Waar Posts

that's cute, you'll "allow" me to do something.

Hope she took my advice and is giving fakku time to forget most of what she's done, it's the only way I'm ever considering letting her back.

Because mod abuse only happens on special occasions, or like... when I feel like it.

I didnt read any of this thread, but I do support this idea.

You can, as long as you're not trying to do your business in public. Make sure it stays in pm format because if anyone tries to engage you publicly I'm going to have to lock this.

Could limit it to 1 girl per series, might encourage people to expand their horizons. Or include real people?

Was right handed, now I'm left.

i dont think so.

You're right, that would be a funny joke.

Rebuttal to what though? You've only posted personal opinion. You challenged my assertion and then didn't provide any proof of reasoning.

Do you want a rebuttal for your opinion? Alright. I don't agree cruz. Lemme know if you come up with something more valid and ill take a crack at it.

I'm not claiming to be a victor yet, we haven't even started an argument.

edit: p.s. reality is not subjective, nor is it based on perception. I can believe something based on what I've perceived but that doesn't mean it's reality. If a tree fell in the woods and no one was around to hear it did it make a sound, it certainly did because the tree has mass and gravity would create a sound with that mass, did the tree even fall? of course, perception is subjective, reality is not.

It seems you misunderstood... I made statement A

A: It's illogical to kill in God's name

You said statement A is false because of statement B

B: Logic is subjective so what may be illogical to you may not be illogical to me

Because you decided to challenge my assertion you have to prove that logic is subjective(something you're avoiding). I reject your premise and maintain that people simply use it as justification to kill other humans for wealth or profit(this is not me providing evidence, simply waiting for yours).

I'm willing to hear out any evidence you have to the contrary but you've still to this point not said anything factual that supports your statement that logic is subjective. Thus far you've provided the same thing as I have, opinions. Which is fine, where you erred is when you held that your opinion is actually fact.



Your opinion of how boring I'm being has little baring on this debate, while I may be boring you at this point you have still not shown me to be wrong.

Perhaps, wait and see.

lol, the burden of proof is on you.

I make statement A
You say statement A is false because of statement B
You have to prove B and in this case that means you have to prove that logic is subjective.

Cruz Ive played your game far too often for it to work, stating your opinion as fact can be effective but you either have to be arguing with someone who doesn't know better (which is not the case this time) or are capable of arguing your opponent under the table(which you are incapable of at this time).

p.s. name calling at this point in an argument is a weakness.

Wait, did you think any of what you said was evidence of your point? It's entirely your opinion, I don't understand why you think any of that need a rebuttal?

idk why im locking this

Prove that logic is subjective. At this point you've disagreed with me while providing no evidence of your own to back you up. I will once again restate my original point as you seem to want to change this argument to suit your goal: killing another human being in God's name is illogical and is simply false justification to commit murder.



You're right, the majority of the country is burning and people are being killed because they dont pray to the same God, but there is still a semblance of a formal government in the rest of the country; you really picked up on the important part of my argument... this debate about killing in God's name was originally started with you.



I'm saying in terms of morality context matters little, you should feel responsible for ending a human life regardless of reasoning. I'm not saying killing in self defense and murder are the same but you should at least feel some regret after taking another humans life.

It is, and the whole point of this debate was you arguing my original point(which was about killing in God name), so you deciding to change the debate doesn't mean others forgot what the debate was about.

Because you ended a life? Why do you think soldiers come back from war and avoid the question "did you kill anyone?". Holy shit, I'm flabbergasted that I have to explain this to you. The people who don't feel anything after taking a life are sociopaths(actual name for it).



I would call murder being wrong a self evident truth, and doing so because your God told you to the very epitome of illogical.

It feels like you're trying(subconsciously perhaps) to circumvent my point again. Unless you can show how killing in God name makes perfect sense(you cant) this really is just you arguing for the sake of arguing. Don't get me wrong, I love doing that... when there's a point.

Logic is.

No, being lazy got the better of me.