sv51macross Posts
ss5joshua wrote...
Starwindkid wrote...
enjoy xp
Her arm is both at her side and in front of her face in this picture... trippy
dude look at where her thumb is on the hand. Her left arm is raised to her face and her right arm is at her side
Takerial wrote...
Wild hogs kill three children and people whine about killing them in any form to be inhumane?Are these people retarded? Oh wait, it's probably PETA so I guess that would answer my question about that considering they have released feral hogs back into the wild after being contained for safety reasons. Trespassing while doing so of course.
Who the hell cares how the damn hogs are being killed. They are a very real danger especially to children. Kill the fuckers in any way you want as long as it's only them.
I advocate the humane killing of wild hogs despite what they have done for the same reason I'm opposed to the death penalty. It's just pointless savagery that serves no justice or purpose other than to sate a carnal desire for revenge. We, as human beings, need to be better than animals.
And @fadetoblack, not all humans are civilized. The backbone of civilization is people working by an agreed upon set of rules to better the collective. those people choose to exclude themselves from civilized society, and thus are by definition uncivilized.
Dr. Strangelove wrote...
I don't really see a problem with hunting a pest animal. Taking the first's ear while it was alive was a bit inhumane, but it's no different from an animal eating a kill before it dies. If you don't like what you're seeing, don't watch it. Plain and simple.But the implication is that we should be a bit more humane with how we, as civilized humans, treat other animals. Kosher meats, donating to the Humane Society, making sure a hunted animal goes down in one shot...
Lishy1 wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
If they are doing nothing wrong then why should something be taken away from them? We usually deprive people of something when they do something wrong not because they are doing nothing wrong.
If they are not doing anything wrong, then they won't get in trouble. Gun control and regulation doesn't mean confiscation of your average hunting guns. But it does mean no F2000 or other guns you see in Call of Duty.
I like Canada's laws on gun control. We have (had?) a long gun registry.
I personally love guns, and I wanna do competitive marksmanship one day. I just hate to see them used by criminals <_<
No one here is arguing against that point, we're in that boat with you. Why is Canada removing the long-gun registry, by the way? IIRC, it hasn't helped the police enough to justify the massive cost it incurs.
And why should no-one have access to the F2000? (semi auto at least).
Fpod wrote:
I hate seeing criminals use guns too. So instead of disarming the person who has not committed a crime, why don't we severely punish people who use a gun to commit a crime?
Because it's not as simple as that. Most gun crime stems from other socio-economic factors. Europe doesn't have such a low crime rate from gun laws.
https://www.fakku.net/image-404/images/771604-E35U6YT.jpg
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." -Isoroku Yamamoto*
i do think the world view that americans all have guns has kept other countries from trying to invade. i also think it's part of why we get away with so much stupid shit around the world. if we ban too many guns, other countries might start getting ideas.
Hyperbole on both sides of the quote.
I don't get the link between handguns and scary-looking rifles, and high-explosive launchers. It's like calling someone a gloryhole-patronizing cock-addict because they're gay. And look-up NHTSA and FBI stats. I concluded that the data showed more people die because of alcohol-related traffic incidents than were murdered with a firearm.
Though I don't think other countries have invaded because we have so many guns. We maintain the largest military in the world, rather unnecessarily at that. Also, anyone who might be hostile towards us and has the capacity to attack, has a vested interest in our continued success. Like China, for example.
https://www.fakku.net/image-404/images/771604-E35U6YT.jpg
I am pro-gun control. I believe guns should be *heavily* regulated. Fact is criminals have to struggle if it's harder to buy guns. And there's no reason ANYONE here should be keeping a functional ak47 in their house.
Some exceptions, but heavily controlled and regulated. If someone isn't planning to do anything wrong with guns, then they have nothing to hide.
lol, guilty ;)
In theory, a tactical rifle such as a semi-auto Kalashnikov is a very good home defense weapon. A rifle is easy to aim, even more so if it has a mounted optic such as a red-dot sight. It's easy to control (if semi-auto). The cartridges are very effective in stopping threats, such as an AK-47 firing the 8m3 bullet, or an AR-15 firing M193 or hunting ammunition. Even the magazine capacity is useful. In such a defensive scenario, unless one has lots of experience in such situations, the ability to change a magazine quickly (especially smaller ones which are harder to handle under stress) is greatly reduced. Thirty rounds will cover any situation a homeowner may face. Ten rounds may not.
