A plea from a desperate soul.
0
animefreak_usa
Child of Samael
yurixhentai wrote...
Can you cut me some cake too plsI'll slice a piece of DAT ass sugar buns.
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
opanihuya wrote...
Waar wrote...
if you provided logical reasons and they outweighed the negative aspects of the action you could influence Jacob or myselfI am sorry but this is not how it could have been solved. Out of everything that I said you listened only to those two points of benefit. If being a member of the fakku forums was simply a matter of producing benefit from staying then I wouldn't be visiting this site in the first place.
The only way this could've worked out was solving this exclusively tete-a-tete, as it only did for the others two that I know of and even I understand that no amount of logical reasoning would outweigh the number of voices against her if I am to be the sole speaker.
As the person who gets the make the final call on this I decide how to solve the issue in the case. The sheer number of users complaining doesn't outweigh logic in my opinion, not when it's on one person to decide. Of course I only listened to the benefit of keeping Koko, it's the only thing I asked for. The others on Fakku who don't provide much benefit weren't all banned 40+ times so it really is a matter of risk vs reward here, I need to know what the reward is.
TheOverFlow wrote...
Mmm. When I say "cut equally" I mean we are all same in terms of humanity. No one is better than others.You're wrong. I would go into detail about why you're wrong but I already have in another thread and you're pushing this debate off topic. Stop.
0
I see... So what kind of reward would be considered appealing by you, in manageable terms and considering that she will retain her persona but within the limits of rules? A chance to piss off the kids in ib/ctfg doesn't cut it right.
0
Damoz
~Not A User~
devsonfire wrote...
Damoz wrote...
I would say let her back on the pure point that she amuses me ( i know how little that matters)But that said, her past actions cannot simply be ignored and she tends to overreact not matter what the situation would be.
But it would seem to me she care more about her account faves and usage.... so would it be possible to allow her back but revoke posting and pm rights? I would think that would be a suitable course of action.
It means
- No problems of the past
- She gets what she seemingly asked for
- ?????????
- PROFIT!
And then we can all cease caring like i know most will~
Well, it's kinda pointless. AND WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN MAN?
Pfft i know that, its more work than waar could ever be capable of~
Also, ive been off fakku for a while due to.... well its a long story. And well i decided to come come back because its almost my 2 year thread time~
Gonna be in the city today though~
0
Waar wrote...
His reasons for defending her aren't important, his logic and reasoning is, now all he has to do is show some.So his reasons for defending her aren't important, but his logic and reasoning is? We're asking him why he would defend her so we can find out what his logic and reasoning is behind doing so, I'm pretty sure that adds something to the debate.
:/
0
Good gracious, I am glad I missed all this drama for the most part. No idea it had escalated to this.
0
gizgal wrote...
Good gracious, I am glad I missed all this drama for the most part. No idea it had escalated to this.But it's stupidly funny. We actually have people defending a person who won't change
for the better.
0
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Damoz wrote...
Pfft i know that, its more work than waar could ever be capable of~Also, ive been off fakku for a while due to.... well its a long story. And well i decided to come come back because its almost my 2 year thread time~
Gonna be in the city today though~
I'm in Burwood at the moment, sleeping over at a friend's and because i need to go to library ;__;
0
Damoz wrote...
devsonfire wrote...
Damoz wrote...
I would say let her back on the pure point that she amuses me ( i know how little that matters)But that said, her past actions cannot simply be ignored and she tends to overreact not matter what the situation would be.
But it would seem to me she care more about her account faves and usage.... so would it be possible to allow her back but revoke posting and pm rights? I would think that would be a suitable course of action.
It means
- No problems of the past
- She gets what she seemingly asked for
- ?????????
- PROFIT!
And then we can all cease caring like i know most will~
Well, it's kinda pointless. AND WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN MAN?
Pfft i know that, its more work than waar could ever be capable of~
Also, ive been off fakku for a while due to.... well its a long story. And well i decided to come come back because its almost my 2 year thread time~
Gonna be in the city today though~
Hey, you're back.
ot; So, is she coming back to haunt us or is she gone again?
