Fiery_penguin_of_doom Posts

Have a talk with Ziggy then. She believes the exact opposite.

I agree the Racism makes sense though racism isn't always about the color of skin. Every new "race" that comes to America is treated poorly for a short while until the next ones come in. Everything from Asian, Jewish, German, Italian, etc, etc, etc were all treated poorly. It's because of the poor treatment of the Italians that lead to the creation of the mob.

I can kind of sympathize with White Supremacists who follow a "white pride" mantra. Mostly because they feel like they are being attacked. The whole push on multiculturalism while shutting off white culture can feel like an attack. Basically, forcing white people to feel guilty for things their ancestors did in the past. They also feel like other races are getting a handout while whites have to earn their bread. have a talk with one (not one of those that says "I hate'em just cuz I hate'em"). Look for one that actually explains it. You may not agree with their outlook but, you will definitely understand.

If any board member looks anything like L it's Raze.

Also Fluffy Man L is serious. I don't think you have ever made a serious statement.

It's not that it's bankrupting them they have money. It's just morally unacceptable but, since people are jealous of those that have leads us to this general mentality that the rich should pay more. Instead of people wanting to become rich we have this mentality that because they are rich they are never paying their "fair share" of taxes. Thus anytime there is a tax increase it's always on the rich. It may not bankrupt the now but, eventually it will.

Alternative. Fairtax (i.e. National Retail Sales tax) Read previous post for a general rundown. Visit the site for more info.

National retail sales tax. No taxes taken out of our income at 33c/$1 then a 7 cent sales tax on the state and county level (the level here probably higher where you live) which you pay 40% of every dollar you earn in taxes. The poor people have taxes taken out of their income and they get taxed on the food,cloths and gas they buy. So why not give everyone the entire paycheck then only tax people on the money they spend.

On a deeper level the removal of the other taxes (Death,gift,gas,inheritance) tax would lift a larger burden off the poor. A large sales tax would only really hit the expensive items like luxury cars and planes. Which would also include the large amount of money in the "underground economy" such as drug money and such that isn't accounted for in income tax. People could invest money towards whatever they want (IRA's or similar things if they were smart)

To alleviate the burden of the increase sales tax on items such a bread and milk. The government would write a check to every American equal to the amount of taxes they would pay on basic items up to the poverty level (the government will get the money back).


A side note: The Government saves money by eliminating the IRS and April's "tax day" would just be anther beautiful spring day.

tl;dr
I direct you here
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer

A lot of people also voted for him solely because he was black. Could have walked on stage said he was Jesus Christ and been shit faced drunk and there would still have been people voting for him "because he's black".

If he gets assassinated I'll blame his social policies. His ideas pissed off a lot of people A LOT. Though if he gets assassinated because he's black I wouldn't be surprised. At this point I'll keep my mouth shut to avoid pissing off a fuck ton of people.

People will always judge people who aren't the same. If we were all white we would all be judgmental of people with blond, brunette, or red hair. Everyone in the country has some bit of prejudice if not open racism. If you claim you aren't prejudice then you are a blatant liar. It's human nature to be skeptical of those who aren't like you.

So just because you don't make bad decisions when running your company somehow you don't deserve to keep what you earn. Now what about the small businesses? Do the owners of those companies deserve to have their income taken from them? Those people work every day in their stores/office/where ever. Then again the idea to envision a fat guy in some office building with a suit every time you think of a "rich guy". How about the guy who runs a construction company? He has to constantly secure contracts and manage the various aspect of his company. How about a guy who opens a bar or pub in a major city. In a good year he could gross into the governments idea of "rich" then he gets taxed for being "rich"

The government's idea of "rich" is people who earn over 250K a year. So everyone between 250K to "*Snap* I just bought you" rich just paid 90% of the federal income this year. They will also do it next year.

It's not a matter of if they can handle the taxes or not. Its a matter of why is it somehow acceptable to tax people based on a single characteristic when we would find it unacceptable to tax people over any other characteristic.

The easy, do nothing, job then? Not like he has anything else to do. Golf? Senators get a lot of vacation time. Maybe he will take up model ship building. When you boil it down all the whole thing is old men talking to other old men for a few hours and getting paid more than most of us will earn in a few years (total)

This is just a more expensive version of

You just went up a point on the awesomeness scale. You know, only cool kids like us are born on July 23rd.

From the senate? I don't think he will. 165K a year is a hard paycheck to walk away from.

The only question I have lingering is. Would McCain have done better if Mike Huckabee was his VP instead of Palin? The few Female votes that Palin netted him after Clinton's defeat probably walked away as fast as they joined.

Understandable, everyone tells a bad joke from time to time. Now that this is settled I believe we're cool again, correct?

July 23

Lean to take a joke then. Not every joke will be funny to fucking person in the whole world. It was a joke not a careless statement. The Italian president makes careless statements. I on the other hand made an intentional joke pointing out the fact that I am disappointed by the actions of presidents going back as far as Carter.

Get the stick out of your ass. It can't be comfortable.

Most men are horny people. Hell, they will even fuck other men if a woman isn't around and if nobody else is around they will create something to fuck. Unless they are too lazy to build something to fuck. Then they will just fap.

I agree with my brother from another mother, also a couple similar interests doesn't hurt either.

Thank you, now I can go wash off this smell. Smells like a damn farm in here. You can't honestly think that I believe voting Obama is any form of "progress". C'mon I hated the guy from the start. The only "progress" that was made is the argument against affirmative action. Jesse Jackson and his crew can pack up and head home. We have Black Ceo's, black politicians and now a black president elect. They can't say "America is still racist. Jesse and his crew still operate under the idea that institutionalized racism still exists.

P.S. I reread what I wrote that you replied to. I meant to state a question instead of a statement "So we won't be a "progressive" country until we elect a Hispanic, an Asian, a gay or any combination of things that aren't straight, white, men?" My bad. Sorry everybody, my bad. Sorry

Clinton promised tax cuts his entire campaign and the taxes were only raised. Politicians will tell you anything and everything you want to hear. Their job is to earn votes and stay popular. No president will run on the platform of "I'm going to raise your taxes". You may read the news but, you don't understand a politicians game.



Yes, it was in jest. The suggestion of a couple people from a Hentai forum could run the country better than previous presidents is an obviously humorous statement. Calm down and go smoke a bowl,fap, play a game or something. Damn.



A lot of European countries are basically socialist and they aren't totalitarian as well so it's not only Sweden. Sadly the store didn't have the book in stock (very little political material). While a socialist country may not use military force to maintain power. Economic control can be just as powerful as a soldier standing in the street with a gun. We could debate this until the end of time but, I'll just say I'll keep looking for the book.



I want to see you run a multimillion and/or multinational company. Prove to me that any guy off the street can run such a company. Then you'll have a point but, as it stands the average guy off the street won't be able to run a company like that nor would they be able to successfully build a company up to that level even if they were given every opportunity. Some people just can't do certain things. I can drive any vehicle below a 18 wheeler that isn't a motorcycle and I can manage my finances. That doesn't mean I have the ability to drive a Indy race car or manage a bank.

Ziggy beat me to it. 16 just isn't mature enough. After seeing the idiots that graduated after my class. I think we should increase schooling to more days a year and more years before they can graduated.

I'm rather disappointed that the ban is in effect.

There are studies out that show the difference between a single parent household vs a household with a gay couple. This is like comparing apples to oranges. The only common factor is that both are fruit (a.k.a the child is missing a significant factor).

I think more studies on the development of children need to be done before any real conclusion can be made that a household with a gay couple is any different than any other households. The studies could also come across methods to raise children in any household that could negatively affect the development of a child.