And criminals cannot legally get guns. In America, to purchase a firearm one must go through a background check first. Few gun owners advocate the removal of the NICS system.
Mr.Shaggnificent wrote...
I would like to see strict restrictions rather than all out bans. why not let someone own a rocket launcher? so long as they can pass tests and background checks and such. i'm pretty sure more people die from cars than guns per year, but i couldn't find stats on the guns part outside of biased pro-gun sites. "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." -Isoroku Yamamoto*
i do think the world view that americans all have guns has kept other countries from trying to invade. i also think it's part of why we get away with so much stupid shit around the world. if we ban too many guns, other countries might start getting ideas.
Hyperbole on both sides of the quote.
I don't get the link between handguns and scary-looking rifles, and high-explosive launchers. It's like calling someone a gloryhole-patronizing cock-addict because they're gay. And look-up NHTSA and FBI stats. I concluded that the data showed more people die because of alcohol-related traffic incidents than were murdered with a firearm.
Though I don't think other countries have invaded because we have so many guns. We maintain the largest military in the world, rather unnecessarily at that. Also, anyone who might be hostile towards us and has the capacity to attack, has a vested interest in our continued success. Like China, for example.
https://www.fakku.net/image-404/images/771604-E35U6YT.jpg
Lishy1 wrote...
I am pro-gun control. I believe guns should be *heavily* regulated. Fact is criminals have to struggle if it's harder to buy guns. And there's no reason ANYONE here should be keeping a functional ak47 in their house.
Some exceptions, but heavily controlled and regulated. If someone isn't planning to do anything wrong with guns, then they have nothing to hide.
lol, guilty ;)
In theory, a tactical rifle such as a semi-auto Kalashnikov is a very good home defense weapon. A rifle is easy to aim, even more so if it has a mounted optic such as a red-dot sight. It's easy to control (if semi-auto). The cartridges are very effective in stopping threats, such as an AK-47 firing the 8m3 bullet, or an AR-15 firing M193 or hunting ammunition. Even the magazine capacity is useful. In such a defensive scenario, unless one has lots of experience in such situations, the ability to change a magazine quickly (especially smaller ones which are harder to handle under stress) is greatly reduced. Thirty rounds will cover any situation a homeowner may face. Ten rounds may not.
And criminals cannot legally get guns. In America, to purchase a firearm one must go through a background check first. Few gun owners advocate the removal of the NICS system.
Mr.Shaggnificent wrote...
PCheaf wrote...
Not inhumane, nope, wild life that is dangerous and damages property should be hunted down.But... is hunting with assault rifles legal in US?(Might as well got with a 50 cal sniper next)
The fact that assault rifles are legal is ridiculous enough.
I don't think it was an assult rifle as i never saw it fire full auto. you may be cofusing terms with the catch all 'assult weapons'. but lets not derail this thread into a gun control feud.
Not turning it into a debate.
Most likely a semi-auto M4 clone, a 'M4gery' as it were. No full-auto, so not an assault rifle. In most states it is legal to own a full-auto weapon, however one must submit to an ATF screening and what amounts to a 3-6 month waiting period. One must notify the ATF when travelling out of state, or when moving permanently.
I'm not a Texas resident so I don't know the specifics. Most states specify magazine capacity and terminal energy of the bullet, none do so of the appearance. an example is that many states prohibit calibers smaller than .30 and magazines greater than 5 rounds (for hunting). Then there are states that let you hunt with whatever you want. AR-15 rifles with heavy barrels are popular for smaller animals ("varmints") and some have hunted with higher-end AK-47 clones.
It depends. I think that sex is inherently intimate and while it can be casual, should only be casual with friends, ect. A gangbang or orgy is hot to fantasize about but I'm not sure how it would work-out in practice for a relationship. I think that three is about as many as you can go before all intimacy is lost in the act.
Sanada-Kun wrote...
[color=red]Evangelimoon (Evangelion + Sailor Moon doujinshi). lol I forget when was the first time I read that ._.Was my second. First one was 'Nozzle' (son finds porno mom made, comes on to her, she caves and they fuck)
Guro is fukken awful. So is scat, on a similar level but for a different reason. I'd also add loli just because of the bad taste it leaves in my mouth. Forced/Rape isn't so horrible in hentai because most of the women end-up liking it to a degree. Most are still unfappable.
