ShaggyJebus Posts

A lot of cool Jedi action happened before the Clone Wars, and after the Clone Wars, too. Why not show the action of those eras, instead of dwelling on the Clone Wars?

As I said, all the really cool stuff has already been shown, in the movie themselves and in the Cartoon Network Clone Wars shorts from a few years back. The action in those shorts were far better than anything this new cartoon could offer.

This is the biggest problem with the whole "no gay marriage" position - if you want gay marriage banned, you pretty much have to want divorce banned, too, because they both pervert the "sanctity" of marriage. Unfortunately, I never hear that brought up in conversations between the big-wigs on both sides of the issue.

I watched a Dr. Phil episode today about gay marriage. (I hate Dr. Phil, but the subject interested me, and thankfully, Dr. Phil said next to nothing.) A good point was brought up that made everything clear to me. The side against gay marriage was saying that California had already voted democratically to prohibit gay marriage and that should be respected, and someone on the side of gay marriage said that in the past, the majority of Americans also voted to make interracial marriage illegal. The government ignored what the majority thought and made interracial marriages legal, because it was the right thing to do. The same thing should happen with gay marriage, and I don't just mean, "They should do it." I mean, it probably will happen in the future. I don't know how far in the future, but hopefully sometime in the next twenty years, or sooner. When gay marriage is made legal all across the country, and people everywhere take the sticks out of their asses, gay marriage will become a simple thing, just like interracial marriages are nowadays.

Might want to spoiler tag that shit, bro.

The Ellis Sisters are hot lolis. My vote goes to them.

It's a movie based on a book series where vampires sparkle when they're touched by sunlight. They don't explode - they sparkle.

I hate Twilight, and I hope the woman who wrote the book series dies of a massive stroke.

And before anyone says it, I know that's not funny, my brother died that way, but I still hope it happens.

That is awesome. You are awesome for having that.

Unless you're gay and you really suck at picking up guys.

I'M IN DESPAIR! THE TRUTH OF THAT STATEMENT AND THE FACT THAT I CAN DO NOTHING ABOUT IT HAS LEFT ME IN DESPAIR!

That's still a hot topic with a bit of discussion, but most people say that what females squirt isn't urine, though it may contain traces of urine. The best evidence is how it looks and acts - what's squirted is clear and doesn't smell like piss.

For the sake of clarification - if the total number of people dead did not reach the right number, even if all people in a country or place died, then the wave of death would continue outside the country or place. The important thing is the number of people dead, and it is nonnegotiable.

I'm really liking the responses, but how about we add a little spice? For all the scenarios, what if you could live, but your family would die? Would you rather condemn the random people or your family, if your life was safe?

Why should that sort of thing be punished? People are just saying who they voted for, and every vote doesn't deserve a long explanation as to why the person voted for that girl. Besides, not every decision would have a long explanation. Sometimes, it's as simple as "I like her," and you can't really improve on that.

First, a guy cannot cum and piss at the same time. An erect penis is supposed to be set up so that urine cannot be let loose, only cum. So, no worries about a guy peeing in a girl's mouth if he's sporting a rod of steel.

As for a girl peeing while you're eating her out . . . I wouldn't break up with the girl, but I would quite possibly refrain from going down on her ever again. Of course, she might break up with me, because to her, we'd be having fun, then I'd suddenly run to the bathroom for an hour and refuse to speak to her. (Not because I was mad, but because my mouth would be full of soap.)

NOT BEING ABLE TO SAY "____ HAS LEFT ME IN DESPAIR!" HAS LEFT ME IN DESPAIR!

Wait . . . Shit. I fucked up. Oh well, that's life. Don't like it? Well, then feel despair once more.



I can understand that. I really like shows with downbeat endings, as long as it makes sense and isn't just an excuse to make the viewer miserable, but I think I like them mostly because the majority of them say something important. Like, "Life's a bitch who will never give you a second chance" and "People are ruthless and will tear you apart if it helps them in some way, and sometimes they'll do it even if it doesn't help them." Those are harsh lessons, but they are true, and people need to see that shit. They need to understand that life is shit.

