The Jesus Posts
Waar wrote...
aznstoner wrote...
Future Virginia Tech Scholarship?Wow...is that too far?
yo bad call.
I don't think so.
aznstoner wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
Cheese-kun wrote...
l3lackmage wrote...
Speaking of squad 11, did anyone catch the new manga where Yumichika reveals his real shikai? pretty sweet.the fact where he hid his shikai that well and still grabbing which seat? 5th? was epic win.
He would have been 4th, but the kanji wasn't "pretty" so he took 5th.
The weird thing is, Yachiru, the Lieutenant of squad 11 is possibly the weakest of the four(Kenpachi, Yumichika, and baldy).
Not necessarily. She hasn't shown her true power. The only time she's ever really displayed any power at all is when she scared the messenger shitless while she was watching Kenpachi and Ichigo fight. Otherwise, all she's shown is that she's incredibly fast. The fact that she still is a lieutenant means that she's gotta be packing some incredible power. If anything, I'd rank her 3rd after Kenpachi and Ikakku. Ikakku has his bankai and Kenpachi is Kenpachi. Yumichika has Fuji Kujaku and is strong in his own right, but the fact remains that after he joined up he became a seated officer and not a lieutenant.
Cheese-kun wrote...
l3lackmage wrote...
Speaking of squad 11, did anyone catch the new manga where Yumichika reveals his real shikai? pretty sweet.the fact where he hid his shikai that well and still grabbing which seat? 5th? was epic win.
He would have been 4th, but the kanji wasn't "pretty" so he took 5th.
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
RaiArashi wrote...
It is not possible for one person to take control of the world, especially not with today's existing technology. Even if you successfully managed to drag all other countries under your control, the economic disaster created by wide scale military destruction would likely take longer than your lifetime to fix. Also, while you are in control you would have to combat various groups that wished to undermine you. You could not insure that people are absolutely loyal. If one man has power over the entire world, then that is more than enough temptation for even your closest advisor's to turn against you. You can see this in the case of Hitler - probably the one man who came closest to ruling the world.Ruling the world and controlling the world are two different things. It could be possible to control the entire world, but it would take extreme measures. Simply ruling the world would require all nations to accept you as being in a seat of power that overrides any establish organization, government, monarchy, regime, etc.. Personally, I would think that the world would be more comfortable with a single ruler, considering the fact that so many countries are so dissatisfied with their current leaders. One way to take control, while not alienating others would be to allow individual countries, certain ones, to maintain they're established governments, but they would have to go through you before they did anything. I'm not saying complete autocracy, but giving them some freedom to act.
In my overall "plan" there would be no concern about the economies collapsing and military destruction, because those are all things that would be essentially "phased out" and restructured in the beginning stages of the ruler's ascent to power.
Placing one person in control of such power is doomed to failure for everyone. Even with individual government holding their own sovereignty over their own lands. The "president of the world" or whatever their title would be. Every disaster or every negative event is just another chance for that one person to wrestle control away from the sovereign government in the area of crisis. That path would eventually lead to one man to rule them all and that is the death of all freedom and individuality.
You're generalizing. Basically anyone is susceptible to corruption in positions of power, but there are, in fact, some who wouldn't let it go to their head. There are also instances where some nations would be better off going through a period of time where there is a higher, more objective authority governing them. During a civil war, would it be better that one side has the majority of the power or that a mediator would be step in and take control until order is restored?
Lord_Helmchen wrote...
This was also mentioned here:https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=7744
However we didn`t find a "Perfect" solution so far. Maybe i should just post something more detailed and see if it works.
The master list is something I suggested around the same time that thread was started:
https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=7725
kasul-rahul wrote...
I would have to agree with you King..I know this bitch was Crazy..after that episode when Nunnally actually caught Nina almost red handed Masturbating on the edge of the table, to a picture of Euphiemia. You can't tell me you guys did not catch that in that episode.I try not to watch it, but one night I had Adult Swim on and they were playing that episode. Apparently, they didn't realize what she was doing because they played the scene without any changes, that I noticed at least.
