Rbz Posts

No, I wasn't. I have basically two modes: Pedantic prick and facetious cock. The pedantic prick part just notices and focuses on, often times, insignificant bullshit. Like this:


>per say

I'm also not as well read as you, but I know how to logic, so in the end it all works out for me. Facetious cock is basically what you saw as the lead-in to my last response to you. It was just my way of letting you know that I'm not going to be doing any serious participating here anymore. I said what I needed to say and saw what I wanted to see, so it was about time for me to fuck off.



Reminiscent of the shit I posted before: "You presume the intent of an individual's actions as selfish based on the inference that the alleviation of their distress and/or the psychological reward received after the fact are justifications for their behavior. The only thing we can know is that their emotional disturbance for that moment spurred them from complacency into action. What we don't know is whether that action was motivated by selfishness."

Speaking of which, for the sake of pedantry I'll clarify a particular point: "Wow, didn't expect someone here to understand epistemology. Really though, you could apply that argument to disprove the majority of statements."

Not sure if you were thinking of this, but I didn't mean knowing to a degree of definitive metaphysical certitude. I had some cunt use that on me back in the day in SD, claiming we don't really know anything and we have to have faith in our existence as we know it, trying to retort my stance about atheists not being burdened by the dipshittery of faith, while theists are. That shit just kills any discussion. I mean, we have to start from somewhere, or else never make any conclusions about anything. No, what I meant was knowing to the extent that we can know anything about our universe, given the limits of our ability to analyze it. I'm an empiricist. Put another way, I firmly believe in the validity of the scientific method (methodological naturalism) as a means of providing us with robust, logical and reliable epistemological bases for making claims about reality. It's the best means of knowing anything that humanity has to offer. So in order to support the idea that egoism is an absolute, or that true altruism doesn't exist, one would have to prove this negative through empirical evidence beyond what we could ever hope to attain; one would need to be omniscient to have such evidence.



Since you bothered with me some more, I'll give you a legit response: This detail is ultimately irrelevant to the question as I mentioned before the point of it, but a psychopath is not retarded, they just lack empathy. Unless they were born as an adult from an overgrown test tube, they should have the personal experience necessary to be able to logically piece together the details of a particular circumstance in order to realize someone's fucked. "Let's see, dude's walking where cars drive and to the left is a speeding vehicle that doesn't look like it's going to stop any time soon, so judging by its trajectory the guy's roadkill. I was able to understand their situation. Now to sit back and watch a for reals action flick with realistic special effects."



Personal experience?

---

Man, all this talk about skepticism and epistemology reminds me of my main man philosonigga, René Descartes. Dude could solipsism like a fucking pro. I'll never forget his most inspirational quote:



R.I.P.

Yea, saw that shit on gelbooru, too, but that better be a fucking doujin cover. I check the fire emblem tag on exhentai daily.

Guaranteed it's the molestation minigame that did this. Also, I heard Nohr master race is the leader.

Didn't bother responding before as it was the wrong section, but since the thread moved and I didn't completely forget about you I'll do my good deed for the day.

Drag the girl into google image's search bar. You should get this as one of the results: http://konachan.com/post/show/147493. It's an original work. Tags give you the artist's name.

That's how we of the aristocracy refer to it when we're not swirling our glass of Cabernet Sauvignon. You plebs know it as "SD." My butler shall escort you from the Insightful Botherer section. Fucking mudbloods.

Yea, you failed to catch it with your face when it was thrown. Go back to the Slobbering Dimwits section, we here in Intellectual Bickering are speaking about matters of life and death.

By looking at big titties and nodding with the dude next to him in agreement that all is right with the universe. Then he high fives and stabs the motherfucker to remove the competition. Cold, calculating, killer altruist.

I got what I wanted for the most part, so my job here is done (but hey, this thread did get a little more interesting again, so I may reply some more). The excerpts were amusing; philosophers just can't help dicking around with semantics and conjecture. If you don't mind indulging me a bit further, I'd like to see precisely what your refutations are.

The greatest enjoyment I derive from this thread is just staring at your avatar's nipple. See my avatar for more info.




How to properly conclude? Ah, with a quote from Socrates, master of philosophy. He once said this as a rebuttal to a particularly brutal critical examination of his work by Plato, utilizing his trademark Socratic method: "How about you philosophize deez nuts?"

You have taken egoism for granted and assumed it as the truth while demanding others prove altruism can occur. That is making a claim about our nature. The burden always lies with the one making the claim.



