Should we declare War on North Korea?

then a bullet should fix it.

Give up, OP.

The haji's tried that. My shoulder stiil hurt on rainy days.

eat weed brownies

Smoke a blunt or use hash oil.

the trick for really good brownies is to make the 'weed butter' with the hash oil, then melt it, spray the pan with it then produce the brownies per whatever recipe you use.

Golden every time.

We're still waiting for that which I haven't "proven", you couldn't possibly mean the PM right? Good god, you're incredibly persistent for something irrelevant.

And we're still waiting for that which I supposedly "didn't research". That's alright, I'm a patient man I'll continue to wait :D.




A: Uh, no. What I said was in the grand scheme, they themselves aren't important.
In the scheme of the site, they certainly are important to the community and as such I've discussed respectfully with Tegumi and even Jacob as it regarded personal account problems.

But they are not the end-all, be-all. Again, if something were to happen then I'll find something else to occupy my time.

B: I asked you and didn't get an answer, maybe if I bold it you might feel compelled to answer. What is this standard for Serious Discussion that my post lacked?

I won't reply to another post until you actually manage to answer that question. Or perhaps, is it that you can't answer?(I know you can't because the thread
itself was legitimate)





How can a question be "One-sided"? In other words, it would be a question with only one logical answer. Or a question asked in a manner in which forced a person to agree. Do you even comprehend your own statements?

The only thing one-sided about the post was my position. I had announced my beliefs, and I had asked others to do the same. In no way did I compromise the debate or the discussion. And if you bother to read, you'll see that my position started to lighten up, even just a bit to the idea of diplomacy.

Bringing 'other countries into the conflict'? Since the Armistice was signed, not a peace treaty. South Korea technically has been at war with the North since 1953.

And with the North's abduction of Japanese civilians, Japan is very much involved. As well as the domestic threat posed by long range North Korean missiles.

Yes, there are contingencies in the Middle East, and I'd rather not a two-front. But we were threatened with Nuclear Weapons. And to quote Chuck Hagel, I'd rather not be the first one wrong.

The longer we wait to deal with North Korea, the less of an opportunity we will have to actually avert a longer, more costly war.

If we are to be diplomatic, hopefully we can get meaningful concessions for peace.





Yes, I missed but one word. Anything you can get, eh my friend? And that one word didn't butcher the meaning or anything at all. The meaning is to say that truth is irrelevant, the truth is merely the accepted 'reality' of a mass of people. Or even the accepted reality of individuals.

In this case, we both believe the other to be incompetent. You believe that by virtue of the action of forum superiors, that it deems you correct. But what you seemingly cannot (or probably are refusing to) comprehend is the fact that the initial thread itself was not moved here.

Indeed, it took about 10 pages to do so. Coinciding mostly with Jacob's annoying spam. To be sure, a detraction on economic debate on my part helped out. But I believe that was minor compared to the meaningless spat between me and Jacob.





Warping things to my excuse of a defense? I've only seen Jacob engage in such acts. Name one time I falsified information towards you. I've stated time and time again that I've been factual in my debate, and it is you who has proven incapable of proving otherwise.

For the record, we shall observe your 'proof' of my errors. I am a betting man that it is you, who has stretched the definition of 'error' and has engaged in falsehood..





Glad you asked, here's the answer: I wasn't "upset", I was "annoyed" because as I've stated time and again: Until Jacob(and a few others with a post here and there) started to detract said thread the conversation was perfectly serious, free flowing and I'm sure I had engaged my opponents just as they engaged my thinking.

Also, it was yet another assumption on your part that I was 'upset' but I'll let that go this time out of the same 'kindness'.

In addition, your gross over-simplification of the situation doesn't deem it correct. Yes, it's true that the moderators moved it here. No, it wasn't on the account of my intelligence or on the account of the intelligence of the topic.

But specifically the derailment of said topic.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/derailed






So now you're nitpicking semantics?(The difference between the words 'capping' and 'shooting'). But because we're on an internet forum, with at least a decent understanding of computer functions and the verbiage, and the fact that we're not 'saying' anything but rather typing leaves it a mute point.

In much the same way, though one can stretch and call a forum a 'community' and there is a 'population' of users. But the general populace neither knows or cares, most of them are looking at doujins or many more frequent the other parts of the forum(community).

