Fiery_penguin_of_doom Posts
Elouj wrote...
There are more than 4 recorded migrations to the americas, and I think the similarities between the Asians and the Native Americans is because of interracial marriage, not that they started the race.Could you clarify how interracial marriages explain why two different peoples from two different continents can look so similar before we had any form of oceanic travel?
Traversing the land bridge in the Bering straight 10,000+ years ago seems like a good start. Then the early humans who settled here divided into tribes,etc. Developed their distinctive cultures and societies. Having a common ancestor (mongoloid) sounds like a more logical explanation than interracial marriage of people who lost contact for several thousand years.
The ultimate net stalker is this man! err..this is the avatar of that man!
https://t.fakku.net/assets/avatars/1730199705493d36c5a3680.jpg
For those of you who don't recognize him. Shame on you!
https://t.fakku.net/assets/avatars/1730199705493d36c5a3680.jpg
For those of you who don't recognize him. Shame on you!
Elouj wrote...
I'll see if I can find some of the sources and pm you, but bear in mind you'll be getting works from tons of religious and non religious sources, ranging from apocraphal Judeaism, to some that are more modern. Perhaps some east indian too.I'm used to it. I was a Church every Sunday, bible reading, cross/crucifix carrying, on my knees praying Christian before.
Elouj wrote...
I think that we should kill them, and pity them. What makes you any different from them? They took a life and in return you took a life. While the circumstances were different isn't still the same thing? You know the old saying "an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind"
I used to support capital punishment until I reconsidered the American Declaration of Independence. "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" are considered unalienable rights. So it would be hypocritical to say you have rights while taking away the rights of someone else.
ChaoticHeart wrote...
natural fiery red hair----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just to throw this out there for those of you who don't already know. I'm an Atheist but, that doesn't mean just because I don't like Microsoft I won't come over to play Halo with you.
God suddenly created Adam and Eve (and Lilith) around the same time from..clay & Adams Rib. Suddenly being created wouldn't allow for the melanin to have changed into being a darker color to adapt to the surroundings. The counter point is if Eden was a paradise. God would have designed it so that things like sun burns wouldn't have happened. Though with them being cast out. They would have browned like thanksgiving turkey.
As for "Jesus was black". Logic would dictate that Jesus was one of three "races/colors" Arabic (brown) African (black) or Asian (you get the idea). The reason being, the area around his "birthplace" and Jerusalem. Look at the skin tone of the people in those areas. So unless Mary moseyed up from central Africa. It would mean he was mostly likely brown. Northern Africans are brown as well as most middle easterners.
So the award (Jesus) goes to... Drum roll please
Mexicans! Congratulations Mexico. You won your very own Jesus!
Edit:I just had an idea! Jesus WAS black. OMFG I can't believe I didn't see this earlier. Jesus had to be black. God knocked up Mary and then got the hell out of dodge! The whole "Water into Wine" thing. Then walking on water
Follower: Um Jesus. You're black. You can't swim.
Jesus: Nigga please. I'm the son of God. I don't need to swim. *walks across the water*
:lol: I'm sorry my black Fakku brothers I had to do it. :lol:
braintist wrote...
What do you think? I seriously cant think of an answerTaking a guess from another post that brushes up with this topic. The decedents of Adam and Eve created the races of Africa. Asians are also out due to another child and his wife. Which leaves, Caucasian and Arabic.
Though it brings up a question. If Adam, Eve and Lilith were the first humans..Where the fuck do the children of Adam & Eve find their wives?
Things like these are the reason I stopped being Christian.
To start off. I want access to any and all info you have on these topics. You have my interest.
What was the name of this "beast race"(For a moment there I got Cain & Abel mixed up with Romulus and Remus somehow linking Romans as the "beast race")?
Why the hate of Latin? If you were from Gaul I could understand considering the Romans raped the fuck out of you.
Also wasn't Cain black due to the curse or "mark" that God places on him (along with the destruction of his only skill which was cultivating crops)?
Don't you mean Abraham? Since the Hebrew Bible (the Book of Genesis) and the Quran. Give this account. Also Sarah was the niece of Abraham (which explains a lot).
Native Americans traveled to the Americas from Asian over the land bridge (Beringia) around the end of the last ice age. We belong to the "Mongoloid" or "Mongol-like" people. Which explains the similar traits shared between Asian people and Native Americans. Though all the -oid racial terms (e.g. Mongoloid, Caucasoid, Negroid, etc.) are deemed offensive now since it's a generic insult for idiot and it's also a synonym for people with Down Syndrome.
