User Posts

leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
mibuchiha wrote...
Well, you deeming it special is not sufficient to make himself celebrated.

Yes, but no, not all dystopian culture and/or science fiction gets my ok. A lot of them I found to be shitty, though I have some I am interested to try. Brave New World is my taste. Simple.

Genesis from Bernard Beckett is very good as well, it's almost BNW in compact form to me. Animal Farm, while enjoyable was mediocre and 1984, the one I am currently reading, seems good.

They may or may not be of the same genre, I am simply telling of the things I recently read and/or found memorable.


No, no. He is celebrated nonetheless for other reasons. That said, forget all about it. I was pulling your leg.

Thank you so much. I would go through them if I have the time.

I will post my opinions about Norwegian Wood for your contest entry if you don't mind.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Fallan wrote...
I wanted 300...


Don't worry, I have completed the tsundere parody. Will forward it to you. Just to cheer you up.

Sorry about just now Mibuchiha. I really wanted to get the 300th page thus the silly arguments.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
I have explained myself haven't I? His command of the language and his dry humour are what I deem special. Even if you did not find it special, this is an opportunity to read more and learn more surely?

Aldous Huxley's Brave New World isn't it? Science fiction and dystopian fiction are to your tastes, I presume?

Having said that:

GOOD! I HAVE GOT THE 300th PAGE OF THIS VERY THREAD!
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
mibuchiha wrote...
So, what if he is some celebrated journalist? All I know is I agree with the annoyance he expressed in how others celebrate it. I do not find his writing to be anything remarkable.

And to answer, I do not celebrate it. I am agreeing only to the extent that whether I do or don't, I have to see and hear the fireworks. And people being magically jollier in a day that is completely like any other.


I hope you won't mind an argument.

There is a reason why he is celebrated so I will still say that you are missing out. I am merely making a recommendation out of goodwill. This person is saying that this is a good author, this is a good journalist. The person believes that there is something remarkable about his work and he wants to share it.

For the sake of argument:
One isn't in a position to agree or disagree if one doesn't celebrate that festival. The expression to use is most likely 'sympathise' or understand the argument behind it. Now, this paragraph has less goodwill in it and hairs are being split at this stage.

That said, what are your tastes in reading?
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
xninebreaker wrote...
leonard267 wrote...
Is it impossible to be in first place in terms of points the harder it gets?


This is not impossible. Though if you are ahead in points, that means you have probably killed everyone and are on the way to world domination/conquest already. Time score is generally used as a prevention method to 'turtling', the act of constantly increasing defense as to not die from an enemy's offense. It's a far more useful victory in multiplayer games.


Thank you. Will you be reading any contest entry during the first poll?

high_time wrote...
I once coined about 6000-ish points in the end with America on settler difficulty. with the same kind of playstyle I used to make Aztec and Babylon victorious too. maybe, no matter the kind of difficulty may be, I maybe should just play it off like usual, I think.


I can only manage 3700 points the most for Civ 5!
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
mibuchiha wrote...
I did not find it entertaining, nor do I deem it a quality work.

But I do agree about the annoyance he expressed.


You are missing out. This is a newspaper article and the author is one of the better journalists I have come across.

Do you celebrate the first of January? I don't and so I can't agree or disagree with his opinions. I do find the dry language extremely entertaining though.

I really wonder what is quality to you or what you enjoy.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
mibuchiha wrote...
I agree with the general sentiment, however I see nothing that could serve as an inspiration in it.


Meaning that you found it entertaining or do you agree with the author?

Anything can serve as inspiration that is why I accept almost anything in the Writer's Lounge. In this case of course is the expressions the author uses. I find that I have a lot in common with the author's style of writing. The dry and resentful emotions that come this article entertains me greatly.

If you want to pick up a language, I believe this is the way you do it. Seek learning points or inspiration from quality work.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
xninebreaker wrote...
I was pretty much born and raised with tactical games, and civ is no exception. I have logged my fair share of hundreds of hours on both civ 4 and 5, so I do not deny that I know my way around the game. On higher difficulties like monarch/king it is increasingly important to understand things like city placement, tech routes, and money management.

Just some quick tips off the top of my head:
1.) Rush SOMETHING. Being well-rounded, especially early on will not get you far. Rush catapults, or rush Pyramids, or rush the Oracle, etc. Early leads snowball into victories.

2.) Land is power. Depending on what map you play and how many players on on the map, you can generally kill off 2-3 AI easily early on with some form of catapult+melee combo. You can manage with 3 cities (or even 1!), but it's hard and it's simply easier to take over other peoples specifically generated good capital cities.

3.) Seige units. Use them.


