The console wars
Which is your favorite console
0
KLoWn wrote...
"I don't think that developing for the PS3 is hard at all. It was much harder developing for the Famicom,"
Did he just compare the game-development for the NES to the Ps3?
Did he just compare making games on a cartridge for a 8-bit system to making games on a blu-ray disc for a current generation console?
What the fuck kind of comparison is that??
Maybe he found it harder because he was a rookie back in 1985?
Still, that's one stupid comparison.
0
animeholic1 wrote...
KLoWn wrote...
animeholic1 wrote...
I had it ready anyway.
www.ps3fanboy.com/2008/08/27/team-ninjas-itagaki-says-ps3-development-easier-than-famicom/
www.ps3fanboy.com
I always enjoy getting information from a non-biased source :P
(j/k)
"I don't think that developing for the PS3 is hard at all. It was much harder developing for the Famicom,"
Did he just compare the game-development for the NES to the Ps3?
Did he just compare making games on a cartridge for a 8-bit system to making games on a blu-ray disc for a current generation console?
What the fuck kind of comparison is that??
Im sure he knows what hes talking about. Hes been doing development for a long time.I gucess the comparison is that for him at least it was childs play.
0
well of course your going to find good things being said about the ps3 in a ps3 conference.
still doesnt change anything, what they said is what they mean.
LOL it seems its just me and animeholic1 on Ps3 side :]
still doesnt change anything, what they said is what they mean.
LOL it seems its just me and animeholic1 on Ps3 side :]
0
giroro wrote...
well of course your going to find good things being said about the ps3 in a ps3 conference. still doesnt change anything, what they said is what they mean.
LOL it seems its just me and animeholic1 on Ps3 side :]
Nope. =P Just don't feel like arguing the point.
0
hmmm so everything that was said at the 360, ps3, and wii conferences are just supposed to be disregarded because it was specifically intended to benefit each of the 3.
interesting :/
interesting :/
0
giroro wrote...
hmmm so everything that was said at the 360, ps3, and wii conferences are just supposed to be disregarded because it was specifically intended to benefit each of the 3.interesting :/
IDK Wii didn't really do anything right at E3 except make themselves look bad in the serious gamers eyes.
Also I had forgotten exactly how long the PS2 was the flagship. 10 years, is a long time. Its almost a copy of what the PS2 did as the PS3 is doing now. SLOW start but EPIC WIN.
0
animeholic1 wrote...
giroro wrote...
hmmm so everything that was said at the 360, ps3, and wii conferences are just supposed to be disregarded because it was specifically intended to benefit each of the 3.interesting :/
10 years, is a long time. Its almost a copy of what the PS2 did as the PS3 is doing now. SLOW start but EPIC WIN.
yep! and ps3 is only in its 2nd going on 3rd year :]]] imagine years 5,6 7!
0
I just really want to see what the cell processor can do in say year 3 & 4 +. Killzone 2 looks mighty impressive. BTW wasn't there a mystery game that Sony was showing at E3 that was behind " Closed doors "?
0
animeholic1 wrote...
giroro wrote...
hmmm so everything that was said at the 360, ps3, and wii conferences are just supposed to be disregarded because it was specifically intended to benefit each of the 3.interesting :/
IDK Wii didn't really do anything right at E3 except make themselves look bad in the serious gamers eyes.
I really don't why people are are saying Nintendo has abandoned the core market. Last time I checked, they released Zelda: TP, Metroid Prime 3, Mario Galaxy, Brawl, Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn, Mario Kart and Battalion Wars in the past 2 years. That's basically almost all of the game people were asking for. They even said they're working on Pikmin 3. Nintendo has 14 studios, there's no way they're all working on casual titles.
Also, people gotta realized that the new E3 is not aim at gamers but stockholders. Obviously, they want to see what's gonna make the most money this and next year. You really can't blame Nintendo for hyping Wii Sports 2 or Music. Just checked the sales for Wii Play and you'll see why.
0
Azuran wrote...
animeholic1 wrote...
giroro wrote...
hmmm so everything that was said at the 360, ps3, and wii conferences are just supposed to be disregarded because it was specifically intended to benefit each of the 3.interesting :/
IDK Wii didn't really do anything right at E3 except make themselves look bad in the serious gamers eyes.
I really don't why people are are saying Nintendo has abandoned the core market. Last time I checked, they released Zelda: TP, Metroid Prime 3, Mario Galaxy, Brawl, Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn, Mario Kart and Battalion Wars in the past 2 years. That's basically almost all of the game people were asking for. They even said they're working on Pikmin 3.
Also, people gotta realized that the new E3 is not aim at gamers but stockholders. Obviously, they want to see what's gonna make the most money this and next year. You really can't blame Nintendo for hyping Wii Sports 2 or Music. Just checked the sales for Wii Play and you'll see why.
Thats just it, its the same thing. Mario this mario that, Zelda this zelda that. Sorry but to me the Wii is nothing but a gimmick. Wii has made nothing that I thought was creative and innovative. Don't say that the console its self is innovative either because games is what I mean.
0
animeholic1 wrote...
Azuran wrote...
animeholic1 wrote...
giroro wrote...
hmmm so everything that was said at the 360, ps3, and wii conferences are just supposed to be disregarded because it was specifically intended to benefit each of the 3.interesting :/
IDK Wii didn't really do anything right at E3 except make themselves look bad in the serious gamers eyes.
