Should we declare War on North Korea?
0
Callonia wrote...
They want the free aid and food so they can feed their citizen while keeping an illegimate regime in power which cannot keep their citizens from starving without aid from foreign countries.Callonia wrote...
USA wants the NK to starve so there'll be a regime change preferably the one without nuclear missles capable of landing in usa if USA does not do as NK says.Callonia wrote...
Worst case scenario: NK invades and wins control of SK and doesn't suffer retaliation in any kind.Callonia wrote...
OH SHIT SCENARIO: Nuclear missles launched everywhere and everyone dies because KIM decides that if he can't be in power, everyone else can die along with KIM the little dictator who loves cake who also wants tributes from countries more powerful than his own.
0
Tanasinn
The Bellpepper
Kona-chan wrote...
Callonia wrote...
They want the free aid and food so they can feed their citizen while keeping an illegimate regime in power which cannot keep their citizens from starving without aid from foreign countries.Callonia wrote...
USA wants the NK to starve so there'll be a regime change preferably the one without nuclear missles capable of landing in usa if USA does not do as NK says.Callonia wrote...
Worst case scenario: NK invades and wins control of SK and doesn't suffer retaliation in any kind.Callonia wrote...
OH SHIT SCENARIO: Nuclear missles launched everywhere and everyone dies because KIM decides that if he can't be in power, everyone else can die along with KIM the little dictator who loves cake who also wants tributes from countries more powerful than his own.Callonia had to have written this as a troll post.
There's like, no fucking way....
0
fuwaruu wrote...
LustfulAngel wrote...
on what grounds am I not capable of making an intellectual post?Spoiler:
I know that intelligence is hard for you guys to come by, but could you give an actual reason? I mean, you waste your time creating voice messages as if that makes more of an impact: Hint: It doesn't.
And what time did Tegumi "own me"? To the contrary, I've held my own intellectually with her and even pointed out there were times she overstepped her boundaries.
0
Cinia Pacifica
Ojou-sama Writer
LustfulAngel wrote...
Hint: It doesn't.That's not how you give a hint.
0
animefreak_usa
Child of Samael
Cinia Pacifica wrote...
LustfulAngel wrote...
Hint: It doesn't.That's not how you give a hint.
0
Tanasinn
The Bellpepper
LustfulAngel wrote...
fuwaruu wrote...
LustfulAngel wrote...
on what grounds am I not capable of making an intellectual post?Spoiler:
I know that intelligence is hard for you guys to come by, but could you give an actual reason? I mean, you waste your time creating voice messages as if that makes more of an impact: Hint: It doesn't.
And what time did Tegumi "own me"? To the contrary, I've held my own intellectually with her and even pointed out there were times she overstepped her boundaries.
I would like to point out something here if I may? I do apologize I do not mean to come out as a asshole towards you I am just pointing out vital flaws in your argument that needs to be addressed.
Directly pointing out a hint doesn't really make it a hint. It just makes it redundant to an extremity.
As for Tegumi 'pwning' you.. Well this is a guess, but I figure she is probably the one who moved your thread to IB.
Also as how other members here have expertly picked out posts of yours that reflect their side of the argument, you have yet to provide any proof as to how and when you pointed out to tegumi when she took things too far.
You see the point of presenting your defense is to provide evidence in order to make your claim convincing. Otherwise, it will just be seen as a empty statement with no real weight to it whatsoever. Now, I know that evidence to prove your point is hard to come by for you, but could you please give some actual posts of yours that you feel supports your 'empty claim'?
0
Tanasinn wrote...
Kona-chan wrote...
Callonia wrote...
They want the free aid and food so they can feed their citizen while keeping an illegimate regime in power which cannot keep their citizens from starving without aid from foreign countries.Callonia wrote...
USA wants the NK to starve so there'll be a regime change preferably the one without nuclear missles capable of landing in usa if USA does not do as NK says.Callonia wrote...
Worst case scenario: NK invades and wins control of SK and doesn't suffer retaliation in any kind.Callonia wrote...
OH SHIT SCENARIO: Nuclear missles launched everywhere and everyone dies because KIM decides that if he can't be in power, everyone else can die along with KIM the little dictator who loves cake who also wants tributes from countries more powerful than his own.Callonia had to have written this as a troll post.
There's like, no fucking way....
;D
0
Tanasinn
The Bellpepper
Callonia wrote...
Tanasinn wrote...
Kona-chan wrote...
Callonia wrote...
They want the free aid and food so they can feed their citizen while keeping an illegimate regime in power which cannot keep their citizens from starving without aid from foreign countries.Callonia wrote...
USA wants the NK to starve so there'll be a regime change preferably the one without nuclear missles capable of landing in usa if USA does not do as NK says.Callonia wrote...
Worst case scenario: NK invades and wins control of SK and doesn't suffer retaliation in any kind.Callonia wrote...
OH SHIT SCENARIO: Nuclear missles launched everywhere and everyone dies because KIM decides that if he can't be in power, everyone else can die along with KIM the little dictator who loves cake who also wants tributes from countries more powerful than his own.Callonia had to have written this as a troll post.
There's like, no fucking way....
;D
Jolly good show
0
artcellrox
The Grey Knight :y
Kona-chan wrote...
LustfulAngel wrote...
You see, IB does exist for those of you who'd rather not participate in intellectual debate.My sides...
Does every SD user think like this?
50/50 kind of thing. Lustful, however, is a special case of stupid, ignorant and arrogant.
LustfulAngel wrote...
Cinia Pacifica wrote...
Lustful made thread.Thought it was incoherent to begin with.
Incoherent literally means to lack relevance or knowledge. I disagree that this thread met any of those criteria.