If I were to be a heartless bastard, I'd say that I don't believe in a 'cyberworld'. This is no different from a phone, except in written form instead of direct conversation. But either way, this is a non point on your part.

You're also mistaken in assuming that I believed that I would gain a victory. Perhaps, in some small fashion I hold out the slightest hope that you would at least acknowledge the differences between us. But I no longer hold such hopes.

If you believe me to be delusional, I believe you to be as delusional. The difference is, understanding that we share this belief to an extent means there's no point in trying to 'win' this debate(a pointless debate if there ever was one)








As we both believe the other to be delusional in our thoughts about ourselves, any rebuttal at this point is meaningless. As a perfect example, you state that trying to prove my intelligence kills my claims of being intelligent at all.

So, when a person pleas not guilty to a crime, by attempting to prove their innocence they are establishing their guilt? As I said, one of the greater flaws as Tegumi explained it to me, was that this forum was detracted and debased. Both by myself to an extent, but as well as other factors.

I had offered to Tegumi a resolution, that namely I would stay on course and the discussion would be more closely moderated by its participants. I imagine I hadn't heard an answer, quite correctly IMO because this thread has become far more detracted since.

You earlier asked why I cared, well I don't care that much but in everything intellectual that I do, pursue, etc holds in it a piece of my pride. Whenever someone moves something to IB, insults me or even prevents me from speaking out altogether(such as in the economic discussion) I take that very personally.

Who ordained your crowd the know-all of common knowledge? Other than following each other like lambs I mean.





That would technically be true, if I beheld myself to be a dumb person. Which I don't. You do on the other hand, but fortunately for me I've grown to care less about other's opinions.




Haha, very funny. I used to be of the opinion of 'sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me' until I was bullied myself mercilessly throughout my K-12 years. I now know that I have to stand up for myself, even if it means using the same tactics and means. If others question my intelligence, I will rightly question their's.

Especially on the account that if I do as you suggest, and ignore the lot of you. You would all deem your great triumph or proof of Lustful's stupidity.



[quote="Tanasinn"]You do vote, right?

Let's play a game: I'll tell you a generic statement, and you tell me if you agree with said statement or not:. "America's a melting pot". Most people will
agree with this catastrophic philosophical viewpoint.

But our Founding Fathers grossly disagreed with the supposition

In viewing that we are a melting pot, we've given up all form of identity. As I said earlier, our "identity" is found under the love of 'freedom'. A vague concept, which at its worst can provide legitimization to the worst(or perhaps laziest) of acts.

It's not 'freedom' as a whole that is wrong. But I defined the difference between universal freedom and guided freedom. In short, prudence.

To me, if we maintain only those 'freedoms' we deem most important to us. Rather than freedoms that 'convenience' us(when they really don't and in fact endanger our social structure), then we would have moved closer to the Human Ideal.

Fascism, to me was not only a successful economic model it was also an excellent model for civilization.

Hence, I want to revive Fascism, here in America.

Yeah good luck with that. If you can get any kind of political position that is even remotely important and isn't self-appointed, I will be astounded. Especially if you run with the campaign slogan "Bring back Fascism!" Yeah people will love you just like they do here.

I don't know what's going on here, but it looks like a failed attempt at an sd thread got wrecked, and now the op is mad...

And kona;


I think you mean:
>Implying every regular in ib isn't retarded
ahuehuehue
But seriously, we are smart, and will enter an argument, but a) there is never anything worth arguing over, and b) we're fucking lazy

@Lust You can go ahead and try to bring Facism to America, (assuming you're dumb enough to think it isn't happening already), but the moment you want to come and trample on my rights, well, let's just say those that seek to subjugate others will meet more-than-stiff resistance.

Only reason Facism worked in Nazi Germany was because of several reasons; first off, Germany faced economic troubles after being first to not only take responsibility for WWI, but also made to pay for the war, (October of last year, I believe, was when the country was FINALLY able to pay off that debt that the US and Allies imposed on it), and secondly, people were tired of the government that had turned its back on them and wanted a new type of leadership.

Ultimately, Facism would not work in the US, not certainly for economic and social reasons. Though there are signs of it already in play in the US government, we're actually seeing more and more socialism taking over, however painfully slow it is happening.

We're still waiting for that which I haven't "proven", you couldn't possibly mean the PM right? Good god, you're incredibly persistent for something irrelevant.