Is it impossible to be in first place in terms of points the harder it gets?
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
I expect every move to be carefully calculated though the more difficult it gets. Whenever I play the Prince level, all of the other civilisations build wonders faster than me, research technologies faster than me, and get points much faster than me. A time victory I think for the difficult levels is impossible.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
mibuchiha wrote...
Yeah, but not too high in the whiny gauge.


Makes me even more interested. Let me post the entire article which I genuinely enjoyed and found entertaining. It comes from some newspaper columnist.

Spoiler:
Last Tuesday night, long after I had gone to bed, total strangers burst into my house yelling †˜Happy New Year!’, and shook me from a deep sleep.

Actually, they didn’t. But they might as well have done. Instead, total strangers near where I live thought it fun to let off fireworks which sounded, in turn, like landmines and an anti-aircraft barrage.

Sleep was impossible from 11.30 till 12.30.

If you want to celebrate the New Year, that’s fine by me, though I can’t for the life of me work out why.

But I really don’t see why you feel the need to make me celebrate it too, or why the sensible law banning fireworks after 11pm doesn’t apply on December 31. I don’t mark Christmas or Easter by letting off half a ton of explosives in my garden at midnight (and it would be rightly illegal if I did).

I couldn’t care less that the calendar has changed. All it means to me is the need to buy a new season ticket, plus some disagreeable memories of Moscow during the Soviet Union’s dogged attempt to stamp out Christmas, and make everyone celebrate the meaningless change of the calendar instead.

Until Ted Heath, of accursed memory, came along, it wasn’t even a Bank Holiday in England.

And until the Blair creature appeared, with his daft Millennium, fireworks were only for Guy Fawkes.

Before then it was a quiet night. If you lived in a sea port (I grew up in Portsmouth), there might be the strange and melancholy sound of all the ships’ foghorns sounding at the turn of the year. Perhaps there would be a few church bells. But you could sleep through that.

Yet somehow this empty feast day grows in compulsory importance each year (just as the soul is sucked out of Good Friday, once the most solemn day in the calendar).

Shops close, silence falls – in honour of what? And pretty soon the miserable privatised train companies will stop running trains too.
I don’t want it. I couldn’t care less about it. You can have it if you want to, but stop forcing it on me.



Was wondering if you felt the same way as me after reading this. You are familiar with how I write. That person is most definitely becoming an inspiration to me.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
xninebreaker wrote...
leonard267 wrote...
Had the same problem. Cultural victories look easier to achieve. Just get the correct technology and policies. In Civ 4, which I am playing now, the cultural victory is the hardest to achieve.


leonard267 wrote...
high_time wrote...
the decisive part was the start and the opening thingy I think. can you tell me what's the difference while playing on higher difficulties?


Not much difference I think. The civilisations will produce culture and science more, more likely to expand so on and so for. Each civilisation has their own preference for victory.


I played on king, and I will tell you that cultural is probably the 2nd hardest victory to achieve, with diplomatic being nigh impossible. Prince is considered the control, as in you are given no handicaps (extra happiness, research, etc), and levels above prince begin to give the AI bonuses like extra production, research, and randomly spawning units.

high_time wrote...
that aside, ever try playing on higher difficulties like Deity and Immortal?


Immortal is do-able... but deity requires a lot of effort and/or luck, in both civ 4 or 5. Though in civ 5, it's definitely a lot easier.


xnine is the expert on this. I should seek your help playing this game someday.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Had the same problem. Cultural victories look easier to achieve. Just get the correct technology and policies. In Civ 4, which I am playing now, the cultural victory is the hardest to achieve.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Jericho Antares wrote...
Best of luck to everyone in the coming polls. Minimal presence achieved. Semi-kidding, semi not. Busy busy life. Be back soon though.

Watch out for parody overload, Leonard. Sent one of my friends to the hospital. You know not what you toy with.


Yes. I have to ask for permission before I write those parodies. Not all of them are humorous though. I believe parodies are stories that are non-canon.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
I am quite interested in your tastes in reading, Mibuchiha. A litmus test for you. Do you find the following whiny?

Last Tuesday night, long after I had gone to bed, total strangers burst into my house yelling †˜Happy New Year!’, and shook me from a deep sleep.

Actually, they didn’t. But they might as well have done. Instead, total strangers near where I live thought it fun to let off fireworks which sounded, in turn, like landmines and an anti-aircraft barrage.

Sleep was impossible from 11.30 till 12.30.

If you want to celebrate the New Year, that’s fine by me, though I can’t for the life of me work out why.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
high_time wrote...
leonard267 wrote...

Welcome to the dark side. Now I am writing boring stories in my Cesspit. If I weren't doing that, I'd be playing that too! Each game lasts for several hours.

