Fiery_penguin_of_doom Posts
Kuroneko1/2 wrote...
Coco-tan wrote...
Kuroneko1/2 wrote...
Nor is Coco white.Half white. Half black.
Which part is the white part? The upper part?
Of course you'd want the lower half black.
Tsurayu wrote...
I'd have to agree with kgods though. It would be virtually impossible. Your a Libertarian :PFix'd.
I still feel the need to try. I mean, have you seen the personal history of some senators? Two of them were accused of rape and they kept getting re-elected.
Edit: God! I wanted to take a shot at Barry-O. Fucking A!
Shawn2005x wrote...
GA is a hot place with crazy assholes lolFix'd.
So which base you going to be stationed at in Ga Audio?
* Fort Benning
Columbus, Georgia
* Fort Gillem
Forest Park, Georgia
* Fort Gordon
Richmond, Jefferson, McDuffie, Columbia County, Georgia
* Fort McPherson
East Point, Georgia
* Fort Stewart
Liberty County, Georgia
* Hunter Army Airfield
Savannah, Georgia
Any of these sound familiar?
Nashrakh wrote...
kgods_a-theory wrote...
This is all a bit of a moot point though. I seriously doubt anyone here would run for public office, the paper trail of this site would be a career killer. Haha Guess you don't know FPOD then.
Hello, I'm FPoD and Yes, Nashrakh is correct. I do have serious intentions in running for some level of office from city mayor to member of congress.
Ziggy and I have one of those Brita pitchers. I find it rather annoying how often I have to change the filter.
The water tastes pretty good though.
The water tastes pretty good though.
Nashrakh wrote...
I don't even know what this is about. Care to clarify, OP?I assume it's about the British Elections. Only major election that I'm aware of. Caught a bit of their last debate a while back. Oh and the controversy over Gordon Brown's comment towards an old "labor party" supporter. Called her a "bigoted woman" or something.
I didn't because I'm forbidden to vote in your countries elections.
I've heard a little bit about the three parties involved but, I know nothing of their platforms and what they are pushing for.
I've heard a little bit about the three parties involved but, I know nothing of their platforms and what they are pushing for.
catfish wrote...
AB+. I'm the rare one.Not so rare anymore.
Don't you love how we can accept all types?
Kuroneko1/2 wrote...
I do agree with everything being said in this thread except for one thing.Quadratic wrote...
Tap water's cleaner, much cheaper, and tastes better than most bottled water. Not everywhere does tap water taste better than bottled water. Where I live, in the south of the country, tap water tastes pretty damn awful. I know zero about how healthy it is, but it sure isn't tasteless. In the north though, it used to taste good.
He does have a point. Where I used to live during middle school. The water of that city was slightly less flammable than napalm.
Also that is when you need to start something, a organization or a petition, something to get your water treated. If a place has good water treatment (and companies NOT dumping shit in the water supply) the water is pretty tasty. Bartow Country Ga had some nice water even though lake Allatoona is pretty terrible to swim in. Makes your skin and hair feel greasy and generally nasty but, damn! it tasted good out of the tap. Just don't swim in it or get any in your mouth...or eat anything of the fish out of it. Just, avoid it at all costs.
Tsurayu wrote...
Yeah gotta love that. Bottled water is by far the greatest irony in the world today. Hey! Let's pay a couple of bucks for some water! Okay!But yeah the false advertisement is the best. "Fresh, mountain spring water" and all of that jazz. Ironically enough they don't have to prove that, and don't get in trouble for false advertisement. It is all basically the same tap water.
Just so much fun all around.
- We can pay outlandish prices for water in a bottle
- It's plastic which inevitably is going to harm the environment in one fashion or another
- Can actually be more dangerous since many companies don't disclose their purification methods, the water source, or the chemical pollutant level in each bottle.
If somebody wanted to call Americans a bunch of dumb fucks. THIS is a legit reason that nobody can dodge with excuses.
Also, anybody notice the irony that hipsters or yuppies (traditionally environmentalist supporters) are the ones who drink the most bottled water?
I remember about two years ago there was this little fuck-wit drinking a bottle of water that cost about 5 bucks a bottle. His reasoning "They (government) put fluoride in the drinking water. In the rest of the world they ban the use of any water that contains fluoride."
Annoyed me that he was talking about something he didn't have basic knowledge of to begin with. Couldn't tell me the difference between fluorine or fluoride and didn't even know the basics of water fluoridation or the benefits.