Nothing has been "disproven," your assumption was simply dismissed. To quote the mighty Hitchslapper, "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." If other commenters wish to make claims, that's their problem. I, however, in the process of answering your OP, introduced no new claims about our reality (didn't claim altruism definitely does happen, nor did I say it doesn't), so I get to sit back, chillaxing all cool, and shoot some b-ball outside of the school.

Do you concede that altruism is a possibility? If not, prove it.

---

Let me take a whack at this thought provoking question shit. Who is your daddy and what does he do? Hold on, wrong note. If a psychopath, or someone who lacks empathy, assists another, is that behavior necessarily due to selfish motives?

Oi, lads, I've seen some shit. You'll be sucking my dick for this: Desktop Waifus.

First 2 have sound.


Read this. Assets. Soundtrack (think it has voices). Textures and MOCS (heard it has a readme).

@Cruz737 Come get your improved new avatar



Also, how to S-Rank Camilla instantly:



I haven't installed it, so report back if you get it working.

I don't shitpost, I just post shit. Finally have an excuse to use that line; nice of you to cooperate.

I'm taking a shit now, so naturally it's the perfect time to wax philosophic in IB.



The only one who needs to do any kind of proving is you. They call it a burden for a reason. You presume the intent of an individual's actions as selfish based on the inference that the alleviation of their distress and/or the psychological reward received after the fact are justifications for their behavior. The only thing we can know is that their emotional disturbance for that moment spurred them from complacency into action. What we don't know is whether that action was motivated by selfishness. That is unless you are omniscient and know precisely how every human's mind functions, thus you can know without a shadow of a doubt exactly what happens in their brain during that moment and can, with absolute certitude, declare those behaviors selfish. My position is to allow for the possibility of altruism. I do not know when it occurs and in whom, but I shan't preclude considering such a turn of events. You, on the other hand, have to prove its impossibility. I don't necessarily disagree with egoism, as I'm sure it accurately describes many, if not most, cases, but I would be intellectually dishonest if I ever considered it an absolute.



I should check this place out more often during bowel movements.

Hold on, I'm working on it.

edit: my job here is done.

Again, not a difficult decision. Are you a Hoshido peasant who prefers shit tier waifus, or are you master race? Remember: Nohr rhymes with Thor and Hoshido rhymes with Bullshido. Vote Thor.


Time for more dump.

Elise:


Hinoka:


Sakura:


Setsuna:


Mozume:


Nyx:


Rinkah


Charlotte




@cruz737 come get your new avatar

Listen, all I'm complaining about is bullshit in marketing. It's not even serious to me, I'm just scoffing at an annoyance. What I'm not doing is criticizing this game in any way; I'm happy about these changes. What I mentioned about repetitive patterns is an inevitability. The novelty will die, I will become bored, "new" is a lie.

We clearly have different definitions of "new." After seeing a map reconfigured with the same shit enough times, there is no more new. The novelty is dead. If you can somehow derive enjoyment from a map you've seen countless times, where one building switched places with another, good for you. This is why I rarely replay RPGs. Different character build, same old shit, even with minor narrative changes based on choices. The only way a game can convince me to tolerate repetition is through compelling mechanics or a great story/characters.

I'm just gonna pop a squat. It's about time for a good dump:



I'm telling you, prepare for some cock blocking. Some prick precluding. Some dick denial. Some wang waning. Some penis prevention. Some erection deflection. Some wood chopping. Some boner breakage. Some titanic sinking. Some snake sniping. Some megatron murder. The cocksuckers who censored Tharja are masturbating as we speak. Camilla's hips are in danger.

Dude's emotions were a house of cards. I got to know him somewhat before he left and it wasn't surprising in the least. Hentai Elder was a young adult when he was here. He denied my accusation of him being a "grown ass man." On the other hand, I'm a definitely a grown ass man. I like big butts and I cannot lie.

All the warmness we praise gambler for, H.E. did better.

Since no one bothered with the links, I'll spoon feed:



Also, I had a dream about butt fucking Camilla. Woke up, my dick was facing the sky in reverence. The gods hath spoken. I shall buy Nohr if it isn't extremely neutered. Tharja's panties were censored. That petting shit is getting cockblocked.

Literally awakening characters figuratively existing in this world. Also, some spoilers about story deaths, otherwise here's a character chart.



Camilla confirmed for personal slut. Dia is L. Leo carries fag genes and aids. Hoshido tries to make up for shit tier waifus with lesbian. If it wasn't for Rinkah and Yuugiri, Hoshido would be complete trash. They're not even blood relatives, fuck them.

Also, never ever let anyone fuck Matoi. She'll figure out a way to cuck them for Chrom, I guarantee it.