330 turns was fast though. I had a Technological Victory at 370+ turns out of 500. Warlord difficulty. Wu Zetian.


mind that I played it on the lowest difficulty lol

it appears to me that the AI players are mostly annoying and tries their hardest to piss me off. I think being a warmonger and simply destroying everything was the fun part =D

the decisive part was the start and the opening thingy I think. can you tell me what's the difference while playing on higher difficulties?


Not much difference I think. The civilisations will produce culture and science more, more likely to expand so on and so for. Each civilisation has their own preference for victory.

I ought not to focus on every victory, just a certain victory. It is important to generate science and money and people to obtain those victories though. Need to select which buildings are important. The science buildings I believe are a must build. As for other buildings like forges and barracks and so on, one can begin to specialise. Buildings nurture great people.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
If Gene was ready, he did not show it. After reluctantly shaking hands with Vic, hoping that Vic's hand would suffer an allergic reaction from Gene's dead skin and snarling at him, he gripped his weapon tightly. Ghouls like Gene could stay awake for a few days without effort. He knew that the rest of the team were aware that he saw them as expendable. Vic expressed strong displeasure about it, if displeasure were the proper word to use. Falling asleep and leaving them at their mercy was not exactly high in his list of priorities.

Though Daniel advised him to sleep in his affable voice, Gene pretended to comply and stared blankly at the ceiling of the subway station instead.

He spent the 2 hours that was supposed to be spent sleeping doing a bit of thinking and trying to make sense where they were and what was happening. The team was quite some distance north of Manhattan, their destination. Gene intended to sneak his way into Times Square which was at Manhattan with the rest of the team serving as his bodyguards and meat shields.

The former Soviet embassy was the landmark of that area though it was dwarfed by a very tall tower which they had to climb. It was in that tower where the cache was. Though that was the same place was where Gene lived and he laid a network of traps and devices to deter other ghouls and mutants from entering, who was to say that his corner of Times Square was entirely safe?

What was most important now was to get their bearings straight and follow the tunnels south. Even that presented problems.

Another reason why Gene was willing to abandon Daniel, John Windsor and Vic in order to sneak into the tunnels was because he knew the tunnels were controlled by his kind. He did not want the ghouls to know that he entered the tunnels because he is not exactly on good terms with them. There was bad blood between them, a result of Gene tricking and backstabbing his fellow ghouls many times in the past for some petty gain like caps, ammunition or the very occasional weapon or plot of land.

While the team was fortunate that the mutants did not successfully manage to pursue them into the underground, there was no cause for celebration. Gene imagined that there were ghoul guards sniping at the centaurs drawing them away from their tunnels. Those ghouls would know something is amiss due to all the commotion. They might be even aware of their presence in the tunnels. As to why they did not act for almost a full day, Gene did not know. That aside, it was either the mutants or the ghouls, neither choice pleasant. It must said that ghouls discriminate against healthy human beings and backstabbing ghouls.

As he was lost in his thoughts, two hours passed. Wade broke the silence,
"Do you think they're ready?"

Gene cut in rather rudely,
"Not if you don't know where to go next. Not if you don't know that we are pretty much getting of the frying pan and into the fire,"

He proceeded by telling them about the ghouls in the tunnels and the fact that they aren't really too happy with him.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Met a lady with large mammary glands. She is a bit large though. The above user might like such a woman.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Haven't spoke to that gentleman for quite some time.
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Going to work in construction in the future. Perhaps we can share pointers. How many persons were involved building that house?
leonard267 FAKKU Non-Writer
Liase wrote...
I want to thank you all for your support and kinds words... It's been a really weird holiday with him not being here (we hung out on New Year's Eve last year, and shortly after that was when our "fling" happened).

I made a thread about this because I was hoping for a lot of different perspectives/advice - there aren't many irl friends or family I can talk to about this (I'm in counseling to talk about it, and it's helpful, but usually speaking to just one person isn't enough for me) - and I find all of your comments to be really helpful. It's very interesting for me to see how other people handle events like this, and the teachings they share with other people after they make it through them. I'm a nursing student, and one of the things I try hardest to remember is that every patient copes and responds differently, even if they're facing the same situation. This doesn't mean however, that people can't adapt or try other people's methods of coping (provided they aren't destructive!), as they may find something new that works for them.

I find your words to be very comforting. Thank you so much. Happy new year.


I hope you won't mind this post. I ought to have made a reply earlier.

Thank you for your kind remarks. If you have anything else (hopefully more cheerful) you would like to share with us, you can try interacting with this community. (I suggest the Random Section) For me, doing anything, preferably productive, to take my mind off unpleasant thoughts is my way of dealing with problems.

I joined the forums due to the sense of community it provided and the fact that people all around the world post here. Would be glad to befriend you as well.