Final Fantasy 13

I heard there was no versus though. o-o

Check it, 2 more parts. Warning: you should really watch this if you're considering buying the game.

Ah yes I forgot that. still to me that's not much of a big deal. As long the storyline remains the same I don't care.

I watched a few seconds of the first vid and stopped. He sounds like a douchebag

Suit yourself.

Some comparison screen shots.





Video Comparison is also pretty noticeable. The 360 version isn't even in HD.



http://www.eurogamer.net/videos/digitalfoundry-final-fantasy-xiii-xbox-360-ps3-comparison

Video may take a little long to fully load. Warning, no dialogue spoilers, but obviously CG and gameplay spoilers.

Euro Gamer gave FF13 an 8/10.

Oh god, don't even start it. Those comparisons are so stupid. People need to stop trying to use graphics to define this generation. OMG LIEK TEH GRAPHIXS ON PS3 RULEZZZ!!!!

Hardly anyone can tell a difference with a standard 720p HDTV, and I hardly credit 1080 users either. It's nonsense. Yes, the graphics are slightly less on the 360 therefore the 360 version automatically sucks. That logic is sound. /sarcasm.

Nice assumption that I am trying to sell the PS3 version as the better simply because of graphics. You can't compare graphics for multiplatform games because it's up to the makers to make them as close as possible. I was simply pointing out what a fucking horrible job they did porting 13 over to the 360. 360 version is worse because they did a terrible job with it not because the PS3 is more graphically powered. The PS3 version is the better version obviously because it's not all blurred and shit, but the same can be said for Bayonetta which looks much better on the 360 than the PS3. The companies are to blame for the difference in those games not the consoles.



Wow, you think there is going to hardly be a difference on a 720P Tv for both versions? You will see the difference between the PS3 and 360 on the same scale as the pics no matter if you're using a 720 or 1080P Tv. The game only goes up to 720P. Why would there be less difference than what is shown in the comparison shots? You think they were biased and deliberately made the 360 shots worse? You'd have to be blind not to notice a clear difference between those shots. I hope you clicked on those pics to see them in their actual form instead of the smaller version Fakku puts it in.

Fucking horrible.

No console can truly run a game at 1080p from a disk only at 720p at best.



And even if it could, for you to see the true benefit of 1080p that it makes a noticeable difference you'll have to be sitting 2 feet away from your TV while playing it.

I don't even know how you justify its a bad port from it having slightly "blurred" textures. A bad port would be GTAIV to the PC not this.

So stop nitpicking like a dirty fanboy and play the fucking game.

I'm not understanding who this is directed at. Who here is nit picking about 1080p? The game doesn't even run in 1080p. The PS3 version runs in Native 720p according to Digital Foundry, but why you're mentioning 1080p I have no clue.



I wouldn't say slightly and yes it's a bad port because of that reason. It's bad in that aspect which still makes it bad. Gameplay is unaffected on the 360 version as far as I know. Visually they did a bad job porting it.

It's common discloser for people to think all console games run at 1080p. I am just pointing out that these points about it.

And also holic, why are you blabbering about blurred textures? I mean your not even going to play the xbox version, so why are you making an issue of it when it's not your issue to deal with?

It's my opinion and I choose to make it known. It might not be my issue, but I expected more from them and find it lazy. Blame might not entirely fall with the team who made it, but it was something that should have been made better. Just like Bayonetta.

Sure it's your opinion but surely you can't justify it solely off these pictures?

And why not? Are those pictures that they took biased in any way? Even the video is a side by side comparison and it's clear that there is a difference. Show me a reason why those pictures and video(s) (more videos at the site where they reviewed it) aren't creditable and I will take back my statement that 13 is a bad port.

Because no person will take your opinion seriously if your basing it on one aspect and off one piece of evidence.

Because now im totally not going to buy it on xbox because of this image and because you said it was a bad port. In which you telling me it's a bad port is based off little evidence of one aspect of the game that doesn't even matter.

Some will if that opinion is of the visuals and the evidence is comparisons of such. How else do you compare visuals of the two other than screenshots and side by side video? It's not really my opinion they should be taking seriously as to if there is a difference it's the material I have shown. If you notice the differences then obviously you share my opinion that the visuals are lacking, because you can see so yourself, more so in some parts. If you actually care about it, well, that's another thing. To each their own.

You're making this out as I am the only one that has noticed this or knows of it. If that's what you think then you must be under a rock somewhere.

If you or anyone doesn't believe there is a difference or doesn't trust the source of those pictures and video feel free to do your own research. There are multiple comparison videos, pictures, several video game site threads as well as many people who've played the game who say that there is a difference.



If you or anyone wouldn't buy the game on the 360 just because there is a difference is quality from the PS3 to 360 then you never really wanted it to begin with. I said it's a bad port based off the visuals and only the visuals. I never once tried to sell the 360 version as a bad port on any other aspect besides the visuals.



Doesn't matter to you, but matters to some I'm sure.

In that video, the differences basically seemed the same to me.
It's definitely not gonna be noticeable, because I'll be too busy focusing on what's happening to care about a little extra detail.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Whether you intended it or not, you are picking a useless fight Animeholic, and making yourself look like a fanboy asshole.

No one is going to care about some minute differences in graphic quality. Only the fanboys think it is big enough of a deal to warrany constant mentioning of such irrelevant crap. I mean seriously, if anyone is playing FFXIII because it is "pretty" than I feel sorry for them. The graphics don't make or break the game. It never has in over thirty years of gaming and it still doesn't today.

I'm just so sick and tired of fanboys using the graphical comparison between a 360 and PS3 game as a call to which version is better regardless of which console it is better on. Fanboyism is annoying enough, but to base it on stupid graphics is beyond idiocy.

Never picked a fight, I stated facts and you took them the wrong way.



Lol, the old I feel sorry for you pitch. Nice. Believe it or not, but I am not the only one that plays games for it's visuals and story. As I said if you or anyone else doesn't play this game because of the difference between the two then you're missing out on an awesome story and still some pretty damn good CG and gameplay.



If you're sick and tired of it you sure are quick to accuse someone of it and start a chain of unnecessary comments.

Bottom line: I never meant it as a LOL PS3 GRAPHICS RULEZ comment. If I had I would of mentioned it or made some sort of comment to the 360 lack of ability to produce the PS3's quality. The 360 even beats the PS3 in face rendering and frames per second in the game if I remember right from the review. Companies fault, not the game console. So yeah, don't get all mad and start hatin on me.