Waar Posts
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Dr. Nyar wrote...
Because I noticed that I sounded unintentionally hostile.Meh, I am used to it. You could have simply changed the tone, that is if you feel the point is still valid.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
I just posted evidence as to why they're the same character? So yes, you got me, I just arbitrarily decide things without doing any research. In fact I made those two entries in the wiki because I was lazy. I am a brilliant mastermind who only seeks to rip your beloved waifu from your grasps.
I have to live up to my name as the second coming of Hitler.
edit: Why did you delete your post, I was looking forward to your retort.
I have to live up to my name as the second coming of Hitler.
edit: Why did you delete your post, I was looking forward to your retort.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
So mangaka, Rimururu., and Iam1vs100xp have all been given 3 days off for this thread.
Another concern is that 2 of the aforementioned users have the same IP... If anyone has any information why they might be logging in from the same IP please feel free to pm me.
Another concern is that 2 of the aforementioned users have the same IP... If anyone has any information why they might be logging in from the same IP please feel free to pm me.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
mantisprime1250 wrote...
[color=green]Of course it was, the tsun-kitty is all hyped-up from the other threadI'm doing my job properly and you think I'm "hyped-up"?
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
mangaka350 wrote...
It's their problems, not ours...You're wrong on soooooooo many levels.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
On the matter of Bernkastel:
Two quotes:
and
To me this indicates all three characters are in fact the same. Whichever claim came first (Bernkastel, Frederica Bernkastel, Rika Furude) is the only valid claim. I'm not going to get deeper into the debate of whether they're different characters at this point, for the same reasons why I wont touch any card captor sakura debates; to try and sort through them all is something I dont have time for in my life. Different theories exist and I'm telling you as the games creator which theory I accept.
Two quotes:
Frederica looks very similar to Furude Rika, as she is the overall culmination of Rika's existence on the Higurashi gameboard. This is implied in Matsuribayashi-hen that when talking about Rika she refers to Rika as "I" or "me".
and
Bernkastel shares many ties with Rika Furude from Higurashi no Naku Koro ni.
It has been stated in an interview that she is the personality of the 100-year-old witch Rika seperated herself from in Saikoroshi-hen and is the crystallization of only the cruelest parts left over from the 100-year-old witch. It is possible this 100-year-old witch is Frederica.
It has been stated in an interview that she is the personality of the 100-year-old witch Rika seperated herself from in Saikoroshi-hen and is the crystallization of only the cruelest parts left over from the 100-year-old witch. It is possible this 100-year-old witch is Frederica.
To me this indicates all three characters are in fact the same. Whichever claim came first (Bernkastel, Frederica Bernkastel, Rika Furude) is the only valid claim. I'm not going to get deeper into the debate of whether they're different characters at this point, for the same reasons why I wont touch any card captor sakura debates; to try and sort through them all is something I dont have time for in my life. Different theories exist and I'm telling you as the games creator which theory I accept.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Circe wrote...
Toxic Influence wrote...
Iam1vs100xp wrote...
I claim Bernkastel of Umineko naku ko niSo since he didn't use her full name this is invalid right?
Right. So, assuming that I'm correct, I'd like to claim Frederica Bernkastel of Umineko no Naku Koro ni.
The wikipedia page lists the name only as Bernkastel (Witch of Miracles)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Umineko_no_Naku_Koro_ni_characters
http://umineko.wikia.com/wiki/Bernkastel
The only reference to your claim is under the title Higurashi no Naku Koro Ni
http://whentheycry.wikia.com/wiki/Frederica_Bernkastel
I don't know anything about either show, so idk if they're the same or w/e. But I would say his original claim is valid based on this info.
Look at images of both, seems they're the same person. The claim isn't invalid it can just be stolen if not properly claimed. If the person who posted the original claim posts again (before she's stolen) with the full name the claim is then solidified.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Right... so you're banned.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
You can drive the cat away and release it on the other side of your city.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Nope.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
PumpJack McGee wrote...
Waar wrote...
Perhaps I institute the rule with an amendment that states anyone can gain the ability other than Jack?That's oddly specific.
"It's the little details that are vital. Little things make big things happen." -John Wooden
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Tegumi wrote...
Thanks for the advice, but while I'm wary of cop outs, I'd rather not hold back valid arguments just to avoid them.And thus the cycle will continue. The only one who suffers(through all the "cop outs") is you. As it seems to be impossible to dissuade you I will leave it at that.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Go call a girl fat in pyp, you'll be real popular.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Perhaps I institute the rule with an amendment that states anyone can gain the ability other than Jack?
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Tegumi wrote...
Waar wrote...
