[Locked] Somene we know Made it to FARK
0
Sisami wrote...
No need to use big words when you're talking about shit you can find at Home Depot, Tegtsutsumi.We're talking about hammering objects. Boners shall be popped.
0
Sisami wrote...
Your parents are so careless. REAL PARENTS TELL KIDS STUFF LIKE: "Always talk to strangers.", "If everybody else is doing it, why shouldn't you?", "Murder is only murder if you murder a hooker. Nowait. An ugly hooker."you mean it ISNT murder if its an ugly hooker. jeez, what are they teaching kids these days.
0
Tegumi
"im always cute"
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
wow thanks for this again captain obvious. get the heck outta here.Perhaps you should try reassessing the discussions going on in this thread before you tell someone to "get the heck outta here".
0
Tegumi wrote...
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
wow thanks for this again captain obvious. get the heck outta here.Perhaps you should try reassessing the discussions going on in this thread before you tell someone to "get the heck outta here".
uh how about you bite my shiney metal as.
0
Takerial
Lovable Teddy Bear
Tegumi wrote...
Kalistean wrote...
And often, trying to suggest there is a set definition in which "This is one, and this isn't." Often gets you a muddy result because well, you don't have a set definition for it.I figured you'd play that argument, flawed as it is. Your assertion is likened to saying that since a hammer and a screwdriver both help apply a thin metal object (nail or screw) into another material to assist in holding it together with something else, they are the same thing. However, we know for a fact that hammers and screwdrivers are different tools.
In this case, the application of the nail or screw into something is your example of "muddy" middle ground. It, however, does not magically turn a hammer into a screwdriver, or vice versa.
While blogs and forums do share some commonality of function in their current state, their set purpose, as stated earlier, is very different. A blog without a comment system is still a blog, whereas a forum without consistent author is still a forum.
Their set purpose is to communicate information over the internet. All three of them.
How they do it can seem slightly different, but often you'll see a lot of crossover because let's face it, when you're trying to do the same task with similar types of set-up, you will get them to crossover.
And there is no set definition of the three terms. If there was a set definition of the three terms that wouldn't include the other two terms, then there would end up being a whole lot more than just the three of them needing to be used.
And you think a hammer will work in getting a screw to fasten something securely? Heh, funny.
0
Tegumi
"im always cute"
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
uh how about you bite my shiney metal as.I see manners are lost on such low-browed retards such as yourself. I apologize for treating you with any manner of respect.
0
A website is a website.
A forum is a forum
A thread is a thread.
A post is a post.
A blog is not any of the above, it is just a blog.
A forum is a forum
A thread is a thread.
A post is a post.
A blog is not any of the above, it is just a blog.
0
Kalistean wrote...
And you think a hammer will work in getting a screw to fasten something securely? Heh, funny.She did mention the nail with respect to the hammer.
Speaking of nailing and screwing, this thread needs more bitches and hoes.
0
Tegumi wrote...
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
uh how about you bite my shiney metal as.I see manners are lost on such low-browed retards such as yourself. I apologize for treating you with any manner of respect.
apology acepte.d
e:
MoneyDRuffy wrote...
A website is a website.A forum is a forum
A thread is a thread.
A post is a post.
A blog is not any of the above, it is just a blog.
a blog is a website and a collection of posts. ritard.
0
Tegumi
"im always cute"
Kalistean, why don't you concede this debate? You're grasping at straws.
Anything that sends packets to a network has the purpose of communicating information over the internet. That doesn't make a modem anywhere near the same category as a blog or forum, now does it?
Yes, oh god, I debunked this already. Read my previous post.
There is a set definition, and it has to do with purpose. And I explained it to you already.
No, in that analogy, it is what YOU think.
Kalistean wrote...
Their set purpose is to communicate information over the internet. All three of them.Anything that sends packets to a network has the purpose of communicating information over the internet. That doesn't make a modem anywhere near the same category as a blog or forum, now does it?
Kalistean wrote...
How they do it can seem slightly different, but often you'll see a lot of crossover because let's face it, when you're trying to do the same task with similar types of set-up, you will get them to crossover.Yes, oh god, I debunked this already. Read my previous post.
Kalistean wrote...
And there is no set definition of the three terms. If there was a set definition of the three terms that wouldn't include the other two terms, then there would end up being a whole lot more than just the three of them needing to be used.There is a set definition, and it has to do with purpose. And I explained it to you already.
Kalistean wrote...
And you think a hammer will work in getting a screw to fasten something securely? Heh, funny.No, in that analogy, it is what YOU think.
0
Tegumi wrote...
Kalistean, why don't you concede this debate? You're grasping at straws.Kalistean wrote...
Their set purpose is to communicate information over the internet. All three of them.Anything that sends packets to a network has the purpose of communicating information over the internet. That doesn't make a modem anywhere near the same category as a blog or forum, now does it?
Kalistean wrote...
How they do it can seem slightly different, but often you'll see a lot of crossover because let's face it, when you're trying to do the same task with similar types of set-up, you will get them to crossover.Yes, oh god, I debunked this already. Read my previous post.
Kalistean wrote...
And there is no set definition of the three terms. If there was a set definition of the three terms that wouldn't include the other two terms, then there would end up being a whole lot more than just the three of them needing to be used.There is a set definition, and it has to do with purpose. And I explained it to you already.
Kalistean wrote...
And you think a hammer will work in getting a screw to fasten something securely? Heh, funny.No, in that analogy, it is what YOU think.
your gay
0
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
MoneyDRuffy wrote...
A website is a website.A forum is a forum
A thread is a thread.
A post is a post.
A blog is not any of the above, it is just a blog.
a blog is a website and a collection of posts. ritard.
Still just a blog.
0
MoneyDRuffy wrote...
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
MoneyDRuffy wrote...
A website is a website.A forum is a forum
A thread is a thread.
A post is a post.
A blog is not any of the above, it is just a blog.
a blog is a website and a collection of posts. ritard.
Still just a blog.
no it isnt you g.d. r-tard. it is a website. all blogs are websites. not all websites are blogs. its like all chinks are gooks but not all gooks are chinks.
0
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
its like all chinks are gooks but not all gooks are chinks.Holy shit. Did you actually use such derogatory terms in making your point?
0
LostQuartet wrote...
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
its like all chinks are gooks but not all gooks are chinks.Holy shit. Did you actually use such derogatory terms in making your point?
sometimes i forget that you younguns might not be aware of SNL skits from the 70s
0
Tegumi wrote...
Kalistean, why don't you concede this debate?Oh you. Walls don't know how to give up.
0
Rbz wrote...
Tegumi wrote...
Kalistean, why don't you concede this debate?Oh you. Walls don't know how to give up.
Knock 'em down.
1
Jeff Goldblum Fan wrote...
its like all chinks are gooks but not all gooks are chinks.This is possibly the best made point in this entire thread. I commend you good sir.