I really don't why people are are saying Nintendo has abandoned the core market. Last time I checked, they released Zelda: TP, Metroid Prime 3, Mario Galaxy, Brawl, Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn, Mario Kart and Battalion Wars in the past 2 years. That's basically almost all of the game people were asking for. They even said they're working on Pikmin 3.
Also, people gotta realized that the new E3 is not aim at gamers but stockholders. Obviously, they want to see what's gonna make the most money this and next year. You really can't blame Nintendo for hyping Wii Sports 2 or Music. Just checked the sales for Wii Play and you'll see why.
Thats just it, its the same thing. Mario this mario that, Zelda this zelda that. Sorry but to me the Wii is nothing but a gimmick. Wii has made nothing that I thought was creative and innovative. Don't say that the console its self is innovative either because games is what I mean.
Of course it's not gonna be innovative when developers are not even trying to make innovative games. When they finally decided to stop porting or making crap, then we'll probably see the true potential of the Wii (which probably won't ever happen because people keep buying the crap)
0
giroro wrote...
well of course your going to find good things being said about the ps3 in a ps3 conference. still doesnt change anything, what they said is what they mean.
Except that Sony has been lying on their conferences before, like when they presented new Ps3 games on some E3, can't remember which year, and told everybody that everything they saw was real-time footage.
That turned out to be bullshit, pretty much all of it was ju pre-rendered.
Things like that takes away from your credibility.
Read about it here among other things.
giroro wrote...
LOL it seems its just me and animeholic1 on Ps3 side :]Well it's pretty much just me on the Nintendo side most of the time, although i see Azuran has joined now.
Even though i don't really like takin sides in console wars, since i play on 'em all, i usually end up defending Nintendo, since they mah boys from way back :P
animeholic1 wrote...
IDK Wii didn't really do anything right at E3 except make themselves look bad in the serious gamers eyes.Sony looked like dumbasses in 2006 with their "Giant Enemy Craby/Riiidge Raaaacer!" E3, it was just Nintendos turn this time.
MS will get it next year :P
animeholic1 wrote...
Also I had forgotten exactly how long the PS2 was the flagship. 10 years, is a long time. Its almost a copy of what the PS2 did as the PS3 is doing now. SLOW start but EPIC WIN.The Ps2 didn't have a competitor toally owning the market as Wii is doing right now though, it pretty much was "the Wii" back then in terms of sales.
giroro wrote...
yep! and ps3 is only in its 2nd going on 3rd year :]]] imagine years 5,6 7!Are you guys saying that just because the Ps2 survived for 10 years the Ps3 is gonna do the same?
It's a whole nother market out there today than when the Ps2 reigned, the competition is also a whole nother deal.
0
@Klown were not saying it will last for 10 years sony said thats how long the PS3 will be the flagship. ( gucess thats when PS4 will come out ) Also its just a assumption sense both the PS1 & PS2 started off terribly then later became great successes.
0
animeholic1 wrote...
@Klown were not saying it will last for 10 years sony said thats how long the PS3 will be the flagship. ( gucess thats when PS4 will come out ) Also its just a assumption sense both the PS1 & PS2 started off terribly then later became great successes.Well if they've said that it's gonna be their flagship for 10 years then i guess it's gonna be, usually the starting sign for the death of a console is when a next-gen console comes out and the support is cut off.
The Ps2 ain't following those rules tho lol, it it's still selling better than Ps3, dunno bout the 360.
0
I was thinking about this today. I know that you guys previously posted that in order to win these so called "console wars" they must have the majority of sales and etc etc.
But wouldnt it also be important on how well the console does game wise, hardware and awards?
The majority of sales doesnt mean victory :/
e.g 10,000 B.C got over 94Mil in box office and got disgustingly bad reviews(on RT 06%) whilst a movie like "Almost Famous" gets movie of the year and only got 34Mil in the box office.
now you might be asking "wtf has this got to do with games?"
well all im saying is that majority doesnt always decide whos better...
i mean look at George Bush :P
But wouldnt it also be important on how well the console does game wise, hardware and awards?
The majority of sales doesnt mean victory :/
e.g 10,000 B.C got over 94Mil in box office and got disgustingly bad reviews(on RT 06%) whilst a movie like "Almost Famous" gets movie of the year and only got 34Mil in the box office.
now you might be asking "wtf has this got to do with games?"
well all im saying is that majority doesnt always decide whos better...
i mean look at George Bush :P
0
Sales does have alot to do with it but wouldn't popularity/appeal lead to more sales? Or are people too conceited now adays?
0
giroro wrote...
I was thinking about this today. I know that you guys previously posted that in order to win these so called "console wars" they must have the majority of sales and etc etc.But wouldnt it also be important on how well the console does game wise, hardware and awards?
No.
giroro wrote...
The majority of sales doesnt mean victory :/Yes it does.
giroro wrote...
e.g 10,000 B.C got over 94Mil in box office and got disgustingly bad reviews(on RT 06%) whilst a movie like "Almost Famous" gets movie of the year and only got 34Mil in the box office.now you might be asking "wtf has this got to do with games?"
well all im saying is that majority doesnt always decide whos better...
i mean look at George Bush :P
Nobody has said it does.
But something tells me that if the Ps3 was leading in sales you'd say the exact opposite.
LunaManiax wrote...
PS3 will win cause they have MGS 4 miawMGS4 has been out for quite a while now and the Ps3 is still in last place :?