sv51macross Posts
Rovencrone wrote...
amadorhi wrote...
You know what sucks? If he had just stopped when he fund ut she tasted bad, he woulda saved himself a TON of discomfort. Lesson to learn here, don't try to too hard to please a woman, she'll probably end up screwing you over anyway.lol there's a lotta truth in that.
^This^
This.
Bitch didn't bother to mention she had herpes? I smell a nice, tasty lawsuit here. Herpes isn't ever going away, I'd be fucking pissed to hell.
Bitch didn't bother to mention she had herpes? I smell a nice, tasty lawsuit here. Herpes isn't ever going away, I'd be fucking pissed to hell.
Tsurayu wrote...
Meh, to be honest I don't trust the police department either, but that doesn't mean I think people should take justice into their own hands. "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" isn't exactly my policy, but that's a different topic altogether. Perhaps I'll feel differently when and if my possessions and/or life is in imminent danger, but until then I stand by what I feel.
Revenge is not why most people buy guns. It isn't justice in our own hands. It is defending oneself, one's familliars, and one's property from theft and/or harm. By far most of the time firearms are not even discharged, the presentation of force is enough to deter a would-be mugger/rapist/home-invader.
So if you don't trust the police...and you aren't willing to purchase a means to defend yourself/your loved-ones...d'you just get off from being vulnerable?
And that's really smart too; "Oh maybe when I'm faced with the armed intruder/thug gang, then I'll think guns are okay." ...... Expecting a gun shop to pop-up out of nowhere? And in a WROL (without rule of law) scenario...all the gun stores are going to be either closed or cleaned-out. Not leaving yourself with much option here man...
Tsurayu wrote...
sv51macross wrote...
Tsurayu, I'd also like to add that your willingness to walk all over the fourteenth amendment just to work down the second really speaks to your character.Not really, I don't think of guns as a civil right or a personal liberty. If you put it that way, then no one could ever make amendments to the constitution because it jeopardizes the Fourteenth Amendment's standing.
It isn't as though that amendment in infallible. Really it should be redefined. It says a lot, yet really doesn't mean anything either. Old and outdated while often taken out of context.
As for my character, I could say the same about people who want to carry guns around.
That we desire the right to protect ourselves from assault and robbery...
Yeah, if not wanting to make myself a doormat to criminals makes me a bad person in your eyes, then so be it. Just remember, there is alot of truth in the adage; "When seconds count, the police are minutes away."
Plus, Warren vs. DC ruled that police have no obligation to protect the public (let alone be actually accountable for their actions), merely to enforce the laws. So they have no obligation to interrupt a murder in progress, just to catch and jail the person who did the murdering after the fact.
There alone is reason enough to arm oneself.
Tsurayu, I'd also like to add that your willingness to walk all over the fourteenth amendment just to work down the second really speaks to your character.
Tsurayu wrote...
It's the pinnacle of idealism, but where did we get this idea that idealism is wrong now? I want a world where no one can have guns. Is it so wrong for me to think that way? So what if it isn't realistic, since when do I have to be logical about everything? Oh well, I digress I'm completely going off somewhere else now.
The problem with idealism is that it is impractical. You, and people like my father dream of a world that's as fanciful and happily clean as the top of a Candyland board. It is perfectly fine to wish for such a society, but the problem is that people like you try and apply that vision to real life, current day situations. Until we can get the human race to behave more like the Flood from Halo, we will always have selfish people, sociopaths, and people who are either lazy or just don't give a damn, until humanity becomes...inhuman, your happyland scenario will not come to fruition.
What'd you expect? As from the Star War's Gangsta' Rap: "Bitches ain't nothin' but ho's and tricks." True words and oft applicable. Best bet it to get a good dutch-wife and just play emotional VNs over and over on the computer. Remember, Machines cannot betray you, they do exactly what they're instructed to their capacity.
Dunno if i should let this thread die. You guys want me to keep 'em coming?
also I preffer Tae and the Kung-Fu whoop bitch over Reika...
I gotta be honest...I'm not that fond of Tae. Yes she's cute and apparantly unafraid to sexually service Kurono but...she look so damn young...TBH if it was me going out with her I'd feel like a pedophile.
Now the 'kung fu lady', I really like her. she looked like Angelino Jolie, had massive, perfect breasts, kicked-ass in melee combat like no other, and on top of that she let Kurono fuck her right there in the hallway not five minutes after meeting him!
Spoiler:
Zak wrote...
also I preffer Tae and the Kung-Fu whoop bitch over Reika...
I gotta be honest...I'm not that fond of Tae. Yes she's cute and apparantly unafraid to sexually service Kurono but...she look so damn young...TBH if it was me going out with her I'd feel like a pedophile.