0
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
opanihuya wrote...
I see... So what kind of reward would be considered appealing by you, in manageable terms and considering that she will retain her persona but within the limits of rules? A chance to piss off the kids in ib/ctfg doesn't cut it right."Hey everyone, why should I unban koko?"
"Waar, what could I say that would convince you?"
I'm not going to build your case for you, you know where I stand on this. If it's something you/others want it's up to you. The idea of angering people is attractive but as you've noticed I'm being a good mod right now so that won't be enough of a reason.
Pyre wrote...
Waar wrote...
His reasons for defending her aren't important, his logic and reasoning is, now all he has to do is show some.So his reasons for defending her aren't important, but his logic and reasoning is? We're asking him why he would defend her so we can find out what his logic and reasoning is behind doing so, I'm pretty sure that adds something to the debate.
:/
Not if his reasons are personal... Jake met her in real life and she didn't seem crazy, that's not justification to allow her to come back but it's a personal reason for him to try and side with her, so if op has something similar(personal non logic based reasons like friendship) then it has nothing to do with the case and trying to force that out of him is only going to make him run away. I need people to talk which wont work if they're bullied for stupid reasons.
It's like you're going into a debate and attacking your opponent rather than his points... it's a good tactic in an argument but it wont win you anything in a debate.
0
Damoz
~Not A User~
devsonfire wrote...
Damoz wrote...
Pfft i know that, its more work than waar could ever be capable of~Also, ive been off fakku for a while due to.... well its a long story. And well i decided to come come back because its almost my 2 year thread time~
Gonna be in the city today though~
I'm in Burwood at the moment, sleeping over at a friend's and because i need to go to library ;__;
Fair enough, it would be nice to meet up for some drinks. But im gonna be interstate till after new years~
0
Waar wrote...
It's like you're going into a debate and attacking your opponent rather than his points... it's a good tactic in an argument but it wont win you anything in a debate.The only thing I called opan out on was being a hypocrite and making up excuses not to provide any kind of reasoning (personal feelings or otherwise) to his side of the debate.
Waar wrote...
Not if his reasons are personal... Jake met her in real life and she didn't seem crazy, that's not justification to allow her to come back but it's a personal reason for him to try and side with her, so if op has something similar(personal non logic based reasons like friendship) then it has nothing to do with the case and trying to force that out of him is only going to make him run away.opanihuya wrote...
And what more logical backing could I possibly offer? Jacob already told you his logical backing, pretty self-explanatory right. Then why do I need to come up with something special?He doesn't have any, and likely won't be able to provide any, because he thinks personal feelings count as logical backing. I didn't ask him for his logical backing after this reply, I wanted to know why he decided to side with Jacob; is it because he likes to support the underdog? Respects Jacob's opinion? It's more about who he is as a person rather than the debate itself. I do realize that this isn't entirely related because of that.
On topic though,
People constantly bitch about the state of the community, "there isn't as much going on, it's boring and uninteresting, not what it used to be". I think the major point Koko has going for her is entertainment. Drama does in some respects help a community grow and stay interesting and this is basically what a lot of users have been asking for. For something to happen, for there to be a single object they can collectively rally against without stepping on toes and ruining relations. It's something that can be discussed other than random image macros, YouTube videos and Tegumi obsessions. Which, if taken from a utilitarian standpoint, provides a decent amount of benefit.
That's my argument for her, Koko drama is the most community centric subject to arise in a while. On the other hand there's a mountain of evidence against her coming back and a lot of butthurt.
I think she should be unbanned, if only for "teh lulz". But I think she should stay banned because it probably wouldn't be the logical choice as far as the debate has gone.
-6
I think my performance was beautiful.
Anyway so as usual you had to get steam blown up your ass before you can start aone of your debates. You know..I said jacob said this is between me and you.
Not Me. And Ib. Aaaaaaaaand you. Everytime, everywhere ANYWHERE I stand on my own two feet. If something's wrong with someone I don't go and hide behind a crowd. I don't care if you don't have respect for yourself or other people but your not gonna disrespect and try to lie about me to your boyfriends.
