Takerial Posts
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
No thanks, I'm a faggot but I prefer my faggotry to be of legal age.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Gambler wrote...
I have taken the liberty to edit the rules a little, so that users will have a better understanding of when they are allowed to bump topics.Do not necro bump threads unless you have something to contribute to the discussion.
-If a thread is more than two or three weeks old, do not post in it. Make a new thread. This mostly applies to the larger forums, such as Random but can apply to other forums in certain cases.
- [Update by Gambler] As mentioned in bold, it is all right to bump threads as long as a user has something meaningful to contribute to the discussion. Examples include giving their thoughts and opinions on the matter, latest updates on an anime or manga title, etc. Simple replies such as "yes", "no", "quoted for the truth" etc do not count as meaningful in most cases.
-If a thread is more than two or three weeks old, do not post in it. Make a new thread. This mostly applies to the larger forums, such as Random but can apply to other forums in certain cases.
- [Update by Gambler] As mentioned in bold, it is all right to bump threads as long as a user has something meaningful to contribute to the discussion. Examples include giving their thoughts and opinions on the matter, latest updates on an anime or manga title, etc. Simple replies such as "yes", "no", "quoted for the truth" etc do not count as meaningful in most cases.
If you have any further suggestions or queries, please feel free to contact any of the staff members, including myself. Alternatively, you could continue to post in this thread.
All hot female members must use naked images of themselves as their avatars.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
animefreak_usa wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Renovartio wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Anesthetize wrote...
Takerial wrote...
If you have seriously thought about it, and weighed all pros and cons of the situation then it is something you should do.As long as you are willing to accept any consequences of said action. If you are unwilling to take full responsibility for your action, then you shouldn't do it.
Don't listen to this guy, he's a faggot.
Do it and then post pictures.
Spoiler:
spoil dude
Can't, I'm a faggot.
We really like our Wheat if you know what I mean.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Renovartio wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Heh, how about whether or not people think Condoms are a safe effective way to have sex or not?but condoms aren't 100% guaranteed and the safest sex is no sex.
got anything else?
WHAT MAKES THE BEST PET?
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Renovartio wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Anesthetize wrote...
Takerial wrote...
If you have seriously thought about it, and weighed all pros and cons of the situation then it is something you should do.As long as you are willing to accept any consequences of said action. If you are unwilling to take full responsibility for your action, then you shouldn't do it.
Don't listen to this guy, he's a faggot.
Do it and then post pictures.
Spoiler:
spoil dude
Can't, I'm a faggot.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Heh, how about whether or not people think Condoms are a safe effective way to have sex or not?
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
the unknown wrote...
Takerial wrote...
No, there is no such thing as 100% in science unknown.Anyone claiming tests to create 100% accurate results are either naive or lying.
And no, even if you test a chemical compound and everyone else does it would not be 100% accurate. All you're doing is failing to prove it isn't accurate. That's how science works because to prove 100% accurate means you would have to prove the same results.
IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
Which is beyond what we are capable of.
Yeah but if my result can never be proven wrong or indifferent, isn't that 100%
No.
Because you would have to prove it absolutely right for it to be 100%.
And that's ignoring the fact that the Scientific Method cannot produce anything absolute regardless on if you prove it right with the Scientific Method in all circumstances.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Renovartio wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Renovartio wrote...
Isn't this becoming less about how beliefs are and more about how he is presenting his argument?Meh, there's no argument he can make that cannot be applied back against the side he's trying to take so it's a pointless task regardless.
I think he's confused on how philosophical arguments work.
Its not even about philosophy any more and more about pointless banter and accusations.
This wouldn't even make it on a high school debate team.
@legend well four but yeah.
Hence why I think he's confused on how they work.
Because he keeps whining about facts and how it makes him right.
I don't think he understands how philosophical evidence differs from scientific.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
animefreak_usa wrote...
Im not into butch guys but that was pretty bonerific.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Renovartio wrote...
Isn't this becoming less about how beliefs are and more about how he is presenting his argument?Meh, there's no argument he can make that cannot be applied back against the side he's trying to take so it's a pointless task regardless.
I think he's confused on how philosophical arguments work.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
No, there is no such thing as 100% in science unknown.
Anyone claiming tests to create 100% accurate results are either naive or lying.
And no, even if you test a chemical compound and everyone else does it would not be 100% accurate. All you're doing is failing to prove it isn't accurate. That's how science works because to prove 100% accurate means you would have to prove the same results.
IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
Which is beyond what we are capable of.
Anyone claiming tests to create 100% accurate results are either naive or lying.
