A plea from a desperate soul.

I don't want to be harrassed on here. Please don't unban her. I thought we were friends or.at least friendly until she had a fight with Simon and learned I was friends with him. After that she would.be unreasonably hostile. I've done a lot of things to a lot of people to make them hate me, but she was unwarranted. Look at what's happened in this thread. She is toxic to those around her. Don't allow her back. With 47 alts she has had more than her share of second chances and she blew each one IMMEDIATELY. She's shown us what she has done, what she does, and.what she will.do.

Quest completed.

Holy shit 8 pages


you mean this world?

I am sorry but this is not how it could have been solved. Out of everything that I said you listened only to those two points of benefit. If being a member of the fakku forums was simply a matter of producing benefit from staying then I wouldn't be visiting this site in the first place.

The only way this could've worked out was solving this exclusively tete-a-tete, as it only did for the others two that I know of and even I understand that no amount of logical reasoning would outweigh the number of voices against her if I am to be the sole speaker.

That doesn't make any sense, which part of you and waar is cut equally? What do you mean by cut equally??

@Waar: i'm sorry if I sounded like I attacked opanihuya, a little bit of me did feel irritated by his indirectness and not telling us why he thinks that we should let Koko back in. I'm also glad that you get what I meant about the precedent part.

@Opanihuya: I'm sorry if I sounded like I attacked you, I was just irritated. But now, I still wanna hear why you think we should let Koko back. I'll try to be as objective as possible, but it piqued my curiosity already.

EDIT: OverFlow is not SolidShark, it's Sgt.Broski. SolidShark is Humbugs Associate.

Well you tried opan.


At this point only the one who can make a decent case for her, is koko herself. She doesn't really seem to want to show remorse for her actions or willingness to change, so the probability of her saying anything worthwhile is pretty slim.

This!

As much as a retard a person can be, if they start harassing people over the internet (PMs and "go fuck yourselves" for no obvious reason), it's still unacceptable.

And underage faggots and socially inept retards is inevitable, but you can't just start pointing fingers and calling people out like that.

Unban someone that's made over three dozen accounts to do the same shit that landed her a permaban in the first place? Nope.



Because they don't go around personally attacking people that once considered her their friend and acting like a spoiled brat every five seconds when something doesn't go their way. At least, not to my knowledge.

(Note: This is just an inference based on what has been said about her, since I've never really got involved with her.)



>Implying everyone who frequents CTFG are socially inept or underage.

Huahuehuahue.




And yet you had enough of them to make this post...

Don't respond seriously to arpeggi.

I would say let her back on the pure point that she amuses me ( i know how little that matters)

But that said, her past actions cannot simply be ignored and she tends to overreact not matter what the situation would be.

But it would seem to me she care more about her account faves and usage.... so would it be possible to allow her back but revoke posting and pm rights? I would think that would be a suitable course of action.

It means

- No problems of the past
- She gets what she seemingly asked for
- ?????????
- PROFIT!

And then we can all cease caring like i know most will~

Well, it's kinda pointless. AND WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN MAN?

Easy for you to say, you're not the one that has to clean up after her.

You can't be this dense. I refuse to believe it.

Believe it all you want, I still don't get your point.

Mmm. When I say "cut equally" I mean we are all same in terms of humanity. No one is better than others.

That's pretty naive.

This thread

That's the truth in this case.