Why don't you act 30 and take this where this should be. NOT in front of your backup dancers but in PM Like you always say to everyone else. That's where I started it. Thats where you should have kept it. I don't care about you're need for attention and love for drama and debate right now this shit isn't workin for me. Because unlike you and simple minded anger loving Tegumi and whoever else is up your ass in the drama club kidzone-
I. Have the ability, to talk and act and present myself like the adult Iam when it is needed. Take this to pm's. Now. Don't make me say this again.
-looks down and points my finger at you firmly liked disciplining a child-
Anyway so as usual you had to get steam blown up your ass before you can start aone of your debates. You know..I said jacob said this is between me and you.
Not Me. And Ib. Aaaaaaaaand you. Everytime, everywhere ANYWHERE I stand on my own two feet. If something's wrong with someone I don't go and hide behind a crowd. I don't care if you don't have respect for yourself or other people but your not gonna disrespect and try to lie about me to your boyfriends.
Why don't you act 30 and take this where this should be. NOT in front of your backup dancers but in PM Like you always say to everyone else. That's where I started it. Thats where you should have kept it. I don't care about you're need for attention and love for drama and debate right now this shit isn't workin for me. Because unlike you and simple minded anger loving Tegumi and whoever else is up your ass in the drama club kidzone-
I. Have the ability, to talk and act and present myself like the adult Iam when it is needed. Take this to pm's. Now. Don't make me say this again.
-looks down and points my finger at you firmly liked disciplining a child-
0
She should stay banned. I have never met her, but I am willing to take the responsibility for aiding in the banning of a person that voices the need to redeem themselves on Fakku. I have many reasons, fair or not they are my reasons for this choice. She causes too much trouble just from being mentioned casually, already there are many posts in this thread that are vehement and barely related to the topic at hand. Fakku is not even that important to her, as she has shown from her reckless behavior, it's a nice place to be around but it's not integral to her life so perma-banning would not greatly impact her life that heavily. Even if she truly seeks to redeem herself, she still broke the perma-ban limit and must take responsibility for her actions.
Is there solid evidence that she will repent if freed? Even if my vote is sealed, I feel it would be unjust to judge her without all the facts and it's hard to believe that she's done such terrible things with little attempts for redemption.
Is there solid evidence that she will repent if freed? Even if my vote is sealed, I feel it would be unjust to judge her without all the facts and it's hard to believe that she's done such terrible things with little attempts for redemption.
0
Mikaze Ai wrote...
snipThe thing is, Koko, it's not only about you and the mods.
This is a community, and if everyone hates your guts, then you don't belong here.
9
devsonfire
3,000,000th Poster
Mikaze Ai wrote...
As much as I liked you as a person (I never had a problem talking to you), I don't think what Waar did, assuming you're talking to him, is wrong. And please do understand I don't particularly favour Waar over any other mods here. I have respect for him and will give him when it's due. Trivial things aside, let's get started.
Let's get this clear first. Waar is one of the Global Moderator of Fakku, and I can confidently say that he's the closest one to us members of Fakku. Waar has a responsibility, among many, to keep order and "peace" in IB and other places.
Jacob did let Waar to decide whether the ban given to you should be lifted or not. As someone who has that responsibility to keep order in the forum, I personally think he has the right to ask for an opinion from fellow members, unless you have something that can invalidate my opinion about this one.
I admit, not many responded greatly about the idea of lifting your ban, but I think it's not unjustified, considering how many of them didn't like how hostile you were towards them, and your hostility isn't what people would call justified.
But please do remember, in one of Waar's post he said he ALREADY had his own opinion about this issue, so it's not exactly he's hiding behind a crowd. In fact, I'd laugh if anyone thinks that way, considering Waar is one of the most confrontal user in Fakku.
I'd appreciate it if you'd read this carefully, and just to let you know if you didn't know this already, I'm not posting this to point fingers at you, or backing up Waar and everyone else.