And no, even if you test a chemical compound and everyone else does it would not be 100% accurate. All you're doing is failing to prove it isn't accurate. That's how science works because to prove 100% accurate means you would have to prove the same results.
IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
Which is beyond what we are capable of.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
I'll admit to the horny part.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
If there is no absolute facts, then you cannot tell something their theory or idea is absolutely wrong either.
Which is what you are doing.
Which means in return you are doing exactly what you say you are not doing.
Which is what you are doing.
Which means in return you are doing exactly what you say you are not doing.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
BigLundi wrote...
Renovartio wrote...
@lundiok let me restate what was said before but as an example.
You cannot castrate a computer because of a malfunction within a small part of the whole.
Just because you had to deal with people with narrow views and mindsets doesn't mean everything related to that is wrong.
Ok, here's why your example doesn't apply in this situation: I have never claimed religion doesn't have redeeming values. I never said religion is 100% completely wrong.
Whatmy argument is, is that religion has a lot of bad things about it, and not enough redeeming values to make up for the bad parts.
And any redeeming values religion DOES have, are in no way UNIQUE to religion.
Here's a challenge for you. Provide me with a single observable benefit of religion that cannot be gained without it.
Religion itself has nothing inherently wrong with it
Same with Atheism or any other side of the issue.
There isn't anything inherently right about it either.
You're confusing actions people take with concepts.
That's a nasty problem you should fix.
And again, you'll see the same type of breakdown between people on any side of the issue. Trying to argue something about one side can just as easily be applied to the side you're defending.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
You don't think a Scientific Law is still a theory?
That is so naive it's not even funny.
A theory is an explanation to a given question or given set of questions using facts as support. It is true that the questions tend to come after seeing the facts such as seeing an apple fall to the ground and then asking "WHY does the apple fall to the ground?"
The Law of Gravity is explaining WHY the apple fall to the ground as a theory.
Nothing I said suggests that getting more accurate is a correct way to look at things. Learn to read.
That is so naive it's not even funny.
A theory is an explanation to a given question or given set of questions using facts as support. It is true that the questions tend to come after seeing the facts such as seeing an apple fall to the ground and then asking "WHY does the apple fall to the ground?"
The Law of Gravity is explaining WHY the apple fall to the ground as a theory.
Nothing I said suggests that getting more accurate is a correct way to look at things. Learn to read.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Meh, I already posted my two cents on the actual topic itself on the very first page.
It's just a poorly designed topic that lead to people blowing things whatever way they wanted.
It's just a poorly designed topic that lead to people blowing things whatever way they wanted.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Anesthetize wrote...
Takerial wrote...
If you have seriously thought about it, and weighed all pros and cons of the situation then it is something you should do.As long as you are willing to accept any consequences of said action. If you are unwilling to take full responsibility for your action, then you shouldn't do it.
Don't listen to this guy, he's a faggot.
Do it and then post pictures.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Renovartio wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Renovartio wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Actually Lundi, Laws are just theories. You should know that by now right?And facts are actually used to support theories, not the other way around. Theories are actually there to explain certain circumstances and questions, not facts.
starting to think that the persons understanding of things is a bit askew.
Yeah. Seems like someone that pulls a lot of facts from youtube videos and wikipedia type sites and only understand about half of what he reads.
He's constantly misusing terms.
Did you find anything wrong with one of my previous posts in this thread? Just wondering since I wouldn't want people to think of me as being half assed in my opinions.
Anywho wasn't the original topic of this thread lost in some way?
Nothing I really saw that bothered me a whole lot. Not going back too far because I'd rather not read certain comments that will just make my head hurt.
And losing the topic happens a lot in these types of threads.
Always going to be someone who has to show the absoluteness of science while claiming that's not what they're doing.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
He really likes to use the word fact a lot. This is based on fact, this is based on fact.
A biased opinion based on certain facts is still a biased opinion.
Making accusations while ignoring that they can be applied to the position you hold.
Good job being hypocritical again.
A biased opinion based on certain facts is still a biased opinion.
Making accusations while ignoring that they can be applied to the position you hold.
Good job being hypocritical again.
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Renovartio wrote...
Takerial wrote...
Actually Lundi, Laws are just theories. You should know that by now right?And facts are actually used to support theories, not the other way around. Theories are actually there to explain certain circumstances and questions, not facts.
starting to think that the persons understanding of things is a bit askew.
Yeah. Seems like someone that pulls a lot of facts from youtube videos and wikipedia type sites and only understand about half of what he reads.
He's constantly misusing terms.