And we're still waiting for that which I supposedly "didn't research". That's alright, I'm a patient man I'll continue to wait :D.




A: Uh, no. What I said was in the grand scheme, they themselves aren't important.
In the scheme of the site, they certainly are important to the community and as such I've discussed respectfully with Tegumi and even Jacob as it regarded personal account problems.

But they are not the end-all, be-all. Again, if something were to happen then I'll find something else to occupy my time.

B: I asked you and didn't get an answer, maybe if I bold it you might feel compelled to answer. What is this standard for Serious Discussion that my post lacked?

I won't reply to another post until you actually manage to answer that question. Or perhaps, is it that you can't answer?(I know you can't because the thread
itself was legitimate)





How can a question be "One-sided"? In other words, it would be a question with only one logical answer. Or a question asked in a manner in which forced a person to agree. Do you even comprehend your own statements?

The only thing one-sided about the post was my position. I had announced my beliefs, and I had asked others to do the same. In no way did I compromise the debate or the discussion. And if you bother to read, you'll see that my position started to lighten up, even just a bit to the idea of diplomacy.

Bringing 'other countries into the conflict'? Since the Armistice was signed, not a peace treaty. South Korea technically has been at war with the North since 1953.

And with the North's abduction of Japanese civilians, Japan is very much involved. As well as the domestic threat posed by long range North Korean missiles.

Yes, there are contingencies in the Middle East, and I'd rather not a two-front. But we were threatened with Nuclear Weapons. And to quote Chuck Hagel, I'd rather not be the first one wrong.

The longer we wait to deal with North Korea, the less of an opportunity we will have to actually avert a longer, more costly war.

If we are to be diplomatic, hopefully we can get meaningful concessions for peace.





Yes, I missed but one word. Anything you can get, eh my friend? And that one word didn't butcher the meaning or anything at all. The meaning is to say that truth is irrelevant, the truth is merely the accepted 'reality' of a mass of people. Or even the accepted reality of individuals.

In this case, we both believe the other to be incompetent. You believe that by virtue of the action of forum superiors, that it deems you correct. But what you seemingly cannot (or probably are refusing to) comprehend is the fact that the initial thread itself was not moved here.

Indeed, it took about 10 pages to do so. Coinciding mostly with Jacob's annoying spam. To be sure, a detraction on economic debate on my part helped out. But I believe that was minor compared to the meaningless spat between me and Jacob.





Warping things to my excuse of a defense? I've only seen Jacob engage in such acts. Name one time I falsified information towards you. I've stated time and time again that I've been factual in my debate, and it is you who has proven incapable of proving otherwise.

For the record, we shall observe your 'proof' of my errors. I am a betting man that it is you, who has stretched the definition of 'error' and has engaged in falsehood..





Glad you asked, here's the answer: I wasn't "upset", I was "annoyed" because as I've stated time and again: Until Jacob(and a few others with a post here and there) started to detract said thread the conversation was perfectly serious, free flowing and I'm sure I had engaged my opponents just as they engaged my thinking.

Also, it was yet another assumption on your part that I was 'upset' but I'll let that go this time out of the same 'kindness'.

In addition, your gross over-simplification of the situation doesn't deem it correct. Yes, it's true that the moderators moved it here. No, it wasn't on the account of my intelligence or on the account of the intelligence of the topic.

But specifically the derailment of said topic.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/derailed






So now you're nitpicking semantics?(The difference between the words 'capping' and 'shooting'). But because we're on an internet forum, with at least a decent understanding of computer functions and the verbiage, and the fact that we're not 'saying' anything but rather typing leaves it a mute point.

In much the same way, though one can stretch and call a forum a 'community' and there is a 'population' of users. But the general populace neither knows or cares, most of them are looking at doujins or many more frequent the other parts of the forum(community).

If I were to be a heartless bastard, I'd say that I don't believe in a 'cyberworld'. This is no different from a phone, except in written form instead of direct conversation. But either way, this is a non point on your part.

You're also mistaken in assuming that I believed that I would gain a victory. Perhaps, in some small fashion I hold out the slightest hope that you would at least acknowledge the differences between us. But I no longer hold such hopes.