Elouj wrote...
His wife Lilith begat Cain, who's descendants were a beast race* which is mostly gone.What was the name of this "beast race"(For a moment there I got Cain & Abel mixed up with Romulus and Remus somehow linking Romans as the "beast race")?
Elouj wrote...
And because people hate latin (I do too, I consider it the devil's language.) People call them black now, or Africans which is where the land of Canaan is. The African's race has also come to be associated with Cain, probably due to the fact that Cain had black skin too.Why the hate of Latin? If you were from Gaul I could understand considering the Romans raped the fuck out of you.
Also wasn't Cain black due to the curse or "mark" that God places on him (along with the destruction of his only skill which was cultivating crops)?
Elouj wrote...
It was the older race because supposedly it was the race of Adam. His wife Sarah, begat the Asians.Don't you mean Abraham? Since the Hebrew Bible (the Book of Genesis) and the Quran. Give this account. Also Sarah was the niece of Abraham (which explains a lot).
Elouj wrote...
The Native American race came last and somewhere around 600 BC, but I'm not going to the trouble of looking it up. Native Americans traveled to the Americas from Asian over the land bridge (Beringia) around the end of the last ice age. We belong to the "Mongoloid" or "Mongol-like" people. Which explains the similar traits shared between Asian people and Native Americans. Though all the -oid racial terms (e.g. Mongoloid, Caucasoid, Negroid, etc.) are deemed offensive now since it's a generic insult for idiot and it's also a synonym for people with Down Syndrome.
ShaggyJebus wrote...
Dante1214 wrote...
You must be watching the same channel as me...Yeah. That, and I have the DVDs of the episodes and have seen them a million times.
Dante1214 wrote...
But honestly, it would be your mom.Your loss, my mom isn't hot at all.
I think we are the only ones who have seen "it". I knew that question sounded familiar.
Dante1214 wrote...
Hey, I didn't say I believed it.
I didn't even say it made sense.
I just said some crazy people believed it.
Polio doesn't make you insane.
I was just questioning...
C'mon feed my hunger for knowledge!
mmm brain meats
Waar wrote...
by posting this you broke rule #1 and #2 about fight club, i hope you enjoy your time in hell.I'm an Atheist. I'm either right or I was heading there to begin with. I get the last laugh on this one!
Ha Ha Ha..wait, this doesn't seem like something I should laugh about...
Dante1214 wrote...
ShaggyJebus wrote...
Klorofolun wrote...
ShaggyJebus wrote...
Dante1214 wrote...
And while it's true The United States did not get involved in the war because of Hitler's war crimes, it's also true that the extent of his war crimes was not fully clear until after the war was over. Most Allied soldiers were surprised by what they found in concentration camps.Also, from what I've learned, the US government wanted to enter WWII before the attack on Pearl Harbor, but the citizens didn't want to. I'm not sure, but I imagine most citizens didn't think we needed to get involved because they didn't know just how bad things were. It makes sense; after all, the government would know a lot more details than the average citizen.
And thus the conspiracy theory that "The US Government staged Pearl Harbor!" started.
Yeah . . . It actually does seem probable, but it's unlikely. FDR doesn't seem like the kind of guy who would just let America be attacked. I'm sure he took advantage of the attack to convince the people that we needed to help in WWII, but he probably didn't like it.
Then again, Japan did have some reason to attack us. I don't remember how it all went, but we had blockaded some place so that Japan couldn't get there, and it was hurting the country. On the other hand, Japan was trying to hurt other countries at the same time, so it's hard to paint the issue in only black and white.
Exactly. War isn't about good and evil, because in war, good and evil are about perspective. And then, as has been said, the winners write the history books, so they are the "good" ones in the end, until someone more powerful comes along and wins bigger and writes new books.
Also, the conspiracy theory goes that FDR let it happen so that he could get a practical test for the Nuclear bomb.
Didn't the Nuclear bomb get developed towards the end of the war? Seems a little improbable nay, impossible that FDR would have allowed the destruction of the Pacific Navy to allow the test of a weapon that never existed (outside theory) before the beginning of the war.
August 2 1939 is when Albert Einstein sent the letter to FDR. The first test was on July 16 1945. Seems like a stretch that FDR would allow an attack to occur when the weapon wouldn't even be ready for trial runs until mid-late 1945 when the Pearl Harbor attack was on December 7 1941. Why would FDR risk treason and sacrifice all those lives just so he could use an untested weapon that would vaporize entire cities?
