Rbz Posts

Waar's dick is chill shit, right?

I highly doubt waar is seriously being a weaboo faggot. Then again, I may be wrong. Fucking weaboo faggot.

Waar's the one getting head, not me.

Which science doesn't claim it can do. It's not about proving anything metaphysically, it's about coming to a conclusion based on observation, finding cause and effect, experimentation, etc. All of which are empirical, you know, something that can be observed, unlike god.



The correct method of knowing? Maybe not, but it's the best humans have, unlike believing that which cannot be verified.



You referring to the big "why" questions? For example, why are we here, why is there gravity, why is the universe here? If not, the "why" can easily be demonstrated through cause and effect; experimentation. That is how we find the "why". If you isolate enough variables, you'll find the "why". It doesn't matter if we don't know the exact truth behind something, the point is there is strong evidence pointing toward the validity of our conclusions. We didn't know about Einstein's relativity before Einstein presented us with it, but it doesn't mean our previous model of gravity was completely wrong. It wasn't replaced by relativity, rather relativity just elaborated on the subject.



Why can't you use something to show that it works, especially if it provides results?

The scientific method just comes naturally. We observe, we experiment, we attempt to find cause and effect, then we started isolating variables, and calculating mathematical equations (which were later verified by further observations). We saw that this kind of method worked and called it the scientific method, which we constantly try to perfect. So, in a way, this logical method of coming to conclusions through empirical observations (and not faith), proves itself effective.

The conclusions, ultimately, supported by evidence and replication of the conclusion by other scientists. No faith needed or is present.





For the last time, I agree. I do think people can label themselves a certain religion and still be rational thinking people in daily life.



Rather, I'll just clarify myself again. When you speak of your religion, and when you think about it, your thoughts and beliefs are irrational. It's all just belief without evidence and unsubstantiated claims. "God did this, god did that, god wants those, but not these." How can you know any of this? You believe even though you have no compelling reason to believe.

Let's be honest, this game was primarily created to make a quick buck off of gamers, but that's implied.

So basically the question is, "Is it too soon?"

That depends on how funny it is. In this case, it's lame, so fuck them for making it. I've seen much better funny content related to the spill. In general, it depends on the person, of course. I don't get infuriated if there are jokes made about tragedies, so I will always say it's never too soon.


^Always able to do this. At the same time, I can be a little depressed.

I'd wish I had a sister.

Flawless way of testing your homosexuality if you're a guy:

Do you have someone else's dick in your hands?

Unfortunately, I don't have a picture of your mother.

inb4 >implying he wouldn't get a boner for her

Wait your turn. Sis is still busy with bob.

No worries, waar said you'll be fine.

I'm not you.

I heard your house was worse than mine. What happened, nigga?

You seem to have experience with bob. Do it for me.

Retort: Suck bob's dick.

Even better. I'll make sure trespassers give it a blowjob before I let them run.

Bob

It's more appealing, you know. Plus, it just might have a shotgun in it.

It was implied.

Which I was never implying, btw.



The implication is that I'm closed minded to other points of view. You're wrong, I'm just looking for the most logical one.



You weren't reading my post right. I said they can be rational minded people (In my post I said "you." You are a religious person. Read it again with that in mind.). But, when talking about religion and thinking about it, that is where irrationality happens. The superstitious thought is what's irrational here.



LOLOLOLOLOL! The old "science requires faith" bit.
I refer you to the rebuttal of that claim: https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=37134&start=150#1027465



You were offering up possibilities, yup. I was criticizing one of the possibilities for not making sense. If you think about it, we both agree on the "possibilities." But being possible doesn't mean shit in reality. Countless apologetic possibilities can be invented on the spot.

When I said,


It wasn't used to refute your post, but rather show the more logical possibility. Occam's Razor.