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876) is the supreme court case that state that you must be informed of the exact nature and cause of the accusation against you.
The no fly list is basically being charged for a crime or suspected crime without being informed that you have been charged.
Edit: ACLU's case against the TSA was ruled in their favor which made the no fly list public for the first time.
I think the list itself is useless and doesn't really help anybody. Just toss the damn thing out.
The no fly list is basically being charged for a crime or suspected crime without being informed that you have been charged.
Edit: ACLU's case against the TSA was ruled in their favor which made the no fly list public for the first time.
I think the list itself is useless and doesn't really help anybody. Just toss the damn thing out.
I'm not sold on removing it entirely but, I'm certainly in favor of loosening the restriction.
Im fine allowing people to talk about legalization, how it effects their personal lives or how drugs effect society, the chemical compounds, research on the effects of drugs on the human body (both positive and negative). Personal opinions or morals on the drugs. What I'm not fine with is opening the rule so much that people can talk about where to buy, what to look for when buying, what to buy, people showing off their stash or their bongs/pipes, etc.
Im fine allowing people to talk about legalization, how it effects their personal lives or how drugs effect society, the chemical compounds, research on the effects of drugs on the human body (both positive and negative). Personal opinions or morals on the drugs. What I'm not fine with is opening the rule so much that people can talk about where to buy, what to look for when buying, what to buy, people showing off their stash or their bongs/pipes, etc.
The no fly list by itself has been challenged by the ACLU though I can't remember the outcome off the top of my head but, I suspect that they lost.
Beyond being "un-American", the list doesn’t actually help catch terrorists. Why? Because
[quote]Any watch list where it’s easy to put names on and difficult to take names off will quickly fill with false positives. These false positives eventually overwhelm any real information on the list, and soon the list does no more than flag innocents - which is what we see happening today, and why the list hasn’t resulted in any arrests.[quote]
Here is how effective the list really is in stopping terrorism.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/05/sky_marshals_on.html
http://www.schneier.com/essay-052.html
Forgive me citing the same guy twice but, the man knows a lot on the subject. If further evidence is needed I, Gibs or Flaser will be glad to provide.
List of rights being violated by the No-fly No-buy legislation.
The second, the Fifth, and the sixth. I'm not sure about the fourth being broken as I am not seeing any search of seizure. I guess the privacy aspect is being broken which depends on how the go about gathering their data. The fourth amendment is in a murky area of the law as "being secure in your person and papers" is interpreted as a right to privacy while others interpret the amendment as requirement for law enforcement to get a warrant to search.
Bruce Schneier wrote...
There’s something distinctly un-American about a secret government blacklist, with no right of appeal or judicial review. Even worse, there’s evidence that it’s being used as a political harassment tool: environmental activists, peace protesters, and anti-free-trade activists have all found themselves on the list.Beyond being "un-American", the list doesn’t actually help catch terrorists. Why? Because
[quote]Any watch list where it’s easy to put names on and difficult to take names off will quickly fill with false positives. These false positives eventually overwhelm any real information on the list, and soon the list does no more than flag innocents - which is what we see happening today, and why the list hasn’t resulted in any arrests.[quote]
Here is how effective the list really is in stopping terrorism.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/05/sky_marshals_on.html
http://www.schneier.com/essay-052.html
Forgive me citing the same guy twice but, the man knows a lot on the subject. If further evidence is needed I, Gibs or Flaser will be glad to provide.
List of rights being violated by the No-fly No-buy legislation.
The second, the Fifth, and the sixth. I'm not sure about the fourth being broken as I am not seeing any search of seizure. I guess the privacy aspect is being broken which depends on how the go about gathering their data. The fourth amendment is in a murky area of the law as "being secure in your person and papers" is interpreted as a right to privacy while others interpret the amendment as requirement for law enforcement to get a warrant to search.
Waar wrote...
good way to alienate the current staff then...I'm sure the others are not as offended as you by the idea that I desire a second opinion from the owner to clarify the rules. If Jacob says something is Kosher then I drop the subject and go on about my business. If Jacob says something is against the rules and reports go ignored. I contact Jacob.
Simple as that, nothing personal.
Nashrakh wrote...
In before some conservative says this was a waste of hard-earned tax money or shit.Won't happen.
