Tegumi Posts

To label it as "worse" without regard to circumstance is folly. We're done here.

Whether or not you do something out of goodwill, anger, honesty, or spite; doesn't mean the outcome that follows will be such. The outcome could be good, bad, or benign.

That's like saying doing anything out of honesty is good.

I don't know. You're the one who is saying that picking it back up out of spite is worse.

Not physically.

It is unhealthy to eat food dropped on the floor, period. What's your point?

Oh, look what I found.
[11:18:16 PM] Catcher:

Another factor could be how upset you are over the dropped food.

And during the interim, nothing of value was lost.

HentaiFoundry is that way ->

Lie still on the ground here for a couple of hours while I go get a forklift and a slab of concrete.

No discussion.

I'm sure policy would change if we linked the PETA.

Oh look, you found the loophole. Or at least, I'd say that, but neither procedures are considered routine anyway. The fact that you are required to do one or the other is indiscriminate.



Fact: I have provided articles, you have not.



YES, IT DOES. INDISCRIMINATE BODY SEARCH IS ILLEGAL. THIS IS A FACT. YOU ARE IGNORING THE EVIDENCE AND LOGIC I HAVE PRESENTED YOU.


This is a HORRIBLE analogy. The CORE reason why disturbance of the peace is against the law is because it VIOLATES other people's rights.


This is TERRIBLE logic. Technically, you aren't under obligation to do ANYTHING. This does not mean that the procedures at the airport do not have to be legal.



Oh, god. If there was a procedure which allowed the TSA to know -exactly- what every passenger was carrying, but violated legal, moral, and privacy standards; it is not a valid procedure.


Okay, I get it. You don't feel it's that big a deal. You can just stay at home and avoid it. This, however, does not change the fact that other people cannot, and that it violates our rights as U.S. citizens.

Yes, this is why the indiscriminate routines exist by law. However, because they already exist, and specifically exclude pat-downs and body scans, those two items would be ILLEGAL if used indiscriminately. That is the point I am trying to make.



Despite all the empirical evidence I've provided. What do you want me to do?



Just because it is done routinely doesn't make it legal! The law does not state that it is a routine procedure!



That's because several of the methods used by the TSA are kaput. But obviously the adoption would be a synergistic procedure, there ARE competent people out there.

Ah! Of course, sorry.
No particular image. If you think it works well as a render, use it. Text would be his full name, "Usui Takumi". Style can be like the ones you have currently, I suppose that would be 'simplistic'.

You're making up a lot of hokey-pokey, you know that? What in the world is 'innocent suspicion'? Also, the argument is against pat-downs and scanners altogether, ergo the situational point you were trying to make doesn't even materialize.



Wait, what? Are you saying that the justification for scanning someone is the fact that you hadn't scanned them yet?


Do not qualify as 'routine procedure'.



I don't think anyone suggested taking the Israeli airport security manual and printing "TSA" on it.



Yes, the same reason why people are upset about the methods.

My reaction to 90% of the posts on Fakku.

Hello! A sig featuring Usui from Kaichou wa Maid-sama, if you please. :)