If you believe me to be delusional, I believe you to be as delusional. The difference is, understanding that we share this belief to an extent means there's no point in trying to 'win' this debate(a pointless debate if there ever was one)








As we both believe the other to be delusional in our thoughts about ourselves, any rebuttal at this point is meaningless. As a perfect example, you state that trying to prove my intelligence kills my claims of being intelligent at all.

So, when a person pleas not guilty to a crime, by attempting to prove their innocence they are establishing their guilt? As I said, one of the greater flaws as Tegumi explained it to me, was that this forum was detracted and debased. Both by myself to an extent, but as well as other factors.

I had offered to Tegumi a resolution, that namely I would stay on course and the discussion would be more closely moderated by its participants. I imagine I hadn't heard an answer, quite correctly IMO because this thread has become far more detracted since.

You earlier asked why I cared, well I don't care that much but in everything intellectual that I do, pursue, etc holds in it a piece of my pride. Whenever someone moves something to IB, insults me or even prevents me from speaking out altogether(such as in the economic discussion) I take that very personally.

Who ordained your crowd the know-all of common knowledge? Other than following each other like lambs I mean.





That would technically be true, if I beheld myself to be a dumb person. Which I don't. You do on the other hand, but fortunately for me I've grown to care less about other's opinions.




Haha, very funny. I used to be of the opinion of 'sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me' until I was bullied myself mercilessly throughout my K-12 years. I now know that I have to stand up for myself, even if it means using the same tactics and means. If others question my intelligence, I will rightly question their's.

Especially on the account that if I do as you suggest, and ignore the lot of you. You would all deem your great triumph or proof of Lustful's stupidity.





So question, if you don't care, then why do you bother to even post a response?

Also to answer your bold post, please re-read your thread. I figured someone with such 'high intelligence' would've caught that. But I suppose I was wrong.

Another point here, I'm not your friend. You have this weird stalker like vibe about you.

We're still waiting for that which I haven't "proven", you couldn't possibly mean the PM right? Good god, you're incredibly persistent for something irrelevant.

And we're still waiting for that which I supposedly "didn't research". That's alright, I'm a patient man I'll continue to wait :D.




A: Uh, no. What I said was in the grand scheme, they themselves aren't important.
In the scheme of the site, they certainly are important to the community and as such I've discussed respectfully with Tegumi and even Jacob as it regarded personal account problems.

But they are not the end-all, be-all. Again, if something were to happen then I'll find something else to occupy my time.

B: I asked you and didn't get an answer, maybe if I bold it you might feel compelled to answer. What is this standard for Serious Discussion that my post lacked?

I won't reply to another post until you actually manage to answer that question. Or perhaps, is it that you can't answer?(I know you can't because the thread
itself was legitimate)





How can a question be "One-sided"? In other words, it would be a question with only one logical answer. Or a question asked in a manner in which forced a person to agree. Do you even comprehend your own statements?

The only thing one-sided about the post was my position. I had announced my beliefs, and I had asked others to do the same. In no way did I compromise the debate or the discussion. And if you bother to read, you'll see that my position started to lighten up, even just a bit to the idea of diplomacy.

Bringing 'other countries into the conflict'? Since the Armistice was signed, not a peace treaty. South Korea technically has been at war with the North since 1953.

And with the North's abduction of Japanese civilians, Japan is very much involved. As well as the domestic threat posed by long range North Korean missiles.

Yes, there are contingencies in the Middle East, and I'd rather not a two-front. But we were threatened with Nuclear Weapons. And to quote Chuck Hagel, I'd rather not be the first one wrong.

The longer we wait to deal with North Korea, the less of an opportunity we will have to actually avert a longer, more costly war.

If we are to be diplomatic, hopefully we can get meaningful concessions for peace.





Yes, I missed but one word. Anything you can get, eh my friend? And that one word didn't butcher the meaning or anything at all. The meaning is to say that truth is irrelevant, the truth is merely the accepted 'reality' of a mass of people. Or even the accepted reality of individuals.

In this case, we both believe the other to be incompetent. You believe that by virtue of the action of forum superiors, that it deems you correct. But what you seemingly cannot (or probably are refusing to) comprehend is the fact that the initial thread itself was not moved here.

Indeed, it took about 10 pages to do so. Coinciding mostly with Jacob's annoying spam. To be sure, a detraction on economic debate on my part helped out. But I believe that was minor compared to the meaningless spat between me and Jacob.