Now the 'kung fu lady', I really like her. she looked like Angelino Jolie, had massive, perfect breasts, kicked-ass in melee combat like no other, and on top of that she let Kurono fuck her right there in the hallway not five minutes after meeting him!
Going to dump the rest of the pics in here, so here they are. Watch out, it's quite alot.
General 'Big Breasts' (7 img)
A bit big for me but you gotta love the expression. (1 img)
I Really, really like this girl's attitude! (1 img)
And now, what are my favs, the best of them for last. (IMHO) (6 img)
General 'Big Breasts' (7 img)
Spoiler:
A bit big for me but you gotta love the expression. (1 img)
Spoiler:
I Really, really like this girl's attitude! (1 img)
Spoiler:
And now, what are my favs, the best of them for last. (IMHO) (6 img)
Spoiler:
Kuroneko1/2 wrote...
The lolis are pretty nice. I enjoy most of them. Except these two:sv51macross wrote...
Spoiler:
They look way too young. :\
Exactly why I wanted the stuff off my computer. They're still kinda cute though.
I'll add in some more stuff I guess.
'Couple of K-On pics here
Spoiler:
A couple of the more random pics; Lucky Star and Zero Tsukima (Louise)
Spoiler:
That's all for now, rest in next update. bTW, I've been saving (what is IMO) the best for last.
Posting for those who don't regularly go to Sankaku Complex, this is a pretty hot image set IMO and I want to increase it's exposure. Artist's name is Kaisenn.
And so, without further adieu...
Even though this guy makes loli remotely attractive to me, there's some of it that I still don't want on my computer. So I'll post the remainder of the loli images in one block and get it over with. [hey, that sounds good; Loli-Block.]
And I don't like Kuroko either (Mikoto's just fine though), so here's the two 'Railgun images.
Nagato. Not much else to say, the img doesn't do much for me.
More to follow later.
And so, without further adieu...
Even though this guy makes loli remotely attractive to me, there's some of it that I still don't want on my computer. So I'll post the remainder of the loli images in one block and get it over with. [hey, that sounds good; Loli-Block.]
Spoiler:
And I don't like Kuroko either (Mikoto's just fine though), so here's the two 'Railgun images.
Spoiler:
Nagato. Not much else to say, the img doesn't do much for me.
Spoiler:
More to follow later.
For anyone who's read the mange, you know there's usually cheesecake at the beginning of each chapter. for those who haven't...well now you know. I'll be posting the cheesecake in blocks, plus a little extra bonus hotness I found in one chapter..heh heh...
Anyway, here you go.
I love this manga!
Anyway, here you go.
Spoiler:
I love this manga!
More power to 'em! As unattractive as they are it really is a novel way to go about fundraising for one's honeymoon. But hey, they've raised almost $2000USD, so something must be working right.
lollollol12 wrote...
Shinxxx wrote...
just twin desert eagle
NOT DESERT EAGLES IN THE PICTURE LOL
Plus, Desert Eagles are terribly impractical. They're huge, unwieldy, have enormous recoil, and have shitty magazine capacity. The Deagles were made as penile enhancement and sport guns, nothing more. (mag caps: .357mag-9rnds, .44mag-8rnds, .50AE-7rnds)
Something far more appropriate would be a Glock-17 or Beretta 92FS, firearms with nice, large mag capacities (15+ std for both, 30rnd extended mags available for both) and you're aiming for the head anyway, a 9x19 Parabellum is more than enough to shred zombie-brains.
I apologize if this is not the appropriate place to voice such concern but I felt it would garner appropriate attention if placed here.
In essence, NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg is very anti-gun. And what he wishes to do is to create a 'No-Fly, No-Buy' database wherein the 700,000 US citizens and residents on the 'Terror Watch Database' would be prohibited from purchasing firearms. Please remember that this is the same database that prevented the late, great Senator Kennedy from boarding commercial airliner flights, as well as calling small children, Federal Air Marshalls, and US soldiers who have and are still fighting overseas, 'suspected terrorists'.
This proposal threatens not only potentially 1.3 million* American's 2nd amendment [not to mention unreasonably restricting their ability to use air travel] but also their 14th amendment rights as there is no legal way to contest one's place on the terror watch list.
Please, if you are a legal US resident or US citizen, contact your senators and ask them to oppose S. 1317 and S. 2820. We cannot let these gross molestations of the the constitution be allowed to progress any further then they already have.
Thank you for your time, I apologize to the mods if this is an inappropriate post.
