may contradict each other, but that doesn't make them two opposite stances. I just prefer to side with one.
razama wrote...
Gambler wrote...
Noutakun wrote...
Gambler wrote...
Lesson Learned: One can never be away from Fakku forever. :eng101:Some members may take breaks every once in a while, but they eventually return (or so I think), though they may no longer be as active.
You talking about me again Gambler?
Not exactly, but now that you mentioned it, I guess you could fall into the above category too. :)
I was thinking along the lines of regular members whom I never got the opportunity to speak with before I became a member of Fakku. I am quite sure some of them continue to visit the site, perhaps as lurkers.
You make it sound like their spirits are watching over us.
You know too much. +_+
Gambler wrote...
Noutakun wrote...
Gambler wrote...
Lesson Learned: One can never be away from Fakku forever. :eng101:Some members may take breaks every once in a while, but they eventually return (or so I think), though they may no longer be as active.
You talking about me again Gambler?
Not exactly, but now that you mentioned it, I guess you could fall into the above category too. :)
I was thinking along the lines of regular members whom I never got the opportunity to speak with before I became a member of Fakku. I am quite sure some of them continue to visit the site, perhaps as lurkers.
Those guys are dead. I've made sure of it.
Being an oldfag has its chores too. >o>
Gambler wrote...
Lesson Learned: One can never be away from Fakku forever. :eng101:Some members may take breaks every once in a while, but they eventually return (or so I think), though they may no longer be as active.
You talking about me again Gambler?
KLoWn wrote...
Also, im aware that the subs are moving very fast at some points, that's due to two things, me wanting to have more dialouge than the timeframe allowed and my in-experience with the programThe inexperience certainly does not show. I think you did an outstanding job.
I've taken a few practical science courses, so let me try to address what was brought up.
As I was taught it, the Big Bang was not just the explosion of a single atom into all existence. All matter at the time, which is equal to all matter in existence now in quantity, existed back then in a simpler state. The law of universal gravitation comes into play, bringing all those atoms together until friction and chemical reactions cause them to eventually ignite, ultimately exploding, creating heavier known elements that could only be made at such a heat.
All matter is thought to have existed already, as the law of conservation of mass tells us that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Ultimately, the Big Bang theory is that a freak explosion occured when certain atoms of certain elements condensed and eventually ignited. With all of what we know of our world, I find this easier to believe than religion.
As I was taught it, the Big Bang was not just the explosion of a single atom into all existence. All matter at the time, which is equal to all matter in existence now in quantity, existed back then in a simpler state. The law of universal gravitation comes into play, bringing all those atoms together until friction and chemical reactions cause them to eventually ignite, ultimately exploding, creating heavier known elements that could only be made at such a heat.
All matter is thought to have existed already, as the law of conservation of mass tells us that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Ultimately, the Big Bang theory is that a freak explosion occured when certain atoms of certain elements condensed and eventually ignited. With all of what we know of our world, I find this easier to believe than religion.
GSDAkatsuki wrote...
Dude online sucks go play in tourneys. That's where REAL brawlers are.Bah. I don't enjoy tournies. I prefer matches with friends. Some friends still brawl pretty damn well.
(Continuing now)
Loli is as valid a fetish as paipan, feet, scat, balloon tits, paizuri, watersports, imouto, stockings, moe, or nymphomania. The funny thing is, if you're not into a particular fetish, you regard it as stupid or disgusting. Take 2 girls, 1 cup for example. Someone somewhere thought that was hot. If you didn't, you thought it was disgusting. Go figure.
Final verdict: Judging lolicons as if they were pedophiles is unfair. Fetishes should not be grounds for slandering someone or attempting to humiliate them. We all agree, fapping is awesome. /endrant
Loli is as valid a fetish as paipan, feet, scat, balloon tits, paizuri, watersports, imouto, stockings, moe, or nymphomania. The funny thing is, if you're not into a particular fetish, you regard it as stupid or disgusting. Take 2 girls, 1 cup for example. Someone somewhere thought that was hot. If you didn't, you thought it was disgusting. Go figure.
Final verdict: Judging lolicons as if they were pedophiles is unfair. Fetishes should not be grounds for slandering someone or attempting to humiliate them. We all agree, fapping is awesome. /endrant
Only read the last post. Interest spiked.