I don't know how some people can put futanari as worse than guro or scat. What's more disgusting; a woman with a nice juicy cock above her pussy, or someone defecating on another's face, or...the horrible stuff that goes on in guro. XP
I don't know how some people can put futanari as worse than guro or scat. What's more disgusting; a woman with a nice juicy cock above her pussy, or someone defecating on another's face, or...the horrible stuff that goes on in guro. XP
I've been fapping to this image, literally for years, and it's still one of the hottest asses I've seen. I want moar of this character, but have no clue of the VN it came from. If anyone can point me in the direction of a DL for the CG set I'd be much appreciative.
Thanks for the time, the usual +1 for success.
Thanks for the time, the usual +1 for success.
Been playing for awhile now. I like multiplayer, though in my case not much has really changed. The whole weapons perks thing was advertised as something it's not. I thought it was going to be a system where you earn points to put in the different categories, but it really is just one perk at a time. I wish though they had retained the old camouflage colors. the new ones are all really drab looking, MW2's desert was pretty much on all of my primary guns.
Another point of contention is that, once again, they remove the gas block on my fav rifle (M16) when adding an optic. Why? There's no low-profile unit in it's place, or a flip sight. no, they just remove it entirely. Why not put the ACOG on top of the carry handle, or put the EOTech or red-dot on a riser, that would remove the front sight tower from view just fine. And why did they go back to the plastic handguards for them? I defy you to show me a M16A4 in use that doesn't have a KAC M5 RAS. On top of that, they mount short sections of rails right on the side, where the joint between the handguard halves are. there's no damn point for them to be there!
And while I'm getting nitpicky and going gun-otaku on it, why-the-fuck is the red-dot once again a made-in-china POS airsoft red-dot? SureShot does not make anything that belongs on a real rifle. They even mount it on a damn PKM for gosh sakes. Perhaps if the dot started floating around after the first...fifteen shots or so it would be accurate. Why not use an Aimpoint M2 or T1 for the red-dot? Were they afraid that people would confuse it with the ACOG? [shakes head]
Final nitpick...the campaign was a little short. There were a couple missions missing from the end of Act-III, it felt a little rushed. The final battle...sure, it was cool. It needed a little more lead-up. And we still don't have much motivation behind Makarov, he's just the evil bogeyman we have to kill. Maybe if he
[spoil]
had actually shot Soap himself, and then the rest of the mission 'Blood Brothers' took place, there would have been more emotional drive to kill him.
[/spoiler]
Another point of contention is that, once again, they remove the gas block on my fav rifle (M16) when adding an optic. Why? There's no low-profile unit in it's place, or a flip sight. no, they just remove it entirely. Why not put the ACOG on top of the carry handle, or put the EOTech or red-dot on a riser, that would remove the front sight tower from view just fine. And why did they go back to the plastic handguards for them? I defy you to show me a M16A4 in use that doesn't have a KAC M5 RAS. On top of that, they mount short sections of rails right on the side, where the joint between the handguard halves are. there's no damn point for them to be there!
And while I'm getting nitpicky and going gun-otaku on it, why-the-fuck is the red-dot once again a made-in-china POS airsoft red-dot? SureShot does not make anything that belongs on a real rifle. They even mount it on a damn PKM for gosh sakes. Perhaps if the dot started floating around after the first...fifteen shots or so it would be accurate. Why not use an Aimpoint M2 or T1 for the red-dot? Were they afraid that people would confuse it with the ACOG? [shakes head]
Final nitpick...the campaign was a little short. There were a couple missions missing from the end of Act-III, it felt a little rushed. The final battle...sure, it was cool. It needed a little more lead-up. And we still don't have much motivation behind Makarov, he's just the evil bogeyman we have to kill. Maybe if he
[spoil]
had actually shot Soap himself, and then the rest of the mission 'Blood Brothers' took place, there would have been more emotional drive to kill him.
[/spoiler]
Ever climax so hard that your back cracked? Because I did and I felt at least three pops in my lower back. lol, was fun. hope to do it again!