Full story:
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=5238
In essence, NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg is very anti-gun. And what he wishes to do is to create a 'No-Fly, No-Buy' database wherein the 700,000 US citizens and residents on the 'Terror Watch Database' would be prohibited from purchasing firearms. Please remember that this is the same database that prevented the late, great Senator Kennedy from boarding commercial airliner flights, as well as calling small children, Federal Air Marshalls, and US soldiers who have and are still fighting overseas, 'suspected terrorists'.
This proposal threatens not only potentially 1.3 million* American's 2nd amendment [not to mention unreasonably restricting their ability to use air travel] but also their 14th amendment rights as there is no legal way to contest one's place on the terror watch list.
Please, if you are a legal US resident or US citizen, contact your senators and ask them to oppose S. 1317 and S. 2820. We cannot let these gross molestations of the the constitution be allowed to progress any further then they already have.
Thank you for your time, I apologize to the mods if this is an inappropriate post.
Full story:
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=5238
Spoiler:
Ziggy wrote...
I thought it was obvious anything under 4 inches was small. Is it actually all that common to have a penis that small?I think that most guys just see porn, see the male actors' larger-than-average tools, and feel insecure because they feel they can't do stuff like that.
Personally I'm not insecure about myself. I've accepted my place at the low-end of average, but I'm fairly confident in my circumferential measurements so I don't worry about it. Not like I'm ever going to use it anyway, so it's all academic.
I also don't appreciate the negative sentiment directed towards the woman in the video. she doesn't look that bad and I thought the sarcasm towards the end was perfectly readable. Stop being so sensitive, guys.
Gatheringsin wrote...
Sasha Grey and Jenna Haze, its just that the noise they make when they're going at it that makes them such great talents to watch.Esp with other girls! :D
I'd have to say Maria Ozawa. She's hot, cute, and enjoys sex on camera. Did I mention she's hot?
Was wondering if anyone knows where I can get the CG set to this eroge, and what the name of said eroge is. Thanks for the time.
rubhereforluck wrote...
I know that this will be highly unpopular but the fact that they were confiscating guns was in fact a good thing. Violence and crime was going out of control in New Orleans right after Katrina and martial law was sort of enacted de facto through a State of Emergency. So under these circumstances your gun can be confiscated and later reissued after the crisis is cleared up.Now how they went about it was mostly wrong. They should have given out receipts for the confiscated fire arms for retrieval at a later date. New Orleans was not in such a bad state that they could not do that.
And on the old woman, even with the camera men there you have no idea what she might do when she pulled that gun out. And in a city that went mad like New Orleans did you really cannot even trust old ladies. Why just look at this documentary on what happened when the brits ignored their growing problem of malcontent senior citizens!
So I take it you were paying no attention to how she was holding it? and if it was such a good idea, then why was there a near-unanimous, bipartisan passing of the above mentioned law preventing it from happening again? And I should remind you, NOPD is one of the most corrupt LE agencies in the US, plus NOPD LEOs were actually participating in the looting themselves.
rubhereforluck wrote...
I would read your link but it's not from a real fact checked media site, or even the NRA directly so I highly doubt its authenticity.Anyway, on topic. I can see the pros and cons of assault weapons. Pros: I can now take down the government when they come to take my assault weapons. Cons: the only people who actually buy assault weapons are criminals and slack jawed yokels who spout what I placed in the pro slot. That being said, I am ok with people legally owning assault weapons of any type. Rifles, shot guns, sniper rifles, the whole gambit. I may not like the idea that people feel the need to arm themselves to the teeth but hey, as long as they are responsible and sane it should be ok.
My views on gun laws.
Spoiler:
I would like to make a couple of remarks here.
1: I am offended to an extent by your opinion of those who wish to owen so-called 'assault weapons' (technically, the application of the term to military-style semi-automatics is a purely political thing, assault weapons actually define such things as the Javelin and AT4 rocket launchers). Tactical carbines and derivatives as such are perfectly legitimate for self defense and are actually advisable for those who are (either socially or geographically) removed from prompt police response. They are not just the purvey of revolutionary ijit-heads or 'slack-jawed yokels'.
2: Conceal carry is a form of discretion. IMO, open carry serves two purposes; civil demonstration or penile enhancement. One needs not parade the fact one is armed and it is oftentimes inappropriate to do so.
3: There is such overwhelming evidence that gun-free zones just don't work. All the mass shootings in the news? Gun-free zones. Plus, as satirical as it is, this FOX vid rings some truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7pGt_O1uM8
4: Lastly, to an extent they [grenades, rocket-launchers, ect] are legal to own. They require NFA registration with BATFE, the heavy-duty background check, and the $200 tax stamp (per grenade, so it's a very expensive hobby to have).