You against the entire world's common opinion. I'd politely ask you to stop being this deluded, but it'd fall on deaf ears as usual, wouldn't it?
0
artcellrox wrote...
50/50 kind of thing. Lustful, however, is a special case of stupid, ignorant and arrogant.
You against the entire world's common opinion. I'd politely ask you to stop being this deluded, but it'd fall on deaf ears as usual, wouldn't it?
Laughable, it's impossible first off for someone to be "stupid, ignorant and arrogant"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arrogant A stupid or ignorant person has no sense of self. The incompetent therefore cannot hold any arrogance. He has no standing on which to do so.
Secondly "The entire world's common opinion" I'm going to have a lot of fun with that statement. First: IB, or the few posters who've posted do not constitute "World opinion". Second: Let's suppose that you do, it's ironic then that you call me "stupid" and "ignorant". For what's true ignorance, is following others like a sheep.
So if this knowledge you supposedly hold is common, it is in fact ignorance.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/06/the-failure-of-american-schools/308497/
But please, carry on in ignorant "supremacy", it's much too amusing.
0
China is on your ass if you declare war against the big and glorious North Korea. And China has fire power.
I'm certain my point have been brought up several times before is this thread.
Are you thick as a brick?
I'm certain my point have been brought up several times before is this thread.
Are you thick as a brick?
0
Ryssen wrote...
And China has fire power. Actually China has manpower. America spends more money on military expenditures than the other top 5 countries on the list combined. That being said I'm not so sure China is actually going to back N. Korea fully though they might continue to slip them under the table support.
0
Ryssen wrote...
China is on your ass if you declare war against the big and glorious North Korea. And China has fire power. I'm certain my point have been brought up several times before is this thread.
Are you thick as a brick?
Actually, yes your "point" has been pointed out. And I've refuted it with up to date information about Chinese/Russian frustration with N.K.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57568850/north-korea-irks-allies-russia-and-china-with-3rd-nuclear-test/
After all, when Russia comes to your side in approval, you know ties are strained.
North Korea's bolstering has significantly weakened its position in ways not seen since the cold war.
There's no longer a guarantee of Chinese/Russian intervention, infact it's remotely possible a coalition could be formed between the U.S/China/Russia regarding this situation.
0
Tanasinn
The Bellpepper
meh, someone call me back when LA has the balls to actually respond to my post and provide 'proof'.
-1
Tanasinn wrote...
meh, someone call me back when LA has the balls to actually respond to my post and provide 'proof'.There's no proof to provide(nor do I feel like wasting my time 'proving' anything to you). But I'll give you historical perspective anyway: I believe it was a thread surrounding economics(I'm pretty sure). In no short form, because a few others disagreed with my economic views, Tegumi had banned me from posting in that particular thread.
In a PM,I pointed out to Tegumi that using her moderator authority over me, but not others was clearly biased. We had went back and forth on the manner, but I believe my relations with Tegumi to be much better now. As she understands that even if she should hate my guts, the moderator position is one of neutrality.
0
Tanasinn
The Bellpepper
LustfulAngel wrote...
Tanasinn wrote...
meh, someone call me back when LA has the balls to actually respond to my post and provide 'proof'.There's no proof to provide(nor do I feel like wasting my time 'proving' anything to you). But I'll give you historical perspective anyway: I believe it was a thread surrounding economics(I'm pretty sure). In no short form, because a few others disagreed with my economic views, Tegumi had banned me from posting in that particular thread.
In a PM,I pointed out to Tegumi that using her moderator authority over me, but not others was clearly biased. We had went back and forth on the manner, but I believe my relations with Tegumi to be much better now. As she understands that even if she should hate my guts, the moderator position is one of neutrality.
So if you don't feel like proving anything then why bother trying to endlessly defend yourself when obviously the general agreement here is that you are pretentious and assume blindly that you are better than everyone else? I mean honestly for anyone to take you seriously you have to provide sources to your claim. Otherwise, silly viewpoints such as yours end up in the bowels of Ib.
Sure you can say stuff and 'claim' that you pointed Tegumi out and put her in her place, but without any real backbone to your delivery it will always be seen as some loser trying to save face on the internet.
Really Lustful Angel, for someone who wants to desperately stand his ground, you really know how to make your claims unbelievable. Going so far as to be unwilling to prove anything shows us by logical understanding that you never really spoke to Tegumi at all and you are just making it up.
And that is why your thread is here. Your approach is pure non-proven/researched nonsense.
0
Tanasinn wrote...
Really Lustful Angel, for someone who wants to desperately stand his ground, you really know how to make your claims unbelievable. Going so far as to be unwilling to prove anything shows us by logical understanding that you never really spoke to Tegumi at all and you are just making it up.
And that is why your thread is here. Your approach is pure non-proven/researched nonsense.
Lustful doesn't need to prove anything, just read his posts as he's so "cleverly" worded in response to my opinions and links, which is always the same. If he can't beat you, he simply states that you are irrelevent. No point in arguing further.
0
Tanasinn
The Bellpepper
theotherjacob wrote...
Tanasinn wrote...
Really Lustful Angel, for someone who wants to desperately stand his ground, you really know how to make your claims unbelievable. Going so far as to be unwilling to prove anything shows us by logical understanding that you never really spoke to Tegumi at all and you are just making it up.
And that is why your thread is here. Your approach is pure non-proven/researched nonsense.
Lustful doesn't need to prove anything, just read his posts as he's so "cleverly" worded in response to my opinions and links, which is always the same. If he can't beat you, he simply states that you are irrelevent. No point in arguing further.
You have a point.
I just some people just love being in denial.
Stepping out and looking at the whole exchange made me realize that people like Lustful actually exist. It was silly beating him down and expecting him to defend his view points in a civil manner.