That said, I love life. The thing that brings me the most despair is, I'd say, the fact that people can be horrible. But I don't just mean that people can kick puppies and not feel bad. People are stupid. Mistakes are okay, but when a person makes the same sort of mistake for the fifth time, it stops being a "mistake." It's a "problem," and the person is the reason for it. I'm not saying we should kill the people who keep making horrible problems; those people simply need to learn how to act.

Now, there is a difference between repeatedly making the same mistake and having different beliefs. If you think a man should be allowed to cheat on your wife or girlfriend, you need help, but not as much help a person who thinks that cheating is wrong but nonetheless cheats repeatedly. If we could all get at least to where the former is, the world would be a better place.

If only this were true. Unfortunately, it's not.

Even if everyone shares the same skin color, people would still be prejudice against religions and location. Instead of saying, "All Asians are bad drivers," a racist could just say, "All Chinese are bad drivers." The racist may not be able to look at a random person on the street and tell if the person is Chinese, but the racist could still make comments concerning everybody in the country, and the racist could definitely express his/her racism if confronted with someone by China who makes it known that he/she is from China.

But people would still argue about color. "Haha, Billy's only one-eighth black! He's nothing compared to me, a half-black!"

It looks like that kid got hit by his parents.

That's funny. Child abuse is funny.



Seconded.

Time for hypothetical situations that could never come true! Yay!

What if someone came up to you and said that you had a choice to make: A weird organization is going to either kill you and four of your family members (or friends, or people you care about) or five people on the other side of the world that you have never met and never would have met in your entire life. You can decide who dies, your loved ones, or the strangers. What do you decide?

Think about that, then move on to this:

The situation's a little different now. Instead of just five people dying, this time, a hundred people are going to die. Either one hundred people from a place you've never even heard of die, or one hundred people that you know (in some sense) will die. First will be you, then your family, then your friends, then people you know (met but weren't friends with), and if that still isn't a hundred people, then people who lived close to you, spanning out until one hundred people are dead. Do you give up your life and the lives of all you care about, or condemn one hundred people to death. You know nothing about the other group that will die if you decide to live. They could all be savages, or they could be close to discovering a new way to bettering mankind.

Think about that, then move on to the final one:

What if one million people had to die? Either you and your family, and so on, die, and then people from the country you currently reside in until one million people are dead, or one million people from some other country die. If you live in the United States, then you could end up killing a million people in Japan. And if you live in England, you could end up killing a million people in the United States. Do you decide to sacrifice yourself and your country's people, or do you wish to destroy a million random lives from some other country?

The choices you made, why did you make them? Are the lives of people you don't know worth less than the lives of people you do know? Would you regret anything, making your choices? What if, in the last scenario, you could decide which country would lose a million people? Would that make the choice easier? Harder?

[size=3]P.S. - I watched Bokurano recently, if anybody notices how these situations and that series are similar.[/h]

You could cut down the tree. I mean, it's a fucking tree! Who's going to miss it?

You could even turn it into paper. You could, in fact, cut down the tree, turn it into toilet paper, and wipe your ass with it. That'd teach that goddamn tree for making fun of you.

People have sex because it feels good. It feels a lot better than masturbation, and you kind of get hooked on it, too. As for ejaculating outside, that still wouldn't completely prevent pregnancy, because of precum that can come out before ejaculation and can impregnate the egg.

Truly, the only way to completely prevent pregnancy is to practice abstinence. Of course, similarly, the only way to avoid alcohol poisoning is to not drink alcohol. But people still drink. And a lot of people would shit all over you if you tried to make them stop drinking.

You seriously think that homosexuals are just being immoral? You don't think they might just have a natural inclination towards the same sex, that they might have been born to like the same sex? Even if things happened in their childhood to "make" them gay, they're still not that responsible for it. Do you think gay people wake up in the morning and say to themselves, "Well, I love breaking the rules. Time to have some buttsex"?

Also, there's no way that young children could see gay couples and believe that homosexuality is "the norm," by which I believe you mean that kids will think that homosexuality is what is supposed to happen, versus heterosexuality. There are plenty of heterosexual couples to ensure that such a thing could never happen, because for every gay couple a child saw, there would be at least ten straight couples that the child would see. (Note: Ten is a very low number in that situation, I'm sure.)