Warping things to my excuse of a defense? I've only seen Jacob engage in such acts. Name one time I falsified information towards you. I've stated time and time again that I've been factual in my debate, and it is you who has proven incapable of proving otherwise.

For the record, we shall observe your 'proof' of my errors. I am a betting man that it is you, who has stretched the definition of 'error' and has engaged in falsehood..





Glad you asked, here's the answer: I wasn't "upset", I was "annoyed" because as I've stated time and again: Until Jacob(and a few others with a post here and there) started to detract said thread the conversation was perfectly serious, free flowing and I'm sure I had engaged my opponents just as they engaged my thinking.

Also, it was yet another assumption on your part that I was 'upset' but I'll let that go this time out of the same 'kindness'.

In addition, your gross over-simplification of the situation doesn't deem it correct. Yes, it's true that the moderators moved it here. No, it wasn't on the account of my intelligence or on the account of the intelligence of the topic.

But specifically the derailment of said topic.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/derailed






So now you're nitpicking semantics?(The difference between the words 'capping' and 'shooting'). But because we're on an internet forum, with at least a decent understanding of computer functions and the verbiage, and the fact that we're not 'saying' anything but rather typing leaves it a mute point.

In much the same way, though one can stretch and call a forum a 'community' and there is a 'population' of users. But the general populace neither knows or cares, most of them are looking at doujins or many more frequent the other parts of the forum(community).

If I were to be a heartless bastard, I'd say that I don't believe in a 'cyberworld'. This is no different from a phone, except in written form instead of direct conversation. But either way, this is a non point on your part.

You're also mistaken in assuming that I believed that I would gain a victory. Perhaps, in some small fashion I hold out the slightest hope that you would at least acknowledge the differences between us. But I no longer hold such hopes.

If you believe me to be delusional, I believe you to be as delusional. The difference is, understanding that we share this belief to an extent means there's no point in trying to 'win' this debate(a pointless debate if there ever was one)








As we both believe the other to be delusional in our thoughts about ourselves, any rebuttal at this point is meaningless. As a perfect example, you state that trying to prove my intelligence kills my claims of being intelligent at all.

So, when a person pleas not guilty to a crime, by attempting to prove their innocence they are establishing their guilt? As I said, one of the greater flaws as Tegumi explained it to me, was that this forum was detracted and debased. Both by myself to an extent, but as well as other factors.

I had offered to Tegumi a resolution, that namely I would stay on course and the discussion would be more closely moderated by its participants. I imagine I hadn't heard an answer, quite correctly IMO because this thread has become far more detracted since.

You earlier asked why I cared, well I don't care that much but in everything intellectual that I do, pursue, etc holds in it a piece of my pride. Whenever someone moves something to IB, insults me or even prevents me from speaking out altogether(such as in the economic discussion) I take that very personally.

Who ordained your crowd the know-all of common knowledge? Other than following each other like lambs I mean.





That would technically be true, if I beheld myself to be a dumb person. Which I don't. You do on the other hand, but fortunately for me I've grown to care less about other's opinions.




Haha, very funny. I used to be of the opinion of 'sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me' until I was bullied myself mercilessly throughout my K-12 years. I now know that I have to stand up for myself, even if it means using the same tactics and means. If others question my intelligence, I will rightly question their's.

Especially on the account that if I do as you suggest, and ignore the lot of you. You would all deem your great triumph or proof of Lustful's stupidity.





tl;dr

The whole argument is also too stupid to bother reading.

That. is. one. fucking. long. post.

I learned that the more buttfrustrated a user is about their 'intelligence' being laughed at, the longer their post.

I'm just letting him talk now. Not that I read any of it either. Not worth it.

http://vocaroo.com/i/s1w7pB33iQyS

Elly wonders if lustfulangel is butthurtful or not.



I told her that lustfulangel is.

Elly laughed together with me at lustfulangel.

I touch elly boobies, she went oh u!

We have fun together with martinis.


Plenty of crying in pain from lustfulangel there was from pure frustration of his thread being moved to IB.


There is also plenty of no fucks given from Me and Elly.

Anything to make you feel better :) Well, this thread has lost all meaning and purpose. So you guys do whatever the hell you wanna do with it.

Ah another error that needed to be pointed out:

The thread lost all its meaning and purpose at the first post.

there you go. :3