While there may be some merit to FDR allowing the attack to allow America to join WW2 but, I still stand by the idea that America was non-intervention (due to the fiasco of getting evolved in foreign affairs like WW1). Then the pearl harbor attack stirred the sleeping giant. Then Uncle Sam had to put his boot up Hitlers ass and give the emperor a good (and slightly savage) beating.
Maskedsatyr wrote...
Haha what a fail on my part...Same here. At least you have someone to row the boat with you.
Zellgadus wrote...
Great Post. In the end what you have to remember is the one who is right is the victorious one. In every war mankind has had there was a victorious side and a losing side. The losers had to follow the orders and policies of the victorious. After WWI and Germany having lost the war, the country was a sinking ship. It was utter disaster. The country had it's government completely deprived of any real power and the economy was controlled by the Jews. Everything inside out was out of control of the Aryan people. This is why such a tragedy as WWII. A country felt oppressed to the point they saw a saviour in Hitler. Do you think that the German people agreed with everything their new leaded did? Of course not. They just saw him as the only one capable of taking them out of such a shitty situation.
With that said, If Hitler had won the war I doubt we would see him as evil it's just that the winner decides of what is wrong or right. (wink wink your history books you are so proud of might have history written in some way but it might not reflect what really happened. Keep that in mind)
In short "The winners decide who was right". Though it goes with my argument. To one person somebody might seem like a madman. To another he is his hero. Which ends up with the whole thing being subjective. I hate taking my information from one side since you never get the whole story. Best thing to do about anything is get the story of both sides then come to your own conclusion.
Maskedsatyr wrote...
goggle.com Estimated Worth $223263.2 USDhttp://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.goggle.com
Google is worth less? Lol I'm not sure about that site :)
I think it's just the website. Not the company. If I understand that right..to buy google.com it would cost you $223,263 to be paid to Google inc.
Hell Google's assets are worth US$ 25.335 Billion (as of 2007)
I <3 random useless information.
I assume that the general consensus of the idea of good and evil are subjective is what pisses off Lord_Helmchen. If Lord_Helmchen is German like I heard then I can see where he is coming from. Hitler is a stain on the German history due to his numerous war crime and violations of human rights.
On a side note: Who de-repped him? The man has every right to disagree with my (or anyones) views. Though I would have preferred him to counter back with evidence that pure good/evil exist. He needed to defeat my argument with a better one or point out the flaws in it. Insulting me and calling me ignorant isn't going to change my opinion.
On a side note: Who de-repped him? The man has every right to disagree with my (or anyones) views. Though I would have preferred him to counter back with evidence that pure good/evil exist. He needed to defeat my argument with a better one or point out the flaws in it. Insulting me and calling me ignorant isn't going to change my opinion.
Nate River wrote...
Hitler was a very wicked dude or the fact that he never liked lolis...Nate River wrote...
he never liked lolisTHAT! Is pure evil.
Go look up "evil" in the dictionary and it'll say "one who doesn't like loli"
Nate River wrote...
jk, just an expression...like young fuck, old fuck, tall fuck, fat fuck...the original ava had the two hands in the way, i couldn't get a good render of it, so i lurked a bit and found the joker one, thought it'd correspond with the "doom" theme
edit: much love, fpod, don't be sad...
Makes sense to me.Okay, I'm not sad anymore
theotaku wrote...
elfen lied wrote...
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Nate River wrote...
Fiery penguin of doom: personally, i don't like the attitude of some senile political-opinionated american guy(that's just what i think when he posts in political-issues-related-topics) who likes to post in essay format, but they did help me on my civics term papers...so...Ow, my pride...Love you too Nate. Very nice work +rep. I just have one question. Why is my face painted like the Joker? Wait..when the hell did I become senile :shock: !?
No, Its Fpod.
I thought that Nate thought higher of me..or at least liked me more than that. I need to work on building my image.
I'm sad now
Nate River wrote...
Fiery penguin of doom: personally, i don't like the attitude of some senile political-opinionated american guy(that's just what i think when he posts in political-issues-related-topics) who likes to post in essay format, but they did help me on my civics term papers...so...Ow, my pride...Love you too Nate. Very nice work +rep. I just have one question. Why is my face painted like the Joker? Wait..when the hell did I become senile :shock: !?