I still don't see the spot where you asked me, unless you mean in the general sense when you first asked or do you mean when you said "Don't suppose anyone is going to explain it, though"?It was when I said that you could also explain.
Waar wrote...
It was, and I while don't fault your curiosity I'm still skeptical of your motives. Perhaps if you pm the user in question he'll explain it. Side-note; these long conversations we/you have where you dont drop something is one of the reasons people respond with "no one cares" cop out responses. While I'm sure I sometimes also elicit the same response from people I tend to try avoiding it when I want something from them. People don't like being badgered until they have to ignore you or are forced to respond.
I think it's a bit more subjective than that. Not really any point in PMing him now since he already expressed disinterest in explaining it.
With text as the medium, it is sometimes hard to tell when someone is running out of patience for something. However, my wariness of cop-outs stems more from the frustration they cause and less from frequency of occurrence.
Telling me I can explain and asking me to explain are different, I hope you understand that. A passive aggressive implication that I should explain something to you is less likely to work than saying, "Paul, please explain what he meant". As you know however with my suspicion of your motives there was little chance I would regardless of method used. Just advice when dealing with others in the future.
Regardless of the cause of your true frustration the advice still stands; if you want to avoid it perhaps alter your approach.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Tegumi wrote...
I did end up asking you, actually. Also, this statement you put out: Waar wrote...
To be fair I don't think anyone else cares.is what threw me off.
It seemed like one of those cop-outs that people use to end conversations (e.g. Nobody cares!) I know that's not the case now.
I'd say it was more 'what did he mean by that' when I asked you.
I still don't see the spot where you asked me, unless you mean in the general sense when you first asked or do you mean when you said "Don't suppose anyone is going to explain it, though"? Not that it matters as I still don't particularly see a reason to explain another persons passing comment.
Tegumi wrote...
Waar wrote...
I honestly assumed it was you just looking for more praise and spotlight as you have been known to in the recent past.I don't feel it was for praise or spotlight, but I might be in a bad position to judge that. Honestly I didn't know what he meant. Well, I still don't.
However, I think it's natural to be curious when people say things about you.
It was, and I while don't fault your curiosity I'm still skeptical of your motives. Perhaps if you pm the user in question he'll explain it.
Side-note; these long conversations we/you have where you dont drop something is one of the reasons people respond with "no one cares" cop out responses. While I'm sure I sometimes also elicit the same response from people I tend to try avoiding it when I want something from them. People don't like being badgered until they have to ignore you or are forced to respond.
Again not trying to sound passive aggressive, just throwing out where I stand and what I think.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
The next game is still scheduled for around xmas time but Ill see about adding some perks to those of you who played this game (because of the shorter time between games).
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Tegumi wrote...
Waar wrote...
Having no will to explain is not a reason, there must be a reason why people are unwilling; and here is where a lack of caring comes in. Because I care enough to reply to you means I care enough to explain something someone else said? Please don't tell me you believe that.
This really surprises me tegs, didn't think something this basic would go over your head.
'Lack of care' is a strange reason to not want to answer a question. Normally, when someone refuses to answer a question, it's because it'd be too annoying or hassling to answer the question, or perhaps they don't like the person. It might even be that answering the question would make them feel like they were conceding something.
Don't often run into a situation where the response to "Why won't you answer my question?" is "I don't care". Terribly sorry for misconstruing your statement due to my lack of experience. I'm glad you managed to throw in an affront to my intelligence at the end there, though.
The peanut gallery is excellent however. Testosterone and all.
Hrmm, perhaps I should explain why "I don't care". Someone made a passing comment that had something to do with you, which I understood given the context of our conversation, after the conversation between me and that person was over you asked for clarification, sure I could have answered but why would I? You didn't ask me, nor does it benefit me to answer you, the conversation had almost nothing to do with you and so it fell on the originator of the comment to answer you. He obviously doesn't want to and thus "I don't particularly care", why would you expect anyone aside from someone involved with the comment to answer you is beyond me... It wasn't "why wont you answer my question" "because I don't care" it was "Why did he say that" "ask him".
That statement wasn't meant as an insult, I am honestly shocked you didn't get it, you of all people. I honestly assumed it was you just looking for more praise and spotlight as you have been known to in the recent past.
Edit: There is no hostility or passive aggressive nature in this post
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Final round start: Just remember those of you who plan on claiming 2 waifu this round you need a total of 4 previous game appearances for you to qualify. Anyone with more than 4 can of course also claim. To find all of the old threads you simply have to look at my created threads and link either the list or your claim post. The burden of proof is on you.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
yurixhentai wrote...
My anus is ready. And of course it's been more than 40 minutes.Waar wrote...
should happen sometime after 40 min from now.