Personally, I find nothing wrong with loli. I've enjoyed it, and hell, I'll probably continue to enjoy it regardless of public opinion or legal interference. Frankly, who are we to judge a man's ideas of what's appealing to him? Is that our business?
Let me touch a few subjects here. I'll start with an easy one--appeal. Part of loli's appeal is taboo. It's human nature to want what we can't have or do what we're told not to do. Loli is just another manifestation of that aspect of humanity. Why do you think we've discovered things such as reverse psychology? Simple: it's common knowledge that people are only enticed further by restrictions or limitations. That compulsion to break taboo resides in nearly all of us, and it's cruel and hypocritical to call foul on a fellow man for catching a different view from the window we all look from.
Similarly, there is a large difference between a lolicon and a pedophile. Pedophiles, convicted sex criminals, are those who have victimized a child through sexual activity. A lolicon is one who finds sexuality in sexually-underdeveloped females, usually understood to be minors. Not finding the difference? Have an analogy. Murderers are imprisoned or executed because they have purposely ended the life of another unlawfully. Let's face it, we've all entertained the thought of killing someone before. Does that put us on the same level as a murderer? Maybe you wanted to kill to avenge a loved one. Would you consider that as despicable a crime as that of he who takes a gun to school and slaughters students and teachers for no reason other than despair for their social ostracization? I think not. So why pair he who finds cheap thrills in cartoon children with he who permanently destroys the innocence of a child? I don't see the logic.
(I need to continue in another post, ran out of room.)
Personally, I find nothing wrong with loli. I've enjoyed it, and hell, I'll probably continue to enjoy it regardless of public opinion or legal interference. Frankly, who are we to judge a man's ideas of what's appealing to him? Is that our business?
Let me touch a few subjects here. I'll start with an easy one--appeal. Part of loli's appeal is taboo. It's human nature to want what we can't have or do what we're told not to do. Loli is just another manifestation of that aspect of humanity. Why do you think we've discovered things such as reverse psychology? Simple: it's common knowledge that people are only enticed further by restrictions or limitations. That compulsion to break taboo resides in nearly all of us, and it's cruel and hypocritical to call foul on a fellow man for catching a different view from the window we all look from.
Similarly, there is a large difference between a lolicon and a pedophile. Pedophiles, convicted sex criminals, are those who have victimized a child through sexual activity. A lolicon is one who finds sexuality in sexually-underdeveloped females, usually understood to be minors. Not finding the difference? Have an analogy. Murderers are imprisoned or executed because they have purposely ended the life of another unlawfully. Let's face it, we've all entertained the thought of killing someone before. Does that put us on the same level as a murderer? Maybe you wanted to kill to avenge a loved one. Would you consider that as despicable a crime as that of he who takes a gun to school and slaughters students and teachers for no reason other than despair for their social ostracization? I think not. So why pair he who finds cheap thrills in cartoon children with he who permanently destroys the innocence of a child? I don't see the logic.
(I need to continue in another post, ran out of room.)
lollollol12 wrote...
LOLLOLLOL12: A HUGE NIGGA WITH AN EVEN HUGER DICKSPECIAL MOVES:
DEZURT EAGAL LOL: HE PULLS OUT A FUCKING DESERT EAGLE (.50) AND SHOOT IT AT YOUR FUCKING HEAD AND YOU INSTANTLY DIE BECAUSE THATS USUALLY WHAT HAPPENS BECAUSE THIS SHIT ISNT MEANT TO BE USED ON A HUMAN BUT LOLLOLLOL12 DOESNT GIVE A FUCK
COCK SMASH: LOLLOLLOL12 TAKES OUT HIS COCK AND FUCKING 1 HIT KILLS YOU
SEA MEN SHOOT: SAILORS COME FLYING OUT OF LOLLOLLOL12'S DICK AT DEADLY VELOCITIES (89589583489583489053405348905 MEGAMETERS PER SECOND)
I lol'd. That was actually pretty entertaining.
I think this thread would be cooler if we made up the moves of another user, though. Lol
I wouldn't be lying if I told you my current desktop was the Wii startup menu, because the Wii is how I get here, lawl
the78thdude wrote...
I haven't lost in a long time. >.> I haven't played anyone who is super good though.Interested in trying your hand against me? I promise it'll be fun. +_+