The Make-A-Wish Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization in the USA
It's a private organization. No tax dollars go in or out of the foundation.
@Flaser
The "various conservatives" are on the wrong side of the "rational" line. They are more accuratly next to the counter culture group. Anybody who listens to even five minutes of American talk radio would agree. Neocons fall into where "various conservatives" should be.
Neocons worship the state while traditional conservatives (paleocons) believe the state to be inherently evil.
Other than that nitpicking it's spot on for American politics.
Edit:
We're close to agreement. Like you I believe it is the states responsibility to make sure we have equal opportunity in the workplace and equal protection under the law. I differ from liberals on "equality" since I don't want everybody to have an equal amount of material wealth. I just want people to have the opportunity and are not unfairly shut out due to religion, sex, age,etc. The fruits of our labor can be unequal (based on work ethics and similar factors) as long as everybody has the equal opportunity to get into the fray to begin with.
If a woman does 100% equal work in quality and time as a man she should receive 100% equality in pay but, if she's taking more days off or doesn't produce as much she shouldn't receive equal pay because it's not equal work.
We just disagree on how much regulation is needed.
The "various conservatives" are on the wrong side of the "rational" line. They are more accuratly next to the counter culture group. Anybody who listens to even five minutes of American talk radio would agree. Neocons fall into where "various conservatives" should be.
Neocons worship the state while traditional conservatives (paleocons) believe the state to be inherently evil.
Other than that nitpicking it's spot on for American politics.
Edit:
I value justice over freedom, as in each person has an inherent right for living decently (health-care, education, food, etc.) and through *some* means (not necessarily state intervention, more like regulation) the state and the people have a responsibility to maintain this net. You don't have an inherent right for luxury, you don't have an inherent right for wealth and prosperity. The later two will have to come through your own effort. A just society regulates the market - keeping it free - so that you have a chance to do so.
We're close to agreement. Like you I believe it is the states responsibility to make sure we have equal opportunity in the workplace and equal protection under the law. I differ from liberals on "equality" since I don't want everybody to have an equal amount of material wealth. I just want people to have the opportunity and are not unfairly shut out due to religion, sex, age,etc. The fruits of our labor can be unequal (based on work ethics and similar factors) as long as everybody has the equal opportunity to get into the fray to begin with.
If a woman does 100% equal work in quality and time as a man she should receive 100% equality in pay but, if she's taking more days off or doesn't produce as much she shouldn't receive equal pay because it's not equal work.
We just disagree on how much regulation is needed.
Flaser wrote...
Here is a question toe the Pro-Life party:Since there will be a bunch of unwanted children in the country thanks to anti-abortion regulation, how much are you willing to pay to have them fed, educated and raised?
The dismal thing is, most of these Christian conservatives while stoutly proclaiming and demanding anti-abortion regulation are unwilling to spend so much as a cent on the children themselves.
That's neocon through and through: protect the unborn, kill the living.
Christian conservatives think that if you aren't capable of handling the responsibility of children you shouldn't be having sex in the first place. Since babies are the result of sex. It's kind of the reason we have it in the first place, biologically speaking of course.
Anyways, I'd pay some extra taxes to help those thrown into the adoption mess (state taxes, not federal). The feds are too removed from the situation to manage it effectively.
For the Neocons and most conservatives in general. They protect the unborn because it committed not crime and has done nothing to deserve death. While the living have committed a crime (speaking about the death penalty). Unless one wants to claim that conception is the crime but, those are usually left/right party extremists.
Tsurayu wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Ramsus wrote...
My handwriting is so bad that often enough I can't even tell what I wrote. Other people sometimes disbelieve I was actually trying to write anything at all and think I just randomly drew on the paper.I'm exactly the same way with my writing.
All that time spent practicing and I still can't make a cursive C that doesn't look like a fucking E. (T_T)
What your handwriting says about you.
Bottom line is I'm versatile and intellectual? Sounds nice and all, but uh, no. That's just not right. XD
Graphology is considered a pesudoscience at the moment. It's like your horoscope, fun to think about.
Ramsus wrote...
My handwriting is so bad that often enough I can't even tell what I wrote. Other people sometimes disbelieve I was actually trying to write anything at all and think I just randomly drew on the paper.I'm exactly the same way with my writing.
All that time spent practicing and I still can't make a cursive C that doesn't look like a fucking E. (T_T)
What your handwriting says about you.